Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

13637394142235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,676 ✭✭✭Gusser09




  • Registered Users Posts: 279 ✭✭HartsHat


    At this stage I'd be on for the Unions banking whatever we can get before this winter.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's quite a big assumption you're making about my circumstances and work ethic, but says a lot about your character.

    Because I can express empathy for those on low pay, I am poor-mouthing and haven't worked hard enough to be promoted?

    The fact that you say you know how difficult it can be manage on low income, makes your comments now even more tone deaf in the current climate.

    The cost of living was already a struggle for lower paid grades, even before the rapid escalation in living costs and inflation we've seen this year. It has escalated the situation to a crisis point for many.

    They don't have time to "work harder" and career plan their way out of it. They have rapidly increasing bills to pay NOW.

    As I mentioned earlier in the thread, a CO in my section resigned this year literally because they couldn't afford to pay both rent for the month and feed themselves adequately on a CO wage. That's what brought home to me just how serious this was. But I guess you'd think they were just "poor-mouthing"?

    Also as I said earlier, this thread has truly highlighted those whose true interest is their own self-interest. I assume they're not union members either. I don't see the point in them being members, if that is their attitude.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭08122019


    Did you not quit this thread a while back when you got called out on your nonsense?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I quit this thread by my own choice because I was disgusted by the display of blatant self-interest amongst those in the higher grades and the punching down on lower grades.

    Doesn't preclude me from returning to the thread at any point. Do you have a problem with that?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Why is it "not realistic" to expect pay rises to match inflation?

    Taxes rise in line with inflation.

    Anything less is a pay cut. Why should I or anyone else accept a pay cut?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    its very hard to make out where you are actually landing in all this with the number of positions taken in this post but fair enough



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    welcome back loueze

    i think public servants across all grades who know how long and hard they have worked and do work to get there are allowed to value themselves on the topic of current pay talks without constantly being castigated by yourself if they dont feel that they can yet again take the hit for the govt cheaping on public sector wages.


    your way ends up with one grade on one salary scale and while im all for a little more socialism i think thats best done centrally through taxation and govt policy decisions and not by an already underpaid professional/management tier signing away their dues every time someone can (rightly) point out that clerical officers starting off have it worse

    its not a very good argument and its a fairly blatant appeal to shame and emotion and i would encourage anyone reading it for the fifth or sixth time to actually consider it for a moment and ask themselves why its just not workable to continuously go back to the well of hacking at HEO and above to pay for a fair deal (which we all support) for EO and below.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    and to address "I've had a CO resign because the wages weren't enough"


    a) Then they are underpaid relative to what else they can get out there. Not relative to further grades

    b) We can't, as an entire service, get in HEO/AP candidates in a whole range of qualified professional disciplines as already set out many times in this thread, because such candidate are drastically underpaid vs what else they can get out there.


    the solution to neither is what you suggest and it is going to keep being said to you regardless of your fair snide insinuations about anyone who dares to disagree with you tbh



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oh don't worry, snoopsheep, I'm not here to stay.

    I only replied because of this completely and utterly tone deaf post by Gusser09, quoted above.

    I've no interest in getting involved in this again. I stand over every single one of my previous posts, my position has not changed, and if anyone feels "castigated" by my comments, then good, as far as I'm concerned.

    Noted though, that after I left the thread, several others have tried to make the same points I did and were castigated for them.

    At all costs, we mustn't make the higher grades feel "devalued" by easing the pressure on the lower ones. After all, they need the money to top up their AVCs.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    yep you certainly answered all the issues raised there 👍👍👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Not going to happen. Stop using the private sector an example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Great news for employees like me who invest heavily in my employers share scheme, as a way to reduce taxable income. Not to mention my pension and other investments in companies.

    Long may the profits continue to rise across all sectors of the economy.

    How dare you critize the profits generating mechanism that will be my pension. I don't like paying for your guaranteed pension either then. Let's put a limit on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,273 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    The problem with the “work a little harder” theory is it doesn’t solve the problem. When the CO does work a little harder and does get promoted, they get replaced by another CO at the bottom of the scale. You’ve just moved the problem around without solving it.

    Dont fall for capitalist myths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,466 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    So?

    Everyone starts on lower money and progresses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Only someone snuggling up and nuzzling at the teat of the State to make a living and subsistence could come up with this. An extra comfort blanket is needed rather than going out and proving yourself.


    How could employers reward individual performance if everyone has to paid the same? Why should those putting in the effort be limited to the rewards of the hangers on and dossers?

    That leads the star employees to leave for better pay elsewhere while the dossers hang on. Suggesting a union is like shooting yourself in the foot.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 Doughnutholer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭An Ri rua


    The ONLy driver of inflation is the ECB and the creation of many extra euros. Price 'inflation' is the effect of inflation, not the cause.

    This looseness about what inflation really is, is what allows the monetary and fiscal authorities across Europe to deploy the narrative that they are attacking inflation (they're not even doing that, they're just posturing) whereas they are merely pretending to rein in that which they created.

    If they do not allow inflation to burn through the eurozone at a fiercesome clip, there will be no more eurozone as the sovereign debt piles will explode.

    Its in this context of deception re the nature of inflation that the inflationary wage spiral fallacy is truly sickening. Libertarian yanks often talk about taxation without representation. The fact is that the ordinary person (and moreso the poorest and the lowest paid) get hit disproportionately by this insidious stealth tax. We all (I didn't) bought into it when we voted for the eurozone and euro. Its inflationary by design. 40% purchasing power gone between 2002-2019. God knows how much across 2020-2022.

    If wages were increased to the level of inflation, the sky would not fall. All that would happen is that that insidious underhand taxation would be redistributed to those who already earned it.

    Its shockingly simple. You agreed to work for X amount on January 1 and on December 31 you find it buys you 10-15% less (price inflation is much higher than the CPI guff). Why has the gap between wages and assets opened up in the last 40 years and accelerated in recent years? Due to money being increasingly subjective, debauched and debased.


    Anything less than wage increases to equal inflation is structured theft. Then again, without that structure, we wouldnt have had any pandemic payments and wouldn't have lasted 2 months on the international bond markets without Mammy (Brussels) to hold our hand. The bottom line is that life has to be paid for and not many of us have the stomach for genuine hard work any more. Regardless of the posturing here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Ill be honest, i stopped reading after the first sentence. The ECB are not the only driver of inflation. There are many factors.

    I want to be clear here. Should wages match inflation this year? Yes. Will they? No. I'm just trying to be realistic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭An Ri rua


    Apologies, I did try to make it as simple as possible. Hopefully, an alternative narrative to Keynesian drivel will open up to you. It comes down to whether you believe in hard money or not. If you don't, you believe there are other drivers of inflation (supply-side inflation is driven by money supply inflation, except in rare circumstances) and then you get sucked into false narratives.

    Wages won't match inflation because most people don't understand money. If they did, they'd realise they're being robbed of their agreed wages (purchasing power is implicit in these social contracts).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I think its very difficult to have any dialogue with someone as condescending as you. Hence, I am not going to engage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,676 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    it's not a tone deaf comment though in reality. Co's pay is nothing to do with what I earn or the value I bring to my department. You can't just pick out an entire grade and a throw a 15 percent pay increase at it. Obviously some will deserve it but a lot won't based on the responsibilities they have for example. Unfortunately the way in which grades are remunerated means one CO could be doing a hell of a lot more work than a CO in a different section but they will both be on the same pay. It's not fair but it's probably the fairest method available. As I said don't be getting tetchy with me because I have managed to progress.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,461 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Interesting times ahead - the private sector starting to feel the hit this is just the beginning, we as a country only came out of covid at the start of this year there was always going to be a boon to finances and the summer months were going to be good from a taxation point of view yet the private sector companies (local) have already started to hit the wall, as no one seen the war in Ukraine, everyone thought we were past brexit which has brought a lot of uncertainty and expense and of course the lingering supply delays from Covid have heaped up hyper inflation. Inflation will not last as people cannot afford the current prices that are ongoing and if prices don't drop more companies will hit the wall.

    Be interesting to see where the 2.3Billion needed for the 10% pay rises come from. I think the government know the game is up and it cant be afforded I cant see any other reason why they would just head on their holiers without any agreement.

    As someone in here said I would take what they offer that is on the table as this winter is going to be terrible for a lot of people (well in the private sector anyways) job losses, further increase in cost of living, if we add another 10% to ps pay its going to push inflation up even further and the idea that inflation will stay as high as it is will not continue. It will come down over the next 2/3 years as a lot of people currently can not afford prices and in the short term (next 12 months) costs are going to increase. Not going to continue with the posts you all know my views on PS pay the winds are changing. Good luck to you all just as an aside I dont blame you looking for your raises would love one myself but the question of affordability will have to be answered at some point in the future.

    I may pop back on with updates to whats going on in the private sector as some in here really do live in a bubble.





  • Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭trigger26


    Plenty of time and space for ya to post nice little blog first thing after a 3 day break! Hopefully you won't pop back to grace us with your oh enlightened views



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You still don't get it, do you? This round of paytalks was triggered not to argue who deserves what increase based on their grade or level of responsibility.

    This round of talks was triggered to tackle the rising rate of inflation and the cost of living. And it is widely acknowledged that that impacts harder on those on lower pay.

    Any increase to compensate for inflation should be the same increase in basic rate for all.

    Otherwise "2% may be a decent increase for a PO, but is fcuk all to a CO".

    And quite frankly, I couldn't give two tosses how far you have managed to progress. You take every opportunity to punch down on CO's, and most recently Service Officers, who according to you their work is not difficult or taxing either.

    For someone who says they were a CO for 13 years, you most definitely have forgotten where you started. I cannot abide grade snobbery. You probably work for one of those Departments where the grades all sit separately for tea breaks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,676 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    You have a serious chip on your shoulder with that condescending tone.

    Best of luck with everything.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And you have a very high opinion of yourself.

    I'd rather be what I am, than as self-interested and tone deaf as you've shown yourself to be, through out this thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 259 ✭✭exitstageleft


    Jayzus, you're a right ray of sunshine on a dreary day.

    To be fair, your doom and gloom might end up being the case. You're cherry picking the worst of it though, and always with a negative slant.

    The very low rates of unemployment paint a somewhat different picture to 2008's recession. We might have a slow down but not necessarily a recession as bad as last time. House prices are unlikely to collapse the same way either, so people will generally avoid the negative equity calamity.

    Inflation is a problem for costs but don't forget that 10% year on year inflation means anyone already with a mortgage or loan actually has the real value of their repayment reduced. This is true for both the state and individuals.

    Regarding the question of the thread, I think there will be an improved pay offer, but maybe not by much. My preference would be for a lower offer backdated than a higher offer that won't kick in until some distant time in the future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 853 ✭✭✭crinkley


    How much is a PO paying in tax and extra pension contributions. If you actually calculated the take home pay after a 2% increase for both grades you would see that POs aren’t rubbing their hands together whilst COs are supposedly starving the difference is actually like €6.50 roughly.



Advertisement