Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

China’s Army posts “Preparing for war!”

1234689

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,909 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Would it be fair to say that the dialogue between Taiwan and China is, say, nuanced, and that they live with the current relationship fairly well?

    And how would that idea, were it true, sit with the idea of a country like the US flying in and out, and possibly stoking tension? Where does the Taiwanese public opinion lay, or for the Chinese public opinion too?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Did the US call Chinas bluff?

    The last thing China want is a war. Their property market is tanking. They need the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,946 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Absolutely, couldn't agree more however it is the forces of US imperialism who engage in lectures about democracy yet have done much to undermine it through their actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    We'll see but yes at the moment the CCP have shat the bed on this. Full of bluster and fancy videos about their military but little substance, basically a dog with a lot of barking but little bite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I'd do a bit of reading if I were you.

    Beijing despise the DPP party currently running the show because they are not bought my mainland interests. The DPP are politcally in the ascendancy, and it will likely stay that way with voter sentiment under 60s definatively identifying as Taiwanese first.

    Beijing placed all their bets on the KMT, many of the senior leadership who they have bought off or coerced. They (Beijing) run voter interference campaigns come electoral time doing their best to boost KMT candidates. They also pay off triad and organised crime outfits to astroturf community groups as pro mainland / unification and to buy off pensioners (just about the only demographic left that vote KMT consistently).

    Luckily for Taiwan, their security services know CCP tactics better than anyone, have a massive network of informants in the PRC and know exactly what Beijing get up to at all times.

    Taiwanese, and particularly young Taiwanese massively favour visits from Pelosi and the likes. They do not regard a foreign politician visiting as "stoking tension" and would laugh a Western know-nothing for suggesting as such when the reality is the PLA has their missile batteries trained on them.

    This may stun and apall some contributors here, but Taiwan is the last place in the Chinese speaking world where you can do and say what you please. You can carry a sandwich board in downtown Taipei that reads "Tsai Ing Wen is an American running dog" and no one pays you the blindest bit of bother (in fact, they know well kooks like that are poor people paid to be there by shady characters, no one is genuinely stupid enough to think that). It's a remarkable democracy and one of a kind in Asia. It should (and will) be defended at all costs, and that's just the moral imperative aspect.

    Regretably, in the PRC, "the public" are told what to think about Taiwan from a very young age. You're not going to get a divergance of opinion, because wrongthink on this can land you in serious bother.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,869 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    China love calling out everyone else when it looks like they are losing face but care naught for when they do the same

    They have been using the same rhetoric for years and have yet to try and take over Taiwan as they know they will lose in all areas but they just love that juicy pie made out of semi conductors of which they import billions of dollars worth but could get for free

    They will do their blustering and military exercises and in a week be all forgotten about till the next "egg on their face"

    (When I say China I mean the CCP)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Where are you doing the bit of reading from yourself?

    Just interested



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Haven't been to Taiwan in a long time, but I was a regular visitor for personal reasons over the years.

    I recall being there in the months when mainland group tours were allowed for the first time (they were previously banned). One thing I noted down by the night market in Taipei was seeing the mainlanders drawn to a newstand (Taiwan now the last standing Chinese speaking territory with a vibrant anything goes free-press) but being ushered away by the mainland guide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    A presentation at the start from Audrey Tang (digital minister in Taiwan and savant) about PRC interference and disinformation campaigns in Taiwan.

    She is a bit difficult to listen to and speaks rather rapidly, but you get a sense of how radically different Taiwan and the PRC are poltically and in outlook. I defy anyone after watching this that they seriously think Taiwan isn't worth defending.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,005 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    This century will be defined by the Western approach of Democratic freedom Vs totalitarian regimes and cultures.


    Unlike the last 70 years the impetus favours the external and the internal opposition is quite strong as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    It really is beginning to look like Europe is going to have to “play it’s role” with the US in arming and getting involved in global politics outside of simply using trade and financial penalties. The comittment to defence spending will probably end up multiples of what’s being touted, time to invest in weapons manufacturing !

    If Xi is really in trouble of losing power then the Taiwan escalation makes sense, the question may be how far he might be willing to take it to hold onto power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    The CCP fired a few missiles into the sea last night im reading this morning. Those fish are really paying the price for Pelosi's visit 🤣

    NK mark 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,005 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    China should have remained a pariah State in the 90s, it was still a Communist country. A totalitarian regime with scale.


    Winding down economic interaction as much as possible with them is necessary. Not easy at this late stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 873 ✭✭✭gk5000


    A different member of Congress should visit Taiwan every few weeks....see how many toys China have to throw out of their pram, or how many fish they want to shoot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Most have don't have the balls that Pelosi has. A politician standing up for something they believe in is a rare thing in America



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    Pelosi has balls 😮 ..thought there was something odd about her alright!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    How about leave it to the people of Taiwan to figure out?

    If they want back in, fine.

    If they don't want back in, then the CCP should respect that.

    Anyone who voted 'Yes' in our of GFA and thinks its OK for China to take over Taiwan by force are idiots and hypocrites.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Honestly, I know you are living in the US, but not EVERY SINGLE THING about the US has to be GOP vs DEMS. Most people in Ireland don't give a damm about the 'He said, she said, blah blah' that infects most Americans.

    So maybe leave it out of there, as it's already infected numerous threads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The thing is, there is already a thread dedicated to that. Post away there about your favourite hobby horse, but perhaps leave this thread to Taiwan and China.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Can you imagine China having a transgender minister serving in the top echelons of government?

    All the left-wing tankies as you call them should be fully on-board protecting Taiwan's liberal and open democratic system from authoritarianism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    An American diplomat has travelled to Taiwan which is what has incensed the Chinese. Doesn’t matter what a person thinks of this action or who is right or wrong, USA is at the core of this subject whether you think China has no right to react like it does.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    How many wars have China started in the past 60 years compared to USA?? Pandering to the US has the world in this mess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    There is a thread dedicated to the whole 'American Imperialism' sthick. This is not the thread do redo that.


    On your point, if China gets so upset over an 82-year-old American woman visiting an Island, then it says more about them, than the Americans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Well that’s not completely true either. The problem in these threads is that you get posters who are overly aggressive at either defending or attacking the USA. I mean you can’t even question potential US role and motives with the Ukraine situation , but part of the reason is the absolute line in the sand some people are taking on the topic. They can only see and discuss it in black and white as they see it.


    There’s an awful of posters with great knowledge on these topics but they let their sentiments/emotions cloud rational discussion. Would be good to see an objectively balanced and open thread on USAs role without people childishly throwing insults about putinists or right wing or whatever and just discuss what is being said (instead of attacking the poster).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    No problem talking about the fact a politician from the US visited Taiwan but the thread will potentially turn into biden said this, trump fan boys said that, maga this and Kamala cackled that.

    Click into either the Trump or Biden threads - that poster is number 1 most active dishing out divisive shite

    Can we not have one thread that involves the US but doesn't go down the same garbage path?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    But that’s not the point. Why is America getting involved? I’m not looking to make this a USA bashing thread, I just think it’s not right to make a thread on the recent China/Taiwan tensions and suggest that USAs role and motives are somehow irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    They invaded Vietnam and went to war with India twice. Nearly went to war with the USSR over river islands.

    You think you're dealing with boyscouts here?

    Know your history before you Tankie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    That’s fine, so ignore them, don’t engage them. Posters like me who don’t engage in this stuff often and aren’t familiar with these posters, feel like there’s a “no discussion of USA in a negative way regardless of how involved they are in a topic” kind of rule. Then I get caught in the cross hairs and get accused of being one of these conspiracy theorists because some of you presume birds of a feather flock together and then I just don’t bother engaging.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    So 3?

    And America has been involved in conflict in Afghanistan, Yemen, Iraq x2, Pakistan, Somalia x2, Operation Ocean Shield, Libya, Uganda, Syria, Kosovo, Haiti, Bosnia/Croatia, Kuwait and Panama.

    And that’s only going back 30 years ffs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    We're all able to criticize the US. But there's utter morons who will blame the US in every circumstance when an autocrat covets their neighbour.

    Taiwan is a case in point. The place only exists as a going concern, and a highly vibrant democracy and innovation powerhouse because they have been given the tools to defend themselves.

    We have utter roasters, who just like the Ukraine situation, are perfectly willing to give people like Xi and Putin a free pass - men who are actively planning wars to crush democracies. And they'll focus on narrow conspiracy theories to jump up and down on the head of a pin.

    It's brain dead swill. The US had nothing to do with Putin's decision to invade. He wanted Ukraine, and he went ahead and tried to take it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Its getting involved because its has a legal obligation to support Taiwan, along with supporting its allies in the region, Japan, South Korea, The Philipines and Australia.

    Would you rather the Americans disengage and let those other countries at it? Do you KNOW what would happen if they did that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    The poster asked how many wars China was involved in as if they were Amish pacifists. They also got stuck in to Korea at the request of Stalin.

    I gave him his answer. China does war, and it's preparing to do another one in the coveting of a democracy.

    Wake up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    They also invaded Tibet. Killed 20% of the population and destroyed almost all their religious monuments.

    One of their favourite ways to torture the population was to make the Tibetan children kill their parents and the monks.

    China are no boy scouts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Would I rather the Americans disengage? Where is that question coming from? I’ve not once here insinuated anything that should or should not happen, all I’ve said is that I think you can’t discuss the topic without discussing americas role in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    If anyone knows what type of future awaits Taiwan under the CCP, look no further than Hong Kong.

    Hong Kong - China

    The Committee was deeply concerned about the overly broad interpretation of Hong Kong’s National Security Law (NSL), which was passed by the National People’s Congress of China without consultation with the Hong Kong public. Since its enactment in 2020, the NSL has reportedly led to the arrests of over 200 people, including 12 children. The Committee underscored the shortcomings of the NSL, including the lack of clarity of “national security” and the possibility of transferring cases from Hong Kong to mainland China, which is not a State party to the Covenant, for investigation, prosecution, trial and execution of penalties. The Committee urged Hong Kong to take action to repeal the National Security Law and, in the meantime, refrain from applying it.

    The Committee also raised concern about the excessive number of civil society organizations, such as trade unions and student unions, which have relocated or ceased to operate since the enactment of the NSL. It regretted that the Hong Kong government had not provided explicit assurances that civil society and their representatives engaging with the Committee in this review would be protected from charges under the NSL. The Committee requested that Hong Kong refrain from taking any action that could curb the freedom of association and ensure that members of civil society will not be prosecuted under the NSL for their participation in the current review.

    Open liberal democracy in Hong Kong is dead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    So why not ignore them if they are “roasters” or “nutters”, you are worse for engaging them.

    The issue as I see it is that some posters then make out anybody asking a similar question is by default one of these posters and treated with the same aggressive responses.

    Edit: I will tap out of here. Im not looking to derail the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Because dumb posts deserve disdain.

    This isn't a knitting circle. Soemtimes crap needs to be called out for what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Haha, I am the poster who asked. Stalin wasn’t around in the 1960s as far as I’m aware. So since the 60s you can come up with 3 wars involving China, I was able to come up with 16 the US we’re involved in and only went back to 1990. Yet China are the ‘warmongers’.

    And as Taiwan is already part of China, they don’t need to covet it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,535 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    China wants to invade Taiwan. One of the factors preventing that is the US, and the fallout from such an action.

    There will always be people who try to turn that on it's head to scapegoat blame away from China.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,021 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    How does it feel to be on the side of a tyrannical authoritarian regime?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Check your dates on the Korean war. And you said 70 years not 60, and you got your answer.

    If Taiwan is 'part of China', then why are they acting like scum threatening war?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I never said that Taiwanese cannot decide themselves - I responded to a poster who was surprised about chinese people having a fixation on Taiwan being "theirs"

    No different to the attitudes of people re separatist territories all over the world



  • Posts: 443 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How does it feel to be on the same side as a country who has started many wars and tries to police the world while at the same time doing nothing to prevent children from being murdered in schools in their own country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    America for all it's faults and it has many is the beacon for democracy for our world. Without it pieces of sh1t like Xi and Putin would run riot.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It really is beginning to look like Europe is going to have to “play it’s role” with the US in arming and getting involved in global politics outside of simply using trade and financial penalties. The comittment to defence spending will probably end up multiples of what’s being touted, time to invest in weapons manufacturing 

    Due to considerations relating to Europe. ie, Russia. It has nothing to do with China.. and Europeans have no reason in getting involved with Asian affairs. The US does because they've spent 70 years dabbling in their politics and economies, along with the trade considerations.

    If Xi is really in trouble of losing power then the Taiwan escalation makes sense, the question may be how far he might be willing to take it to hold onto power.

    Xi promised the return of Taiwan to his main supporters (the military) throughout the first period of his rule, so if he wants to retain power he has to give the military what they want. However, I suspect they know very well that they're not ready for a war with the US, so they'll get something else instead. Likely further increased budgets instead. But Xi will be leaving sooner or later.. he's failed to deliver Taiwan.

    Escalation and invasion of Taiwan made sense when the US was committed to the M.East, the Chinese economy was doing well, and their own society was stable. Now, the US is no longer heavily involved with the M.East, the Chinese economy is shattering, and social unrest is on the rise. They've missed their best opportunity.. and likely know it.

    This is all just posturing. No different from the hundreds of other times the US/China have sought to push each others buttons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    So do you think in an alternative universe where usa wasn’t a super power since the 20th century, the world is better or safer and has less conflict?

    Of course it’s a hypothetical thought excercise but there’s plenty of evidence in history of how that works out for populations. Now throw in nukes to dictators and see what happens when people try to overthrow regimes. Xi May start a war with Taiwan so he can galvanise his people to vote for him so he can stay in power, how is that good for the world if USA stays out of it?

    I personally think that the USA has influenced on some level (good or bad) pretty much any major global conflict singe its been top dog. But that doesn’t imply it’s all bad or that they are responsible for the responses of other parties.

    You can’t be the one major super power in the world and not influence things. Even doing nothing can influence things. Where I feel people looking to drag down the USA are misguided is that for all the damage they feel the USA are causing (and the damage that they have caused), there seems to be little consideration for the damage that could be caused without them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is a thread about China, and relates directly to the foreign policy of the US. Any discussion regarding America's foreign policy (past/present) is relevant.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,535 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    If you support Taiwan's sovereignty and democracy, then yes, that would put you on the same "side" as the US.

    Here's an interesting concept, you can be critical of a nation's politics or foreign policy from various administrations, but also agree with some of their policies or stances.



Advertisement