Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ESB eCars

1130131133135136191

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Surely if in constant use it's a success?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    All things being equal, yes. But all things arent equal. Say if you have a phev on the DC pulling 6kW from the fastAC, a chademo leaf on the HPC pulling 35kW and a Taycan limited to 40kW on the other side of the HPC, along with a Tesla queuing, is that a success? No because you're supplying 80kW when you could be supplying 200 - that's over half of your profit gone.

    Better utilization of scarce resources allows more profit for the charging company. Some (tesla, Ionity) have solved for this with redundancy of units to exceed normal demand, others have tried to do it with time of use pricing but I think ultimately the best would be a per minute pricing rather than per kWh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,353 ✭✭✭markpb


    An efficient system is one which has the right amount of use and the right amount of slack. If your goal is to maximise revenue per location then a busy site is success. If your goal is to facilitate the transition to an EV fleet then a site needs to be busy but not so busy that customers cannot access the system in a reasonable time.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Stop Making Sense🤐



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,048 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Gotta agree with the per minute prices, at least for the DC chargers. Ensures that people only plug in for as long as they need, regardless of how fast they can charge

    Or another method would be to make the kilowatts free but charge for parking. Good way to discourage people parking but not plugging in

    Or there's my favourite solution, more chargers 😁

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,048 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    True to a point, but if you have 3 cars charging and 5 cars pass by and end up going to EasyGo chargers then that's an opportunity cost, you lost out on that potential revenue

    ESB don't car IMO because they control most of the chargers in the country, so even if customers move on there's a good chance it's to a different ESB charger

    Also I'm fairly sure Ecars is just a way of getting revenue for ESB via government grants

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators Posts: 12,389 ✭✭✭✭Black_Knight


    So the app still isn't fixed I guess.


    Opened the app to see the nearest unit to me is available, tapped into it and it's been in use for 15 minutes.

    Opened the map to see a "hub" is available to me (filtered by CCS). Tap into it and both units are in use.

    Thought this was all a 3rd party out of the box app/software which ecars pump their data into?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,144 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    I tried a 150kW charger in the Amber station in Fermoy today.

    Car was at a low SoC and battery was above 20C so should have got 125kW. Only got 88kW! 😖


    I think the reason is that the 50kW charger next to it is sharing the capacity and there was a car pulling 50kW from it which left me with “just” 88kW.

    A HPC advertised as such should not be sharing like that, imo. It would probably be worse again if someone was charging at the other side of the 150kW charger as it is a Delta dual charger.

    If I make an effort to go to a 150kW charger and I’m paying more for it I expect to get the rate I’m paying for.


    Are all these new 150kW eCars sites the same?

    i.e. You only get 150kW if no one else is at the site.

    Ionity ftw, if that’s the case. I have always got 100kW+ from Ionity even with other cars charging at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,472 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    I plugged into a 120kW Gridserve charger at IKEA Belfast the other day and only managed 45kWh in an hour in an ID4.


    Plugged in at 4%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,908 ✭✭✭zg3409


    I see Laghy south Donegal now has 2 X 50kW. Back a few years ago this was listed as a future hub, which I assumed would be higher than 50kW. 50kW is ten year old technology. Even 100kW load sharing would be an improvement. Many motorists will be stopping for say 30 minutes, meaning only max/typical 4 cars an hour at this "hub" site. Each of those cars can only get max 25kWh in 30 minutes so some drivers may stop for longer.

    It's a great improvement but still far from future proofing. 3 years ago it may have been ok, but now it will not meet existing demand let alone future demand. The site may also be busier with drivers skipping other single charger sites before and after.

    We really need Lidl Donegal town to swap their AC charger for DC, or the supermacs across the road which have 2 X EV marked spaces as part of planning permission to actually install a charger as they are required by law.

    It does worry me as a 2 car household (one EV) if we can go 2 X EV based on no realistic growth of charging network planned that will make charging while away on holidays realistic. 2 X kids on tow mean even 30 minute stops are a hard sell, particularly when daily diesel use is near zero, so fuel savings are negligible.




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I used a site in Wales that had 2 Osprey chargers with a similar configuration (same model of charger). They used the two units to serve 2 charging spaces instead of pretending it was for 4. If that picture contained 4 of those chargers for the 4 spaces we'd all be much happier.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    At least cable length is improving to aid Tetris parking due to charge port location



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,238 ✭✭✭digiman


    Good to see at least a 2nd 50kW gone in, but yes I was also expecting this to be a 150kW site. It was one of the first ones mentioned by ESB 2 years ago when they were doing their new rollout!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I think it was intended to be 50+150 like Kells Park Ri, but local supply restricted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,876 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Are those chargers 1 chademo and 1 CCS?

    Seems a bit pointless having 2 chademo sockets and 2 CCS when the majority of EV's use CCS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,760 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Every eCars multi unit site with the exception of Mayfield has a 50/50 split between CHAdeMO/CCS, despite CCS cars outselling CHAdeMO cars by a factor of about 9:1 over the last 2 years or so....


    someone will be along shortly though to say there are a lot of old Leaf's out there blah blah blah....


    More CCS cars sold in 2022 alone than Leaf's sold/imported in the last 10 years..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,048 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    There's a lot of Leafs out there 😉

    Kinda wish they'd gone for the Delta untis they've been installing recently, you can put CCS on one side and CCS and Chademo on the other.

    So you can charge 4 cars, up to 2 of which can be Chademo

    200kW per charger would also have been nice as well 😏

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Most of the ecars sites I've been to have the same number of chademo and CCS plugs but can only charge on one of those plugs at a time, so calling it a 50/50 split is inaccurate. The last time I was at J14 they had 1 dedicated chademo, 5 dedicated CCS and 2 which has CCS and chademo.

    When I got to J14 the last time an ID3 had just pulled in to the dual charger so he was taking a space a chademo could pull from despite there being 2 free "CCS only" spots. When I asked him if he'd move (he wasn't plugged in yet at that stage) he basically gave me the finger and said "first come first serve"

    Lovely carry on from fellow EV drivers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Those delta units can charge 2 cars at a time maximum regardless of whether the cars take CCS or Chademo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,048 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Oh I know, but they can double up the cables on one side, so you've the option of CCS or Chademo

    So instead of 2 cars at a time, you can charge 4. And you can don't sacrifice CCS connectors to support Chademo

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,908 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Those chargers in Laghy can only charge one DC car at a time, so putting on 2 X CCS cables would make no difference. They can charge 2 cars at once if one is using the 22kW AC connection, and there is a need for 2 spaces per charger as some cars and only charge in left space, others can only reach in right space. It also means if some car is abandoned in one spot there is a chance of connecting in other spot. It's far better than 3 spaces between 2 similar chargers like on other sites where if a car parks in middle spot they can prevent the other charger from being used by some cars depending on charge port location. Really they should be oriented like petrol pumps with room for 2 cars on each side. This would also allow EVs with trailers to fill up and the odd EV bus, van, truck and ambulance of which there is the odd one knocking about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,876 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    My favourite thing is the ESB and council coming together to put in a charger with 2 sockets but only painting 1 space green. This allows vans, cars etc to park there and block one of the sides. The long cable is mine. I'm parked 2 spaces away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,048 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I've seen similar except it's one van parked across both green spaces

    I've always been tempted to wrap the cable around the van to try and trap them in place, but the gobsh*tes would probably drive away anyway and damage my car 😬

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Nothing where here though as spaces not correctly marked as EV only



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Nothin g wrong there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,760 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Most of the ecars sites I've been to have the same number of chademo and CCS plugs but can only charge on one of those plugs at a time, so calling it a 50/50 split is inaccurate.

    Thats why I said multi-unit sites, and I'm specifically aiming at the sites where they have a 150kW + 50kW unit. These are sites that can charge 3 cars at once just as long as one of them is a Leaf. I've been in Kilcullen before, with 2 CCS cars charging, and another 2 CCS cars waiting to charge, with 1 empty bay waiting for a Leaf to arrive...... in 2022 that's not right. Another CCS plug on the 150kW unit means it will see much more usage compared to it's current configuration.

    I maintain, that every eCars site with multiple units (with the exception of Mayfield) is split 50/50 between CCS/CHAdeMO, and in 2022 where CCS cars outsell CHAdeMO by around 9:1 it's just idiotic....



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,152 ✭✭✭innrain


    Like the charger below. One side is CCS only the other one is CCS or CHAdeMO. Fastned is using them in this config.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,760 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I know the CCS vs CHAdeMO argument has been done to death etc... but seeing as how eCars will just not change their ways anytime soon, I think the best we can hope for is the way they've set up the Tuam 4 car 'hub' There are 4 spaces, and each space has a CCS or CHAdeMO plug available to it, so 4 CCS cars can all charge simultaneously, or 4 Leaf's can charge simultaneously..... (unlikely, but eCars logic means support CHAdeMO at all costs).

    I think it's completely wasteful having 4 CHAdeMO plugs there, as 2 would probably suffice, but eCars are all about spending that hard earned money, so 4x CCS & 4x CHAdeMO it is...

    I think outside of Mayfield, it's their best set up site as it's 4 spaces, and 4 CCS cars can charge simultaneously there.

    If every eCars 'hub' was configured that way, you'd go as far as to say the network was sufficient, but as we are, the majority of their 'hub's can charge no more than 2 CCS cars simultaneously (down to 1 if a Leaf arrives and plugs into the (cheaper) 50kW unit at a 150kW + 50kW site).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Yes I'd settle for that too as at least all 4 plugs are available to CCS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Looking at the photos of the one in Kilcullen I see a 50kW unit that can charge either a chademo or CCS or AC43 and a HPC that can charge a Chademo or a CCS

    So that site can charge 2 cars at the same time regardless of socket, meaning your comment is completely inaccurate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    In this setup you can charge 2 cars at once regardless of socket, so it's the same as the ecars setup at kilcullen except only one physical unit instead of 2?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    How much extra does adding the Chademo plug cost? Some people on here recon it's about €100 per plug. To me a €400 once off payment to bring in the 30% of leaf drivers (and don't forget the early tesla adapters) doesn't really scream "Wasteful" but each to their own



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Sorry to fact check you

    At kilcullen if the right cars show up you can charge 4.

    Say the following: Zoe on AC 43. ID 3 on CCS 50kW , then HPC CCS in use by model 3 and HPC Chademo in use by an outlander phev (could be any chademo car)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian



    I'm happy to be fact checked, no apology needed. So you are saying the CCS/Chademo (HPC) box can charge a CCS and Chademo at the same time? That I didn't know, and is a bit of a waste.

    If a unit can charge 2 cars it should have at least 4 plugs



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,152 ✭✭✭innrain


    How is the same? The Delta unit has two cable. If CCS is in use only CHAdeMO cars can use the other side. If the 50kW is used by another CHAdeMO, which is sensible giving the fact that they can't charge faster anyway, all is lost.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,760 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Which comment was completely inaccurate?

    The HPC can charge both CCS & CHAdeMO simultaneity.

    Kilcullen can charge 3 cars simultaneously, as can most of the sites with a HPC & FCP. The issue I and most have is the HPC only has a single CCS plug on it. If it had 2x CCS and 1 CHAdeMO, it could still charge 2 cars at once, but crucially 2 cars could be CCS.

    Probably worth reading my comment again with teh knowledge that the HPC can charge 2 cars at once.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,003 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    It's impossible to square this circle and keep everybody happy :-)

    The Delta unit can have a CCS and CHAdeMO cable on each side to cater for all CCS/CHAdeMO scenarios.

    Other side of the argument is that a 150kW unit, which can load split to 2x 75kW, shouldn't have a CHAdeMO at all as almost all are 50kW limited and older Leafs may only take 40kW in practice.

    These debates may never end until sites are built in the Kempower layout. Sh1t loads of connectors decoupled from the power modules with load sharing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The problem with your solution is if 2 leafs came along they could both be potentially waiting for the CCS car on the dual-side to finish, even if nobody is charging on the single-side. While at the same time one of the leaf's would be waiting for the other one while the single side would potentially be free to another CCS car to rock up and go



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Strange... I still own a Leaf and the Chademo port works perfectly... Can you explain your comment in more detail?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    If you own a betamax it will still play betamax tapes perfectly. Try getting a shop to provide new video in that format



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭UID0


    I think the logic behind having 4 CHAdeMO plugs is that, in general, people don't consider other users. If there were units that cold support CCS only on one side, and CCS/CHAdeMO on the other side, then if a CCS car arrives and plugs in on the CCS/CHAdeMO side, there is no availability for a CHAdeMO user, even if the other side is not in use. If the site is busy, queue management can then become an issue.

    Red Silurian pointed out an experience he had had where an owner chose a CCS/CHAdeMO point instead of a CCS only point.

    Perhaps I am giving too much credit to ECars, but I would assume that their data shows the number of times CHAdeMO is unavailable despite not being in use and that it was decided that it made sense to have both connectors available at each charge point.

    It's the same logic as putting both diesel and petrol at each point in a filling station. It would be cheaper to have a bank of diesel pumps and a bank of petrol pumps, but queue management becomes more problematic.

    Sites should be either all CCS (like Ionity) or should have CCS & CHAdeMO available at each charge point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Use is approx 75:25 at the moment between CCS and Chademo at fast and HP chargers as per the monitoring site shared by a boardsie. This is only going to decline further for chademo. As usage is currently 3:1, three of every 4 plugs should be CCS only and one chademo only. That's the current usage pattern. As CCS gets more prevalent still and the chademo cars die off, this will be CCS only more and more. No point wasting money and resource on chademo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,760 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    So we should always keep 1 side of a 150kW unit clear in the off chance a Leaf will arrive to pull 50-60kW from it, as opposed to adding another CCS plug in the highly likely event that there'll be more than 2 CCS cars there needing a charge...

    Strange logic, but each to their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    That's my point...

    Try to find a chademo charger or somebody to repair a leaf or an outlander, which are still in production and still for sale and you shouldn't have too many issues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    If we don't then we have the same problem you've been complaining about, except it's for Chademo cars instead of CCS cars...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Exactly. Spot the ownership bias. FWIW I have one CCS car (Ioniq28) and one CCS+Chademo car (X75D). That's as close to charge standard agnostic as it gets.

    Would you open a betamax shop?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    For nostalgia maybe but not for profit, because that's a dead format, unlike Chademo

    Are you reading my comments properly or just acting the eejit?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    My very point is that anything other than equal CCS/Chademo plugs per charger will result in an unfair queuing format.

    When 80%+ of car sales were diesel in this country the forecourts were still 2 pumps per filling point because it's the most efficient and fair way to do it. The same format should be applied to EV charging



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,760 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Yes, so better to favour the cars that currently account for 25% of the HPC/FCP usage as opposed to favouring the cars that account for 75% of their usage.....



  • Advertisement
Advertisement