Alex Jones Believers - How Do Ye Feel Now ?

Lol No man, it's not equally likely to be those 2 options. It's not plausible to suggest that it was a false flag where the US government created fake children and got actors to pretend to be parents.

It's not "snuffing out" discussion to point out this is a silly and childish thing to suggest. Nor is it "snuffing out" discussion to ask people about this claim and ask them to explain it further or explain the many, many logical issues with it.

And to that, it's not "snuffing out" discussion to hold shitburgs like Jones for the harrasment the parents of those dead kids suffered.

He could have easily JAQed off about the event to his hearts content without targeting the parents and defaming them and he would have been free to do so to his hearts content.

But then he'd probably not have made as much money.

Also, not sure how people can be punching down on a multimillionaire...

Also lol. You really go in on this whole madey uppy "midwits" term.

Punching down on somebody with their own media company and money we couldn't even imagine? LOL you do make me laugh. He didn't just get it wrong. He targeted people who had suffered a major loss and he did it to make money. That is punching down.

I would've thought that Alex Jones of all people would consider money another tool of the NWO to enslave humanity, so he shouldn't be at all afraid of losing some or all of it. In actual fact, watch him desperately concoct schemes to hang onto some of it. A bogus charity, maybe, or an account in the Cayman islands. Because he's so bang to rights on all of this, he may as well forget about hiring a better lawyer and instead focus on getting a creative accountant.

You literally created this account to "badger" people who challenge conspiracy theorists. It's in the very first post. You might not be a hardcore conspiracy theorist yourself, but you are one of those types who orbit them, share similar world views and feel a bizarre need to "defend" them.

Likewise you feel the need to defend Jones, so you compare him to a handful of conspiracy cartoon "villains" like Gates, Fauci, etc. It used to be Soros, but the conspiracy community got bored of him.

Conspiracy theorists and anti-science types are the victim of their own irrational beliefs, nothing else. All the meltdowns and tantrums don't change that fact.

No. Often the truth isn't hard to come by, but some people high on paranoia and low on critical thinking avoid it in favor of a more appealing, simple narratives.

If I don't understand something or find it too complex to understand, I don't invent alternative narratives or lies, nor do I go seeking them. That's borderline mental.

And conspiracies are not all harmless as we are currently seeing, literally the subject of the thread.

Soros is on the outs these days. Not it's Bill Gates or Klaus Schwab who control everything and always had.

Anybody noticing an inverse relationship between length of post and quality of post today?

Lol. We're only going in circles because like most conspiracy theorists you have difficulty in answer direct questions.

You believe that Alex jones is wrong about his claims about the NWO etc. At the same time you're claiming he's somehow also right.

You say he's exposing their plans, but he claims that their plans include stuff like Sandy Hook.

You are defending him because you're saying that he's right about things and that his claims have some value.

You want to pretend this is the case because if you start thinking that conspiracy theorists might just be wrong about stuff... well then you might start asking difficult questions about your own world view. In conspiracy theory thinking, this is not allowed.

Again, Alex Jones among a great many other ridiculous, silly, hateful shite claimed that Sandy Hook was faked. He claimed that no one there died and all of the children and parents were actors.

In what way is this "speaking truth to power"?

In what way is this a "Harmless way of understanding a complex world"?

How do you gel these claims with the fact that he's been shown to cause harm with these theories?

But when he says there's a big group of people making the calls, he believes that those people are baby eating satanists.

You don't believe that's true. You believe he's wrong.

The information he uses to reach this conclusion must be false because his conclusion isn't true. His line of thinking must also be false for the same reason.

So if he's spreading false conclusions, using false reasoning and false information, how could he be "on to something."

If your belief was true, then this would mean that Alex Jones is still misleading people. Hell he's putting people off of your truth because he's making it look sily.

Same thing with Icke. He also believes that the world is controlled by a group of elites (His elites are just lizard people from the centre of the Earth). Is he "onto something" too?

So what else has Jone's claimed that you believe is plausible? Your one example you've contradicted yourself on. You agree he's talking shite about the vaccine. You believe he was talking shite about Sandy Hook.

What else?

The gay frogs thing maybe?

Conspiracies happen all the time, only have to open a newspaper.

They bear no relationship with most of the made-up fantastical nonsense posted in here, replete with all the generic anti-science, anti-intellectual and far-left or far-right world views.

As mentioned before, people are only a victim of their own silly or stupid beliefs. The guy who believes satellites aren't real, who rants about anyone who challenges him being a troll, who wants the forum changed so people can't challenge his views, who endlessly plays the victim, who claims everyone is "sealioning" or "purposiing" him or whatever, is only a victim of his own irrational beliefs.

Again, Jones was claiming that the Sandy Hook was faked by actors.

People are not closed minding for pointing out that a very stupid thing to believe. Your rant is very funny when put in the context of what it's defending.

Heh

If your child was murdered in a school shooting, you wouldn't have a problem with a conspiracy host spreading lies about the shooting for money, resulting in his followers harassing you for years, sending you death threats, causing your family to move?

Or you would have a problem with it?

That's what this thread is about. The greater point is that these "harmless" conspiracy theories can be harmful, as demonstrated by what has been happening. And cut this tribalist crap about "debunkers", you start talking Sandy Hook BS anywhere and anyone will pull you up for talking nonsense.

Funny but when I got my vaccine, I definitely talked to a nurse and went through symptoms that were possible before taking the injection.

Anyway, none of this has anything to do with Alex Jones, only the overlap between anti-vaxx loons and Jones acolytes. It's refreshing to see Jones getting slagged. The jury award is high, and the trial's in Texas which has tight limits on punitive damages (got to protect those corporations at all costs in the Lone Star state), but this hasn't fully played out yet.

Feel free to bring this back to the anti-vaxx thread. Oh wait... sorry, you've been threadbanned there. Looking towards this one as a pathetic attempt to get approval for your whackadoodle beliefs?

So, what about Alex Jones?