Alex Jones Believers - How Do Ye Feel Now ?

Exactly. You know how I knew this? Because it's the same mindless tired narrative we see over and over on this forum by legions of "sheep" who never once question any of it.

Look at any conspiracy site, drenched in fearmongering stories of nefarious terrible things. Open one up from 10 years ago, did it happen? Or is it all just conveniently forgotten or spun away in favor of the next exciting conspiracy thing that's "just about to happen". All designed to bypass reason and go straight to emotions. All the projection that everyone else, the media, scientists are doing it to deflect from who is really doing it. Interesting how that works isn't it.

Next time you come across someone who is a flat-earther or whatever, notice how all their lines are exactly the same as yours. "Don't trust the mainstream media", "they are feeding us narratives", "no mention of the other side", etc.

Conspiracy theorists will follow whatever is the new fad (Covid) so as not to feel left out, to feel like they are "special information" and Alex Jones is a grifter who is always there is validate that.

It's a civil case, not a murder case.

He did engage in the process, he absolutely knew of the default liability (it's an agreement) but he repeatedly ignored discovery requests and court orders, so he was found liable by default. That is actively torpedoing his own case, you don't need a jury decision to deliberate a case the defendant is directly or indirectly trying to lose.

Whether found liable by jury or judge, the outcome is the same, the punishment is the same. The semantics are different because he didn't allow the case to proceed to jury decision, which was entirely his choice. I suspect to be the victim and claim "I wasn't found liable by a jury", no he was found liable by default, and worse by his own hand. Crazy but par for the course for Jones.

It's the equivalent to defaulting a football game, giving the other side the points and then saying "we didn't lose". On paper it's exactly the same, they did lose.

And like clockwork there's the "other side" fallacy. Well so far you seem to be following all the conspiracy memes. Would you say you do your own research?

I don't know why you keep using the word guilty. It isn't relevant. He was found liable. That the judgement was in default is irrelevant

Alex Jones liability by judge (default), loses case and has to pay 50 million. Plaintiffs win.

Alex Jones liability by jury, loses case and has to pay 50 million. Plaintiffs win.

You are trying really, really, really hard here to salvage something, anything from this.

Thread on Alex Jones and the case:

Bill Gates ✔

Klaus Schwab ✔

Covid plandemic ✔

Anti-mask stuff ✔

Anti-vax ✔

False flags ✔

Pedantry ✔

No, he would have lost the case if he went to trial. All of the same evidence would have been shown.

The court did find he defamed and harmed people with his words.

You've already posted the court ruling that says this, you're just pretending not to understand it. (Or you genuinely don't understand,)

Your defense is really embarrassing and displays just how dishonest and desperate the folks in Jones' cult are.

So what supplements of his have your tried?

He torpedoed his cases, he was found liable by default in all of them. As I've mentioned before I suspect he did that purely so he could claim "a jury didn't find me guilty".

Again, these are civil suits, one side seeking damages from the other, Alex Jones just shortened that process in each case and gave himself an automatic loss in each one just for optics. No one apart from himself and his supporters gives a toss over the semantics and technicalities of how he lost each one. Ironically it could encourage even more people to sue him now.

Comparing this low life with Galileo is one of the more ridiculous comments I've ever seen on this platform.

Yeah its fantastic stuff though. One of the best things abot the internet, random hilarious madness like that.

There is also the that the jury that did hear the evidence presented by Jones decided it should cost him $45M. If they were convinced he was liable they could have ordered damages of $1. I think it is safe to say that the jury did think he was liable.

I dont see the point of people trying to minimise the outcome of the case but you don't seem to have an issue with someone doing that. Odd. i suppose you would prefer if we all just forgot about it. we probably will for a while until his next case gets to court.