Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2022 In Between Grand Slam Thread

1252628303134

Comments

  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    so the most successful clay court player ever has won 1 title there in the last 8 years where he has won 3 each in both Rome and Monte Carlo in the same timeframe

    where Federer who has never one a single clay court masters in Rome or Monte Carlo has won multiple titles on the clay at Madrid

    but there's nothing much different about it - sure!

    it's the clay court masters where players who could never come close to Nadal at Roland Garros or rarely at Rome or Monte Carlo have been able to beat him and they have had more success there


    2021 for Alcaraz you're quoting - that's quite funny given that Alcaraz only made his breakout in Autumn 2021 near the end of the season and obviously really came on in 2022 - expecting that to be taken seriously as a point is a bit rich


    and taking 2022 ->

    hard court win-rate = 87.5 %

    clay-court win-rate = 86.2 % (including "Madrid")

    Also Alcaraz's ELO rating is also higher on hard-court than on clay-court (ELO ratings give credit for the ELO strength of opponents)

    http://tennisabstract.com/reports/atp_elo_ratings.html

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Does anyone find watching the tennis on amazon prime tough especially on the outside courts where the camera angle is awful and there is no commentary. The main courts seems to be fine except for the music blaring out every change over.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Amazon prime don't play the music at the venues and they can't have commentary for every minor match in a joint ATP 500 / WTA 250 tournament really which is both a male and female event so double the amount of matches.

    I'm guessing the cameras may be automated and / or fixed for the outside courts also to save on personnel.

    Considering that it's included with Amazon Prime and covers a lot of tournaments AND has the replays available also I don't have too many complaints - some on the commentary side occasionally depending on who is rostered lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Ah I know amazon are not responsible for the music but it is annoying, well for me anyway and it gets worse as the day goes on.

    I'm not to bothered by the lack of commentary more on the camera angle on the courts being too low so it can be a struggle to see the ball. It was especially bad for the evans/Edmonds match the other day. In saying that the match was crap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Raducanu doing her best to lose this set



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    the music doesn't add to the viewing experience really on small courts - it's not as bad in the bigger stadium courts like at the US Open where the sound doesn't come across as oppressive and there are enough people there in the crowd to pick out some amusing dancers and posers on the tiered levels



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    First time Raducanu has managed 2 wins in a tournament on an outdoor hardcourt since the US Open last year but 50 Unforced Errors from her in just 2 sets - not going to get too far with that tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    But how much is that down to the heat? I have been reading that a lot of the players are saying it is just a matter of surviving out there and getting through. Looking at the weather for Washington today and it will be 33 degrees and 9£% humidity, don't know how anyone can play in that. I was in California last month and it was 35 or so there and all anyone was doing was getting into the shade or indoors.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    I'm sure that the heat doesn't help but Samsonova who is the next opponent was also playing in the heat and didn't hit anything like that (match 20 minutes shorter)

    if Raducanu manages to win would be the first time since September 2021 at any tournament to get 3 wins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    She hasn't had a good year and it could get worse if she doesn't defend the points won at the US Open. I believe she could suffer the biggest drop in rankings in the history of the WTA. Might be a good thing for her though, who is her coach now? I seen Jeremy Bates was with Katie Boulter in San Jose.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Nearly a year without 3 wins in a tournament now

    Wait a year wasn't it?

    Lost the first set despite the opponent hitting 36 unforced errors which is a bit bad to say the least

    33 winners vs 8 also tells the story on lack of weapons - just a limited game

    I don't remotely see the drive of personality there either to really do the utmost either on court or off.

    Look she has a life of fortune and comfort out of it and probably a cushty bbc commentary job down the line where she will be introduced at every commentary session as "grand slam champion Emma Raducanu" - hardly a bad result and something that quite a few more resilient and talented players will never see.


    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Kyrgios into the Citi open final. Bit of a mess in the mens doubles. Kyrgios and Sock are at the semi final stage. There is suppose to be a meeting by the organisers to discuss what to do especially with Kyrgios in the final.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Kyrgios takes the Washington ATP 500 (as well as the doubles), not dropping a single singles service game on the way but this week's National Bank masters 1000 in Montreal should be a lot more interesting

    He's on course to play Medvedev in the second round as Kyrgios is not ranked highly (didn't play the clay events and missed Wimbledon points, means he is 1000 points lower than would be -apparently would be 10 in the ATP race otherwise) which could be a good match and the casual drama hounds will no doubt be in attendance also although many less randomers will be watching than at Wimbledon

    Can Kyrgios keep a melt-down at bay or is it just a matter of time?

    Top half of the draw looks tougher in general

    On the other side an Alcaraz (seeded 2)/ Sinner semi final rematch?

    Alcaraz if he has his eyes set on a year-end number 1 chance needs to be looking to take good points here and next week

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,544 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Serena has given an interview with Vogue today announcing that the "countdown has begun" to her retirement, so a reasonable assumption that the US Open will likely be her last tournament. I kinda washed my hands of Serena after the US Open 2018 debacle, but women's tennis will be sorely lacking without her.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Ostapenko's circus-worthy-attire outfits have been a recent "eye-catching" feature on the WTA tour.

    but looks like she has just gone and out-done herself with the latest Toronto "married-with-children" Peggy Bundy leopard-print number!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,957 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Is it just me, or does she look woefully out of shape for a professional athlete? Or maybe, as they say in the fashion world, those outfits do nothing for her...



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Careful now.

    you're not allowed to point out the obvious apparently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,957 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Ha, I do recall someone taking offence (on behalf of others as is always the case) on this topic before. I'll leave it there.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,544 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Nothing wrong with pointing out that players are out of shape, as long as the personal jibes are being kept out of it.

    The outfits are horrific though, apparently she designs some of them herself 😬



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Watching Murray against Fritz here , jesus there is so much between them. Why is he still out their on the tour , hes loaded , hes got young kids I think , hes a metal hip and virtually no chance of proper success again. Dont get it at all.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,544 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    He obviously still likes tennis, I'm guessing? Think he's earned the right to retire on his own terms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,218 ✭✭✭✭josip


    A few years ago after a very big work night out and most people hadn't bothered coming in I noticed 'R' in work at his desk struggling with a hangover. I asked him why didn't he stay at home like everyone else. He slowly turned to me and said, "What makes you think it would be better at home?"



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Don't care for Murray's ranting on court these days but at least he cares which is to be admired even if he's a little deluded about being as effective as he once was.

    Medvedev - Kyrgios on "from 6pm" Irish time today - meaning could be up to 90 minutes later depending on previous matches I would guess

    Raducanu out to the dainty but hard-hitting Giorgi in 2 sets (WTA 29 even if she did win there last year, not the favourite by any means for the tournament at 50/1), not exactly fighting for the tie-break as it went 0-7, hitting a grand total of 3 winners in the entire match and the second set went 2-6



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,431 ✭✭✭dublin49


    I think a lot of professional Sports people write cheques against their future well being to keep playing that they will ultimately regret when payment is due.

    With regard to Murray in particular he probably feels he was cheated out of 2 /3 years of a normal career so he is frantically trying to regain those years but it won't happen.He actually looks like he has a bad hip when walking ,the only saving grace for him now unlike Nadal is he does not go very far into tournaments anymore.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Murray is Scottish (not a big spender lol) and is estimated to be worth at least $100 million from multiple sources and up to $150 million plus, including owning a 5-star hotel up in Scotland

    He doesn't need the money

    He just has the genuine desire to play - coupled with a bit of delusion driving it also



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    I like murray, i just feel hes destroying bis body for absolutely no reason at this stage. If he still likes tennis he can still play but theres no point him playing lads like Fritz. But yeah obviously he can do what he wants. He is now shite though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Yeah looks he can do what he wants but i do think its delusion driving it at this stage. Could try win a few doubles comps with his brother.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Murray hasn't been past even the third round of either a Masters 1000 or a Grand Slam in over 5 years but still goes on about challenging in them

    So as I said I admire the hunger to keep competing (he will be retired a long number of years) but the delusion is there for sure

    He's still capable of beating the odd Top 20 player but hasn't been capable of stringing enough wins together to get into the latter stages of big tournaments



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Off-court coaching allowed on trial for the rest of the year on the ATP

    Has been going on anyway and very hard to deal with for officials due to hand signals and foreign languages.

    Also very inconsistent reactions to it too - Tsitsipas getting heavily panned but no real mention of it in others' cases like Alcaraz for example. (and there are plenty plenty more on both the ATP and WTA tours)




  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Yeah its obviously very hard to quit that feeling/adrenaline rush but in Murrays case I think he will regret the extra years.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Alcaraz into a third set vs Paul - probably should have finished it in two and has a match on now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭cudsy1


    Just tuned in for most of third set. Alcaraz beating himself. Ferrero pointed to his temple in explanation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭cudsy1


    I must say, losing twice in a row to sinner surprised me. Sinner seems to be playing really well though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭cudsy1


    The murray thing is interesting for sure. Agree with most of the above. Fritz played unreal. Murray probably fancies his chances against the non top 8 but losing to the likes of isner at Wimbledon doesn't provide confidence



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    To be fair to Raducanu least shes won a grand slam. Alcaraz has never been to a semi and recently lost to the world no 34 on a hard court in the first round there. Paul wasnt defending champion thats for sure , has only one 1 tournament in his life. Atp250. Alcaraz did pick up a set though and Raducanu didnt so there is it that.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Paul played very well there in fairness.

    Great entertaining finish to the match -

    Alcaraz showed some balls when facing match points.

    Alcaraz should have taken the second set - hit a couple of forehands long that needed more spin on them a he was further up the court

    cost him dearly in the end - he probably thought that he was through

    Paul was better in the third set and there is no argument there - Alcaraz had to pull something special out to win any point in that set



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    on the other hand Raducanu hasn't been able to string together 3 wins at any tournament since September 2021

    you won't find anyone in the Top 65 of the WTA who hasn't managed to do that in the same timeframe

    she has been terrible - as if Raducanu is remotely as capable as Alcaraz in the game of tennis!



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    I wonder has the excessive hype affected Alcaraz? Hes really shouldnt have lost that match.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Shes sitting on 1 grand slam ,Alcaraz looks nowhere near winning a slam. Maybe the french.



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Looking forward to this next one , i reckon we will have 3 sets.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    yep she has a slam but that's an embarrassment for the WTA Tour more than anything else considering the actual level shown over the full year



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Do you think the hype has gotten to Alcaraz? He looks very beatable on the hard stuff.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    No, Alcaraz is strong mentally - he was just a bit lackadaisical on a couple of key points today - that's about it - he would have the win otherwise

    That he will learn from

    He's still having an amazing year at 2nd in the Race to Turin he's up to 4th in the world.

    He's the youngest player to get inside the ATP Top 5 since Nadal - that's the most impressive talent in over 15 years

    Hardly not performing!

    Djokovic didn't win a slam until he was 20, Federer was a couple of weeks off 22 and they are two of the best ever to play the game - it's not easy to win a slam on the ATP

    Seles had 8 slams before she turned 20 on the WTA - it's just not comparable in that respect

    Nadal got one earlier because he was a freak on clay even at 19

    his serve needs to be more consistent at times - lost too many points on his second serve today compared to his usual stats on second serve

    he's not the tallest at just 6 feet so is never going to be the biggest server but I think that he'll find a solution



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Yeah but I think youll agree the ranking means jack **** at the moment. Yeah his serve looks way too inconsistent to fulfill these 30 slam prophecies. I dont think hes winning a slam until Novak and Nadal are shite/retired. There will be a lot of new winners after that , id expect medevev to win some more , Zverev maybe 1 or 2 , Sinner defo a couple , Alcaraz a couple., FAA maybe. The atp must be terrified , which is why i presume they hyped poor Carlos to no end after Madrid.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    who said he was going to win 30 slams - only an absolute moron would say that.

    he'll definitely win some slams but nobody can say how many.

    Djokovic is the only real ranking aberration at the moment - Alcaraz would still be in the Top 5

    The ATP has at least 10 decent consistent players who get to the quarterfinals of big events with regularity - they are not "terrified"

    Nadal and Djokovic (barring injury he will stay until 40 but will be fading as time goes on obviously) will go eventually and as 2 of the best players ever by definition are going to have a gap but there are consistent performers who have rivalries and that's what's most important

    if you take the WTA as a comparison there hasn't been consistency in many years - a slam winner can be seen to lose multiple early rounds soon after



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Loads on the interwebs, they hyperbole was truly astonishing, they look a bit silly since!



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    I haven't seen it - you must be frequenting the silly parts of the web tbh!

    It's just as idiotic to expect a player to be the greatest every single tournament in his development- having a successful season each season and showing progression is what's most important and he's done that in spades over the last year winning 2 masters titles on the way - Sinner who has been around a year longer doesn't have one for example

    the guy is great to watch and is a winner - should have finished off Paul today and that's something he will be less likely to do in the future



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,761 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Great seeing the rankings messed up at the moment when they throw early round matches like Medvedev against Kyrgios.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement