Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1388389391393394805

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Dav I was with you all the way but at this point I am going to be voting Sinn Fein which I have never done before as something has to change.

    Its a damning indictment of the Irish political sphere that for the last 2 decades parties are voted in on promises without any repercussions and try to garner votes by spouting about helping out everyone or basically trying to stay in the middle of the political spectrum and yet over the last 2 decades they always pander to vested interest groups from both the left and the right and those in the middle are the ones continually squeezed. We need some change in politics our government politicians trying to get elected should be told to cut the crap and give us your 10 top issues your going to change, implement or take out with full costings (and a full discussion of any unforeseen consequences & moral hazards for the rest of the public that any of those issues) will bring in or take away from our finances and then within their time in government (no point in asking them for any more than 10 as what is happening is they pander to every denominator to get elected locally then again to get elected to govern and these 2 systems of election often come with conflicts of interests for example a policy of say building a new hospital in Leitrim maybe good for Leitrim but it is not good for the rest of the country and vice versa) and then when in power they usually find the perma-government are the ones in real power and these lads are very hard to move along with progress) 10% of a government members pension should be given if they actually implement one of the points they are voted in on if they don't do the other 9 points then they should of worked harder or not promised to get the other 9 done and they should not get the other 90%. More stick as our political classes are up to their eyes with carrots and that really needs a C-change. We don't have a democracy we have a system of allowing liars who don't have any repercussions they have power and a nice salary with lots of perks for a bit of time then they walk off in to the sunset with a huge pension. Sure why would you be bothered when your on easy street no matter how good, bad or ugly you are at your job.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,569 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Have to agree with all that, I have no political affiliation, unfortunately I think they are all next to useless and it’s the civil servants that keep them in the lane when it comes to any of the more progressive policy decisions. The current governments intervention in the rental sector has been catastrophic, but SF proposals go even further and if enacted will make matters even worse, particularly the removal of the option to terminate a tenancy if the LL wants to sell. There will be an avalanche of termination notices if that sees the light of day.

    SF saying they will solve the housing crisis is like some posters on here pinning the blame on politicians for the price of property, it’s idiotic. There are too many factors outside of a Governments control which contribute to people in high paying jobs being able to pay more than those in average paying jobs for a limited resource. SF will not be able to magically build hundreds of thousands of houses, and will not have the money to do so without either increasing taxes or plunging the country further into debt by borrowing tens of billions. SF also will have an eye on the possibility of a reunification vote, and where they are going to get the 10+ billion per year it costs the UK government to keep services in the 6 counties running.

    I feel sorry for those pinning their hopes of getting a house on a change of government, it’s the hope that kills you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I think when all costs and incomes are taken into account I think most experts agree that reunification will cost more like 4 Billion odd (a large chunk of change to find annually). But that is a case in point the lads who would consider themselves nationalists and hear Sinn Fein and United Ireland in our lifetime and will vote Sinn Fein in should be told how much extra they will be paying for this from an increase in taxation on their wage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,569 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    The costs today would be different to the costs a year ago, and the figures fluctuate depending on who pays for the research. 10 is the midpoint of what I have seen, 15 and 5. But irrespective of which one it is, the affect on SFs policies will be that they will need to be able to show that the Irish State can afford it. That’s a tough ask if you are committing billions each year to housing on top of all the other promises they have/will make.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'm very much aware that there is no magic wand to solve all the problems, however there is something very strange going on when our hotels are filling up with families and our homes are filling up with tourists.

    Ive asked you on a number of occasions to name one government policy that did not have an inflationary effect on house prices/rents, I don't recall any answer

    The current system of the private market catering for possibly the top 20% of income earners, with the rest paying much higher rents than what a equivalent mortgage would build is completely unsustainable and will require a forest of money trees. Anyone that does not accept this has there head in the sand mixed with water and cement and left settle for a few hours

    I'd question whether construction is at capacity, given the threats by the industry to cease projects if more taxpayer funding was not forthcoming plus the anecdotal tales of projects been cancelled/suspended by customers. The industry has the taxpayer over a barrel. Its time to put in place plans to call there bluff and have projects ready to go.

    Could government work with our corporates to see if together they can provide housing for their employees. Many are trying to get there ESG scores up, so their are potential supply side solutions there that benefit all parties

    Can nothing be done to deter deriliction, pedestrians have been killed in our 2nd city from falling debris from a derelict building

    Can we not copy and paste the NI model for compliance which works is accountable and is a fraction of the cost. Why is there so much unnesecary white collar grab in the price of a home largely built by trained competent blue collar workers.

    For government to get any kudos, they must first stop making the situation worse and BEGIN with policies that address supply



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    You emphasise my point of property being a parasite on the economy very well. The free third level education paid for by the taxpayer is swallowed up by the property sector in increased rents. Thanks for making that point more clearly than I ever could. When you paid fees and accomodation costs, that money stayed in Ireland funded our colleges and your rent was taxed and recycled within the economy. Today the rent potentially leaves the country untaxed

    Who would have thought that Canadian teachers pension funds would have been the ultimate beneficiary of free third level fees in Ireland. Well done FFG

    Building homes are not a large scale project. We have a branch of the state, Revenue, that are extremely efficient at collecting monies owed. I would be against the state selling homes, these would be a state asset that benefit multiple citizens and the taxpayer through reduced costs or profit that could be reinvested to build more rather than being a partial gift to a specific citizen

    Post edited by Villa05 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,569 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Jesus wept, you completely missed the point, there is a 35 yr time difference, of course rents have gone up since the late 80s/early 90s, if fees still had be paid and adjusted for inflation, students would be paying just under €6k year. My point was that it cost as much then to send students to third level as we had both college fees and rental fees.

    Post edited by Dav010 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    On the rental market, who are these types of properties/prices aimed at ?

    Will cost someone 180K a year to rent, renting this place for 5 1/2 years will cost you 1 million. Which is probably what it would cost you to buy the place.





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,336 ✭✭✭Deub


    Genuine question: why do we depend so much on developers to build houses?

    Can cities/villages not create estates by just designing the plots, bring electricity/sewage/water and sell them to people to build their house?

    People would, of course, need planing permission to make sure they don’t build crazy houses.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭GoldFour4


    Usually at corporates/high level execs who will be in Dublin for a year or so and don’t want to buy a property.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Interesting, wouldn't have thought there would be many companies willing to fork out that much money for rent. But then again, all of that will be tax deductible for corporations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭Pomodoro


    1 million for that? No chance. Closer to 3 million.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    it's incredible how badly the government have handled this situation. According to the Sunday times...

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/garda-vetting-holds-up-homes-for-refugees-bzwmg3p90

    The hold-up with garda vetting has effectively rendered more than 4,000 properties unusable to these families. The Irish Red Cross (IRC) says fewer than 3,000 war-displaced Ukrainians are living in accommodation pledged by the Irish public even though 10,000 homes have been approved for use

    There's an 8 months pregnant woman being sent to city West to sleep on the floor while 4,000 pledged houses cannot be used. What is wrong with this country?



  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Maybe a bit like the Republicans in Texas have been doing, send some of these people to the politicians homes (those that made the call to have unlimited people come in without proper accommodation in place)



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Heard a report that Irish water is telling the builders who are currently building near ringsend at the old bottle factory that they will not have a proper pump in place for water supply for 6 years :) Ireland only we could create a company like this that takes 6 years for a pump incredible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,569 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    So SF/Eoin O’Broin wants the Government to reintroduce a ban on evictions, on top of SF’s stance that if elected, they would remove owner sale as a legal reason for ending a tenancy.

    Surely someone explained to this jackass that when he says things like that, more owners get spooked and decide that there will never be a better time to exit the rental market.

    And these are the clowns people expect to sort the housing crisis.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    It's a bit of a shambles. Policy after policy stoking demand and the government and their agencies unable to provide basic services to enable supply.




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭enricoh


    The missus had a place before we met n has it rented out. She has it rented cheap n never hears from them as a result. I'm sick of saying to her to flog it before anymore anti landlord crap comes in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We had a similar scenario in the noughties in a house share. Landlord with multiple properties was happy to charge rent that met mortgage plus costs until he started going out with an estate agent.

    Mass exodus when she took the pance, pardon my language.

    Alot to be said about deals that suit all parties



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And to compound this, the angst generated by the water mains works on north strand, starting today, shows how hard and disruptive it’ll be to get meaningful water main and electricity cabling work done across the city.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    And from Reading that article the beneficiaries of said works will be paying diddly squat in taxes. Outright robbery



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Construction was heavily concentrated in the commercial sector over the 10's. This appears to be well supplied for now much of that labour is freed up for resedintial

    In the 70's the UK took in many Irish and gave them jobs. I note that housing output in the UK is falling heavily. Surely there is scope their to increase our construction labour. It would be much more convenient for them to come to Ireland than any other EU country.

    I have many uncles/aunts in the UK. There children and grand children are beginning to examine the prospect of reversing the journey of their fathers/mothers. Some had already purchased homes in the crash here.

    There are glaring solutions to most of the issues presented here, it's the willingness of those in charge to grasp those solutions that is the problem



  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Can you please cite your source for "Construction was heavily concentrated in the commercial sector over the 10s"?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,612 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There was virtually no houses build from 2008 to 2014. Commercial construction started faster than house building which did not really start in Dublin until 2016. At that stage commercial was starting to bomb along

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Seems Catriona Carey hasn’t paid her own mortgage in 10 years. And is only now under threat of repossession. How the hell can someone not pay for 10 years without being evicted. It shows everything that’s wrong with our housing market. And makes me wonder why the hell I should bother paying my mortgage. Raging that people get away with this



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Here come the big tax breaks for landlords. Which will drive investors into the market to bid up property prices again.

    Post edited by The_Conductor on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,500 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    What is being proposed?

    Post edited by The_Conductor on


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,612 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Government have no other choice. 60-100 k houses that are vacant are owners are unwilling to rent. LL issuing notice to vacate and selling rental properties at an astronomical rate. 3.5-4k units leaving the rental sector each year for the last five years and the rate of exit rising.

    750 rental properties on daft nationwide at present. What's your solution

    Post edited by The_Conductor on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭SummerK


    Build more houses that people can afford to buy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,061 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    What about the people that cannot afford to buy?

    What about people who dont want to buy?

    What about students? People on placements around the country?


    There are so many people for whom renting is a choice believe it or not, not everyone is in a situation to buy a house and put down roots. The rental market is incredibly important for any country including this.



Advertisement