Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Acres scheme

  • 09-08-2022 6:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 652 ✭✭✭


    Mods please amalgamate if there's another thread, I just can't find it if there is. The search on Boards is poor

    Back to the new Acres Scheme.

    If the acres is going to be based on a points system similar to the Reap scheme does that mean you have to be scored every year? That reap scheme looked a pure balls, i don't know how you could get an any way decent payment as they are looking for so many varieties of plants in the low input pasture and also in the Hay meadows. With ours we'd be lucky to see 2 or 3 in the grassland. Then the right kick in the hole is thistles, docks, rushers, moss and ragwort are considered weeds and attract a negative marking.

    It looks like another payment cut in the guise of a results based system. We got cut from reps to Glas and now this is going to be another cut. If the scheme isn't going to pay a fair price for the activities then why would anyone bother.



«13456735

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think a lot of applicants are going to get a shock when it comes to results time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭minerleague


    The purpose of these schemes should be to attract the" middle of the road" farmer to become slightly less intensive and leave extra room for nature. there are more intensive farmers at one end who wont/cant change too much unless forced to and more extensive farmers who are already doing what these schemes want already. It seems to me that if headline figures of 7 or 10K that were put out early prove hard/impossible to achieve in reality or require constant inspection maybe uptake wont be what they expect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭Diarmuid B


    I got into the pilot REAP scheme and to be honest it’s some of the handiest money you’ll make. Very little needed to be done with the fields that you put into it provided they are low input pasture and you’re not ploughing slurry and fertiliser on them fields. Basically pick the fields that you have that you can’t farm intensively (wet fields/boggy ground/stoney ground etc etc).

    with this new scheme some of the conditions to meet to get the payments are so simple. Use LESS slurry spreading, plant a hedge or a bunch of trees, stick up a 1/2/3metre fence in from your hedge and leave it up for the summer months to let birds/animals nest. Sow some wild bird cover or strips in a field for the winter and you get more money,

    I guess lads like me with poor/average can make great use of these schemes whereas your reseeded/intensive farms will find it fairly difficult to pull a good payment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,775 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    We already moved to low stock rates and weaned off fertiliser mostly. Hoping this might be an easy win.

    however, our advisor said that unless you get into a tier 1 application then it’s unlikely to be successful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Silverdream


    It'll be interesting to see the payment levels. I hope I'm wrong but I think the Cabbage head Ryan has got his way in getting "visual tangible" green measures. So the days of just getting the form filling right are about to end. Inspection based payments on the way



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,904 ✭✭✭kk.man


    I'm seriously thinking of not joining up. Might go more intensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭Dinzee Conlee


    I’m the same Brian - little stock, no fertiliser…

    I’d be afraid of the tier 1 thing as well - I think it will be over subscribed, as lots of people have gone down the extensive, little fertiliser route and see this as an ‘easy win’

    I’ll be annoyed if I don’t get in, the few bob I make from the farm, you could say the GLAS payment accounts for a lot of it… No GLAS/ACRES payment would be a big sting for me… 🙁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭Young95


    is this scheme open yet ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,511 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    I was iffy about extending the GLAS scheme again this year but we did. However I doubt we will be joining the new ACRES scheme and it's not to do with going more intensive but more to do with taking back control on how we farm our land - the way we want too. We don't use artificial fertilizer except for establishing the GLAS wild bird cover.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,328 ✭✭✭tanko




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Silverdream


    It's the amount of hoops you have to jump through now to get a few quid. Counting grass types, taking pictures on apps then uploading them, fencing off this and that from God knows what. Then the big headline in the Farmers junknel that there's payments of over €1k/hectare to be got, but what they failed to mention is you are planting Trees in that hectare so it's gone forever then.

    Kinda thinking the same now and might not bother with it. For the few k you get it takes the enjoyment out of farming and introduces a ball of stress. Average payment in Glass was over 4k for Farmers, the way things are gone you'd need 8k today to be the same value but wait and see you'll be doing well to get what you got in Glas.

    I'll see what these advisors come up with, it'll be another field day for them but this time if I don't like the plan then he can shove it up his hole



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,841 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    That had to happen - the days of money for old rope were not going to pass EU auditors going forward



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 344 ✭✭Hershall


    I did the AETS course last week your planner will score the lipp in yr 1 3 and 5. Most of the weeds i have are negatively marked. It would suit a big farm being extensively farmed if the suitable weeds/plants were present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭Young95




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,328 ✭✭✭tanko


    EU auditors don’t seem to have a problem with armchair farmers getting tens of thousands of euros every year based on what they did twenty years ago, funny that isn’t it, any amount of money for old rope there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭SuperTortoise


    I've honestly given up on trying to remember, done that course last month and the one thing that stuck in my head was the shear ammount of new names put on essentially the same thing.

    As for the new scheme, i'm really undecided, could do with the few pound but i don't want to spend 5 years jumping through hoops for it, there's a real smack of the boiling frog in the pan about the whole thing, get enough of us to sign up to basically neglect our land for 5 years, and just like the BPS they will pay just enough that we have to sign up but not enough to make a living.

    Tempted to tell them to stick it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    On the weeds in lipp, nettles & thistles present in same are regarded as a negative thing, this i cannot understand????? You won't find very many thistles & nettles in land anyway intensively farmed.

    Recently only topped the lipp in glas & the hood of the topper was moving with a sorts of creepy Crawleys e.t.c after the cutting. Are these not the kind of lads they want.

    Obviously need to wait & see on the new scheme as rates & specific measures are uncertain for now.but can see myself likely waiting until others jump in for their 1st year & get a handle on it.

    In glas things were chopped & changed during the first number of tranches when opened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    Id agree, surely thistles etc would be good for pollinators etc....flowering plants ??????


    You would think if its called low input pasture it should be let it grow the way it does naturally not just an artificial selection.....if you get negatively marked on plants that naturally grow yhere does that not just incentivise spraying them....which removes a plant those insects use???


    Is there ever any justification for negative scoring of those plants? .... do farm organisations ever ask for a scientific underpinning for these scoring systems...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    The planners who delivered the one day course, even said you could spot spray the negative nettles & thistles in lipp as boom isn't allowed & spot is.

    Imagine lads out in year one spot spraying the nettles & thistles in the hope of a better score come year 3 on the assessment card

    ACA members seemingly had more involvement in the drawing up of this new scheme more than any scheme in the past according to the planners.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭SuperTortoise


    Not compulsory no, my planner advised to do it, get payed for the day as well so not too bad i suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,328 ✭✭✭tanko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,841 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Thats a separate issue - in any case you would want to take it up with successive governments and the main farming orgs who continue to staunchly oppose changes in that area. I would also point out that CAP has been moving away from a production subs based payment for nearly 30 years now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,841 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    That does sound like a clusterfook alright - alot of the problems with earlier schemes was the lack of training and knowledge among the planners themselves, doesn't say much for ACA either:(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 344 ✭✭Hershall


    Good to have. You get 156 euro whether you join scheme or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 344 ✭✭Hershall


    Rushes, thistles, docks and nettles all of which i have are negative because they do not sequester carbon. You couldn't make it up.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭Dinzee Conlee


    I see the journal has some more detail on this today…

    Has anyone had a look, and if there is actually much detail behind the headline?

    https://www.farmersjournal.ie/payment-rates-for-acres-revealed-715380



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,710 ✭✭✭Cavanjack


    For those who say they are not joining. Will we now not need to be in an environmental scheme to hold onto our full payments in the new cap?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    Such bullshit......I'm probably displaying my ignorance here but if a green plant grows and in the process takes in carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and makes some of that carbon part of its bid and root system + breaks up soil with said root......how could it not be sequestering carbon and aiding the soil to be less compacted and healthier therefore more able to sequester?


    Not to mention provide foot etc for pollinators?


    Are the just looking for excuses not to pay snd make more of a job for de lads....


    I can't figure out why they aren't challenged on stuff like this if it is bullshit...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    I want the money but will it be worth the hassle at all?


    I'm not going out spot spraying thistles/docks ffs.....bad for my back, wallet, morale you name it.....the fact that I suspect its nonsense makes it harder to swallow....


    If it can be scientifically justified I'd have less of a problem but for that kind of bull I nearly think I'd rather have more control on my working time on my property that I paid through the nose for .....it feels more and more like you are a slave at the whims of jobsworths................and the money on offer ain't great ........ they should at least be made justify what they are at and have it held up to some scrutiny rather than seemingly making stuff up as they go along to reduce payments but still remove any autonomy......there's too much inertia too.....every mam and his dog knows calendar farming is the height of nonsense but there it is every year sitting in the corner waiting to **** you over..


    There's too much jnterference to our longterm detriment the way things are going.....im beginning to think we would be better off not taking the money and exerting a little more influence on our businesses rather thsn have industry groups/various vested interests and people it wont affect materially make decisions for us............



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,328 ✭✭✭tanko


    I did it recently, you’ll have to find someone else to bring you😂, it’s worth it to see the dexters alone if you haven’t seen them already, they’re some sight to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,826 ✭✭✭blackbox


    I guess the reason for the negative scoring for docks, thistles, etc. is so that they don't give money to people who aren't actively farming and have just let their land go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,328 ✭✭✭tanko


    No, they’re too quiet for my liking, i’ll stick to the Limousins and Salers for now🤔



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Silverdream


    You hit the nail there. Its all these vested interests who now have a say on how to farm. I think you'll be signing up for a big entourage of these feckers trapesing across the farm planning, judging and directing you while taking a good chunk of money for doing nothing. And then if the day is too cold to go walking farms they can now use the big camera in the sky spot the rushers or see if you are spreading fertilizer.

    I think they've squeezed the last egg out of the poor old goose now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    Is letting it go not kind of the point🤔..low input pasture..biodiversity and all that


    I can top in late late summer after all the auld biodiversity has had its wicked way with each other in the great orgy of spring/summer but they want to incentivise a lad going out with a knapsack......its cracked if you ask me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 825 ✭✭✭cuculainn


    my understanding is nettles and thistles are a sign of high nitrogen content......if you want to encourage wildflowers etc you cut the grass and remove it, thereby removing nutrients from the soil.....wildflowers dont like high nitrogen etc

    someone who has neglected the land, depending on how they neglected it, ie if they never fertilised it etc could get the highest payment for having the most positive identifiers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    I have one small place that has been neglected......and If I neglect it anymore you'll be talking about a sea of ragworth, thistles, docks nettles.......it hasn't gotten nitrogen since I can remember ....


    But I tidy it up by topping and pulling the ragworth, would be interesting to get soil tested



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    Don’t know about nettles but we’ve fields with thistles that have got very little fertilizer in the last 20+ years



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    Thistles will grow naturally on dry ground & if present in a intensive farm, they will be sprayed if a problem in number's. Nettles are manure reliant.no one should be attempting to justify such nonsense of thistles present in pasture for lipp being regarded as a negative indicator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,537 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    The recon around these parts that it takes good fattening land to grow thistles... and from what I can see that appears to be true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    Has anyone looked their eligibility on Dafm, see we’re outside of a marked area, does that mean we can’t get in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,044 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Reality though is you'd want to be having a lot of cattle to make up that money



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    Oh you are probably right......but if you value your time and the hassle and how much of it you will have when they screw you out of it with marking/scoring schemes after you've put in time/effort investment complying


    That's what has me wondering if it will be worth it this time.....some of the proposed stuff goes agsinst the science afaics.....There's a breakdown in trust when it comes to me given some of the stuff that happened in the past with bad advice etc when I was taking over from my father......


    Added to that is a malicious fantasy that if lot opted out instead of rushing headlong in .... powers that be might be forced to come back to the table with a better offer.....or at least scientific justification for what they are at....answers to questions about broader implications/other industries etc


    My gut tells me we should be attempting to have a little more control on our destinies than giving it away but I suppose I know in the end I'll be forced to follow the herd or lose out......you would wonder though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,879 ✭✭✭Ten Pin


    The budget allocation for ACRES is €1.5 billion.

    The total payments adds up to a max of €525 million (50k participants @ €10.5k max payment each).

    That leaves €975 million for administration etc, is that the usual ratio for these schemes: 1 for you, 2 for them

    As pointed out below, it's probably €300 million per annum for 5 years = €1.5 billion

    Post edited by Ten Pin on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭minerleague


    Two types of entry , general and co-operation, marked areas are the latter ( I'm in this ) so you are in first one. On IFJ payment rates shown - planting trees around farmyard looks might suit some. ( over2k for 0.5ha max -- 0.18 ha minimum )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,234 ✭✭✭amacca


    If that's accurate I'd bet our dear media won't be clamouring to ask them why that is? .... somehow I cant see Cooper, Cuddihy, McInerney et al demanding any answers to that 🙃


    The above is what I'm afraid the scheme might be.........I think a valid point is made about farmers timevand I think another point should be made re govt side having to justify negative scoring on things explicitly


    If they are justified then there shouldn't be a problem



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,879 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    Chatting to my ag advisor about this recently...he doesnt know if he will do this scheme....seems to be alot of bullshìt in it....he doesnt fancy going around playing the bad cop...marking down farmers scores etc....

    Dont blame him...

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    It's actually a lot worse than that.

    In terms of payment, ACRES General offers a maximum payment of €7,311 per applicant per calendar year, with an expected average payment (based on 30,000 participants in this approach) in the region of €5,000.

    Actual payment rates will be based on the actions selected and their satisfactory implementation.

    ACRES Co-operation will offer a maximum payment of €10,500 per applicant per calendar year.

    So this means 150 million for 30,000 farmers and let's be generous and say 10k for 20,000 so another 200 million so 350 million in total leaves 1.15 billion for something or other.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement