Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

14142444647160

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 807 ✭✭✭greyday


    Maybe if you kept your posts a bit shorter and to the point, obviously it wont help people understand you any better but it would save people a lot of time before they give up reading and it would be better for the planet.

    I have to say you can be funny but when you drag it out it gets very boring, using exceptions thinking you have a gotcha moment rarely works and certainly doesn't in your case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,497 ✭✭✭plodder


    To be fair no women left in top level sport is an extreme which would firstly depend on enough good but not exceptional male athletes transitioning and secondly the sport. You will never see enough good athletes transitioning for no women left (I think).


    Though I think the original point is correct - that if all segregation were removed from sport then there would be no women in the top tiers of any sport that involves strength or speed. Of course, you can't say all sport because that includes the likes of shooting and equestrian where other factors are more important.

    I made this point before, but it's worth repeating. These beliefs (myths) emanated from university campuses decades ago, based on research that showed the performance gap between men and women was reducing. Some people extrapolated from that to believe that if all social factors could be accounted for, then the difference would eventually reduce to zero. And if that were true, then there really would be no good reason to keep trans women out of women's sport. Now, we have actual data that confirms what most people believed anyway - that there will always be a performance gap, the argument has moved on to a different but related belief, which is just as false, namely that women's sport only exists because men were afraid of being beaten by women. It's a clever argument as far as it goes because you can't use data to refute it. But, the decision makers in sport aren't going to take it seriously.

    I could compete as a man against good female athletes and get well beaten but I'm not a good athlete, if I was I would likely win. The male puberty advantage comes into play where you are comparing athletes of a similar level within their respective sex categories. The disadvantage of transitioning is less than the male female disadvantage.


    Large road running races are a great comparator. When I used to run them as a mediocre middle aged runner, I'd finish around the 33rd percentile usually, and be beaten by loads of women, but they were nearly always 10-20 years younger than me, and much more competitive within their own sex. I can only recall a handful of women the same age as me, who'd beat me, and they were at a very high standard.

    Age and sex are the two biggest factors and that's the reason why sport is segregated that way. That doesn't stop anyone from organising events segregated in other ways, or using handicap systems to equalise whatever advantages exist. I'd see that as a way forward for some forms of participative sport, rather than at the top competitive level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    it would be better for the planet.

    Of all the attempts to shame anyone who doesn’t agree with you into silence, that has to be the ultimate gotcha! Well done Sir/Ma’am 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭JayRoc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    I think I would be in the elite category for scrolling. Based on the practice I get bypassing OEJ’s posts 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I won’t complain about your having any unfair advantages if you use the ignore function 😉



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


     I want to see women being given equal opportunities as men have, and given equal recognition, respect and rewards for their achievements. That doesn’t have to come at the expense of men

    It won't. They won't even notice.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    The discussion needs to start at A) why do we have separate categories and do we need them? B) If we have decided that we need separate categories what should be the criteria for allocation to those categories.

    Regardless of the history of the categorisation (and undoubtedly there was a misogynistic element to it), today I would argue it is vital in order to be able to recognise female athletes for accomplishments. And if it is vital then there needs to be a criteria to govern who is eligible, and the argument needs to be over that eligibility.

    In OEJ's "defence", as much as that makes sense, I believe they don't actually think there should be separate categories, so the logic of allowing transwomen into female sports is understandable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    The evidence of a rise of so-called “MRA” types would beg to differ Podge - people who constantly play the victim as though women being regarded as equals in society has actually come at the expense of men.

    I say people, because it’s not just men who portray men as the victims of women being regarded as being of equal status in society, there are women involved in portraying men as victims too. They noticed alright, but thankfully people don’t pay them that much attention, because they see their efforts for what they are, much like many of the grifter types who are making bank off stoking the ‘gender’ and ‘culture’ wars.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    There will always be "types" who take any reasonable position and go **** mental over it.

    If you mean equalising pay and prize money between men and women's sport then I would agree that there will be a massive uproar over that. Some of the points which have a kernel of truth in terms of the economics of the sports glosses over the historical disparities between them so its a lot more complicated then just "men's football creates more money so they should be paid more".

    If you mean mixing the sports and essentially removing women's sports as I believe you have suggested in the past, then men won't even notice. It literally won't make a difference to them at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,046 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Let's just take the line of thought to the end and skip all the "segregationist" in-between bit then.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,046 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The USA ladies team generates greater views and revenue than the mens team (success begets success), they did however choose to go on lower paid guaranteed salaries vs. the bonus related salaries that the men have (the men generally have their club wage to fall back on as well).

    As was pointed out earlier, a big problem for women's sport has been gaining an audience, they are typically marketed the same as the mens and are going after the same set of male eyeballs, women don't watch women play sport in as great numbers and there will always be pay/wage disparity where this exists (with exceptions where audiences are comparable). Even with football sponsorship tv advertisting, 90% of it is gambling, take aways and cars which are male oriented and much lower value "views" than a comparably watched female oriented show.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    That there needs to be such an argument is crazy, obviously athletes who went through male puberty would dominate women's sport if they were allowed into it.

    There’s nothing controversial about that, anyone who follows a couple of sports knows that. People who argue that is not the case need to be treated with a great deal of suspicion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    If you mean mixing the sports and essentially removing women's sports as I believe you have suggested in the past, then men won't even notice. It literally won't make a difference to them at all.


    No the sports and category labels could stay as they are, it would be the participants which would be different, and not for a minute do I imagine the participation rates among either men, women, boys or girls would be so different that it would be to the detriment of anyone or the sports or competitions in which they choose to participate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    That’s not taking any line of thought I’ve suggested to it’s logical conclusion? What you’re doing is like suggesting that the logical conclusion of giving anyone a baseball bat is that they won’t use it for the purposes for which it is intended. Just because that’s a thing in American fraternities doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t let anyone play baseball, or go to college for that matter, lest they be “initiated into manhood” by a small number of fcuknuggets who imagine themselves as being descended from Greek nobility.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazing



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,517 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    Is there any issues being raised where female to male trans players want to play in male contact sport ?

    where they would be at a major physical disadvantage and risk . or is it only the other way around where the trans player would be the one with the advantage ?



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    At the moment it mainly seems to the male to female trans want to play in women's sports but I would say the same risks as being discussed now would also arise in the opposite scenario. Either way it is dangerous especially in contact sports.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Maybe some do but I doubt most. Those who argue that people should be included in teams according to their gender rather than biological sex are trying to be nice at best (but only in one direction) or slaves to ideology (because once an idea is progressive/far left, they're down with it, no matter what) at worst, and will lie, bully, gas-light, distort as much as they like, while thinking they're good people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Contact sports by their very nature involve a degree of safety risks, and measures to mitigate those safety risks which have developed over time to include changes to the rules, protective headgear and so on.

    There may well be few transgender athletes right now who wish to participate in the men’s competitions, but they do exist, and there are a couple of reasons why they aren’t more visible in sports -

    https://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/18802987/mack-beggs-transgender-wrestler-change-laws-watch-wrestle-boys

    I’d liken it to the observation that there aren’t many openly gay men in soccer and there are some plausible explanations -

    • No interest in playing soccer
    • Being made to feel like they don’t belong in soccer
    • The perception that soccer is a man’s game, for the manliest of manly heterosexual men to engage in all manner of homoerotic rituals and they’re just not into that sort of thing
    • Risk of being outed
    • Risk of physical, mental or emotional abuse
    • Risk of being injured

    I’ve no doubt everyone has their own individual reasons for why they do or don’t wish to participate in any given sports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Do we have to guess because saying it out loud is bigoted and transphobic? You think trans are only trans to cheat? Don’t make us guess, tell us what you really feel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I don't think that's what he's saying. He's saying that trans men don't compete with men in contact sport because of the risk of injury to them.

    There's also a factor of the trans man having less strength and stamina meaning they have to work much much harder to keep up.

    I suspect its those two factors that discourage trans men from competing with men. It's worth noting that the IRFU will permit this, subject to assessment to ensure the safety of the trans man.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Misrepresenting is all you folks have.

    Because female bodied athletes don't have the physical strength to compete against male bodied athletes. Obviously. As we all know. You can pretend this is only bigotry all you like, even though it's an extremely dishonest take, but it's just biological reality that male bodied people are physically stronger than female bodied people.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Exactly. This should be obvious, but Overheal is out to nitpick things he can shout "bigot!" about. Although I'm actually a she - just saying, as it's kinda funny given the thread. 😊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    You told me to use my imagination now you complain when I use it. Rich



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    When asked to use your imagination you default to considering someone with a different opinion to you to be a bigot.

    Says more about you tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    LMFAO okay.

    Also, I didn't realize you were their official spokesperson.

    I don't think that's what he's saying.

    hahaha


    I noted you didn't get their gender right, either, while you were pretending to be so sure about them and what they were even saying



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Why has someone gone and made that list? Is it because when it happens it's because it's exceptional?

    When Billy Jean King beat Riggs (world no.2 at the time), she was 29, he was 55.

    If there were no difference there would be no need for segregation by sex at all? Is that what you want?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Wow, we're going after the listicle writers now with hushed whispers and conspiratorial innuendo?

    This is getting truly desperate.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    You brought up the "listicle" and I am not sure what the hushed whispers and conspiratorial innuendos in that post are supposed to be?

    The list includes a WWE participant who won a staged fight ffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    It also includes a Boxer, American Footballer, Tennis Player, Nascar Driver, 2 Baseball pitchers, Horse Jockey, Surfer, Extreme Sailer, and 2 Gold Medalists. But sure let's impugn Chyna for being a performance wrestler.

    Any one of these examples, if true, obliterates this bigoted notion:

    Because female bodied athletes don't have the physical strength to compete against male bodied athletes. Obviously. As we all know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    The list includes a WWE participant who won a staged fight ffs.


    Have to admit, I balked at that entry myself 😂

    For me the whole idea of comparisons and lists and broad generalisations about men and women is just ripe for cherry picking, ignoring the reality that there are a multitude of factors which influence anyone’s attraction to any sport in the first place, let alone the idea of whether or not they could be considered talented enough to be competitive, and whether it was possible to develop that talent to drive them to elite status in the sport or sports or whichever events they chose to compete in.

    These sort of pound for pound boxing and athletic sprinter times and all the rest of it would under no circumstances constitute credible scientific evidence of anything. It’s literally either too broad, or too specific, but in most cases the comparisons simply lack context, which is why an entertainment industry masquerading as a sport throws up the sorts of anomalies like Chyna and that other Irish wrestler, Becky Lynch, who refers to herself as “The Man” -

    https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/wwe-why-becky-lynch-called-the-man

    Whatever floats your boat I guess 😒



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes, an American footballer who kicker a point. About the most individual task someone in sports can do and not really an example of competing against men.

    The tennis player was, as previously mentioned, a player in their prime against a 55 year old.

    The baseball players were someone drafted into a mixed team, and someone who did well in an exhibition game.

    The jockey seems to have done exceptionally well, fair play to her.

    The surfer is notable for winning entry into a male competition. For the record they have a women's division the last two years and she won it (ten years after qualifying for the male tournament).

    One of the Olympians was in skeet shooting - I see no reason to have segregated sports here so well done to her.

    This is not a particularly good argument for the idea of non-segregated sports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Whether you feel it carries through to desegregation of the sports, you should at least be able to acknowledge it carries through to defeating the blanked statement made earlier.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No it doesn't.

    Like for like, female athletes can not compete for strength with male ones. An individual example of someone defeating that statement does not "defeat" the statement, but even if it did absolutely none of those examples do that anyway. They are, at best, an example of the top percentile of female athletes overlapping a lower percentile of male athletes.

    I am completely comfortable stating that in the absence of segregated sports, women would win <1% of all Olympic medals for example. That makes the statement pretty fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Like for like, female athletes can not compete for strength with male ones. 

    This is a nonsensical statement. If they are like for like competitors they have like for like strength.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Modern sports records cover hundreds of thousands of athletes. We have records of every game ever played, the best times in every event, world records, etc.

    So a list of 12 times a women beat a man does not make the point you think it does. It undermines your position.

    It's like a human racing a horse 100,000 times and he wins once then says "see? humans are just as fast as horses!"

    (The list is dubious also.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Yet you all argue edge cases at the top 1% of competition sport like Usain Bolt as well to exclude trans athletes at all competitive levels from the competition. Thanks for helping me illustrate.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    Not a single woman will be in the top 1% of basically any Olympic sport. The top female X will not be in the top 1000 male X - this is true for almost all sports. That is what I mean by like for like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Zhang Shan just stopped existing after you scrolled through the listicle?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Not a single woman will be in the top 1% of basically any Olympic sport except some specific exceptions such as skeet shooting.

    I have corrected it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    Inclusion is inclusion. Why don't you want women to compete in mens categories? Is it unfair if Amanda Nunes doesn't get to challenge Alexander Volkanovski?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Grand, let's keep iterating away from the incorrect blanket statements.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    The assumption some people have is that it iterates away to all sports being equal. But it doesn't, because that is not iteration and biology work.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Why don't you want women to compete in mens categories?

    I what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    Should women compete against men? Refusal to answer is admission of defeat



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    You've told me you haven't read the thread, without telling me you haven't read the thread.

    Everyone should compete against everyone. Good enough for war, good enough for football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,442 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Haven't time to read back through the thread but I assume the IRFUs decision has been debated?

    Of course, we have folk who say it sets a dangerous precedent.

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/irfu-ban-on-transgender-women-sets-dangerous-precedent-say-opponents-41904307.html

    It's totally the correct decision. Do we really want to see huge transgender rugby players seriously injuring much smaller female ones? They aren't living in the real world.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement