Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
1226227229231232315

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    The only partnership Ukraine are or were in with NATO was the European Partnership for peace, of which Russia and Ireland are also partners. By your reakoning Russia should invade Ireland and declare war on itself. But following the twisted garbage logic you spew here that does seem reasonable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Which shows how irrelevent it was. 2008.

    Russia started its coercion against Ukraine not when it started NATO membership but when it was about to sign EU treaty.

    You cant keep your lies straight.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    Keeping lies straight is impossible when you copy paste 500 word essays not of your own making from different sources.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,502 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Well, if you go back even further to the late 90s and early 2000s, NATO was questioning its own raison d'etre. The Soviet Union was gone, but a lot of former Soviet States were very concerned that the new Russian Republic would go back to its old ways.

    Well they were right, and I think no one could deny that if Vladimir Putinnwas not the leader of Russia, NATO would not exist anymore. Instead, Putin has reinvigorated NATO, reminding all European countries that Russia belives it has the right to meddle in its affairs and the only way to stop them is by a firm defensive alliance. Russias response to that is to try to destroy Ukraine and kill its people. No wonder they want to join NATO.

    Sure even we (Ireland, in case that wasnt clear) were staunchy against taking sides during the height of the cold war, but we are now closer to joining NATO than ever before. The reason being that we have now developed strong links with Eastern European nations and we now understand their struggle for freedom. And we also know how Russia will use any excuse to take over a free nation.

    I guess, in that context, I have ti ask you Bob, do you not understand how Russia operates in destroy nations, or do you just feel so safe living in Ireland that you think "itll never happen here" and that Russia would never invade Ireland because we toy with the idea of joining NATO. Because, while that risk is admittedly remote for Ireland, its very real for our Polish, Estonian and Lithuanian buddies!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭fash


    In May 2002 Putin said (here)

    that Ukraine was entitled to decide on its own whether to join NATO and that he did not see such a decision as one that would “cloud” Russian-Ukrainian relations.

    Further, Russia signed the NATO-Russia Founding Act, pledging to uphold "respect for sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security".

    As regards NATO membership, a country which is subject to partial occupation cannot join NATO - because that instantly triggers article 5 and a war between the US, Western Europe & Russia.

    So no, after 2014 Ukraine could never join NATO - neither could Moldova nor Georgia (at least until after they fully expelled Russia).

    Hence, fear of NATO cannot be an explanation for the 2022 Russian invasion.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,326 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The journo who protested the invasion live on Russian TV is facing the possibility of 10 years in prison. Assuming she doesn't suddenly, by total coincidence, have a heart-attack before she was to be shipped off to a gulag.

    As I said two pages back, "competent leaders" don't need to prosecute and jail journalists pulling what amounted to Father Ted's "Down with this sort of thing" moment on TV. Her "crime", let's remember, was to do nothing but flourish a placard with "No war" written on it. That's it.

    This below action equates to 10 years' worth of punishment, 10 police officers raiding your house, and pre-trial detention.

    In other news, while not publicly confirmed, it seems like "partisans" struck a Russian air-base in Crimea on Tuesday, destroying scores of Russian airplanes. Satellite photography confirmed the destruction; I wonder how much of a fluke the result was, what kind of equipment was used here. That Ukraine can strike targets 150km+ from the front-lines might give Russia pause for thought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 338 ✭✭XVII


    >>Hence, fear of NATO cannot be an explanation for the 2022 Russian invasion.

    Literally from your own link:

    But President Putin stressed that Russia’s position on the expansion of the bloc remained unchanged.

    If you happen to dig a bit more:

    For a long time, Russia has opposed the eastward expansion of NATO. After the fall of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, Russian President Boris Yeltsin launched a transition to a market economy. The reforms, however, also brought high unemployment, inflation, and crippled the Russian military. Nonetheless, Washington went ahead with expanding its military alliance to include former Soviet states. Yeltsin's objections, including letters of protest to the Clinton administration and to leaders of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, were easily ignored, given the other difficulties Russia was already facing.[197] As NATO's expansion continued under the U.S. president George W. Bush, Russia's opposition would also continue under Vladimir Putin, who would eventually intervene in Georgia and Crimea.[197] While not excusing Russia's acts of aggression, a number of Western scholars and officials have long voiced concerns that Russia would view NATO's expansion as unfriendly at best, and a threat to its security at worst, especially if the alliance ends up surrounding the country in the most ambitious version of its expansion plans. The disregard for Russia's concerns and warnings, such as Yeltsin's letters and Putin's statement at the 2007 Munich security conference, has been described as a policy and strategic blunder.[198]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia%E2%80%93NATO_relations#Opposition_to_NATO's_enlargement

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/28/nato-expansion-war-russia-ukraine



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭fash


    XVII says:

    Literally from your own link:

    But President Putin stressed that Russia’s position on the expansion of the bloc remained unchanged.



    To be precise, the Kremlin quoted Putin as saying that Ukraine was entitled to make the decision independently. He does not see it as something that could cloud the relations between Russia and Ukraine. But President Putin stressed that Russia’s position on the expansion of the bloc remained unchanged.


    So are you suggesting that in fact when Putin said that, he was lying?

    That from his perspective, Ukraine was not entitled to make the decision independently? And that from his perspective, Ukraine joining NATO would cloud relations between Russia & Ukraine if Ukraine tried to do so?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭fash


    Even as recently as 2019, NATO was described as "brain-dead" - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50335257



  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭pjcb


    Genuinely confused. If Russia is occupying the Zaporizhzhia why are people saying they are shelling it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Russia signed both the Russia-NATO founding act and the Budapest agreement - the latter specifically with Ukraine.

    These are international treaties.

    The Founding Act expressly permits sovereign states of Europe (of which Ukraine is one) to make its own security arrangements e.g. join NATO

    The Budapest Agreement implicitly permit Ukraine to do so.

    Russia did not repudiate those agreements when Putin came to power. Why not, if Ukrainian and Georgian membership of NATO were red lines.

    This is how Russia acts. Signs agreements. Expects everyone else to abide by them yet they can play by their own rules.

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    To all the Putin bots and apologists etc on this forum look at what your crowd are doing. You will all be silent and have no comment on this. Jailing harmless people for 10 bloody years. The absolute shame of it. What a joke of a country. How can ye come on here with a straight face and defend this sh1t and talk up the Putin regime. When they are resorting to this the argument is lost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    It’s not (sustainable for the Russian economy). But then we all knew that.

    The effect that sanctions are having on the Russian economy is no less spectacular than that of Ukrainian SoF’s recent holiday trip to a certain Crimean airbase. It’s just not as loud and colourful to observe.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,326 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's a small but shocking reminder that Russia is not, and should not be considered, a country friendly towards any neighbour West of its borders - be it culturally, politically, legislatively and so on. Arguing moral equivalence between it and a flawed-but-trying-to-improve country like Ukraine only highlights the arguer as being of Bad Faith.

    Always worth further reminding: this is a country that decriminalised Domestic Abuse. I can only shudder thinking on what that journalist is currently going through.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    Agreed with 1 exception of a country west of its border, Belarus. I was not aware Russia had decriminalised Domestic Abuse but it does not surprise me. However, oddly people seem to be surprised when I inform them that Belarus re-introduced Serfdom a decade ago. Effectively about 1.5 million Belarusians are the property of state collective farms. It is more than evident that there are 2 countries in Europe in a race to to outdo each other in a journey back to the middle ages.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I know I've said it before, but look to Belarus as the template to the future Russia wants for Ukraine, Georgia, any other ex USSR republics and the Baltic States too if they weren't already in NATO.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,326 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I hadn't known that about the introduction of serfdom. That's astonishing, though I've noted even the apologists and intellectual contrarians stop short at focusing too hard on Belarus - given its status is an uncomfortable reality about the end result of Russian influence. Ukraine openly told that influence to F right off.

    But yes, Russia decriminalised domestic abuse, and recall russian politicians at the time hailing it as a return to "family values" and pushback against the Western liberalisation, feminisation of Russia. I believe women's shelters have to operate in secret because of an absence of state support or interest. Maybe things have got better, though I do doubt it.

    So whenever those parachutist posters come along trying to Whatabout or argue that Russia ain't so bad or the real enemy, I think of all those russian women being beaten and abused with the blessing of the state (so long as you don't break the skin; they're not total barbarians /s).

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭Field east


    “Russia created, owned, governed—————— “ You know ABSOLUTLY nothing about the history of Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen


    Thanks for that. I was not aware of that statement ever being made. It was however made at a time when even Russia was talking about joining NATO as at that point the world believed that cold war politics were over and the new mutual enemy for East & West was militant Islamic fundamentalism. Subsequent years eroded this loved up NATO/Russo atmosphere as the US realised that Putin was not Yeltsin and would never open up the Russian economy to US ownership of its assets and he became someone to be removed. The US saw the weakness in the Russian economy and the instability in its structures and wrongly assumed that Putin would be overthrown eventually with a coloured revolution of the type that the US were fond of orchestrating. It never happened as we all know.

    Obviously if Russia were in the process of joining NATO there would have been no objection to Ukraine joining as NATO wasn't a security threat to Russia.

    "So no, after 2014 Ukraine could never join NATO - neither could Moldova nor Georgia (at least until after they fully expelled Russia)"

    Then why was there a recommitment in November 2021 of both Ukraine and the US with the "U.S. Ukraine Charter on Strategic Partnership" which "affirmed that Ukraine will become a member of NATO."? There was also the buildup of the Ukrainian army with financial and military support from the US since 2014 that made it obvious that they were going to try and retake Crimea and the Donbass at some point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen


    Not sure misspelling the capitalised word in your post constitutes a valid refutation of my statement. Is it not a fact that the Bolsheviks created Ukraine's current borders and administered them as a soviet republic until 1991 before voluntarily ceding control?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,683 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its about as relevant as saying the UK created, owned and governed Ireland. They created the current borers and administered it as either a colony or part of the United Kingdom until 1922.

    Its using ostensibly accurate historical points without context to create a false impression.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭fash


    1. So you admit your following statement was wrong?

    " Russia created, owned, governed and subsequently gave away the country known as modern Ukraine. Its only stipulation for this huge geopolitical gesture was that due to its unique history and ethnic diversity it must remain a neutral state and not join ANY military bloc ( including a Russian military Bloc). "

    2. As regards the US affirming something which is not going to happen, you are reminded that not only has the US refused in the past few months to say that Ukraine would be allowed to join when Ukraine asked them to (and when the chips were down) but also that countries make never going to happen political statements all the time - e.g. Turkey joining the EU.



  • Registered Users Posts: 129 ✭✭rocky1813


    Excellent interview. Great to hear a voice of reason and someone speak the truth. Surprised CNN aired this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny


    Nonsense. Waters has turned into a USA hating Chomsky parrot. He can't understand that the Russians will wipe out the Ukrainians unless given as much military help as possible. I've been a Pink Floyd and Waters fan as long as I can remember, I've seen him twice in Dublin but he's been completely wrong about a lot of things the last few years. He needs to make peace with his daddy issues and realize war is very complex.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Even if God will tell that USA started war on Ukraine some of you will still saying that it's lies.Not surprised.

    This winter Europe will sell Ukraine to Putin for gas,same as they did for fertilizer and wheat already.The public opinion preparation process already started in Western media.

    But question is will Putin buy it because until winter Ukraine will be Putin's already.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭fash


    Whatever happened to the claim that Russia would take Ukraine in 3 days?

    Is the fact that the area under Russian occupation a small fraction of the amount occupied in 25 March "just a feint"/part of Russian maskyrovka?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Russia will take Ukraine in 3 days been widely used in Western media.Russia fighting against biggest army in Europe at the moment which are supported by NATO by weapons.

    Also Ukrainian army are same strongly mentally as Russian and same as Russian saying Russians Never give up and will fight until death same Ukrainians are saying.They all Slavic warriors on both sides, literally Russians killing Russians on Ukraine what is the biggest tragedy since Civil war in Russia happened after 1917 revolution.

    Putin before war already said that war on Ukraine will be huge tragedy for Russia.Same said some China politics about possible war on Taiwan



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭fash


    Russia taking Ukraine "in 3 days" was a Russian military and Russian media thing actually- hence "special military operation", the fact they only had supplies for 3 days in the Kyiv assault & the fact that Russian officers had phoned ahead for restaurant reservations in Kyiv.

    If you think "Russians don't give up", perhaps you should read up some more on history - from the war with Japan in 1905, to WW1 to the various surrenderings of millions of Soviet troops in WW2 - e.g. the 600k at Vyazma through to Afghanistan.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,326 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Easy way to avoid the tragedy of Russian deaths: pull the troops out of the foreign, sovereign country they invaded twice-over, and find a Third Party arbiter to head discussions over the supposed humanitarian concerns Putin would have us belief is the motivation for this invasion. Then let Ukraine continue charting whatever geopolitical direction it chooses.

    You know, if Russia's serious about being in Ukraine for the sake of Russian Speakers. The dogs on the street know their motivations aren't pure in the slightest but hey ho. Gotta cling onto whatever branches this scenario presents.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't read "sofa experts" media.And nobody ever won against Russia same as against Afganistan.

    Japan might won but Russia still has part of them territory,same as Viazma.

    Also remember how Russians left Afghanistan and how USA was run from there.Afghanistan still friends with Russia when with USA are not.

    Afghan soldiers has more respect to Russian than to Americans which were killing civilians and children.

    If American would fight on Ukraine they would flatten Kyiv to the ground in first days ! Together with woman and children!



Advertisement