Calvine, Scotland 1990. UFO photo hidden by UK released.

someone fuked a fray bentos pie tin over the hedge.

the first image is a fake though.

the second image is real.

jets sometimes tow angular shaped targets at high speed, for gunnery practice.

Paper Airplane

Some good analysis of the photo doing the rounds on reddit.

Whatever it is - experimental technology or UFO, the photo aint faked.

Funny that the reconstructed photo omits the trees and fence. The original seems like a weird angle.

Indeed, however I'm coming from the opposite side. The number (weight) of reports means simply there are a number of things in photographs/video we can't identify.

Likewise as for the credibility of experts, professionals and witnesses - people have demonstrated, regardless of background, that when it comes to the fantastic, they can either make stuff up or truly believe they've seen something (when they haven't). Again, to re-emphasize, in the 50's up to the 90's there have been millions of cases of abductions, sightings of "aliens", close encounters. Now that we all HD quality cameras in our back pockets, these have all miraculously dried up - demonstrating that millions of people, of all backgrounds, were lying, or believing something occurred that didn't.

Galileo and SETI are the search for extra-terrestrial signals and have nothing to do with determining unidentified photos/footage.

As for US congress - unsurprisingly there were few answers, and it was wandering into a bizarre area.

What evidence is there that the original photo was suppressed?

Can't wait for Avi Loebs super telescopes to get more pictures of flying pyramids.

When we had limited access to weak film cameras/video cameras, there were a vast amount of "encounters" allegedly being reported. Now that we all have instant access to high quality cameras/video these encounters have almost entirely stopped.

Likewise, every piece of footage or photograph happens to be unclear. 100% of them. That's approaching statistical impossibility. If we are having encounters with "aliens", are they just flying out of focus in every single instance someone has a camera/video camera? No, because many describe close encounters, slow moving objects, objects hovering.

It's a bunch of unclear footage of unidentified stuff. Likely unidentified because the footage isn't clear.

It's not like there's a bunch of saucers flying around "just out of focus" for 75 years. That's wishful thinking, which unfortunately becomes part of the equation for some people. And why not? It's exciting. Sadly it's just not logical.

Secret tech.

There are varying degrees of what is likely to be conclusive, visiting aliens is on the lower side.

I stand corrected on the Galileo project, from the perspective that they are not exclusively listening to signals but basically they are looking at stuff through telescopes. It's evidence of our curiosity, but not evidence there are "aliens visiting us", which is a subtext in this thread I am addressing.

Not sure why you keep repeating the phrase "Correlation does not equal causality" - nothing to do with my points.

If you are personally entertaining that some of these unidentified objects in the sky might be "aliens", okay, but that's called wishful thinking. We all do it, but in this case it's not logical for the reasons I've given.

In my personal opinion, I believe there is life and possibly intelligent life out there in the universe. However do I believe that "aliens" are crossing vast tracts of space (and time) via interstellar travel to visit our planet and stay juuuust out of focus, every time, for 75 years? No, that's stupid.

This is a cop out. There is no tangible evidence of "aliens", "ghosts, "mermaids" or "bigfoot", just evidence of stuff we can't identify. So just one side of it.

You could publish 4K video footage from 10 metres distance with Dolby 5.1 audio of a UFO and no one would be any the wiser.

The maths say that there are probably millions of sentient civilisations in the Universe. The maths also say, that the probability of those others a) finding us and b) having the means and/or the motivation to come to our Solar system particularly, are infinitesimal.

So, the fact that UFOs were never a thing before Man himself achieved flight, and only became a truly widescale phenomenon when Man himself achieved military grade rocketry and, soon after, space flight, means all of these sightings are of some man-made device or other.

UFOs have been a thing since early civilisation. From multiple Roman accounts of flaming flying objects and chariots in the sky, to the middle ages with sightings like the Nuremberg spectacle, to 'airships with powerful searchlights' in the 1800s.

The truth of the UFO/UAP phenomenon is likely to be far stranger than fiction. Having seen one myself many years ago, I know these things are real, the Pentagon and US Navy says they're real and now thankfully, Congress is looking into it very seriously. There are physical craft in our skies that manoeuvre in ways that seem to defy the laws of known physics.

Whether they're aliens or not is another debate entirely. Some of the more prominent researchers in this field are of the opinion their origins are actually much more complex. One theory is that they are intelligences from another universe or dimension that exists right alongside our own, where they have the ability to move between them at will. And that how they show themselves while here can change depending on circumstances and prevailing culture. It's clear that some of this phenomena has the ability to change human conscious perception. Consciousness itself seems to be inexorably linked to it in some way.

Another theory is that they are us from a distant future (indeed, this is what one of the military witnesses to the Rendlesham Forest incident was "told" by one of the beings). Another theory is that they could be "ultraterrestrials" - super advanced intelligences who have the technology to mostly avoid us but who've been here all along. Again another one is that some of the craft seen are US black projects run by private aerospace companies, who reversed engineered technology from crash retrievals. Believe it or not there's a fairly decent trail of testimony and evidence that "off world vehicles" have been retrieved by the US.

There's other theory's too. But it's all speculation. What's clear is that UAPs are getting more, not less, spotlight and people are beginning to take them much more seriously.

If these things are in the vicinity of a United States Air Force base, then you can bet your bottom dollar they are United States military property. Just like when you go into the Irish countryside and see a tractor in a field, that's the famer that owns the field's tractor, or a contractor the famer has let on to his property. It's not fairies, it's not ET or Yoda or whatever else you are having.

This has taken my brain to another dimension, pay close attention

How many decades have these flying saucers been spying on us...without any consequences whatsoever. You'd think they'd have finished their survey by now.

They aren't, they are saying these unidentified things, we confirm we can't identify them

When you look at any of the footage, it's pretty clear why they can't be identified.