Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

19091939596164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,973 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Not forgetting Ralph Nader who is the reason we ended up with Bush Jr instead of Al Gore in 2000.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,276 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    The "Republican who loathes Trump " voting bloc is overrepresented in US media to say the least.

    It just doesn't exist in the real world whatsoever.

    Cheney will likely spend the next few years mainly on MSNBC and CNN criticizing the GOP who for better or worse will ignore her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,104 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    100%. I haven't seen any evidence that any sizeable amount of GOP voters are willing to move away from Trump. He got 74m votes last election! Those people are 100% behind Trump. They may claim otherwise in some polls but then will vote for him everytime.

    TBH, Cheney was exactly the same until the reality of Jan 6th forced her to make a stand. The vast majority of GOP voters haven't let that reality become their reality, preferring to continue to believe in the stolen election nonsense.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Plus, presumably, there's the adage that all Politics is local; the gun-totting, election denying Trumpist might seem crazy everywhere else ... except within their own Congressional district. So as long as they keep the nuttier aspects of their rhetoric focused on Washington (Trump didn't exactly invent the narrative of "the swamp" ), I'd imagine many voters would simply hold their nose for someone looking after the interests of whatever gerrymandered scrawl constituted that locality.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,916 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Agreed and even among those that haven't bought into the "big lie" they are still GOP voters and would never vote otherwise even if it's Trump.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don’t believe that people should be held accountable for the sins of their parents but Liz Cheney, to this day, still supports all the policies of her Neo con war mongering father - a man who did more damage to democracy in 10 minutes than Trump did in 4 years. The invasion of Iraq, torture, rendition, WMD are all thanks to Dick Cheney which only a few months ago Democrats were lining up to shake his hand. Do people also need reminding of her position on abortion and her relationship with her sister?

    What people need to understand is that Dick and Liz Cheney’s opposition is not because of some ethical stance on Democracy! The reason the Cheney’s and Bush’s are so antagonistic to Trump is because he ran on an America first platform which was is the antithesis to Neo Con American interventionism which has found its new home in the Democratic Party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,161 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    Is there any hope you could talk about your unwavering support for Trump despite everything? What is it exactly that makes you put yourself out there for him considering there's no one in the world he wouldn't throw under the bus if it would save his skin and allow him to continue his grifting?



  • Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They've been whipped into a frenzy for the last six years by the media telling them orange man bad, so they'll overlook being pro torture etc..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,488 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    rte says it all...

    Republican Liz Cheney looks set to lose her seat in the US Congress to an election conspiracy theorist, in the latest sign of her party's break with traditional conservatism to embrace Donald Trump's hardline "America First" agenda.

    i would like to think that any irish politician would run on an "ireland first" agenda. bizarre way to frame it


    now re rendition, we completely facilitated that via shannon. aided no doubt by rte who only ever reported on the crazies at shannon protesting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,126 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It means that the Dems have until late Nov to get their candidate for the seat the preferred one by persuading the voters that there is a better option for them than sending a conspiracy theorist into the house that other conspiracy theorists of the same belief invaded on Jan 6 at the behest of Trump. I don't think that the GOP have totally broken with big business. It's hard to look at what's happened to Republican Party politics since 2014 to think it allowed the crazies take over the party first and now the house. One thing those crazies did see in advance and use was the liking Trump had for publicity, without overshadowing him.

    At first I thought what Trump did in establishing a friendship with Putin was to take the US foreign policy into an isolationist mode but his behaviour since being elected has proven he is a meddler with no experience in actual management, with an "I'm right and everyone else is wrong" attitude towards the other US politicians he has to share the reins of power with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,488 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    it worked i reckon. any other president would have won a nobel peace prize cos of the abraham accords.

    what better option to americans than america first?

    he did well with NK, iran, russia, and china; even demanding nato pay their agreed contributions else russia will take advantage. . its all gone tits up since he left office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,126 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Actually, due to his very personal involvement in those accords, I suspect that he was as interested in ensuring he has business opportunities as well as a bolt-hole or two in that region to go to when in need of sanctuary. I genuinely believe his relocating the US embassy to Jerusalem was a move to secure a future in Israel for him and his family on a par to a righteous person. He's a genius in spotting opportunities for himself, even if he soon drives them into the ground due to his inadequacies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Trump is pretty heavily pro torture....

    In any case it is a bit of respect for someone not willing to destroy democracy. Dems still disagree with her policies pretty heavily and the sentiment I have seen is well done for not lying but also I ain't ever voting for her. Largely due to the torture and neo con issues as well as largely being aligned with Trump on most things.


    So your point does not make sense. No one is ignoring the issues in her policies, just acknowledging that she is a little more principled than other Republicans.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Anyone who takes a view that goes against established orthodoxies is labelled a “conspiracy theorist”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,973 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    She believes the election was stolen. that makes her a conspiracy theorist.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The belief the 2020 election was stolen, rigged etc. is a Conspiracy Theory, routinely and rigorously debunked. There is no legitimate or credible argument that says otherwise - and even GOP funded election recounts or inspections found no credible indication towards election fraud.

    It's a myth.

    And the only reason it persists is because, for whatever reason, Donald Trump has become a circled-wagon ideology for certain demographics to hide behind and scream "fraud!" as the latest anti-Washington agenda beloved of the eternally insular within the American Interior.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,962 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    'Conspiracy theorist' is almost respectable when compared with those who simply adopt a contrarian approach that does not require any thought processes at all and uses it to amuse themselves. Why anyone would want to align themselves with the flag-wearing, gun-toting, vapid cultists who support their demi-god unquestioningly is a mystery. At least conspiracy theorists have come up with an argument at some point.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Likewise, the idea that Russians hacked the 2016 election is an even bigger (debunked) conspiracy theory yet it was circulated by fake news mafia ad-nausea. Numerous Democrats are on record including HRC saying that Trump was an illegitimate president.

    Democrats also said that the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen and yet these conspiracy theories still get circulated in supposedly good company to this day.

    Democrats are constantly questioning the legitimacy of elections yet none of their pronouncements or videos questioning elections are censored from big tech but if you make a video or post questioning the 2020 election it will be censored across social media platforms.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,973 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    remind me when the democrats instigated a violent riot in the capitol? In all of the examples you gave the democrats conceded the election immediately and ensured an orderly handover.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,071 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    There is ample evidence that Russia was involved in HEAVILY influencing the 2016 election via FB and they also hacked both the DNC and RNC email servers. Note they only released the DNC emails which ended up without a doubt influencing the outcome of election. Did they hack the results of the election? No, but absolutely intentionally interfered in the election as a whole.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Whatabout?

    As has already been said, none of those examples came with an attempted storming of the Capitol, spurred on by a President refusing to concede, while the Dems conceded the prior losses. Many GOP members openly questioned, and continue to question, the 2020 election in a dangerous escalation of anti- democratic rhetoric.

    You can talk about "Fake News Mafia" or orthodoxies all day long but the fact is, 2020 was not stolen and the persistence with this narrative a dangerous Conspiracy Theory that's attempting to undermine democracy. Pleading victimisation doesn't wash.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Never said that 2020 was stolen and likewise the fact remains that neither was 2016, 2004, 2000 or basically any other election that Democrats lost in recent history yet apparently questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is the only one that is considered a “conspiracy theory” and will get you censored off big tech platforms.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not true. Democrats are still questioning the outcomes of those elections today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,973 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    really? can you give me examples of Gore, Kerry or Hilary questioning the outcomes recently?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Why do you wish to question that which has been proven legitimate, even by those who intentionally tried to find irregularities (in fact IIRC GOP enacted recounts only surfaced MORE votes for Biden in some situations)

    Again. The 2020 election conspiracy has precipitated an actual attempt to storm the Capitol building, has seen armed militia Weekend Warriors appear at FBI offices just recently - and a continued narrative from GOP members attempting to claim Donald Trump the true president.

    If you can't understand why this is a dangerous precipice for a country to find itself - a country with noted scars from a brutal civil war, a war where the seditionist flag is still flown by Trumpists among others - then I'm not sure what the point of this conversation is. Bar some wink and nodding towards liberal conspiracy, and attempted self-victimisation.

    This isn't The Moon Landing "just asking questions", this is part of a grouping too disorganised to stage a proper coup, but trying to all the same. These are terrorists, operating under the guise of civility.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,963 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    When it is claimed that Russia "interfered" with the 2016 election, it is not to suggest they interfered with the actual voting or vote counting process. It is to suggest that they were heavily involved in pushing their favoured candidate and sowing discord in the country - which they absolutely did. No one (serious) was or is calling for the election result to be overturned.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Exactly. Claiming equivalence is a thin attempt to Both Sides the situation. Social media manipulation is a known quantity, not just from 2016 but across the spectrum of life now; but nobody ever said the Russians had a hand in the 2016 voting, counting, or certification process - or as you say Podge - having the election result plain overturned.

    2020 was an attempted coup - unless of course one believes the idea all those around on Jan 6th were simply tourists with a love of tactical gear and cable-ties. Or that those in the GOP refusing to concede were deeply concerned about democracy. Trump actively sought advise to just ignore or overturn the result. It's not even subtle.

    And when even GOP or GOP adjacent recounts & investigations couldn't find discrepancies, or proof of bamboo in the paper fibres & all that bullshít? That we're still here discussing the issue speaks volumes about how much of a cult Trumpism has become.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,631 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I don’t recall any democrat questioning the validity of the 2016 election from a numbers point of view. No democrat claimed that there were republican counters throwing away non trump ballots, that they had several million more than trump, that the very core of the election ballot counting process that was filled with hard working Americans, both democrat and republican, was critically broken.

    What they did do, like most of the world, is wonder how it actually happened, when all of the polls suggested it was unlikely and we found out there was Russian influence, digital profiling and targeted advertising nobody knew about at the time.

    The real issue with conspiracy theorists is that they are incapable of taking in any evidence to the contrary of their beliefs. To them, they know the truth, and only information that supports that truth, no matter how flimsy or even disproven outright, is accepted.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    But the theorist isn't capable of processing evidence; by design they must refuse it as an instinct. By the very nature of the Conspiracy Theory, it says "everyone else is in on it". So even if you come along with facts, data and proof the Theory's bullshít - or dangerous bullshít in this instance - wellllll. You're just a sheep aren't you? Look at you, believing what Big Tech or the Fake News Mafia want you to believe. Only the theorist knows the truth.

    All the Bad Science, discredited facts and other ammunition will be clung onto with the devotion of the religious zealot; I'd not be surprised if psychologically they're cut from the same cloth. Emotional investment; in the case of the theorist, depends on a central pillar that says everyone else is a fool.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Trump did launch an investigation into the the number of votes he got in 2016 because he claimed that he could not have lost the popular vote. It died a death due to the fact that as with the majority of his claims, it wasn't based in reality.

    He contradicted his security services in relation to Russian hacking activities against the U. S. government and corporate entities and basically said putin told him that they were wrong and that was good enough for him.

    At this stage with the deaths and arrests that trump"s lies have caused only the lowest of the low are still supporting him or attempting any form of whataboutery.



Advertisement