Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Can Sinn Fein fix the housing crisis or is it beyond them or anybody else?

Options
1121315171826

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users Posts: 68,838 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If your moral compass doesn't allow you offset their motives and the effects of what they are doing against their effect on the housing crisis then that is reprehensible to be honest.

    I presume you would put our humanitarian aid for Ukrainian refugees into that table too. How high up the list of blame would they be or those helping them be, in your opinion?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,392 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Let's presume that SF join a coalition.

    The following day/week/month, there won't be any more plumbers/carpenters/builders, compared to the previous week/month.

    Will SF in Govt cause there to be more plumbers/elec/carpenters/builders? Within a year?

    I'm not sure.

    There are currently approx. 40,000 builders on JSA ("the dole").

    Will SF approach these 40,000 workers, and encourage them to leave JSA, and enter employment?


    There are currently Irish building workers who emigrated during or after the Great Financial Crisis 2008-2012.

    Will these be more likely, or less likely, to return to Ireland with SF in Govt?



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ....we really need to do something about this, our whole approach to the trades is beyond dreadful, they play such a critical role in forming a functioning society and economy, yet we still treat them like sh1t, sf have a serious job to do.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    Your welcome



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    Why.

    You know there is a housing crisis.

    Investment firms are hoovering up properties.

    Charities are hovering up properties.

    Councils are hovering up properties.

    Where does that leave the average joe who wants to purchase a property?

    3 of the top 4 are vultures in the property market approaching developers themselves so the housing estates are not even available to the public.

    The Council, Housing Charities and Investment firms have a Monopoly over the property market which is a disgrace



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,838 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Mary Lou made plenty of noise about creating the circumstances for people to return home on a recent trip to Aus.

    It's certainly a more attractive play for government than circling the wagons around those benefiting from the crisis.

    Can they do that though - create an economy and society that rewards workers properly. We are only going to find out if they actually get into government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...its clearly obvious that the whole approach of financialising our property markets has completely failed, by doing so, this generally leads to monopolisation of markets, as has happened in most other countries this has been done....



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    Agreed.

    All we are hearing from the Government and Opposition is to build more houses.

    Nobody wants to discuss or investigate the root cause of the housing crisis and homeless because it will cost votes and trigger sections of the population.

    I think Ireland needs to open its eyes and look at the truth of what’s happening and make some hard decisions



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,838 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes.

    But you need to prioritise.

    Throwing the baby out with the bath water is not the way to fix it.

    Start with those profiting most and work down.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ..............

    decisions arent really all that hard, reduce the involvement of industries that drives such ideologies, and start publicly building!



  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Ham_Sandwich


    Sinn Fein will be able to offer more money to the builders and the nurses to get them to come back from australia and dubai they could do a deal where some of the houses are set aside for builders electrician and plumbers and nurses that are coming back and they get sorted out with a house



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    sf will try to increase public housing, but they ll struggle with it....



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You're having a laugh. It was down to demolishing older blocks of flats based on the regeneration scam (FF started) and tenant purchases. Cut your codology you messer.

    And its gotten worse under FF/FG.

    You're just spamming head in the sand falsehoods.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There are a few things, which FFG will not do, which would help.


    Vacancy tax. You got a property which is vacant for more than a year? Tax it

    Planning tax. You got a planned site in a development zone and have not commence building within a year of planning. Large % of value tax

    Deriliction tax: Allowed a property to become uninhabitable? You guess it, tax that thing

    Site Tax: Hoarding unplanned land, for non accepted purpose, in a high pressure zone? Tax


    Planning flipping: Planning can not transfer with ownership sale. Too many "Developers" just buy land, get planning, and sell it onto the next hoarder



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Charities for their many faults are helping to supply housing to people on lower income. Investment funds are building while FF/FG/Green wait in the wings with fist fulls of taxpayer money ready to lease rent and buy at whatever price is asked. This keeps prices high.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...wouldnt suit their intended bases, so wont be happening under their watch!



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    When the Lower income people become Higher income people do they move out of there capped price house so the next low income person can move in?

    or does the higher income person have a guaranteed low income rent now and we now have to fund the next house for the low income person?



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...in an environment of rising wealth inequality, i.e. our current situation, less people move up the socio economic scale, and at a slower pace, than a more equal environment, this is also called 'social mobility', our fcuked up property markets is one of the main causes of this.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    At the end of the day . SF policy is to build more houses to use as social housing.

    So no. They will not be solving the crisis.

    They will simply be promoting a benefit culture.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    How is helping working tax payers who's only option is often homelessness, to get housed, 'promoting a benefit culture'?

    It should not be forgotten that the current housing system relies heavily on benefits from tax payer money to supply profits and customers for investment funds and build to rents. Thats what is happening now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Vacancy tax we already discussed on the thread, maybe you know how many houses/apartments it would provide?

    Planning tax? you are going to tax companies because political parties and locals are blocking them from starting to build?

    Dereliction tax I agree

    Site tax: ??? not sure you can tax people for owning land. Are you saying you will force people to build on their own land?



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,838 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Wrong thread



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    Why do you think working people are becoming homeless?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I'll not argue a commonly known fact that homeless numbers rise and encompasses working people on low income.

    If people are working and need assistance, I'm completely happy to help. We should be spending our money on helping our own rather than enriching investment funds profiting off our misery.

    I assume you feel grants for business, lower taxes for investment funds and bailouts promoted a benefit culture?



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,659 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Are SF actually planning to do that though? Beyond having more % social housing (which they haven't managed when in charge of NI and DCC, but whatever), how do they increase supply if they're actively not approving plans already? How many years will it take them to get "approved" plans in place to start building anything? (given inappropriate building is, apparently, the reason they object to so many).

    If they were serious, they would be getting the plans drawn up now so they were ready to get started as soon as possible, are they doing that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne


    I think 10,000s of houses or apartments and 100s of estates should be built for the sole purpose that only individual buyers or families or ftb would be allowed to purchase.

    This will drive house prices down to affordable levels so workers could actually afford homes.

    That way workers don’t become homeless.

    emergency short term housing can be built by the government for people who require help.

    Councils, Investment firms and Charities should seek their own land, planning permission and funds to do as they please.

    Post edited by Ouch Chinese Byrne on


  • Registered Users Posts: 161 ✭✭Housing99


    When my grandparents lived in social housing in Crumlin raising their family in the 50s, 60s and 70s my granddad worked for the ESB. In fact everyone living in the estate worked. Back then council estate tenants where nurses, tradesmen, retail workers, taxi and bus drivers etc etc. In fact up to the 70s you couldn't get social housing unless you had secure work. In England pre Thatcher you needed work references to show you where of the "respectable working class" and not "idle" to get one. So I dont know why you assume social housing cannot be the solution to have long term affordable and secure housing for the hundreds of thousands of us stuck renting.

    In Vienna for example, anyone earning under 70,000 is eligible for social housing, they pay 15% of their net income in rent, 60% of the population lives in one and they have diverse mixed communities with low crime levels as a result, you know because offering affordable social housing to mixed income levels leads to teachers and accountants living next door to the unemployed and not to ghettos.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 161 ✭✭Housing99


    Thats your response? No reason we couldnt have a functioning housing system like we did then. Considering we were all apparently poor back then and now we are apparently rich (even though young people are locked out of building a life thanks to the housing market)



Advertisement