Ukrainian refugees in Ireland - Megathread

They got more than a 'little' help. Go out and get a job to support themselves. Getting a house for free or subsidised already, sure many working Irish people cant find anywhere to live never mind get free stuff.

For someone who doesn't care about Russia you do go out your way to parrot the Kremlin talking points, probably just a coincidence so.

Ah yes, the New Voice of Ukraine.

From the same source lol https://finance.yahoo.com/news/russia-shelling-zaporizhzhya-tpp-ash-155800561.html

So satellites show no signs of shelling or damage at the plant, but at the same time the russians are shelling the plant? Something doesnt add up, hm?

The source is an independent satellite company. Maybe read the article before making a holy show of yourself 😂

Maybe they just have to waive their passport or ask them to give it to them for free

i actually wouldn’t doubt that

When the money runs out and energy becomes too expensive, maybe theyll turn around and leave.

I didn’t specify anything about Bucharest. The report discusses the use of civilian locations by the military.

It's Bucha, Bucharest is in Romania.

You said it's questionable that Russia are targeting civilian areas.

You can retract it you know. Not a hill I'd like to die on anyway. But that's up to you.

The piece is from CNN which based it's story on satellite surveillance from a private company.

According to CNN, new satellite images from Maxar Technologies counter claims by Russian President Vladimir Putin that the Ukrainian military was conducting repeated military strikes at the plant.

Again if you actually read the article instead of jumping with both feet into trying to discredit the outlet that re posted it, you'd know that.

Anyways seeing as Satellite images can prove no shelling occurring at the plant, that means the risk of nuclear incident at the plant is even lower than previously feared

Yep exhausted workers being held at a barrel of gun is super reassuring alright. There is also claims of torture. 👍️

That’s autocorrect changing the word.

Questionable if these are classified as civilian locations if the military are using them, questionable if it’s intentional, they become military targets for the enemy. It doesn’t mean all are or are not. The report criticises using civilian locations as it increases casualties.

With the lower numbers it is understandable, a traditional war would not favour Ukraine. There are no absolutes here, war is messy. No one comes out clean.

The article was written by "The New Voice of Ukraine" - they quoted CNN who quoted Maxar Technologies, but the author of the piece is the New Voice of Ukraine. Its right there in the link you sent, and despite your glib remarks about "if I actually read the article", you yourself clearly havent.

Look I even highlighted it for you, the author publication's name listed just above the headline.

Is this the same as the claims of Russia shelling the plant? Because clearly that is false according to the article you just sent. Doesnt bode well for Ukrainian credibility surrounding the ZNPP plant does it?

And again, none of this looks to pose a massive risk to Ukrainians in the central and West of the country. No shelling of the plant means little chance of radiation leaks which could affect the relatively safe west of the country.

Lets nip the embarrassing deflection in the bud.

Discuss.

Ironic you mention deflection, when you yourself are the one ignoring all my other points in favour of this semantic argument.

In case you forgot:

Is this the same as the claims of Russia shelling the plant? Because clearly that is false according to the article you just sent. Doesnt bode well for Ukrainian credibility surrounding the ZNPP plant does it?

And again, none of this looks to pose a massive risk to Ukrainians in the central and West of the country. No shelling of the plant means little chance of radiation leaks which could affect the relatively safe west of the country. So we shouldnt still be taking in Ukrainians from those safer regions of the country, no?