Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Robert Troy - Property Mogul

  • 19-08-2022 2:11pm
    #1
    Posts: 0


    I'm really surprised at the lack of commentary on this case here (and apologies if there is a thread I'm missing somewhere).

    The mainstream media seem to have abandoned this story at this point, now that he's amended the record, clarified certain items and released the standard mea culpa, 'nothing to see here' statement.

    The scandal here to me isn't about whether or not he maintained appropriate records, or notified SIPO.

    It's the very fact that he, as a former Westmeath County Councillor and current sitting TD (and Junior Minister) representing Longford-Westmeath was engaged in what appear to be fully off-market transactions with Westmeath County Council, at levels that appear to be far in excess of what comparable properties in the same estates were selling for.

    Most local authorities have clear parameters in place for buying properties, and virtually all require that the property be openly listed to ensure they are paying a fair market price for the property.

    The comments from the Westmeath County Council Director of Services for Housing Mark Keaveney raised more questions than answers here too; by not being able to evidence a transparent, fully above board history of transactions with Troy.

    I cannot understand how this story isn't getting more attention and the press seemed to have just moved on from it.



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Thread title here is more appropriate. I heard his first defence on the radio and thought it reasonable enough, selling at a loss to facilitate local housing etc etc

    But since then, a whole lot more colour & queries have been added.

    This man is a senior elected public representative. And he's basically involved in property speculation, churning and flipping properties bought at good prices.

    With his sort of contacts, both at the purchasing end and the potential LA purchasers - really he should be kicked out of office. It's not as if he's not underpaid as a public rep and anyway if he's doing that job properly, how would he have time to be in the property churning business???



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think apologies should only be believed if wrapped in a five pound note.

    Now if he were to make a substantial donation to one of the homeless charities like Simon or the McVery Trust, or even Brother Kevin, it might be more believable.

    Amending the record - Hah!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,489 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    You'd wonder how Barry Cowen and Dara Calleary feel about it (2 FF TDs who lost their ministerial posts earlier in this government over transgressions)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Jarhead_Tendler


    There must be a conflict of interest here. Like you I couldn't care less about the records being amended. Who else are getting these deals off councils? Is it a one off? Sadly it most likely isn't imo. Could this be the tip of the iceberg? Would an investigation into NAMA for example show that corruption within the golden circle hasn't gone away?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Cowen resigned because he was too thick to answer Dail questions about who was in the car with him. Good riddance.

    And Calleary was too young, foolish and impetuous to talk things over with the outgoing AG (Seamus Woulfe) before opting to jump off the cliff.

    Troy's antics really need to be investigated. I suspect that he did nothing illegal, although it seems pretty clear that some of his actions were highly inappropriate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Calleary realised that a quick resignation could save his career. And I think it's worked. He'll probably lead FF yet, albeit what there'll be left to lead is questionable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    He should be investigated for potential money laundering. Doubling the price of a house? Very dodgey sounding.

    "Mr Troy was asked about a property he had bought for €82,500 in 2019, refurbished over three months and then sold on to Longford County Council for €163,000. He said the property was bought on the open market and it had been in an “uninhabitable state” with a “substantial amount of work to be done”.

    He said he sold it on the open market through a local auctioneer and that €163,000 was “the going rate for that property at the time”. Mr Troy said he incurred refurbishment costs as well as professional fees, and made €36,000 before tax on the sale"

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2022/08/23/troy-says-he-owns-11-properties-as-he-apologises-again-for-failure-to-fully-declare-interests/



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,444 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    He won't be investigated for money laundering because you don't know what money laundering is.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Troy gone as Minister.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    Well he has resigned now

    Many opposition parties and TDs have a dislike of landlords. But without small landlords the housing crisis would be far worse. Landlords generate a profit. They need to.

    The state isn't capable of providing housing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,902 ✭✭✭standardg60


    No state is capable of providing housing when the idea of housing everyone has become a money making exercise for those who espouse said ideology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    Landlords exist to make money. Otherwise its kind of pointless



  • Site Banned Posts: 20,685 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    Small scale landlords aren't always making a profit. Like any investment, their can be and ought to be losses, but the rent is helping to cover the long term cost of his assets.


    Have to ask how he was able to even afford so many properties. Like who in their right mind was giving him money. There was a big crackdown on silly lending after 2008 after all



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    I know a lot more about money laundering than you. I refer to S.11(4)(b) of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE (MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING) ACT 2010. Learn something please.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The state built Finglas, Ballymun, Ballyfermot, and many other Corpo housing estates that housed many many families in the 1950s and 1960s. and 1970s, up until the state stopped building social housing. That housing was of a very high standard.

    Why did they stop?

    When did the private landlord appear to be a large supplier in the housing market?

    When and why did building societies (who were the major suppliers of mortgages) become banks? And then those banks become major suppliers to speculators in property assets - why was that?

    And many TDs are landlords - either of public houses or rented property. I wonder if that is the link.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,461 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    probably started when thatcher introduced right to buy in UK in the 80s. and the councils there weren't allowed to use monies received to build new council houses.

    I'm guessing ireland just followed that policy sure what could go wrong?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Exactly - copy the bad policies of the UK.

    Selling council houses here always was an option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    how is buying a property, refurbishing it and then selling it for a profit count as money laundering. Be specific as to which section of the act it contravenes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    In ordinary circumstances it wouldn't be considered money laundering but to double the price in three months is quite unusual.

    I refer to S.11(4)(b) of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE (MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING) ACT 2010.

    The seller could have sold it undervalue to pass on significant value without drawing much attention. The buyer sells it on at actual market value to turn value into cash. Simple.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    that's a lot of assumptions based on no evidence at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    Hence an investigation is required to establish the facts. Maybe he is a great businessman or maybe there is more than meets the eye.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Should every property transaction where someone makes a profit be investigated?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,186 ✭✭✭893bet


    While this lad is a snake there is a danger rhetoric around these day.

    1) Landlord are evil and to blame for housing shortage

    2) farmers are evil and to blame for climate change and foot price increases

    3) energy companies are evil etc. and to be blamed for climate change


    try living with out any of the above…..supply and demand.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    No, not every property transaction. But when someone flips something so quick and doubles the sale price raises questions in my book. Also take into consideration, the buyer is a politically exposed person as another risk factor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    `He paid 82,500, spent 44,500 on refurbishments and then sold at a 36,000 profit. so, yes, he did (almost) double the purchase price but he did that by investing additional money on refurbishments. Also, given the low purchase price the property was probably not inhabitable so therefore not eligible for a mortgage. Houses that are cash only sell for lower prices because of the reduced pool of purchases. After refurbishment it would be mortgageable so that increases the pool of purchasers. None of this is in any way remarkable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,146 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If the house was as bad a state as he says it was, how did he get all that work done in less than 3 months? - keep in mind the property was sold within 3 months, so presumably the works were already completed by the time Westmeath CoCo were involved



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    i've no idea, I don't know the man. Perhaps he has good contacts in the building trade. Either way nothing that justifies an accusation of money laundering.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    If that's what an investigation turns up so be it. Now your making assumptions about wither the property was inhabitable or not fit to be mortgaged.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,461 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    that's just politics these days find a bogeyman and blame them. depressing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    there is no basis for a criminal investigation. and I did make assumptions, reasonable ones. you on the other hand have assumed criminality unreasonably.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 429 ✭✭Madeoface


    The guy is a shyster no doubt but he could be a one man answer to the crisis. Taking an unhabitable house and turning it around in 3 months for coco to put in people off housing list. Kudos.

    If the coco were responsible it'd probably be 3 years.

    No issue with the profit motive here at all imo. Private landlords are needed as part of a solution. His hiding all his shenanigans and bending the truth is the issue and properly ousted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    I think it would be fine if it was all done on the private market. The fact that a local council bought it from him definitely raises a few eyebrows.

    Next Man City manager: You lot may all be internationals and have won all the domestic honours there are to win under Pep. But as far as I'm concerned, the first thing you can do for me is to chuck all your medals and all your caps and all your pots and all your pans into the biggest **** dustbin you can find, because you've never won any of them fairly. You've done it all by bloody cheating.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    As an elected politician, he bought a property on the cheap and sold it on at a profit, having refurbished it. Ordinarily that would be OK, if both transactions were all open market and above board.

    However, he sold it to the local authority at a significant profit. That appears a bit lucky and should be open to investigation - but could be OK - but on top of the non-declaration of this particular transaction leaves it open to question.

    As member of FF, he must be aware of the role landlords and rack rents played in Land League and the struggle for independence, and he would quite careful in his role as a landlord, particularly in the current housing emergency. Apparently not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    That's why investigations take place to determine if criminal activity occurred. No basis? The price being doubled, quick resale, seller/buyer are politically exposed and failure to declare property interest as required on a simple form, together they in my view form a reasonable basis for a criminal investigation.

    If nothing criminal occurred then it would be fairly easy for parties involved to show that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    even if the purchase by the CoCo was done at mates rates it doesn't make it money laundering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    nothing you have said suggests money laundering.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    I'm beginning to think you don't know what money laundering is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭mumo3


    What pisses me off most about any of the "transgressions", is that they get to resign and keep the benefits!!! If you are an active member of the Dail or Seanad and you are found to be caught up in any questionable acts, well then your wage, pension and any other added benefits should be suspended until an investigation is carried out. But these people seem to get in there quick with a resignation and reap the rewards!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I've been convinced you don't know what it is from your first post. Nothing you posted since has changed my mind.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There is nothing to prevent him from making a substantial donation to a homeless charity as a way of saying sorry.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    Hard to change the mind of someone who doesn't understand what is being discussed.

    We have legislation that deals with what can be considered money laundering and part of it covers under/over valuations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭GalwayMan74


    You clearly don't know what money laundering it 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,431 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Calleary's transgression was very minor.

    Cowen, on the other hand, was related to being economical with the truth relating to his drink driving.

    It was compounded by the further 'revelation' that he had been driving illegally (unaccompanied & on motorways) for decades on a provisional licence. Cowen then disputed the garda version of events relating to him turning away from the checkpoint where he was caught being over the limit. Cowen states specifically that he was never charged with evading a checkpoint - which is factually correct but it does not necessarily mean he didn't turn away from a checkpoint. He would not face questions on the issue before the Daily on it, as he stated it would conflict with ongoing processes, which left his position untenable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭Sebastian Dangerfield


    The defending of this by MM and LV is not a good look. It wouldnt fly in the private sector.

    I work for an investment company and as part of our T&Cs we are obliged to get preapproval for all personal trades. I recently put through a batch and missed one for a tiny residual trade of about 40 euro. I self-reported, and received a formal warning for my trouble. Correctly so, because governance should not be optional.

    The fact that HAP tenancies do not need to be declared is a nonsense also; when the TD in question can vote or lobby on decisions that increase their own personal wealth everything should be declared.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Okay I thought money laundering was using illegally obtained money and putting it into the income stream of a legitimate business to make it clean.

    Am I wrong?

    To me, from the information I have seen, this sounds like potentially a case of corruption, of profiting from tax payers money. I don't see where the dirty money is?

    Next Man City manager: You lot may all be internationals and have won all the domestic honours there are to win under Pep. But as far as I'm concerned, the first thing you can do for me is to chuck all your medals and all your caps and all your pots and all your pans into the biggest **** dustbin you can find, because you've never won any of them fairly. You've done it all by bloody cheating.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Azizur Rahman


    Money laundering under Irish legislation is multi faceted. Money laundering is described as doing acts with the proceeds of criminal conduct, such as receiving, converting, disguising, transferring etc.

    From the act itself "proceeds of criminal conduct” means any property that is derived from or obtained through criminal conduct, whether directly or indirectly, or in whole or in part, etc.

    Criminal conduct is basically commiting a criminal offence. The proceeds of criminal conduct could come from corruption or bribery. I'm not saying that happened here but there is cause for questions re possible undervaluation and then selling on to local authority for a killing.

    Its also not nesscary to prove what criminal conduct occurred. Section 11 of the act deals with that and when you can presume property is the proceeds of criminal conduct based on the circumstances of the situation.

    Act in question is http://revisedacts.lawreform.ie/eli/2010/act/6/revised/en/html#SEC7



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭Good loser


    It's quite simple. With the development of the sub contract system it became much cheaper for the L A's to buy houses already built or in progress - than to build them.

    Any State will/can only devote so much of its income to Welfare (in the broad sense); years ago the Social Welfare bill other than for house building was quite small so there was more money available for house building.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    LA let go all the expertise for house building to save money. They let go the caretakers, for example, from the Ballymun flats which caused their terminal decline and ultimate demolition as the 'good' tenants moved out to be replaced by other less acceptable ones.

    LA sold more houses than they built by a larger proportion as the years rolled by. They only started buying existing houses recently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭Good loser


    Recently? They were certainly buying pre 2010.

    I had an electrician here 2005/6/7; he worked on new estates as well. When the crash came 2007/8 I remember him telling me he was busy on houses in an estate - but only those the LA was buying, as all the other buyers had melted away.

    That really was the time for the State to go counter cyclical. But all Joe Higgins et al could do was excoriate builders, bankers, developers, speculators and on and on and on.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement