Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

I've read before that they'll all be terribly busy when the whingers are here.

Unfortunate timing no doubt ...

“I think forgiveness is really important. It takes a lot more energy to not forgive,” she says wisely. “But it takes a lot of effort to forgive. I’ve really made an active effort, especially knowing that I can say anything,”

Her father is ''her own/private'' thing but it is the Royals who need to go and grovel. It's a threat but it's a deluded one based on attention seeking/future faking "I know things, terrible things that would shock you!" tactics. This is someone who inferred that her child could have been killed in a fire despite the fact that he wasn't even in the room when a heater started smoking. I'm sure any genuine dirt Meghan could dig up would be similarly embellished for effect.

The absolute desperation here is to get any kind of reaction at all from the Royals. The never complain-never explain concept still hasn't sunk in. For those calling for their titles then it's clear the Royals are playing the long game here. They will never debase themselves to engage in a tit for tat which the press would only love. The rolling with a pig in the dirt idiom applies. Meghan would love it. They masterfully showed Meghan and Harry their place at the Jubilee i.e. they genuinely are Second Row non-entities in the scheme of things. The rage must be palpable as well as the sense of caveat emptor with those who prematurely signed them up. There is also a cloying sense of the author using a deliberate style to take the piss out of Meghan in the article. The Royals have effectively employed the best tactic to handle deluded non-entities like them i.e. ignore them completely and utterly. What Harry and Meghan must be failing to grasp is that no matter what they say whether it be genuinely truthful or complete and utter bollox is that a simple variation of the succient "recollections may vary" will suffice to box them into a corner they've cultivated all by themselves with a reputation of being, shall we say, loose with the truth. Boy who cried Wolf territory from here on. Now if only the press employed the Royal strategy too and simply stopped covering them, giving them mileage. It must be hard because, with ridiculous articles like this and more podcasts to come to fulfill contractual obligations, we'll be seeing these numpties for a while yet. Equally it must be difficult for the Royals to keep schtum and there must be a temptation to give Meghan (and Harry) both barrels. In saying that it's actually a great insight into how inappropriate they both were for such a life of service. They're the only ones moaning here. The lack of fightback along with restraint indicates that the senior royals have the right stuff for the gig they participate in. A paper thin egotistical narcissist like Meghan would never have lasted long despite the self-aggrandising "hitting the ground runming" guff. She lasted 18 months of which 72 days comprised of actual work.

They felt suffocated and, bizarrely, were even allowed to leave. They wanted to retain a link and were told to basically f*ck off out of it. This obsession with clapping back will prolong the media coverage as well. They claim to have moved on so it actually beggars the question...will they ever just get on with it?

So how low Meghan went shamelessly then...

It's literally a quote from her and can't really be interpreted the way they are now claiming it should be. So she is throwing the journalist who wrote the article under the bus now? I see a clear pattern of behaviour emerging here lol

it would depend on the context in which it was used.

there is no doubt certain elements of the press were ultra-racist, and they wouldn't have needed to specifically use the n word out straight (even they wouldn't be that stupid) to actually refer to someone as one.

suttlety is the key for particular news papers, just say enough to get the message across without using particular words outright.

so i could believe she is correct in her claim about elements of the british press suttly referring to the children as the n word because they are proven racist enough.

she is a princess in name in fairness, the same as kate will be queen in name, it's not that big of a deal really.

i would imagine she was talking about the hanger on elements of the royals who would have had a problem with them existing, that is quite likely very true as stuck in the mud traditionalists and modernists aren#t going to be able to work together in an institution like that.

in the eyes of some of the public, not the public as that would be suggesting everyone sees things in the same light which is far from true.

only a tiny minority in this country care and only the fans are upset by her in the UK.

ok, I know you’re here just arguing for the sake of arguing - but I challenge anyone anywhere to produce an article which comes anywhere close to using the N-word regarding Meghan kids.

You won’t, no-one will - because it doesn’t exist.

She is a liar, plain and simple. I know people like her, who exaggerate grossly to the point of a lie whilst on some level believing it to be true, or at least feel justified in doing so. It’s a part of narcissism.

Eeeeehhh, part of your whole story line in suits is about you dating a white guy.

Well that's definitely proof of narcissism! Equally bizarre and insulting.

She equated her wedding being celebrated in South Africa as similar to celebrations when Mandela was released. However she is not narcissistic. GTFO.