Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1417418420422423806

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900


    You are missing the point. I am not saying that I know prices are going to go down.

    I am saying supply side is not the driving factor for last few years price rises, its policy. The powers that be have indicated that they are shifting policy, you would be a fool not to pay heed. Until they indicate otherwise, I remain convinced prices will drop and keep dropping..



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,570 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Again, you are not acknowledging that supply and demand are TWO of the factors. Is shifting Government/CB policy alone going to increase/decrease house prices? Only if you think that there aren’t people out there to buy houses, or that the number of houses available isn’t a consideration. These factors all play a part in the property market, which one is more important may vary at times. But no one, not you, not the three economists have a definitive answer, therefore they are just opinions rather than fact.

    You are no more right than anyone else predicting boom or bust until it happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭dontmindme



    She and mcsean go on to claim supply and demand has nothing to do with house prices and then go on to describe the issue as REITS ?....lol


    "The idea that house prices are determined by supply and demand is an infantile view of how the market works. Asset prices in Ireland are very high, because there is a wall of money looking for somewhere safe to land"


    First a ridiculous statement with the first sentence, and then completely contradicts it in the second sentence!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 6 zebedy45


    Wondering about changes that could bring down prices in the near future such as...

    If HTB is not extended beyond 2022. Which will be announced with the budget in a couple of weeks.

    Changes to the mortgage lending rules by the CBI e.g. Larger deposit requirement or the 3.5 multiple of salary is reduced.. Prudence due to cost of living. I believe the CBI carry out a review each year.

    Banks lending less... My exemption was taken away a few months back due to stricter lending rules from my bank

    The rising interest rates add a huge cost to a mortgage but I feel people overlook this as as they look at the monthly payments, which don't seem that significant when it is a €50-100 increase per month. But I think roughly for a couple borrowing 350k an extra 1% can add 50k to the cost of credit. Unlikely but this would be good if reflected in prices..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The wall of money is fuelling multiple asset price bubbles

    The author states the investors are looking for a safe place to land and perceives property to be one of those safe places

    The author disagrees with the investors

    For a woman that in 2006 wrote "The coming first world debt crisis" I'm sure her opinion would be valued by many



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    I am not sure if I am misreading the thread but people don't seem to be putting two and two together.

    The State is subsidising half the rental market - the rental market is the reason our whole property market, both buying and renting, is frothy. This is costing the State a huge amount of money and there is little monetary return from this cost to the State. With the likely cost of dealing with the energy crisis this winter, it is difficult to see how the State can continue to prop up the private rental (and by extension the whole property) market. Therefore, it is almost inevitable that the State will have to cut its cloth and the low hanging fruit is almost certainly the landlord subsidies in the rental market that it pays, which will of course, in conjunction with interest rates rising, cause quite a dent in the Irish property market.

    Back to 2017 or back to 2014 levels is what I am wondering.

    Post edited by jimmybobbyschweiz on


  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    In 10 years the majority of the electorate could be renters; this will have material consequences to house prices as they will vote according to their own situation. Past performance is definitely not a guide to future performance when it comes to the property market.

    Post edited by jimmybobbyschweiz on


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,570 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    C’mon, an economist could write a book like that every year, eventually they would be right. The difference is that fewer saw it or expected in 2006, given what is going on at the moment, few economists are not predicting some kind of crisis. You have some predicting Armageddon, others predicting a correction in markets which may be mild and short lived, some will be door stops in future, others will be looked on as works of genius, for now, no one knows. What we all know though, is that the same conditions do not exist today because of what was learned in the last crash. So please, stop thinking that you are/she is the all seeing prophet. Property prices may well decrease as a result of local/global events, but when it does, there is no guarantee that everyone will be able to afford what they want, high income buyers will be able to buy for less, and if there is a recession, it’s the lower income earners who may well be most susceptible to job losses and downward pressure on wages. Will that make buying easier even if prices fall and interest rates rise? Of course not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    My understanding which may be wrong is that she was referring to supply and demand in the sense that supply is houses and demand is people in Ireland wanting to live in them.

    She is saying investors are buying simply as a store of value, passive income or perhaps the passport purchase program.

    She calls it foreign money and states if it dries up....

    Happy to be corrected if I've misunderstood her argument.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,631 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is a limited number of exemptions every year. It's a percentage of total bank lending. It's a kind of ''use it or loose it''. When the bank have used there quota for the year ( it's based on there previous years lending if I remember correctly) then they withdraw the rest of the exemptions. Usually they are used up by mid late summer. Similar happens every year.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Well let’s not forget that a lot of the spending is thanks to tax receipts from handful of MNC. Most of their revenue is generated in other countries (be it EU or non EU), so we are fairly vulnerable to other economies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900


    You are correct. The property market is momentum driven. When property prices are rising there is a lot of extra interest from people who dont necessarily need to buy right now. The reverse is also true.

    Although there will always be buyers needing to buy due to life circumstances, if the extra buyers are removed from the market, falling prices are only amplified. This is why markets rarely are stagnant, they generally move up or down. Declines are quicker.

    Of course prices will always go up over the long term in monetary terms, but prices have gotten way ahead of themselves over the last decade due to easily available credit and excess money in the system. All assets have gone up but all are reverting. We have already seen stock market declines underway, the decline in property has begun in some Countries and will catch up here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,570 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Has credit been easily available over the past 10 yrs? Considering the cost of renting, isn’t it conceivable that the “need” to buy will endure?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,599 ✭✭✭newmember2


    She says..."The idea that house prices are determined by supply and demand is an infantile view of how the market works". And then goes on to say that Ireland's high prices are due to REITS - in other words, demand. What difference do sellers care if it's a prospective homebuyer or an REIT, it's all the same demand inflating the prices.

    What is the perceived benefit of having REITS competing with prospective homebuyers, it's meant to drive development and construction? Our domestic market isn't enough?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    An ageing population of house buyers = a need to buy while they can still get a mortgage



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,040 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Reducing the 3.5 multiple of salary would effectively crash the housing market entirely.

    ICS mortgages recently reduced their limit to 2.5 multiple of salary for residential clients which essentially ended their involvement in that part of the market.

    Since the 2008 crash mortgage rules have been at the limit of what's practical, any reduction like what's outlined above would essentially leave only cash buyers capable of buying property in Ireland.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Historically property has been seen as a hedge against inflation because property prices rise as workers wages increase. We are hearing on this thread that the opposite will happen and price will fall because investors exit the market in fear. This might happen with a few reluctant landlords who after years of being in the red can finally get out with a profit but this is a minority who are afraid of getting burned again and won’t lead to a fire sale. Even if it happened with large investors it would reduce supply and push up rents which in turn would making buying more attractive.

    At the end of the day unless the population of Ireland shrinks there won’t be enough houses. People have to live somewhere whether in rental accommodation or as a home owner so the demand won’t fall away without emigration and/or lower immigration.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt



    why would the limit be reduced? Do you think that The central bank thinks Irish banks are going to fail and they want to reduce the risk? Despite being one of the few countries in the world that adopted measures to mitigate the risk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,040 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I don't. I was quoting someone who was saying it should be considered.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users Posts: 6 zebedy45


    I was considering that the rules are also in place to prevent people from over borrowing. And if people are struggling to meet costs, then the lending rules might be changed.

    I would guess and agree with what you suggest.. that they are unlikely to reduce them to protect banks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The rules are there to prevent systemic risk in the Irish financial system. The banks have their own risk appetites but as a general rule as long as they can demonstrate that someone can afford repayments they will lend right up to the 3.5 times limit….and would lend more if possible because the constraints that stop them lending (capital and liquidity) they have in abundance at the moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6 zebedy45


    Yeah and to improve the resilience of borrowers to economic shocks..

    But you're right that a bank will make their own assessment



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The market moved on from 100/200 individual buyers. They have been purchased in bulk by one buyer to rent out at completely extortionate rents which imo will be unsustainable with real wages dropping especially amongst traditional renting demographic.

    I reckon that these investment funds may reduce or cease future activity in the property market as they consider themselves over exposed to property at a time when other asset classes correct quicker.

    This would lead property values to fall to correlate with peoples incomes and CB rules. I know that completely contradicts my original post but it can be hard to make sense of a completely distorted market

    Property values fall to the income levels of people rather than the financial might of investment funds



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What’s the connection between your comment and the article?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If we don't listen, we loose them,

    Are we back to loosing our best and brightest like the 80's?




  • Registered Users Posts: 14,570 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I was waiting for you to post the article.

    News flash: Young people want to travel.

    Didn’t you ask yourself, how many 18 - 24 are thinking about buying a house? And at a time when there is full employment, the need for that age to emigrate is virtually zero, they choose to do it so they can live a little, and have fun.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Who cares? So long as there's a steady supply of south american workers to fill the lowest paid jobs, and to sleep 3 to a room to pay the extortionate rents, then its all hunky dory!

    Rents are only going one way unless bizarrely an anti-immigration government were to get elected, not likely



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,570 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    And yet it still seems to be worth their while to stay here. Go figure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,973 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    How many times do regular posters need to be reminded that immigration discussion is not allowed in this thread?



Advertisement