Russia

Yeah, they fail at attacking armies and attack civilians and civilian infrastructure instead. Big brave boys throwing a tantrum because they were routed out of Kharkiv. Latest count is 102 abandoned armoured vehicles. Still counting though.

Your lieing ,

Your nothing more an the lowest common denominator troll,

So you agree that the Russian puppet Yanukovych should not have ordered the Berkut to shoot innocent protestors as it removes the moral high ground of supporting Russia.

In your conspiracies the "West" is always to blame, which is identical to the stance taken by the regime in Moscow. They are always the "victim" of Western conspiracies, never their own deliberate actions.

You've been caught using Russian propaganda sites, your extreme views have driven you to e.g. Holocaust denial, posters suspect you yourself are at least half-Russian, you've defend Putin in every situation over the years on this site.

Personally I don't think you're a Putin bot, but ultimately there isn't much difference.

Seeing as you avoided his question I will answer it.

CS has already admitted to posting from Moscow, make of that what you will.

Sorry to interrupt but since the destruction of Iraq and Libya by the good guys denying civilians running water, sanitation and electricity etc is no longer a war crime.

not interested in what you protested about, the issue is what is and what isn’t “International Law” and why do some countries commit “war crimes” and others (the good guys) “collateral damage”.

On Iraq, blowing up water pumping stations, sewage plants, power stations etc is NOT removing a brutal dictatorship but are attacks on civilians and war crimes under “International Law”.

Also interesting that the tin foil minded usually tend to be against the elites and crooked politicians, and now they are defending a kleptocracy headed by billionaires.

They also tend to label themselves as libertarian, lovers of freedom etc. but deep down they seem to be driven by some revenge fantasies towards political opponents who they see as enemies (QAnon really ramped this up past 11).

‘bad man’ Saddam was allowed to remain in power after the 1991 first Gulf War as he was an enemy of Iran and had his uses.

He eventually crossed a line and his days were numbered.

https://www.rferl.org/amp/1095057.html

The Bush admin went into Iraq for a variety of reasons.

People like Rove, Cheney, etc subscribed to the idea that removing Saddam in Iraq via regime change would create a domino effect across the Middle East. It would benefit Israel by removing a key threat. Basically Saddam not being in power, and replaced with a friendly regime would have a whole raft of geopolitical benefits for the US and region allies in general. It was also an "experiment" to pre-emptively remove a very nasty dictator. Of course it ended in disaster, but somehow it looked good on paper to the Neocons.

9/11 was used to whip up the public to go into Iraq, there was even BS that Saddam was involved somehow in 9/11 (he wasn't). The US was on friendly terms with Saudi, a handful of disaffected extremists from that country is not reason to take action against the entire country.

Don't gaslight me thanks. Indeed Saddam had little interest in AQ.

? After the US invaded Iraq it became a hotbed of extremism, Baáthist loyalists remained, fundamentalists poured in from all over the region. In one insane situation US forces found themselves actually working with Sunni insurgents. The US administration literally created a massive terrorist problem, plus it created the precursors for the growth of ISIS.

Endless regurgitation of Putin's koolaid. Precisely like Hitler did, Putin claims that defensive alliances are really "enemies" about to attack the motherland, that bureaucrats in NATO just sit and plot all day about invading the 17 million square kilometres of Russia, that countries like Finland and Sweden aren't nervous of a hyper-aggressive Russia, instead they are "encircling" Russia.

It requires Neanderthal levels of gullibility to fall for state propaganda of that level, but here we are.

For Putin "the West" is always to blame for everything, for you, "the West" are always the baddies in your conspiracy fiction. You obsess over "Nazis" the same way Kremlin's propaganda machine does. Whether another person is poisoned with Russian nerve agent, or elections are being meddled with, or Russia tanks are literally blowing people apart you are here to trip over yourself defending Putin, rabidly blaming "the West" for everything, always painting the Russian billionaire autocrat as a victim, precisely like he does himself.

Posters here have repeatedly described you as a Putin-bot. I've witnessed Putin-bots back in 2014, they weren't half as fanatical as yourself

Link to 9/11?

Lol you're really going all in on your fanboying.

You're gushing over a guy you called a monster.

Still masturbating over the putin Christmas calendar so

Well he could hardly say "lads we fùcked up and I don't know how to get us out of this with even a shred of dignity still intact" could he?

Reminds me of this lad

It’s very strange and in all honestly sick to put someone on a pedestal who is obviously into and encourages rape, mass murder, kidnapping, and Pedophilia. Are you into that stuff yourself @Cheerful S or something?