Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

No the report and graph don't show that.

The actual data shows different effectiveness for the vaccine at week #20 depending on when you were vaccinated. Nowhere does the text or authors state anything about negative vaccine effectiveness. That is a conclusion you have drawn from a graphical picture without understanding it.

Your claim of impaired immune system is false and you are incapable of justifying it other than pointing at a graph when the report itself already provides proof your claim is false.

"Both the BNT162b2 vaccine and previous infection were found to confer considerable immunity against omicron infection and protection against hospitalization and death."

That is the conclusion of the expert authors of the report.

Will you reply again without explanation of how the expert conclusion contradicts your claim? Pretty obvious giveaway when you do that you don't have a leg to stand on.

It shows a line going below zero at a certain point.

You are the one claiming negative effectiveness versus unvaccinated.

Where does the report state this or show the data for unvaccinated?

The underlying data shows very different effectiveness for vaccination at Week #20 based on month of first dose vaccination.

The report text states one of its limitations is that:

Specifically, waning effects of both vaccination and previous infection may have been confounded by earlier infection and earlier vaccination in high-risk children.

It is reasonable to propose that higher risk children are also more likely to be tested etc due to interactions with medical services and may already have had weaker immune systems. This confounding factor would explain why children who received first dose vaccination in Jan'22 at Week#20 had very different outcomes to those who were vaccinated in Nov'21.

Number of references to 'master race' in my posts = 0.

Those are your words not mine.

You also seem confused about which countries are Scandinavian and which ones are Baltic.

In terms of development, similarities and connections and land borders, Sweden is grouped most closely with Finland, Norway and then Denmark.

Asked and answered:

With the highest number of single person households.

Bordered by low population density countries. There were huge voluntary shifts in behaviour in 2020.

Its approach doesnt scale and nothing you have posted shows otherwise.

If the graph really showed negative effectiveness, why is it not mentioned in the conclusion by the authors?

You keep avoiding this point. Why?

Lockdowns and masks reduced the spread of the virus.

As for the rules/laws on the issue, no matter how common sense something is there are people who will ignore it unless it's enforced. Even in countries which are considered progressive with high social responsibility, it's still an issue. This is why we still need laws regarding e.g. seat belts because there are people who are simply too stupid/ignorant/selfish to wear them voluntarily.

Even during the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, which killed tens of millions of people, there were those who opposed masks. It doesn't matter how black/white something is, sadly people cannot be relied upon.

Bloody hell. Back to square one with the masks now? I think the bottom of the barrel has been scraped through.