Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Softening house market?

Options
17172747677145

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,416 ✭✭✭✭Geuze




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Have you even looked at their balance sheet? How is the loan book of 56b funded if not from customer deposits. Their liquidity note even states 'Customer deposits represent the largest source of funding for the Group with the core retail franchises and accompanying deposit base in both Ireland and the UK providing a stable and reasonably predictable source of funds.'



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭dontmindme




  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    So you think Irish banks would not pay interest rates to deposit holders to keep interest rates low for mortgage customers ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    While depositors might want a greater return on their deposit - I'd gladly take it as well the truth is the banks have more deposits then they can lend out. They can afford to let some of it flow out. So there's no need for them to overpay any more than that have to. Regardless the bulk of households savings tend just to sit there regardless.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,500 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    That's literally what they are doing right now. The banks have made it clear that their strong deposits, and the fact that they are now making money from ECB inter-bank lending rates, is helping them to offset interest rate rises for mortgage holders. None of the banks have increased mortgage interest rates yet for their fixed or variable rate customers. Why do you think that is? Deposits were costing them dearly during the negative interest rate environment, now it's making them money.

    It's no secret. Permanent TSB in particular made a big song and dance about it at their AGM in June. We'll see interest rate rises filter through in the coming months, but for now they're trying to win back business from the newer lender entrants - who are getting absolutely hammered due to the fact that they have no deposits to finance their lending. They're also using the opportunity to encourage people to move off tracker rates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,444 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    deposits are not used directly in financing loans, as they are held as reserves, and banks cannot loan out reserves, banks simply create the credit required in loans, its effectively an accountancy activity, this has been confirmed by some central banks now, papers included




  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    Oh this is embarrassing for you. You're conflating various bank terms here.

    We were discussing how banks fund themselves with (generally) shorter term deposits and use it to lend out longer term credit. That's the business model.


    The LCR is a regulatory measure designed to ensure they have enough liquidity over the short term (30 days).


    The fact banks have to hold some short term assets to meet short term payouts is a world away saying they have to hold ALL of their assets in short term products. That's not how banking works.



  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Makes sense, but how long do you think banks will backing the small guys (ones borrowing money) and telling the depositors (ones with the money) to sod off ? I guess one we will have to wait and see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You can google whatever you want, but you didn't read enough to understand it even on a basic level. You appear to have taken it up completely arseways and think it is saying that a bank can only take on short term debt. If you want to educate yourself to a basic level, when you are finished reading what LCR is then you can go and look up NSFR also and try to understand that.

    It's fine. You have no experience in banking or regulatory requirements. Most people reading whatever you are spouting won't either so they won't know the difference either. There is not much point me expending energy on someone insisting the moon is made of cheese or the earth is flat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Some of the posters on here remind me of my sister when she was about 7. She put the coins from her piggy bank into a post office account and then was confused and a bit upset when she later withdrew the money to buy something and they gave her notes instead of "her money" back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900




  • Registered Users Posts: 299 ✭✭Jmc25


    After the last two years I'll never say never but things do seem to have slowed. I rang around this weekend and there's houses for sale well over a month now with no offers despite having asking prices that would have been exceeded in a week back in March or so.

    Asking prices are steady but I do wonder will the PPR show that actual prices achieved have slipped back by the end of the year? Basically while asking prices have changed little, earlier this year they were generally being comfortably exceeded whereas now they're being met or slightly exceeded.

    Anyone else's experiences lately been similar?



  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    That's cute, you're just ranting now. You won't admit you're wrong when there is a page of comments tearing your 'arguments' (and I'm being generous with that term) apart.

    It's fine throwing in terms like LCR but if you don't know what they mean you'll eventually get found out. As can be seen from your contradictory statements above. Let's see you explain the relevance of NSFR to the debate..

    But hey true to your username you could just have a go at everyone else rather than admit you're wrong.

    But feel free to come back with an actual point that's on topic



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    NSFR is Net Stable Funding Ratio. It is in the Basel rules and has to be reported. It was brought in as, on a basic explanation, a measure of maturity mismatch. A bank needs to keep this ratio above a certain level as per requirement. The afformentioned LCR means that a bank has to have enough liquid assets to meet it's short term obligations. For the above, for example, they would be trying to make sure that there is not a liquidity crisis in the bank due to, for example, a run on deposits.

    I gather you think that if a wealthy businessman puts 1m into a demand deposit account tomorrow that the bank will take that money and give out 4x250k 30-year mortgages the next day using the same money. That is not how it works. At a very simplistic toy example, if the bank gets loads of deposits, they are short term liabilities. If it them gives out all that money in 30 year mortgages, then those are long term assets. The risk is that the businessman, or all the depositers, arrive to the bank the next day to withdraw their deposits. You assets are long-dated so you won't have the money to pay them.

    As poster said above, what a bank can lend and can't lend is based off a number of requirements such as capital requirements (Capital is broken down into three tiers if you want to get into more details but that is not relevant for here). Banks need to keep these capital reserves sitting there "just in case".


    If the Bank wants to give out a load of 30 year mortgages, it will have to issue on some longer-date debt itself in order to make sure it has some security over it's future requirements. The short end of the curve is usually lower, but it can invert, or even spike in a time of crisis. I think that the overnight rate in Ireland was up over 10-12% around the time of the financial crisis for example. Banks are not allowed to leave themselves open to such risks. They don't want to hold capital there which is not being used as it is expensive (I can tell you all about KVA for derivative contracts and the difficulty modelling that if you want, but then again I think you need to study hard for a few years before we could even start to talk about that) so the regulators require them to do it.

    Although not banking, one example of someone who was trying to pull a fast one in terms of reserves was a certain Mr. Quinn, which is why we all have to pay a levy now. He wasn't setting capital aside for the risks he was taking on and so he was saving loads of money, but the problem with that was that if the sh1t hit the fan, he wouldn't be able to cover the liabilities.

    Post edited by Donald Trump on


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Oh look, given you liked quoting AIB balance sheet, I took a look at their Chief Executive's Review from their 2021 financial reports. That silly idiot was also going on about LCR and NSFR. What an idiot - talking about things that the boards.ie experts could have told him had nothing to do with banking!!!


    Does he not know a bank works like my then 7-year old sister thought? The bank just takes in your notes and coins and gives those notes and coins back across the counter to someone else who wants a loan.

    The idiot. You should run for his job when he inevitably gets fired for knowing nothing!



  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    Very good you're learning to nearly make a valid point. But I'll call you up on a couple of issues:

    The LCR and NSFR are designed to reduce excessive mismatch but not do away with maturity transformation... Again this is a banks business model. If it were implemented in the way you think banks would not exist.

    Your example of a millionaire holding savings is fine but irrelevant here. It's been a broad increase in deposits across many households not just one rich bloke putting all his savings in. Banks are allowed to assume short term deposits are sticky where they have evidence to that effect.

    I can understand why you use to work in derivatives. But even they seem to have tired of your cockiness and lack of understanding of a simple balance sheet. What do you think the banks are doing with the deposits?



  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    Let's be clear he's not the idiot here.

    You're shooting yourself in the foot. Your clueless assertion that mortgage loans are not funded by deposits is clear nonsense... The very quote you used stated the loan to deposit ratio is 61% if banking was as you described it that ratio would be illegal... Total nonsense.

    Stick with your derivatives my friend cause basic banking seems a little over your head.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    This was was to do with the belief that a bank could just use the deposits it has to give out more mortgages. The thread being about the housing market and mortgage interest rates was brought up as an aspect of that. There was a view expressed that these would not raise due to them having loads of deposits earning 0%.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    That's fine. You're an anonymous randomer posting on the internet. I don't care what you waffle on about.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    ... And totally irrelevant for this thread for the reasons I stated. Musk hasn't just deposited his Twitter money in an Irish Bank, its an across the board increasing in savings so the vast majority of those funds could be loaned out again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I'm not wasting any more time on this. But the bank cannot just increase long term lending (which mortgages are) based only off increased short term (or even demand) deposits. If you can't understand that, it's not my problem.

    Did you never notice that banks will generally offer higher rates for longer term fixed accounts? Did you never wonder why that is? I mean if you think that all they need is regular demand deposits then why would the bother their arses paying more for longer term?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,221 ✭✭✭combat14


    if they are not going up they'll have to fall with rising interest rates and inflation



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Deposits are not reserves, they are liabilities.

    Reserves is part of the capital or net assets of the bank - any losses on loans and operations effectively reduce the banks capital / reserves. Hence why captial / reserves needs to be at a minimum level so the bank can suffer the losses without becoming insolvent / damaging the wider economy.

    Banks 'create' money by leveraging their capital base by borrowing deposits from customers and lending it out.

    Off topic so I'll stay quiet now



  • Registered Users Posts: 556 ✭✭✭Q&A


    It's not wasted time for you... Go back reread what you think you know about your funding ratios but this time pay attention. Your attention to detail is poor on that matter and also on here. For example, you somehow think I referenced AIB first - that was someone else.

    These ratios are about reducing short/medium term liquidity mismatch and ensuring money is there to meet outgoings as they fall due. That's a world apart from saying banks don't fund long term lending with short term deposits. I'll say it again this is the basics of what banks (retail banks at least) do.

    Rather than just attacking everyone else for disagreeing with you and spouting on about your self indulgent knowledge of derivatives, why not tell us all how - you think - mortgage lenders in Ireland fund their lending. Feel free to use the AIB example you seem fixated on. Now I know you'll have to throw in plenty of petty comments for the sake of your own ego but do try and also answer the question?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Have to comment on this - Stable funding which is used in the NSFR calculation is defined as "types and amounts of equity and liability financing expected to be reliable sources of funds over a one-year time horizon under conditions of extended stress"

    Note the emphasis on one-year time horizon i.e. not the time horizon of the bank's loan book.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Comment all you like. Emphasize what you like. I never said it did. It is an example of one regulatory metric which banks have to hit. You can go off and spend a few hours googling something and come back with a shallow understanding of it all you want. But it is better to spend 5 minutes reading what you are attempting to reply to first.

    Within the bank itself, you are going to have risk people knocking the heads of your ALM guys anyway.

    The wannabe accounting geniuses above going on about balance sheets and saying that mortgage rates don't have to go up because they will fund all the mortgages off 0% deposits..........they ironically seem to discount that fact that discount rates are going to have a large impact on that side of the balance sheet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Yes, you did: 'If the Bank wants to give out a load of 30 year mortgages, it will have to issue on some longer-date debt itself in order to make sure it has some security over it's future requirements.' This is clearly false - it just needs a stable form of funding and deposits are deemed stable.

    I'll repeat the quote I provided earlier from the liquidity risk note in the AIB accounts: 'Customer deposits represent the largest source of funding for the Group with the core retail franchises and accompanying deposit base in both Ireland and the UK providing a stable and reasonably predictable source of funds.'

    You don't know what you're talking about.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    We are back to the piggybank example. The other poster attached documents to explain the basics in relation to a retail bank such as AIB.

    If you want to look at the balance sheet someone else posted, you can see that the answer in relation to where they get their longer term funding from. That is there - not to take in a euro and lend it out - but to have it as a capital reserve. Unlike deposits, that cannot be withdrawn on Monday.


    I'm not wasting any more time on this. It's like trying to have a conversation with someone about the moon when all they are concerned about is telling you it is made of cheese. Go get yourself a job in finance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Yes, you did: 'If the Bank wants to give out a load of 30 year mortgages, it will have to issue on some longer-date debt itself in order to make sure it has some security over it's future requirements.'


    Yes, Mr. Genius. There will have future requirements. Getting longer maturity funding now means you have those locked in. I mentioned two quantites as an example. I did not say that these are the only two things that count. Nor did I say that they are once off requirements that only have to be computed now and you'll never have to do them again.


    I'm not wasting any more time on this. There are plenty of well-paid jobs in the IFSC. Go get one. Granted they tend to be more back office, or some middle office type roles now, but it would be a foot in the door for you to use all your knowledge.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement