Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Not in the World According To Buzzfeed. When you strip all context away, to Buzzfeed they are exactly the same thing and more proof the press are wascists.

This made me laugh. Did she and Charles discuss what to do with their non working, ex-pat children's children? This queen said "I"ll go first." . Makes it easier for Charles to follow. They are not the only royals trimming their monarchy.

I heard/saw different...😀 originally they are bread as herding dogs for cattle.. to control them they bit them in the feet. as corgis started to be the fashion dog in the 30's or so they started breeding with some 'good mannered' corgis😁 to eliminate the biting habit but it's still coming through if they are stressed. And that's what they did with the Queen...yes, imagine, they bit her in the ankles.😂 I think it's hilarious there's a very good documentary about it, I think I havn't laughed in front of the tv for so hard for a long time..she had to appoint a dog whisperer into Buckingham Palace to sort out the Corgi issue😂🤣 watch it, it's worth it

The whole thing is distasteful. I don't agree with the concept of a monarchy, think it's outdated and disgusting but I feel for those kids and their dad. He was told in May that they'd be phased out when they turned 25 and would have to make their own money. No problem, eldest two are models. Then 5 days later they are publicly stripped and I'd imagine humiliated. She couldn't even give a good reason why other than "it'd be good for them". Those kids were raised as royals and to pull the rug out like this, so suddenly is cruel. I couldn't ever imagine my grandmother treating me differently from my cousins. She handled it very badly and will definitely cause a rift.

This had been on the cards for years. It was in May they were told it was finally going to happen. They are still family. Nothing has changed, they have their riches, they houses and their jobs. They only thing they cant now do is call themselves Prince and Princess and be deffered to as HRHs. They dont even live in Denmark. and they dont work for the monarchy anymore. What is the purpose of their titles other than to trade off. I dont understand why announcing it to the public, who literally pay for the monarchy, is wrong, or humiliating, or cold. She is still their mother/grandmother and I am sure she loves them dearly. But she is also the Queen of Denmark and owes it to the citizens of that country to tell them this type of news openly and publically. It should not be a humilation or a shock to the family who all knew it was coming. If their kids have been led to believe they are special and priviledged and will always have these titles then that is on their parents. They are richer beyond the dreams of many and will never want for anything in life. But yet the father wants more.

Same with H&M, Charles has been very public about his plans, it has always been on the cards for Harry, he even knew he had X amount of years before George turned 18. The entire dramatics when it eventually happens will be H &M desperatly trying to cling onto titles and priviledge that they are not owed.

I've been researching the British royal family recently and the story of King Edward VIII reminds me of Prince Harry. I had never heard of him before, imagine giving up on the kingship for a twice divorced woman. He would have had 36 years as king and he gave it up for a woman. Although I suppose the Harry situation is different as he wouldn't be king anyway.

There was already precedent as the king of Sweden removed the HRH from his grandkids who lived outside of Sweden which makes sense as if you want all the benefits(doing heavy lifting there) of being in a royal family then you need to live in the country of that monarchy. It’s probably the one thing that I’ve seen monarchs in Europe so that I agree with.

Per the Courtiers book Meghan thought the "Wild about Harry" headline on Vanity Fair was racist. It being a song from a Judy Garland movie in 1939 which involved black face performers and totally not a likely reference to a Sun headline when Harry was born. She was also upset that the Vanity Fair piece focused too much on Harry. The magazine wanted to lean towards focusing on the Prince and not the D list actress no one has really heard of who is only on the coveted cover because of that same Prince? Completely delusional. The Bower book referenced a lack of focus on her humanitarian work because VF researchers couldn't find anything solid on that front.

She also reportedly complained about the photos, which are classic Vanity Fair-style, expensively produced using Peter Lindbergh, one of the top photographers in the world. I'm beginning to think nothing makes Meghan happy, absolutely nothing at all.

They're also gone from Sunshine Sachs as their PR. I guess they couldn't make her happy either. I guess when someone gets a cover like that and they perceive slights and express unhappiness then it could never be a long term arrangement.

Finally it's funny how these podcasts, book and streaming shows tout being honest and truthful but are reportedly undergoing edits, rewrites and changes since Liz kicked the bucket. These two are the "I didn't do it' boys of the Royal family. They need the gossip, tattle, tea and accusations to remain relevant and sustain interest. Neutering or toning down their content will lose them whatever interest people still have in them. All they will have left is Twitter bots, internet trolls and balmpots and the Daily Mail flogging a dead horse.

I think the book is cancelled, his family paid him off. Blackmail wins the day, and the shiny new house. Harry will still be miserable though, no doubt.