Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
14904914934954961062

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Just more of your nonsense and avoidance with your posts now being nothing more than wind-ups attempts with the Irish Green Party ideology and your unquestioning support of it is increasingly being shown for the hypocrisy and economic fantasy it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    The problem with shutting down the nuclear plant that is they are taking away their reserve generation and it is not being readily noticed by the consumers. The consequence of this green energy transition to unreliable source became apparent in Europe in 2021. Cold Spring weather drove up the demand for gas, during the course of the Summer, wind speeds dropped across Europe for extended periods, meaning the electricity generators had to fall back on gas, there was no other generation source, they had been phasing out coal and nuclear plants. When September came around they suppliers needed to buy gas, they all went into the market, but there was no supply and the gas price increased massively, several suppliers went bankrupt and consumers who had been with those suppliers found themselves being moved to suppliers of last resort on less favourable terms. i.e. more expensive. That happened before the Russians who previously supplied 40% of Europes gas invaded Ukraine and the same politicians who pushed wind & solar, imposed sanctions. The correct response was increase supply, and crash prices, to do that would have meant undoing all the policies of the previous two decades where they actively discouraged extracting oil and gas. Now we are stuck with the consequences, inflating price of energy due to multiple failed policies that cannot resolve the lack of gas molecules.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    You experienced power outages where parts of the grid infrastructure were disconnected from the generators caused by wind storm damage or a local transformer blowing. A blackout condition happens where the generator station fails or is taken offline from the grid, the 50Hz frequency cannot be maintained and large sections of the grid must be disconnected by the operator in order to distribute what is left, such as what happened with ESB strikes, they last threatened that in 2013, ESB workers are among the best compensated in the Irish state for a reason.

    Households with dual fuel systems, that could burn turf, coal or firewood, or use the superser heaters, could stay warm in the event of outages. The stated intention of government policy is to remove fossil fuel sources and depend entirely on electricity for heating & commerce. One of the consequences of the turbines being installed in this area is the transmission lines had to be upgraded, In recent years we have not had experience of two week power outages like we had in the aftermath of Hurricane Charlie (1986). Nowadays, power outages are signalled in advance as part of planned maintenance.

    Compared with 30 years ago, our dependence on electricity has increased, more of our jobs rely on it. Can't pump water and sewage without it, we use less physical cash than before, in the event of a power outage, even if the local store is open, you can't buy any provisions you might need in emergency, unless the store has a generator and access to a telecommunications exchange with power. If there is a power outage you cannot even start the oil or gas heating because the on/off switch does not work.

    There is a reason the ESB are well compensated, a blackout will cause widespread economic losses due to loss of income and when the power returns there will be damage to some electronic equipment such as computer devices and others equipment that cannot handle the initial surge. The chances of encountering a blackout condition in Ireland are not zero, they would not be carrying out unplanned war gaming exercises otherwise, there has been a surge in demand across Ireland for generators this year. The dependence on and reliability of electricity networks will be an ongoing concern for the remainder of the decade in Ireland.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Ireland has about 2.5gwh of BESS installed. A small percentage of this capacity would be enough to keep critical infrastructure working while power to the grid is restored or backup diesel generators are engaged.

    The loss of income from power outages is not the end of the world. There are plenty of scenarios that mean industry has to curtail production temporarily. The COVID pandemic proves that we're pretty resilient, there is always a risk of industrial action that restricts economic activity etc


    But the main point you are ignoring is the transition to renewable, carbon neutral electricity is not optional. We need to do this, as quickly as we can to avoid as much of the harms associated with climate change as possible

    And we are (re)learning now that fossil fuels are not reliable. The pipes can be shut down. The global supplies are subject to the whims of dictators in OPEC or supply chain disruption

    Distributed renewable generation with distributed storage is much less prone to individual points of failure



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Ireland has about 2.5gwh of BESS installed.

    What is the source for this 2.5gwh value?

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The point you are ignoring is that it's utterly pointless claiming a necessity in Ireland doing something when it simply isn't true. Ireland is completely insignificant and what it does or doesn't do could hardly matter less. If China, India, Russia and others responsible for high CO2 oitput do nothing, then Ireland might as well do nothing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,278 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    So distributed renewable generation is more reliable than fossil fuel distributed generation ??? In what planet is that statement actually factual true ? The truth is green energy is totally depended on fossil fuel to make it anyway viable.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Akrasia has just made the argument for the LNG terminal



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,544 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    It seems insanely high. We've less than 600MW installed and of that 90% has less than 30 minutes storage.

    0.25GWh might be closer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    That superser heater you mentioned. You could get them for about 70 euro not so long ago. Price pretty much doubled and it is actually sold out in most of the places. Also gas cylinders went up quite considerably. Sign of the times ahead.

    • 11 of them available in B&Q seems they sell quite fast.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indeed. I have no intention of switching away from my duel fuel heating and have a good solid fuel stockpile.

    power was out for a while in the storms last week and really focussed the mind



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,544 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    In development and available are two very different things. Sure according to ER, we had 4GW of generation in development as part of Gate 3 the last time he was in power. How much of that (particularly the 1.3GW of conventional generation) actually materialised?

    A lot of those batteries will never be delivered after they get a haircut for system service tariffs. They cannibalised their own revenue streams.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭ps200306


    It truly scares me that there are people this naive.

    The loss of income from power outages is not the end of the world. There are plenty of scenarios that mean industry has to curtail production temporarily. The COVID pandemic proves that we're pretty resilient, there is always a risk of industrial action that restricts economic activity etc

    We are a high tech economy. Loss of grid reliability would not only be a disaster in itself but would be a catastrophic deterrent for future inward investment. The COVID pandemic was world wide, so did not put us at a relative competitive disadvantage. A self-inflicted energy shortage would most definitely cause investment to be redirected to places that can guarantee to keep the lights on. As it was, our debt to GNI ratio went from 95% pre-pandemic to 106% at the end of 2021. It's better than the situation post-GFC where we went from 30% of GNI to 160% in the five years from 2007 to 2012. But the country was more or less bankrupt at that point, and saved only by historically low interest rates. We are still one of the most indebted countries in the world, and the era of zero or negative borrowing rates is over.

    Fiscal responsibility is going to be vital for developed economies over the next multiple years. A billion here or a billion there for madcap green energy schemes adds up to serious money. As dyed-in-the-wool socialists, the Green party are the last people I'd trust to have a clue about this, and comments such as the above show how clueless Green thinking is.

    Even without the current energy supply shortages, Green policies were going to increase the cost of electricity by at least a factor of two or three between 2020 and 2030. How anybody can be so blind to the implications for competitiveness is frightening, but the Greens appear to be oblivious to the need to even produce any kind of costed plan.

    Ireland has managed to stagger along through various headwinds thanks to its outsize economic growth (and tends to be flattered by wonky GDP numbers when GNI is a better metric). But there is nothing automatic or guaranteed about this situation, and energy costs could well be the thing that finally kills the golden goose. The chill winds of slowdowns and likely recession are already blowing through the tech industry and general economy. US IPOs in the first nine months of the year are down 80% on last year and the full year will be worse. This is a time when every economy needs to be looking at its costs, not throwing money around like snuff at a wake.

    But the main point you are ignoring is the transition to renewable, carbon neutral electricity is not optional. We need to do this, as quickly as we can to avoid as much of the harms associated with climate change as possible

    No, "we" do not need to do anything at all, as Ireland's contribution to global warming reduction will be 0.0°C even if every man, woman, child, and cow dropped dead tomorrow. This is the frustrating thing about Irish Green zealotry. It's like we are inflicted with a deep-rooted psychological need to bring back the Lough Derg pilgrimage by becoming some sort of green flagellants.

    Our transition to renewables -- and particularly the rate we decide to do it at -- is optional. The entire EU contributes only 8% of global CO2 emissions, down by nearly a half from 15% in 1990. Ireland's share is utterly negligible. Sure, let's transition along with the rest of the world, but to do it at immense harm to ourselves is insane. It's only you and Eamon Ryan who have deluded yourselves that having done our green penance we'll be able to demand that other much bigger economies do likewise. The level of hubris is mind boggling.

    And we are (re)learning now that fossil fuels are not reliable. The pipes can be shut down. The global supplies are subject to the whims of dictators in OPEC or supply chain disruption. Distributed renewable generation with distributed storage is much less prone to individual points of failure.

    It was only days ago that the Greenies on here took umbridge at the suggestion they were naive enough to think we could do without continued use of fossil fuels. So assuming you agree we need fossils -- 75% of our gas and 100% of our oil is imported -- you presumably also agree that we should be developing our indigenous resources to the maximum extent possible, as both the most secure and lowest carbon option. Eamon Ryan has said that decisions on existing exploration licenses are imminent. You'll be wanting to see a liberal stance on offshore permitting, right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    It's almost like only the headline is read... It's going to get to a stage were solar wind and batteries are competing for space. clown world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Do you even read what you link?

    So far only 37MW are online and working this time last year. Rest of it is in the same realm as most of the green agenda. LaLa-land.

    Care to guess how many more were finished and put to service since that article was published?

    Your claim that "Ireland has about 2.5gwh of BESS installed." therefore is just a lie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,431 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    We need to lead by example as they will all see how great we are then and will follow our lead. Definitely



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I'm so tired of you doom mongers. Quit with the scaremongering about catastrophic consequences from temporary electricity blackouts.


    Do you know what is catastrophic? Greenland Ice sheets melting

    Or the permanent shut down of the AMOC

    Or the permanent complete loss of the Amazon rainforest

    Post edited by Akrasia on


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The report was from a year ago, much of the BESS discussed in that article will have been installed already or is close to being completed.

    The exact number installed at this exact moment is very difficult to ascertain without paying for industry reports, but it's largely immaterial to the point I was making.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The planet where Oil and Gas supplies are used as weapons of war. The world we live in right now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    It says 2.5 GW not GWH. Batteries are not generators. Moneypoint in Clare has a capacity of 915 MW and it generates ~7 million MW hours/year. (915 x 24 hours x 365 days - other factors like maintenance, demand). Back of the cigarette box figures, daily system demand reaches 5GW on a typical weekday in Ireland, the aim is 70% wind + solar + hydro by 2030, that's 3.5 GW at peak for 14 hours (8AM to 10PM). By 2030, the batteries need to provide backup for 3500 MW x 24 hours x 30 days or 2,520,000 MWH or 2520 GWH. The ESB added batteries with 19MW (38MWh) at a site in Cork. You can gauge the land area used to provide 38 MWH.

    When there are no or low wind conditions for a month can the batteries be charged without surplus coal and gas generation? (i.e. charge batteries and meet system demand)

    Are the ESB quoting nameplate figures, or can the batteries only be charged to 80% of their capacity? and likely can only be discharged to 20% of capacity.

    Batteries are added to solve problems caused by wind and solar erratic generation on the grid, the batteries are there to smooth output providing stability services to the grid operator who need that 50Hz frequency. Batteries are not there to make up generation capacity that has been removed or never been added to the grid.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    I think it is pretty simple actually. To use an analogy: if you think an asteroid is going to hit the Earth in the forseeable future you will do everything possible to avoid it. That is the mindset of the Greens. Where that analogy breaks down is that an asteroid is a simple one off object that you can target while anything to do with climate is non linear, chaotic and complex which is no help to anybody. So, the solution is not a trade off of elements as it should be but a narrow focus on one element namely Co2 because that is the human variable we can tackle. This assumes a simple modelled equation as true, where THE science is settled with human hand on the global thermostat and in which personal responsibility is seen in moral terms and rules set for people and organizations to be complied with and punished when not. Whether other people, countries are involved is somewhat besides the point.The Truth is an a priori religious supposition and has a strong puritan spirit attached so anybody who objects is seen as a heretic. In other words: an imminent apocalypse is due and we must purge ourselves from our fossil fuel sin with a backdrop of the Gaia theory with a world unbalanced with too many people roaming the planet. To save the planet we need to bring the current one down. Pretty much the same as the socialist dream except for the part that the socialists really believed in industrialization to reach Utopia. So, the Green movement members are the new socialist middle class puritans who consists of a vanguard of soldiers all doing the 'right thing'. The danger is that this vanguard consists of most mainstream politicians, media and quite a few NGO's which keeps the agenda alive. It turns against the people when the **** hits the fan. Goverments increasingly want to keep control on energy and food supply. They dream of getting there hands on our thermostats (via smart meters) and want to control independent farmers as much as possible. In Holland there is a Minister of Co2 with targets who needs farmers to comply with a target cut of Co2 emmissions. But the farmers are pushing back. As the 2nd biggest producer of food (!) this compliance will reduce food production. Never mind, it will only be poor people in the third world who die. By the millions i might add if this agenda will continue in the West.

    In short: to save the planet the Greens will push the purge down people's throat, whether they like it or not. It is an undemocratic, neo fascist mindset that will lead to ruin. In fact i see this as an self inflicted armageddon. It WILL lead to a sped up apocalypse if we continue with this wide spread mind virus. In order to save a billion people from the effects of climate change they are willing to sacrifice 5 billion..



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    The smart thing would be like what they do in Holland. My brother did get a 15.000 euro state loan/grand to get both solar panels (self installed) and triple glazing windows. The hardware was delivered to his door. He can pay it off in 10 years using the electricity returned to the grid to lower his overall bill. He is currently paying a monthly charge of around 80 euro with a fixed charge 5 year contract. He used to pay 150 euro a month for gas alone and that was before the hikes. Now he just uses electricity.

    That is what we call Smart Green tech promoted by the state. Not what we do in Ireland.In fact cannot do in Ireland. Solar panel power is not a great option in our cloudy environment. No grants for upgrading windows i think which is what im contemplating. Around 8000 euro for our house. Im calculating how long it will take to get financially even. But i really might need that money for the coming winter fuel/electricity bills. It is currently very hard to make any sensible equation about prices/costs/supply for the future. That goes for everybody btw including businesses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    There are certain posters on this forum best to avoid engaging with just like when meeting a drunk/deranged person on the street looking for a fight or spouting nonsense. Make no eye contact and just ignore. They are not worth your trouble..



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,987 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    No I'm saying nothing in life is free or guaranteed, if you house is cold then you can either shiver or do something about it. We did something about ours at our own cost. She qualifies for half the cost of the job. She can either do that or, save up and do it bit by bit. My brother in law lived in Ballyfermot. It cost about 6 grand to do the windows and attic. The credit union is there for a reason. Plenty of people struggle but they also do without so that they can save up and look after their home so that it looks after them.


    FYI I don't support the greens



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,377 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    You being tired of doom mongers is quite hilarious seen as you are chief doom monger yourself!

    If your so tired of people explaining the consequences of grid outages- then why do you continually post in this thread?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭ps200306


    I'm so tired of you doom mongers. Quit with the scaremongering about catastrophic consequences from temporary electricity blackouts.

    Do you know what is catastrophic? Greenland Ice sheets melting

    Or the permanent shut down of the AMOC

    Or the permanent complete loss of the Amazon rainforest

    Ok. Let's go with your assumption of "temporary blackouts" and not the destabilisation of our entire economy. A very simple question for you:

    For each "temporary blackout" that Ireland endures, how much less Greenland ice will melt?

    You've obviously done this calculation. I'd just like to know what you came up with so that I can support your strategy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Read a report recently about a Tesla owner in Norway who paid 82 euro to fast charge his car at a filling station. Do people think this will become the norm here also in a few years time?



  • Registered Users Posts: 500 ✭✭✭Marcos


    "In short: to save the planet the Greens will push the purge down people's throat, whether they like it or not. It is an undemocratic, neo fascist mindset that will lead to ruin. In fact i see this as an self inflicted armageddon. It WILL lead to a sped up apocalypse if we continue with this wide spread mind virus. In order to save a billion people from the effects of climate change they are willing to sacrifice 5 billion.."

    Look at the video of Eamon Ryan a few years ago saying he'd love a one world dictatorship if it meant pushing policies that he personally liked.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Doing the windows and attic isn’t a retrofit



Advertisement