Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Energy infrastructure

Options
1128129131133134180

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,675 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The big problem I see is the move to EV transport.

    How can a two tonne electric vehicle be considered as an environmental solution if it is used to transport a single occupant?

    The quadricycle that Citroen have produced would be a better solution for most people for single person transport. Add public transport and e-bikes and e-scooters plus the old fashioned bicycles and footwear and most needs are covered for local transport. And Gov want to have a million EVs on the road by 2030.

    How would that work for the grid?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,460 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Moneypoint ( and tarbert ) are the back up to our back up .. and I agree they should be kept available for a lot longer than 2025 .. but they're not really backing up wind on a day to day or hour to hour basis .. largely that's gas .. as we get more storage ,(chemical ,flywheel ect ,) on the system that levels the peaks and troughs of wind energy coming in , allowing the gas turbines to be used more and more predictably ...

    Moneypoint and tarbert are then available for a predictable period of extremely high use , ( December ) , a major breakdown ( as happened last year with 2 gas stations , or a very calm weather period ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭KildareP


    It won't, as things stand.

    EV's charging overnight will bring our current night-time lull up to what our current daytime peak is. Anything up to 2.5GW of additional overnight demand, and that's with demand side measures (the grid co-ordinates your charging state and rate within set parameters like minimum SOC to be met, must be ready by XX:XX time, etc.)

    However what'll save that coming to a head is they simply can't produce anywhere close to enough EV's to meet demand, order an EV today from most manufacturers and you'd be lucky to see it in time for a 231 plate, never mind a 222.

    But thanks to how we've built and priced houses, the car is going to stay. We now have a major commuter belt stretching around Dublin as far north as Drogheda, through Navan, across to Athlone, down to Portlaoise, Carlow and Gorey.

    In my own case I'm in a rural town in Kildare that has over doubled it's population over the last 10 years, mostly ex-Dubs who just couldn't afford to buy in Dublin. There is no way you could survive here without a car - the nearest major supermarket is 12KM away, we have no local GP, no secondary school with limited bus service to the nearest surrounding school, public transport we have one single decker bus every 30 minutes into Busaras that already leaves people standing at the stop en-route because it's packed. The closest major connecting transport hub it passes is the Luas at the Red Cow. Closest sources of major employment is 20KM away and then Dublin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭KildareP


    Moneypoint is unfortunately far from a backup, it has been consistently providing anything from 8% to 20% of our live baseload since early Summer so far this year (12.66% average over the last rolling 30 days as of today). Fed with coal, the dirtiest form of generation by far.

    Gas is then the next available fluctuating source to meet major shifts in wind availability, with the caveat being the more frequently you ramp it up or down the less efficient overall it becomes as most of our major gas plant is combined cycle, intended for stable baseload output as opposed to responsive demand driven.

    Most of the fast acting responsive generation is done using either gas or oil in open cycle turbines which are the least efficient form of generation, along with oil being dirtier than gas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,460 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I assume that moneypoint is being used more at the moment to try and reduce gas use..

    ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    But the goal shouldnt be to increase night-time usage to match day-time usage, the goal should be to reduce usage full stop.

    We should be looking for storage solutions so that night-time generation can be stored for day-time peaks - obviously there are big issues scaling any storage technology to the scale required, but adding more load at night time instead of looking for more energy (and space) efficient transport modes in the first place... it just doesnt make sense (unless you are a SIMI member)



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,904 ✭✭✭✭josip


    A quarter of the capacity of Turlough Hill with a similar efficiency.

    https://newatlas.com/energy/china-100mw-compressed-air/

    It might be something we need to consider as a storage technology if Silvermines doesn't go ahead and assuming we can't identify any alternative pumped storage locations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭KildareP


    I imagine so.

    It would also stop the grid from going completely dark if gas flows were suddenly interrupted from the UK. Don't know how our grid would fare in a black start scenario!



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Not necessarily it takes four days for it to step in or out. It's not feasible to run it intermittently. If you need to use it you have to have it running all the time.

    As wind is so variable and the projections are if we get low wind especially over Christmas or other times during the winter when demand use is exceptionally high we could suffer blackouts as we have higher demand than supply in such situations.

    It's easy to supply 90% of the network between 2-5am in a weekday morning.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭KildareP


    It's not a goal per se, we're inevitably going to substantially increase load on the grid even if we just electrified heating and public transport and not a single personal car. Our daytime demand is also going to rise significantly in the coming years.


    The time when public service vehicles are most suited to be charged tends to be at night when buses don't operate so that's where the bulk of this new demand is ultimately going to end up on the grid.

    The NTA are to take delivery of 120 electric buses shortly with a view to increasing to 800 over 5-years.

    Each bus will have 454kWh of battery capacity which should give ~300KM of range, about a day's worth of driving for most routes so assume the vast majority of their vehicles will need a near full charge daily.

    That's going to be well in excess of 350,000kWh of power drawn every single day from the grid, just for these 800 busses, the majority in the overnight hours.

    Extend that same migration of these 800 electric busses out to the rest of the public transport network throughout the country and you're talking thousands of busses, some of which will be required to cover well in excess of 300KM a day and thus require multiple high power charging sessions thorughout the day and so that will feed into higher daytime demand.


    Heatpumps also tend to be at their least efficient overnight (outside air is at its coldest), no assistance in heating rooms via radiated heat from the sun, whilst also having the biggest demand placed on them (have the house warm with plenty of hot water for showers for the morning) so that's also going to place the grid under most pressure during overnight hours too.

    A heatpump could use anything from 3,000-6,000kWh of energy a year per property, most of which will be consumed within the 6-month period October-March. Multiply that out to 600k properties and that's anything from 10GWh (10,000,000 kWh) to 20GWh of average additional consumption to be placed onto the grid per day, or a minimum of between ~0.4GW and ~0.8GW of sustained demand to be met throughout each of the 24-hours, every single day, and weighted mostly in the overnight hours.


    And again, that's before you've factored in a single one of the 1mn EV's, or put in additional public transport options to completely displace a private car commute from happening (which means more busses, more routes, and thus more demand for electricity) or taken into account the tens of thousands of new houses that will materialise in the coming years to solve the housing crisis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,904 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Have any windfarms in Ireland reached end of life yet? There are a few that date back to the 90s.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wind_farms_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland

    Is their end of life determined by regulatory criteria such as the length of operation being stipulated in planning or is it technical where the turbines/blades wear and are no longer economically viable?

    When a windfarm reaches end of life, do they resubmit a new proposal for a replacement farm on the same site?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,675 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The turbines can be substituted for new ones, but the more recent ones are much bigger and therefore generate more power, so a replacement would tend to be bigger. That, I assume would be subject to planning, and also tend to be a question of whether the connection to the grid could take it.

    Are the existing planning permissions subject to a time limit?



  • Registered Users Posts: 232 ✭✭specialbyte


    Yes it is common for planning permissions to come with a time limit. For example a wind farm in Kerry just recently approved is this case file: https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/309156

    Condition 5 is that they have 10 years to build the wind farm. Condition 6 is that once it starts operating it only has 30 year time limit. Condition 24 is that "On full or partial decomissioning of the windfarm, or the windfarm ceases to operate for a period of more than one year, the turbines and all decommissioned structures shall be removed, and foundations covered and soil to facilitate re-vegetation", this must be approved to the satisfaction of the planning authority (local council) 3 months after decommissioning.

    Before the 30 year time limit the owner could apply for permission from ABP to extend the life of the wind farm. However, given the changes in wind turbine technology, it is likely in 30 years that the wind farm will either be decommissioned and removed entirely, or decommissioned and replaced by a new wind farm with a fresh planning application.

    These locations are high wind locations and there is an existing grid connection (that might need upgrading). It's a favourable site for a new wind farm after the old one is shutdown.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭KildareP


    Reports today in the Independent and on RTÉ that seems to suggest Tarbert is pretty much done for, 3 of the 4 oil units would appear to now be completely inoperable.

    While it was due to be retired next year anyway, that's 600MW of generation that is now not going to be available for this winter.

    That's on top of at least 630MW of generation expected online in the near future that is now not going to happen as the various backers all pulled out.

    Really only leaves Moneypoint's coal (900MW) and the various oil fired peaking plants (few hundred MW) as the immediate non-gas generation alternatives to hand apart from wind heading into winter, since the UK are themselves expecting shortfalls in power (so the interconnectors can effectively be ruled out as a reliable source of import if we face a crunch).



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,217 ✭✭✭plodder


    That's on top of at least 630MW of generation expected online in the near future that is now not going to happen as the various backers all pulled out.

    What is the background to that? I've seen this stated numerous times, but never seen an explanation. How can they just pull out like that without penalty?

    Or were they contracted to supply electricity at a specific price, that is now uneconomic?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,675 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think it must be time for the Gov to enable/make/force the ESB to take up these contracts. We cannot be at the mercy of companies walking away.

    I think ESB might actually be one of those companies walking away.

    Also should the Gov not be looking at putting gas generators replacements for Tarbert and Moneypoint as the grid connection is already there, and more generators are needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There was a couple of companies supposed to supply gas fired generations and the have pulled out.

    I do not think the ESB is Shell pulled out of one offshore windfarm before it went to planning and Equinor pulled out of an agreement with the ESB to build an offshore windfarm.

    Both probably see better opportunities elsewhere and Shell is involved in the west of Ireland gas field that had all the protests. I .not sure was Equinor involves as Statoil here as well.

    It's basically down to our administration methods and the inability of speeding up planning

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Maybe they pulled out because they took one look at the gas supply problem and the politician's collective insanity in not fixing it by fast tracking LNG, and said nope.

    I wouldn't put it past ER and the rest of the loonies in charge to be seeking contracts with penaltiies for non supply irrespective of the gas supply situation.

    This country has an absolute genius for making rods for it's own back. And as I have said several times, the planning system needs to be scrapped completely and one that actually works, copied from another country.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The planning system works fine, it just doesn't have enough resources, same with the courts and regulatory authorities.

    It should be possible to submit planning, have appeals, and a final decision, all within max 6 months, if staffed appropriately



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 232 ✭✭specialbyte




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    That was exactly my point, the change was necessary because the planning system is too restrictive.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    €3.5Bn gets you the 3GW 1,373Km long GREGY interconnector project. Greece to Egypt via Crete. "Approximately one third (of the electricity that will come from Egypt) will be consumed in Greece, and mainly in Greek industries, another third will be exported to neighbouring European countries and one third will be used in Greece, for the production of green hydrogen. The majority of this hydrogen will also be exported to neighbouring European countries"

    1,000Km would get you from Ireland to Spain.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,460 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    And what happens with an interconnector to Spain ?

    Are we accessing cheap solar ? During daytime summer hours ? And making it expensive by buying the surplus and sending it down a 3.5 billion dollar wire . With losses ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    It's an option. We could trade solar for wind. We could even supply solar on summer evenings. Hydrogen storage is only 40% round trip efficient but efficiency doesn't matter so much when you are getting very cheap energy like solar in Portugal or Spain or Africa.

    It shows that we could have a major pipe for about a euro a Watt. Nordstream 2 cost 9.5 billion euros so on a per watt basis a hydrogen pipeline might be an even a cheaper way to transport energy here, if we needed vast amounts of energy.


    There's also an interconnector project from Greece to Crete to Cyprus and Israel.


    Storage smoothens out energy costs in time. Interconnectors smooth out energy costs over distance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,460 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Is it very cheap when it's not 24 hour dispatchable ? and it's got to go down a 3.5 billion euro wire .. ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    "one third will be used in Greece, for the production of green hydrogen. The majority of this hydrogen will also be exported to neighbouring European countries"


    https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/greece-energy Greece will be investing in a lot of infrastructure. And getting EU funds for some of it. Existing renewables are a little over 4GW each of Wind and Solar.

    In June 2022, Energy Minister Skrekas stated that 44 billion Euros would be dedicated to the structural transformation of Greece’s energy sector which would include increasing renewable energy capacity to 25 GW from the current 9 GW and tripling the volume for LNG storage. The phaseout of lignite plants was delayed until 2028.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,904 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Although our solar isn't great, and wind can be intermittent, sea waves around our coast are more reliable.

    https://newatlas.com/energy/blowhole-wave-energy-lcoe/

    It looks like these would need to be placed in shallow waters, near the coast. The west coast would be best with the Atlantic. Sorry west coast, you'll have to put up with the modern equivalent of Hitler's Atlantic Wall to keep us east coasties in power. We could put a few on Curracloe, Greystones and Dollymount so that we're 'all in it together'. But not too many mind.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 971 ✭✭✭medoc



    Bord Na Mona’s Bellacorrick wind farm in Mayo is still operational after having opened in 1992. It was one of the first wind farms in Ireland as far as I know. It’s now surrounded by the very very much larger Oweninny wind farm. Phase 1 and 2 is operational and a joint venture with the ESB. Phase 3 is in planning and will be a BNM only venture.



Advertisement