Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1270271273275276334

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    @FraserburghFreddie Did your Dad own a Rover Metro by any chance?

    Rover as a marque was used after the British Leyland marque became toxic.

    By the way, the Land Rover was originally built to get the UK Gov to release rationed steel for its production as it was to sell well in Africa - which it did.

    However, the Land Rover contains a lot of aluminium and the steel was used to build Rover cars.



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    No but I did own an Austin mini metro back in the 80s, drove from Dublin to Waterford (took about six hours,no motorways back then) Mrs and I with five kids jumping about in the back-never missed a beat! 😀



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    @FraserburghFreddie any chance you'll let us know the names of the two senior politicians who you said made those claims about the EU & NIP? The suspense is killing me!



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    I've linked to the Varadkar and Coveney articles. By all means, continue to beaver away Seth.




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    But Varadkar didn't say that. Your own source even confirmed that. He used the word "perhaps" which creates a very different context. I'm surprised that you're continuing to push your misleading stance there.

    That Coveney agrees with Varadkars point of view is not saying that the protocol is too strict but "perhaps" it might be.

    Is it that you do not understand English or are you being deliberately disingenuous?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That is because the Rover name is still owned by Jaguar Landrover so they had to use MG, which did go with the purchase. They also sold cars domestically as Roewe with a lookalike badge.

    I don't know if the other legacy brand names were sold but none have the name recognition of MG - Wolseley, Riley, Morris, Austin etc. Cars your grandad might have driven, whereas there are still mid 00s MGs going around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭rock22


    And while you are at it, perhaps you might also give us a source for your other comments

    @FraserburghFreddie "Airbus is part owned by BAE systems,the largest defence contractor in Europe. The wings for all airbus aircraft are manufactured in Broughton and flown to Europe.Production is ramping up there so I'm surprised by your comments that Broughton isn't important."



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    Seth,I've provided credible links from Irish and European sources.You continue to deny this and are becoming a time sink.If the RTE link provided is incorrect why hasn't anyone from the Irish government claimed they've been misquoted?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Your own link confirmed you to be wrong. You were also provided with a link to the video of Varadkar saying "perhaps".

    Why do you continue to push the line that he said something else?

    Varadkar did not say that the protocol is not working - end of.



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    I was wrong about BAE systems part owning Airbus. Comments about production at Broughton are correct.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭rock22


    Yes but you made the statement in response to @Capt'n Midnight who said

    Brexit means the UK will no longer be an equal partner. Little things will all add up. If the rover had been built in the US or EU it's much more likely to be used. If it ever comes down to a choice between keeping a function open in the UK or the EU there's no question which is more important politically.

    So do you accept the point he made , that little things will add up. Wings for Airbus aircraft are also made in China and i think the US. It is not hard to see in the future a decision to move European manufacturing onto fewer, continental, sites. As he said "If it ever comes down to a choice between keeping a function open in the UK or the EU there's no question which is more important politically"



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    I suppose you could speculate airbus might build a wings facility in continental Europe but you could also speculate airbus sees its wing building and future technological advances in the UK.Here's a link detailing their expansion in the UK.

    https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-07-airbus-completes-assembly-of-first-future-wing-prototype



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Very tough for them to move something like that, would take a (political?) catastrophe to even consider shifting it quickly (e.g. an EU-UK trade war that spiralled out of control or some such might do it). A huge amount of inertia to overcome & I imagine Airbus is big enough and what it is making is crucial enough and expensive enough that it can deal with/bear extra admin load and hassle due to Brexit.

    You can expect nothing "new" (e.g. new technology needed in future aircraft) will be sited in UK which doesn't need to be.

    IMO one effect of Brexit, well maybe more the way UK has conducted it is it will be unlikely the larger EU states will work together on massive joint projects with the UK until there's been a big sea-change in political philosophy over there.

    e.g. (new) things on scale of Concorde or the Channel Tunnel or Eurofighter project will not happen again while current rabid anti-EU political mood that's taken hold over in the UK lasts because while UK govt. protests otherwise it can't divorce strategy it has been adopting of undermining and disrupting or even exploding the EU apart from also doing very serious harm to its supposed "friends" in EU member states it would be working with on these projects.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,213 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    You can expect nothing "new" (e.g. new technology needed in future aircraft) will be sited in UK which doesn't need to be.

    This is one of the big things about Brexit - It's not necessarily that Companies will suddenly shutter facilities and move out , but it's that the UK locations will not grow or perhaps even be sustained over time.

    Each time a company is looking at places to site more staff or to add production capacity , Brexit will be a very large tick in the "Con" column as they make the evaluations.

    It may not always be enough of a negative to stop the investment , but it will always be there and likely be enough to stop quite a bit of future investment and employment going to the UK that ordinarily would have in pre-Brexit times.

    Brexit will almost never be in the "pro" column as a reason to do business with the UK



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    ...

    Post edited by FraserburghFreddie on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 684 ✭✭✭farmerval


    How can any global company take the UK seriously now. Six years of complete instability and no knowing how it will end. Will the UK stay outside of the EU single market? What about the customs union?

    The whole Brexit debate is so toxic and going in ever decreasing circles, there's no way to see a good end, not even a good end but an end that may be acceptable to those that wanted Brexit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,810 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Is there a debate? Who is debating it beyond talking heads on the tv? Among ordinary people they are either Brexiters who will blindly continue the way they are going, or the rest who are fed up with the whole thing and trying to get on with their lives in spite of everything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,906 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    So, the "Festival of Brexit" has gone down like a lead balloon, looks like the government spent about £500 per attending visitor, I'm sure there's a metaphor in there somewhere.

    'Unadulterated shambles': Probe launched into £120m 'Festival of Brexit' | Politics News | Sky News



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Does anything ever come of these investigations in the UK? Will someone lose their job or political position?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That was two prime ministers ago. (May)

    Anyone responsible has moved on.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    If Tony Blair could get away with Iraq, I think this lot have nothing to worry about.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Did Blair get away with Iraq?

    Where is he now - Jerusalem.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Well, he's enormously wealthy and was never held to account so yes.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, he did not get enormously wealthy from the UK PM salary plus expenses.

    If I had to live in Jerusalem, I would not consider I had got away with anything - particularly if I was not a Jew, but a Catholic, as he is reported to be.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    No, he got wealthy from his firm, Tony Blair Associates. UK PM is nothing relative to what they can earn in the private sector.

    He brought the UK into an illegal war. The fact that he's free, never mind continuing to wield influence is an abomination.

    What's wrong with Jerusalem?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,723 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Eight years ago, he was estimated to be worth £100 million. God knows how much he is worth now. Interesting quote from the article:

    "One minute Blair is “advising” in Kazakhstan, another in Columbia, Azerbaijan or Dubai. He seems to have an aversion to democracies."



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    According to Owen Jones, his firm took £13 million from Kazakhstan alone.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The UK had a massive steel shortage and a massive dollar shortage at the time. Steel was allocated to manufacturers in proportion to what they could earn from exports. So it made sense to design models with export appeal. Aluminium was available due to lots of surplus WWII aircraft being scrapped. So it made sense to use it for the body of the Land Rover. The export earnings meant a larger steel quota for use on other cars and the domestic market (waiting lists of years long in the 1950s for a new car in the UK as as much production as possible was exported).

    I wonder how the Land Rovers stood up to use in Africa though. The Australians bought lots of them initially but once Land Cruisers became available, bought those instead due to unreliability.


    Oi! I learned to drive in an Austin! 😲

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Speaking of iconic British car brands...

    BMW is to axe all UK production of the award-winning electric Mini and switch it to China, dealing a major blow to hopes that Britain could be a global hub for zero-emission vehicle manufacture.

    BMW’s decision comes amid reports that Britain’s only planned large-scale battery factory, being built by Britishvolt in the northeast of England, will go bust if it does not receive a £200 million rescue package.

    A spokesman for the business secretary, Jacob Rees-Mogg, declined to comment on BMW’s announcement.




  • Registered Users Posts: 726 ✭✭✭moon2



    the petrol based mini convertible was moved to the oxford manufacturing plant recently. That particular article predates the EV move to china, so keep that in mind when it talks about EV production in 2027.

    It's interesting that the oxford plant is essentially being repurposed to continue building legacy products. I'd say this is a net loss to the area, and to UK manufacturing.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    Even the Telegraph coming out with this sort of stuff now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,103 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    The telegraph is gone nuts. Front page and shame because a comedian ripped the p1ss out of her. And some government committee spending their time b1tching about Joe Lycett and Gary Lineker.

    The Brexit Freedom Bill just been passed which ‘sunsets’ EU Legislation relating to Financial Services by end of December 23 for BoE, FCA and PRA I think. And then all other EU legislation by 2026 The whole damn lot. And back to their own interpretation of law. But honestly, would you trust what’s there at the moment to create complex legal instruments that organise and direct your financial infrastructure. Two separate structures of Regulators taking complete control without stabilisers.

    Who knows how it will and will they be able to passport in by either service or location. It’s scary really.

    I loved a line from the last leg where they were discussing Liz Truss and they said ‘Do you know what, I miss Boris, at least he pretended he cared’.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,712 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    This is madness. Though, to be fair, pretty run-of-the-mill madness by the standards of brexitry.

    What this means is that, until December 2023 in the case of financial services, and December 2026 for all other industries, nobody knows what regulatory framework is going to be in place. Will the existing framework be retained? Will it be wholly or partly replaced and, if so, with what? And, just to compound matters, will the 2023/2026 deadlines be met or, like virtually every other aspect of Brexit, will they be pushed out time and again as the UK authorities realise that they have committed to unrealistic timeframes for a half-baked project that they have no idea how to implement?

    It's deeply ironic that a government that pretends to be committed to growth should commit to a pointless policy whose primary effect will be to create enduring regulatory uncertainty and strongly discourage investment across a wide range of business and commercial sectors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,103 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    So what it looks literally is the legislation for the regulators themselves by DecemberLike the prudential refgulayory authority, Financial conduct authority and the Bank of England and then December the following year to deliver all of the regulated participants legislation.

    im sure anyone related in Finance in the UKh has better CV things to be doing.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,429 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    It's deeply ironic that a government that pretends to be committed to growth should commit to a pointless policy whose primary effect will be to create enduring regulatory uncertainty and strongly discourage investment across a wide range of business and commercial sectors.

    That's Brexit in a nutshell!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    What I know about Financial Services would struggle to fill out a matchbox, but surely a lot of these companies have international footprints; in which case, who'd stick around within such regulatory fog?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,213 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    For some the "regulatory fog" is the benefit sadly.

    They can't be prosecuted for breaking a regulation that doesn't really exist now can they?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,723 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Britain is "the money-laundering capital of the world", according to Tory MP Andrew Mitchell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,810 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I doubt they have any intention of abandoning regulations. Its being suggested now, with a long run up, to appease the braindead brexiters. Either a different party will get in and abandon it, proving they are not reliable in terms of Brexit, or the Tories will somehow get back/stay in and gradually water it down before the due date, having cause maximum confusion in the meantime.

    It just isn't possible to abandon regulations wholesale - can you imagine the ramshackle buildings that will appear everywhere, the dodgy food and medicines that will be produced, the dangerous cars on the roads, the cowboy electricians that will reappear, the 50 and 60 hour working weeks people will be expected to work. Are they looking to go back to early Victorian levels of adulterated milk from diseased animals, wallpaper and paint that poisons people, and effluent being poured into any handy river? No, that is not project fear stuff, it is precisely what people will do if they can get away with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Grassey


    Well they've already gotten the ball rolling on the sewerage into handy rivers no? 🤣🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Just specifically on the elongated working week? That is something absolutely being pursued by right leaning parties - including in the UK but it'd take a while to dig out the sources. Most often these attempts to remove protections hide under the banner of "enabling the right to work", being doublespeak for stripping away protections regards working weeks, holiday allowances and so on. Sure why would we get in the way of people just wanting to work?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    ^^Right to work for peanuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its like that form you can sign "voluntarily" to waive your right to overtime.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Funny you should say that. Led By Donkeys have been up to good again:

    They go through the expected sordid relationship between dodgy think tanks, Truss and Kwarteng and their nefarious influence on UK economic policy.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Bigus



    A bit of reality dawning in this excellent video



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,810 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I just in the last few minutes finished watching that and was going to post it! Worth a watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Absolutely shatters the brexiteer lies about the British economy being hampered by COVID or Ukraine. The film is unequivocal that Brexit is the cause of Britain falling further and further behind the G7



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie




Advertisement