Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the right.

Options
11314161819182

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Definitely true. In general though the nationalists are considered right wing by the media, whereas the globalists are considered left wing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 121 ✭✭dtothebtotheh


    I’m not sure if you get my point:

    left wing/right wing, it means nothing nowadays, it seems to be a US concept, trump or Biden, we’ll they’re both right of centre.

    Chinese “communist” party, wealthy elites.

    large American corporations, wealthy elites.

    the only difference I can see is we have a few more freedoms in the west, but by and large they’re similar models.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,950 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I think you just have an issue conceptualizing this left/right divide.

    You're not far off, it's just the notion that the left is somehow a more noble by nature that's off. The left have always been as bad as the right. They just have better PR these days.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    The whole left/right separation is fairly pointless if you leave out the authoritarian/liberal axis. While Cuba and Norway could be considered left wing, there's a big difference in their levels of authoritarianism. Both left and right can tend towards authoritarianism or liberalism.

    From this thread, I've seen loads make the assumption that left or right leads to authoritarianism which isn't much different from claiming that walking east will take you further north. A country's level of authoritarianism doesn't necessarily depend on how their internal markets or social safety nets work although I'm not saying that there aren't synergies there. Both left and right have in the past exploited anti-immigrant sentiment for their own ends. You can be just as authoritarian as a Castro or Pinochet using vastly different economies and values. Heck, the CCCP have shown that the one entity can flip from communism to free markets while retaining their authoritarianism.

    In terms of the topic of this thread I think it boils down to where the threat of authoritarianism is coming from and that varies by where and when you are in the world. For example, in Cuba threat of authoritarianism is obviously coming from the left while in places like Poland, it's from the right. That's at the moment and could change over the years.

    Here in Ireland now, our main centre-right parties are just about hanging on but they don't have an authoritarian streak or as much deference to the church as they used to. The more rabid authoritarian types don't get much of a voice outside of social media and even there, their influence isn't much. Our traditional left parties have gone away leaving Sinn Féin as the main party of the left these days. It's difficult to know what they would be like in power, but how they've handled the levers of power in the North hasn't been too bad. Anecdotally, from conversations with shinners, I would be a bit concerned with their ability to justify and excuse authoritarianism in places like Cuba and murders here, in the North and UK. Time will tell.

    One place abroad where this question will have tangible results is in the US. They don't have an economic left to speak of so their main parties are right and further right. Their less-right party is socially liberal while their more-right party is socially conservative and claims to want to override election results to ensure that the personality that they've built their party around retains power. The less-right party has their own silliness going on too but pronoun usage and overriding elections aren't comparable. Where I see this as a potential threat here is that the guy that the more-right party have built themselves around has repeatedly praised Putin, deferred to him, acted in his interests and has views on NATO that could have come straight from Putin himself. That has the potential to change the world order from one where democracies dominate to one where autocracies take the top spot, at least in the short term. A disjointed west just won't have the same power and that won't be good for us in terms of favourable trade and security.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Why do you answer questions with another question? What do you think you are achieving? See how this works?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,285 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Yeh, the modern right are incredibly eager to get rid of the so called "left/right paradigm" aren't they. 😐️ Makes it easier to pull the wool over people's eyes.

    As for "nationalism" and "globalism", they're both right wing ideologies in the main. Nationalism, although it can manifest on the left too, usually belongs to the hard right and can raise its head in truly ugly forms, as we've seen over the last 100 years or so in its most extreme incarnations. Globalism is a right wing, neo-liberal, idea that places the benefit of corporations over that of the common man. As things stand, if we're to believe your assessment of the "real political divide", it's a right vs right paradigm, where various shades of right wing thinking vie for control.

    The "left" isn't really in power anywhere at present and has been reduced to a bogeyman. A phantom that is pulled out by the various flavours of the right to wave about because it scares its adherents. The fact of the matter is that the Left lost, which should please those on the right no end.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,826 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Why do you answer questions with another question?


    I didn't answer any questions with a question, because I was asked no question.

    I made a statement followed by asking a question. It's not thematically strange for a "discussion forum".


    What do you think you are achieving?

    Making statements explains my positions while asking a question is usually done to further my understanding of someone's position. In this case I was asking why you perceive the George Soros the billionaire investor to be worse than Elon musk the billionaire investor in regards to the buying of Twitter.


    See how this works.

    This looks like a question but lacks the question mark like your previous questions. But no I don't see how it works as you didn't answer my question. So i will restate it.


    Can you explain why you would have issues with George Soros purchasing twitter but not Elon musk?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Here is an example from our own doorstep where a succession of left-wing politicians - Wallace, Daly, MLMD - have started suing newspapers and other media in relation to stories about them. The Council of Europe is sufficiently concerned to have raised these issues.

    Threats to our democratic freedom can come from right or left, you are indeed correct that both are equally terrible when you get to the extremes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    I asked would it be better if Soros owned Twitter than Elon Musk, see red question above, you replied with a question - see blue question above.

    You didn't make a statement followed by a question, you laid in with a question straight off.

    You are wrong.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    With respect to Venezuela I see that as a country suffering as a consequence of bad management and corruption (and one impacted by US sanctions to some degree also) but while suffering is suffering, I see a marked difference between an outcome of bad management versus an implicit focus to subjugate and target specific groups in society.

    Neither North Korea or Russia are Left Wing. They are both governed under Dictator rule, neither of who govern in any way remotely representing Left wing ideology. If you believe that they are Left Wing, how do you square Trumps admiration for both? And that of the US Conservative right for Putin?

    Yes extremism is bad, Yes too that what is largely negatively impact most people on the planet now are right wing ideals. And sadly, not even far right wing, though (it is heading that way) but even mid-stream right wing, is problematic for the world we live in today.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Easy to square Trump liking Putin. The horseshoe theory of politics.

    "In political science and popular discourse,[1] the horseshoe theory asserts that the extreme left and the extreme right, rather than being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear political continuum, closely resemble each other, analogous to the way that the opposite ends of a horseshoe are close together."


    Incidentally, Putin's biggest supporters in Europe over the last decade have been the left-wing, the likes of Wallace and Daly, SF, Ming Flanagan etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    As pointed out earlier, being against EU militarization does not in and of itself equate with being a supporters of Putin.

    And that aside, having a small number of individuals however vocal doesn't define the ideology of a dictator.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It wasn't a small number of individuals, it was most of the European extreme left, including SF, right up until December 2021. They all rowed in behind Putin, every single time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    • They didn't and don't identify him as Left wing.
    • He doesn't identify as Left wing.
    • Right wingers everywhere explicitly admire him.

    But you claim he's Left wing. And I'll repeat once again that resisting European militarization or excessive expansion (as was the position of SF and those others you mention) does not equal admiring someone. Sure some of them do, but you're going to have to explain to us how this overrides the support and admiration he has gotten from the right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    There's 14 words in the thread title, it's plain English, and it is easy to understand unless you are specifically attempting to deflect from that truth.

    You are attempting to fashion this strawman that 'Left wing = Good and right wing = bad' that I'm pretty sure no one has said here. Definitely not me.

    Today, the 13th of October 2022 the heavy negative Current Affairs talking points are the war in Ukraine, the investigation in to the attempted insurrection in the US, the fact that animal populations worldwide has dropped by 50% since 1970 and the collapse of the UK economy.

    All of these events have occurred because of right wing policies being advocated by various people over both short and longer term periods. That is the point of the thread. You can continue to deflect from that, I can continue to point out that that is what you are doing.

    And just glancing at both RTE News and BBC News as I write this, you can add stories about a mass shooting in North Carolina, and judgements (civil and criminal) in 2 more high profile mass shooting cases also. More events which I think its clear to see continue to happen because of right wing positions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Support and admiration Putin has got from the right?

    Like Fianna Fail and Fine Gael?

    Seriously?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    And none of them as bad as the situations in Cuba, DPRK, China, Russia and Venezuela, all events that have occurred because of left wing politics being advocated by various people over both short and longer term periods.

    As I keep saying, you are not wrong about the damage that right-wing extremism has done, you just ignore the damage that left-wing extremism has done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'm thinking more the likes of Tucker Carlson and the sitting US conservatives who partied in Russia on July 4th a couple years back and who are heavily against any funding for Ukraine to defend themselves.

    And the likes of Baron Lebedev, of Hampton in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and of Siberia in the Russian Federation who Boris Johnson saw fit to place in the House of Lords in the UK.

    Post edited by Tell me how on


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Already debunked the myth that DPRK or Russia are anything remotely Left Wing. Strong argument that China no longer falls under that category either according to many experts and I think you'd find many people who would argue the situations in Cuba and Venezuela are heavily influenced by right wing policies also given how the US has impacted those countries.

    As I keep saying, you are not wrong about the damage that right-wing extremism has done, you just ignore the damage that left-wing extremism has done.

    Again, read the thread title. You and nullzero seem intent in turning this in to a different discussion which to me only validates the accuracy of the title. Feel free to start a thread in the History forum if that is what either of you want to discuss.

    And, there are two reasons I am focused on the present, A, it's what is most significantly impacting all of us, obviously, and B, it's a point worth making on this site where the majority of political orientation or sociological mindset threads (and there are plenty of them) are targeting supposed left ideals or policies and lamenting the damage they are doing.

    People are way more offended about the gender that someone identifies as than they are about whether or not funding for school meals, or healthcare is available and that is a problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well, I gave the example of the Irish and European extreme left who have been supporters of Putin right up and through the war with Ukraine. Wallace and Daly are still at it, even if SF have run away scared.

    That is a fact which blows away your thesis that only the extreme right is wrong. The problem isn't left-wing or right-wing, the problem is extremism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You used the phrase "events that have occurred because of right wing politics being advocated by various people over both short and longer term periods."

    Longer term periods is history so back in your box on that one.

    Also, Russia, China, DPRK, Cuba and Venezuela are regimes lauded and advocated by left-wing politicians over time. So by YOUR standards, they are relevant.

    It is an undoubtable FACT that the citizens of those countries are far far worse off than any citizen of the extreme right-wing regimes you criticise. Try being in DPRK and their healthcare for example, try expressing freedom of speech in China. More people are being damaged by those left-wing regimes, and left-wing supported regimes in those countries.

    I get you are on a crusade against the right-wing, but it is the wrong target.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,162 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    To the left, to the left. Everything you own is in a box to the left. Which by the way things are going ain't going to be a lot



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You're displaying an incredible inability to not be able understand the point being made. You are laughably wrong as to your justification for who can be deemed to be left wing, there's no point in continuing to point it out to you.

    That aside, you are also incorrect in focusing on extremism. Yes there is extremism on both sides, this thread isn't even about that. This thread is about active real life scenarios actively impacting the societies we live in and these are mostly not because of extremists on the right but by many who see themselves as being just right of center.

    I haven't suggested that the right wing politicians of today are of the same mindset as the likes of Hitler, or are trying to enforce policies such as segregation or worse as was in the US prior to the civil rights movement (though a lot of the rhetoric we are seeing is more and more similar to what was around in relation to those matters), what I have done is said that many of the impactful strategies that are affecting people today are the brainchild of those of a right wing nature. And that is patently the case. The war in Ukraine, the impact of Brexit, rampant capitalism in energy markets, housing crises in Ireland etc are all the outcome of right wing philosophies.

    As I said yesterday, you can start your own discussion on extremism, or the history of political ideologies if you wish, you're patently intent in not discussing the subject matter of this thread for some reason.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    lol energy is lead by left wing nutters Mr Ryan has been caught out overstepping his mandate and trying to interfere with data centres energy needs. Hand sitting on gas and exploration. When the lights go out it will be the rights fault somehow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Energy is led by left wing nutters......

    Do you even hear yourself?

    Can you answer the above? And tell us how left wing ideals are responsible for this.

    And on Eamonn Ryan, can you give us your opinion on the following. Fine Gael were in power, with support from Fianna Fail in a confidence and supply type government in 2016 when they signed Ireland up to the Paris Accord. That agreement committed Ireland to cutting it's carbon emissions.

    Why do you think Eamonn Ryan, in his role in government should not attempt to do anything in order to reduce power consumption? And what do you think Fine Gael and Fianna Fail should do in order to meet the commitments that they signed up to?



  • Registered Users Posts: 862 ✭✭✭lumphammer2


    The issue with countries like Russia and North Korea is they prove that far right and far left are the very same ... N Korea is officially a communist thus leftwing country but the Kims act exactly like a medieval hereditary monarchy (rightwing) ... they like Stalin can combine the far left communist ideologies with the far right nationalism .... Putin's Russia is very much a far right son of a far left USSR ... similar to Milosevic's Serbia ... It is probably true that most evil regimes ... Hitler and Pol Pot too ... are a mixture of far right and far left ... and use both ideologies to brainwash their people ... the very name Nazi comes from Nationalism (rightwing) + Socialism (leftwing) and then taken to the extreme ...

    Venezuela and Brazil are not in the same extremism league whether left or right ... they are certainly not menaces on the world stage ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    You dont even know what you are talking about. The regularisation scheme for undocumented migrants would have nothing to do with appeals

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    There was 7,800 applied for it, you cant even get your figures right.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Russia didn't change that much as a state in the 90s, its Govt structures and security forces rebranded but the same Communist apparatchik, including Putin, stayed.


    The system lived on.


    In practical terms the only difference between the radical Left and right in control is the radical Left have better sticking power and that is by targeting the entire population with mass murderer, random abduction and killings.


    In the last century there have been multiple Russian campaigns in Ukraine, Putin's is by far the least murderous, that's only a testimony to the ideological savagery of Communism.


    It's the mindset of the person who is drawn to the radical Left that is the problem, righteous, controlling, aggressive. The same type that made the worst of priests years ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It's the mindset of the person who is drawn to the radical Left that is the problem, righteous, controlling, aggressive. The same type that made the worst of priests years ago.

    More nonsense. Priests, and their supporters are, and always have been radically conservative. Or do you think they supported banning contraception, abortions and divorce while being radical socialists?

    That's up there with Putin being left wing in terms of being disconnected from the truth.



Advertisement