Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

Options
1453454456458459555

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,665 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Brexit is an interesting 'experiment' into what happens when you hand the keys of a country over to a right wing / far right populist government backed by a cheerleading right wing press who refuse to hold them accountable (answer : a total financial, economic and societal car crash).



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,637 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    That FT video, and things like Byline times etc, are all pretty much in line with what many posters here, and commentators in the UK, have been saying from even before the vote in 2016.

    But is there any change in the attitudes in the UK? The Labour party are still saying Make Brexit Work and there still are very few actual calls for the whole thing to be reexamined and the full cost of Brexit to be debated.

    I don't see it? Are the people just fed up with the whole thing? I thought that Truss calls for growth would actually lead to a conversation about how Brexit itself was a brake on growth. That whenever people like JRM stand up to talk the first question back would be when are we going to see the benefits of Brexit in peoples pay packets and standard of living.

    But it doesn't seem to be happening



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,634 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    There are no meaningful pro-EU voices in the UK, and there haven't been for a very long time. Cameron was pro-EU in private, but would not go against the Brexit wing of his party in public. Corbyn had no problem with the UK leaving the EU. Labour as a party were anti-Brexit at the time of the referendum, but that is not the same as pro-EU. Starmer and the current Labour party are not pro-EU, and the Tories have obviously gone completely off the deep end.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    The Covid nonsense had a much bigger affect on the Tories than Brexit. If Boris stuck to his guns in the same way as Sweden had, the Tories would be in a much better place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    We're rehashing the past but would have to say Cameron was definitely not "pro EU" at all, even in private.

    He just thought leaving it unilaterally ("Brexit") was not good for the UK, and would harm his country badly. He was a staunch Europhobe. It was impossible to become leader of the Conservative party (IMO) without being a proven hard Eurosceptic, well before Cameron took over.

    All done to death on here but it was a disaster having such a man leading the argument for the defence (staying in the EU) during the referendum and the "Yes" side was quite hobbled before they began with him and Corbyn as main politicians tasked with selling it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,665 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed, he was a raging Europhobe (much more so than Johnson in fact). There was a touch of inevitability about a referendum held by an honorary UKIP member eventually blowing up in his face - anyone who liked or respected the EU would never have agreed to hold such a sham of a poll. It was all about pandering to right wing English nationalism by a gambler who didn't even understand the odds.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,299 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Are there any Brexiteers left on this thread? Or have they all slunk away with their tails between their legs?



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I'm not convinced. The Tory lead in the polls took a steep decline in April/May 2020, during which time the UK overtook Italy to become the worst-affected country in Europe. Had they continued with Johnson's initial denialism, that experience would undoubtedly have been even worse, and presumably that would have been reflected in a worse poll performance.

    By June 2020 the Tory lead over Labour had fallen from around 20% to just 4% - but it was still a lead. While there were ups and downs after that, the Tories remained ahead at all times and the overall trend was more or less level. 12 months later, in June 2021, the Tory lead was about 10%, although this was more due to a bleeding of support from Labour to other parties than a rise in support for the Tories.

    Since June 2021 the Tory trend has been steadily downwards, and this coincides with the period when the government was removing Covid-related restrictions. By December 2021 Labour had overtaken the Tories, and after that the Tory slide continued. By July 2022, when Johnson resigned, the Tories were about 10/12% behind Labour (depending on which polls you like). Now, of course, it's more like 30%.

    You can argue about what factors account for the change in Tory fortunes, but the timing makes it implausible that it was a widespread feeling that the pandemic restrictions were unwarranted; the period when those restrictions were in operation is actually the only period where Tory popularity was not trending downwards. I'd argue myself that the decline in Tory support is mainly a reflection of the growing public awareness of Johnson's manifest unfitness for office, followed by an even more damning public judgment on Truss. But of course Johnson's unfitness was manifested both in his handling of the pandemic and in his handling of Brexit, so it is hard to disentangle these factors.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,779 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    If Johnson had stuck to his guns, Covid would have turned the UK into a third world country.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,535 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Wait... isn't it just one where they all speak English? A wealthy one? Right-wing extremists running everything, an elite unelected cabal in positions of power, and less and less influence in international affairs? Their only important international export being (soon-to-be) unregulated financial services?

    Post edited by Igotadose on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,779 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Can you offer some evidence for your assertion, please? This one to be precise:

    The Covid nonsense had a much bigger affect on the Tories than Brexit. If Boris stuck to his guns in the same way as Sweden had, the Tories would be in a much better place.

    Sweden is in the EU. Not a valid comparison.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,760 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Predictably enough, JRM's proposal to return to imperial measurements isn't winning favour amongst the engineering community (and presumablty other STEM areas) who need to use proper measurements...

    Arup director of infrastructure design Tim Chapman said: “I’m not a fan of the switch back. If you’re a carpenter in the 16th century and not that literate, yes imperial measurements are easier to use for measuring halves and quarters but now with the complex systems civil engineers use, the metric system is a lot more efficient.

    “Using your thumb to measure is not necessarily what is needed right now.”




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,527 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Indeed , but one genuinely has to begin thinking - For how much longer?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,707 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The definition of 'Third world country' is very much outdated and refers to the era of the cold war.

    'First world' are countries that were allied to the USA and NATO. 'Second world' related to countries that were allied to the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. 'Third World' related to the countries that were non aligned to either side - like Sweden, Switzerland, Finland and Ireland.

    A more modern term is 'Developing World' but that is ill defined, as most of those countries are not developing, but going further into poverty and decline.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,095 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The current Labour leadership are pro EU they just can't say it out loud anymore.

    The best they can promise is a friendly closely aligned relationship.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,779 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    True but there's more play here. What Brexit, Covid and Trussonomics did was ultimately to expose a complete lack of checks and balances on executive power here. There's no point in talking about anything like growth, rejoining the EU or anything else unless this is addressed.

    PR would help, as would strong courts but ultimately we need a way of preventing a few people blindly implementing doctrine from a few sordid little think tanks without any hindrance or scrutiny. A codified constitution may be the way forward but there's no way I would trust the Tory party to write it.

    In a proper union, Wales, NI and Scotland would each have had to agree to Brexit. By implementing it, the union is doomed though it may enjoyed a second wind under Labour.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,634 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    It's not that they can't, they've chosen not to. Since long before the referendum, the UK (in the public arena) has had two viewpoints on the EU: Pro-Brexit and "not pro-Brexit". That wasn't good enough to prevent Brexit, and it won't be good enough to prevent the damage of Brexit compounding upon itself

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,095 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    They have chosen not to because it just becomes a massive distraction and brings you down a rabbit hole on a topic that sadly can't be reversed.

    No point to the party banging on about Brexit. Just get into power and fix it as best they can.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,637 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    But fix what? If they can't even bring themselves to say that Brexit, at is currently being pursued by the Tories, is a terrible idea, then what mandate will they have to make any changes?

    Free movement? No, off the table so any trade deal is limited? What is the solution to NI? Labour hasn't offered any.

    I get that they want to keep their cards until the election, but do they really think an election campaign is a right time to suddenly start talking about all this? No, they will keep schtum. They are scared at upsetting anyone

    I'd point out that I don't even disagree with the approach, I would probably do the same. Why get involved in messy debates when it makes more sense just to stick to lines like 'The woman is not for turning...up!".

    But it creates a problem as when they do get into power are they going to be able to stand up to the Brexiteers who will claim they never voted for any changes?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,779 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The mandate comes from the vote, not from Brexit or any other policy. Brexit is done.

    Fixing it, presumably means making the current deal work and tweaking the NI protocol in collaboration with the EU for both sides' benefit. Focusing on Brexit has no benefit. The electoral rewards are in areas like the cost of living, inequality and climate change. Brexit was voted for over half a decade ago now. It'd be borderline deranged to propose opening up all those scars now.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,095 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Honestly I think by then the moderate Brexit voter will just be happy to see it it never mentioned again.

    And the hardcore ones are lost anyway. Can't keep slowing down for the dumb kids in the class.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,546 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    There's no legal mechanism that determines its members, right? It's just a talking shop for some various self-appointed Rich Nations, yes?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,637 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So, rather than try to bring people round to a new way of thinking, Labour plan to simply say nothing, and then once they get in just do whatever they want? Of course they can do that, but it isn't right and isn't democratic.

    You can continue to claim Breixt is done, but that implies that nothing will change. But we know it will, it has to. NIP, for a start. If Labour want to change the current agreement with the EU then what are they willing to give in return?

    Its is simply cowardice that stops them from putting there actual solutions forward. Far easier to simply pretend everything will be done, tweaking I think you said, without having to actually outline what that means. That is what got the UK into the mess it finds itself and now the UK needs a strong committed leader to actually stand up for what they believe not just pretend that a loss of 4% GDP is nothing to worry about.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,095 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Why do they need to change the NIP ?

    That deal was oven ready and it works. The best course of action is to do nothing. Just stop moving laws and regulations away from alignment with the EU.

    You say they need solutions but solutions to what. The only problem is Tory empty threats and brinkmanship so just not being the Tories is a solution in itself.

    What other problems need solving?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,760 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So, rather than try to bring people round to a new way of thinking, Labour plan to simply say nothing, and then once they get in just do whatever they want? Of course they can do that, but it isn't right and isn't democratic.

    What is not democratic about it? They aren't going to say that they will reverse Brexit - they will tell (and have been telling) the people that they want a closer relationship with the EU.

    You can continue to claim Breixt is done, but that implies that nothing will change. But we know it will, it has to. NIP, for a start. If Labour want to change the current agreement with the EU then what are they willing to give in return?

    Currently there is no plan for change. Any future changes in terms of a relationship with the EU need to be discussed with the EU. So Lab have nothing to tell the people that they will change.

    Its is simply cowardice that stops them from putting there actual solutions forward. Far easier to simply pretend everything will be done, tweaking I think you said, without having to actually outline what that means. That is what got the UK into the mess it finds itself and now the UK needs a strong committed leader to actually stand up for what they believe not just pretend that a loss of 4% GDP is nothing to worry about.

    Again, Lab keeping fairly quiet while their primary opposition is destroying themselves (fingers crossed!) is common sense. Why would Lab stand up and say that they will immediately do this, that and the other which would simply be manipulated by the Tories and their friends in the media?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,779 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's also not remotely what I said.

    No, it doesn't. Brexit is done. That's simply objective fact. I don't know why you're acting as if I said nothing can change when I explicitly welcomed a Labour government working with the EU to bilaterally improve the protocol.

    Finally, you're still pretending as if they're not putting solutions forward.

    Just one example:

    Labour will attempt to force a binding vote on fracking on Wednesday, as Tory MPs mull backing a bid which would allow the opposition to put down a bill banning shale gas extraction.

    The motion submitted by Labour for its opposition day debate is drafted to make it very difficult for the government to ignore the vote or allow mass abstentions.


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,878 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    This motion is actually a brilliant strategy by Labour and really leaves Tory MPs with two sh1t choices. The Tories have whipped against the motion which plays right into Labour's hands. They are only breeding further resentment against Truss. It's kind of insane the Tories have chosen this hill to die on but there you go.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    The 37 Tory MPs who did not vote on the fracking bill some interesting names there


    • Nigel Adams
    • Stuart Andrew
    • Gareth Bacon
    • Siobhan Baillie
    • Greg Clark
    • Geoffrey Cox
    • Tracey Crouch
    • David Davis
    • Caroline Dineage
    • Nadine Dorries

     

    • Iain Duncan Smith
    • Philip Dunne
    • Mark Fletcher
    • Vicky Ford
    • Paul Holmes
    • Alister Jack
    • Boris Johnson
    • Gillian Keegan
    • Kwasi Kwarteng
    • Robert Largan

     

    • Pauline Latham
    • Chris Loder
    • Mark Logan
    • Theresa May
    • Wendy Morton
    • Priti Patel
    • Mark Pawsey
    • Angela Richardson
    • Andrew Rosindell
    • Bob Seely

     

    • Alok Sharma
    • Chris Skidmore
    • Henry Smith
    • Ben Wallace
    • John Whittingdale
    • William Wragg
    • Jeremy Wright




Advertisement