Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1231232234236237471

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,298 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Coffey and Mog will have to be sacked.

    Two names linked with this pushing and shoving behaviour.

    This could end up in an election if Tories aren't careful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Chris Bryant claiming Therese Coffee, JRM and other cabinet members involved with shouting at and then shoving Alex stafford through into the No lobby.

    Considering the majority the ended up with what was the need or reason for any of this?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    Stop threatening to improve everybody’s life like that!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not even Steve Baker on Times radio trying to introduce any alternative narrative of this evenings events. He normally fights the good fight no matter what



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,298 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Timeline is rumoured to be No.10 ordered the 3 line whip be removed for the vote minutes beforehand, nobody told the Chief whip and she and the deputy chief whip resigned on the spot when they found out. Part of what caused all the chaos in the lobby was nobody knew if it was a vote of confidence or not and there was no whip to answer the question.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,926 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Seems her resignation was at the very least 'Unconditional'...



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    https://conservativehome.com/2022/10/19/now-the-chief-whip-is-reported-to-have-resigned/

    This comment. What is happening to British democracy ?

    The stories of Conservative whips/MPs physically dragging other MPs into the voting lobby are deeply shocking. This type of behaviour is anti-democratic insanity, and the world sees it. How can we not feel ashamed of the mess we have gotten ourselves into?




  • Administrators Posts: 53,735 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It’s genuinely hard to keep track of the drama at this stage.

    This feels like the end.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The right of the party must be absolutely raging. A few weeks ago they thought they’d nailed down their position, with Truss and Kwarteng in charge, a libertarian budget and a crazy right wing Home Secretary .

    In am amazingly short period of time, it’s slipped through their fingers, losing their budget, losing Braverman and Kwarteng and seeing them replaced with Hunt and Shapps. And everything pointing to a centrist taking over as PM.

    The right wing, ERG agenda is lost for a generation. No wonder JRM’s patience was wearing thin this evening



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,926 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    You really could not make it up what is happening in British politics at the moment lol. It really is a sh-it show full of clowns lol.


    Lizz Trusses days are numbered. She will be lucky to make it to 60 days in Number 10.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,564 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Deleted



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,161 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo



    Shapps is a disaster, he will probably have a silly video published of himself next to a map of Rwanda (if the Tories last that long)



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭Christy42


    If they thought the whip was in effect removing that many people from the party would end their majority. Even with all the bullying it was around 40 people abstaining including Kwarteng, May, chief whip, deputy whip and Johnson so they really needed to get as many votes as possible.



    Seems like Liz removed the no confidence and the whip precisely because she knew a large number were going to abstain and the whip threat wasn't credible with that many abstaining.


    Also Liz Truss ended up on the abstain list though has since been added as a vote so something went wrong there as well.


    Everyone knew Truss would be a disaster but I am not sure anyone foresaw this level of chaos.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    And now theyve reversed the decision to remove the whip. Just more and more chaos



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,313 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    This, IMHO, is the poison of "institutional tradition" as seen in the UK - and especially the USA. Archaic procedures or bureaucratic norms, kept purely because that's how it was always done is inane. I daresay worse has happened down the years when Parliament wasn't so scrutinised or public; but the needless pageantry of British Democracy insists these silly procedures are kept - and borderline worshipped as something cherished. Remember the outrage and performative shock when an MP walked off with the Ceremonial Mace?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,237 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Question, are there ministerial pensions in the UK like there are in Ireland, that is former ministers get additional money over a regular TD/MP pension, so the likes of Javid, Kwarteng, Braverman etc who were barely in the seat before resigning/sacked would be entitled to more money down the line? The constant merry-go-round of ministers would make it seem that everyone is getting a go to pump up their pension pot.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    I think there is a minimum term of 2 months in the position before you can draw down the pension (at least that's what I read during the week re Liz Truss and her pension)



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,580 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Did the government defeat the Labour motion n Fracking yesterday? With all the chaos I am struggling to find the actual result.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    yes, 326 to 230 iirc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 54,163 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Yes they did and thus broke their manifesto promise



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,693 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Yes just about.

    Wouldn't be surprised if Hoyle makes them go again though. He has currently ordered an investigation.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,483 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    That was a genius move by Labour. People hate fracking so either the government votes against its deranged libertarian agenda or it votes to wreck the countryside for literally no benefit to anyone but the likes of Cuadrilla.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,580 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Is that not a bit of a disaster for Labour? They couldn't even get a close on such a topic?

    Surely they must have thought they would get reasonably close?

    I know the end game is merely to get the MP's name on the register as having voted, essentially, in favour of fracking and they will use that at the next election. So in the end Labour never really cared about the actual result?



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Not really because now they can hang it over every tory that the went back on the 2019 manifesto and are pro fracking. Its a win either way for Labour. No.10 are the ones who turned it into a confidence motion which is what made it such a **** show which became just another win for Labour.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,483 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Does it matter? We're ultimately discussing politics. Fracking is something people hate and has dubious, if indeed any benefits. Surely, banning it would be a good thing?

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,429 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Yes, there are ministerial pensions in the UK. The deal is this:

    For each year you serve as a minister, you get a pension entitlement equal to 1.775% of the salary of your office. It is payable from the state pension age, or later age at which you leave office, and it'll be based on the ministerial salary at that date. So, let's say you serve ten years as a minister and your pension age is 65, you are entitled to a pension from age 65 equal to 17.75% of the ministerial salary that is payable to whoever is in office when you reach age 65. After that, it does up every year in line with inflation (not in line with salary increases for ministers).

    Somebody who only serves as a minister for, say, a month does get a pension entitlement, but it's tiny - one twelfth of 1.775% of salary.

    The deal is better for a retired Prime Minister. They get a ministerial pension under the above arrangements plus, even before they reach pension age, they can claim an allowance of up to GBP115,000 per year for “necessary office and secretarial costs arising from fulfilling public duties”. This is payable regardless of how long you have served as prime minister. But you can't just claim the money and trouser it; it does have to be a reimbursement for costs incurred in some kind of public service. So it covers things like diary support, police protection on public visits*, correspondence, staffing at public visits, support to charitable work, social media platforms and managing and maintaining ex-PMs office.

    * [Yes, ex-Prime Ministers have to reimburse the police for the costs of providing additional police cover on public visits.]



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,313 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Labour has basically forced the Tories to own the issue; it's now on record so once the penny drops across the country about the realities of fracking, a definitive millstone can now be hung around the Tories' neck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,693 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its perfect for Labour. They forced 300+ Tories to publicly back something many of them and their constituents are against.

    The sht show it created is a victory for Labour.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,693 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Gotta love muppets like Siobhan Baillie MP.

    "Environmental issues are hugely important to my constituents. I abstained on the vote last night, knowing the potential consequences."

    Then why did you abstain Siobhan. Why didn't you vote for the motion ?



Advertisement