Ireland running out of accommodation for Ukrainian refugees due to surge in non-Ukrainian refugees?

There is no more room here.

What the government should do is buy a tract of land in the Ukraine, perhaps Poland or somewhere close. Send builders over, hire locals, erect all this modular housing.

Build some facilities, health clinics, provide some staff. The same for schools and provide teachers.

Pay each of the people that flee there the equivalent of the social welfare in Ireland, whatever other perks as well like free travel on local transport.

Plus it could be done cheaper than here.

Would the natives be okay with funding a miniature city in another country? Its essentially the same thing except straighter to the point.

I suppose the biggest difference is that some people wouldn't be making money out of the situation here. But that isn't the point, right?

Right?

Tell us your that are a yank without telling us that you are a yank.

Projection of 15,000 beds short by December.

Time for the Government to wake up and call Time on this. A good first step would be to keep o Gorman away from any decision making. The man's on a different planet .

You say wre not doing enough.

So what do you think of my idea of funding a new temporary city nearer or in the Ukraine?

Quicker, cheaper, less distance to travel.

I made a thread on it in this forum.

When you called local Irish people sex starved you weren't banned but I was. I think you be safe enough.

Do you understand the meaning of something when it's full, reached capacity.

If we had of built for our OWN homeless in the first place we might have had more capacity.

Why build a city here at top prices, with a housing crisis that proves its slow as treacle, when it could be done much cheaper and quicker elsewhere?

All the effort and expense is needed here as it is, so why not just shift that effort abroad?

Every single extant issue stays the same, not enough builders, not enough teachers, not enough health staff. If they're already not here, it makes no difference if they're somewhere else.

Social welfare and supports could achieve the same outcome for fractions what it would cost here.

Building a temporary town or city abroad has nothing to be said against it which can't be said against here already, except with a lot more upsides.

We're funding a city of people here as it stands, money wise and infrastructure wise, why not just do it somewhere else?

You weren't asked to take on this burden.

But seeing as you're paying anyway, wouldn't you rather get bang for your buck?

Why pay to accommodate 100k people from somewhere else when you could pay the same to house 200k for half the price in a different country, social welfare for them, healthcare for them, education for them?

It achieves precisely the same goal, except multiples better.

No my point is . Could I or would i of been allowed to post a joke about sex mad certain people I won't mention without a massive uproar on here. Especially by the mods.definetly not.

By the way I never implied or read a post implying what you mentioned.

A discussion and statements should be fair to both sides.

If that were the case, then what's the point of coming here at all?

The Irish government is tripping over itself to help as many people from all over the planet and they are using Irish people's money to do so, come hell or not such is their altruism with other people's money.

So why don't they take charge of the building and funding of a city in another country at far better value for money?

Better outcome.

Quicker outcome.

Better value.

It's not like they have any other reason for specifically bringing them here. That wouldn't make any sense. Right?

Were they even told what the situation is here vs what the headline rates were for supports.