Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1455456458460461806

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    My thoughts exactly. A great little country to do business in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,651 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    1: You don't lock in an interest rate for your life

    2: Salaries tend to go up over time



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    1 You can for your mortgage life

    2 As stated earlier, statistics show household income decreases after peak earnings around the 30 to 45 age group. Costs would also increase as as this is family formation demographic

    Sunday business post yesterday had an article stating that average first time buyer age is 38 for a couple and 42 for a single person. It was discussed on the Sunday newspaper panel on newstalk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    I think with a new build you can scope out the neighbours before you buy. And you dont know what comes after pyrite. mica etc where your house will be falling down. :) Dont rely on homebond anyway if anything like that happens. Just ask all the people from the last 20 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    CBI - "We're not being responsible?"

    DOF - "Hold my beer"


    Department of Finance pushed Central Bank for lower deposit rule on home lending





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In fairness, a lower minimum deposit required is a much better solution than increasing the LTI limits.

    Obviously there is a greater risk of negative equity as you have less equity in the house, but it doesnt have as big an inflationary impact on the market as a whole.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,627 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Strictly from working on medians the highest is the 40-50 age group followed by the 50-60 age group. However medians and mean can distort the real picture. A lot of women tend to re-enter the workforce from there late 40's on.

    This could distort the 50's age group figure as these women would tend to enter lower wage employment. As well when lower wage workers have children going to college they tend to manage there income to qualify for grants.

    Looking at the reality out there public servants will always earn more in there 50's and even 60's than they did in there 39's and 40's.

    US research shows women's earning peaking at 39 and men at 53. But the US is a complete market economy.

    You have to remember at the lower paid jobs in this country people in there sixties entered the labour force in there mid teens.

    The reason you can see a falloff on wages as there on higher incomes in the private sector move into roles outside structured employment to manage tax and income.

    I would say my income peaked twice once in my mid/late forties and again before I retired 4 years ago. Most people I know there incomes peak in there mid/late fifties where they worked throughout there life. Women's would be different in that they left the labour force for a period and often many( and it's a personal choice) priotise family commitments way ahead of work

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    I would agree, the changing of the LTI limits is a shambles an will just inflate everything to a higher baseline where people will be priced out again. It does absolutely nothing for anyone bar increase house prices for builders and developers, as well as any hedge funds that need to liquidate typically illiquid assets quickly by driving up demand so they can offload quickly.

    I don't want to sound like a nut job but I honestly believe there's a lot more to this crazy changing of the LTI than meets the eye, big changes like this are never too benefit the normal joe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 spudrick


    This is all ignoring inflation too. You'll be very hard pushed finding someone who is working and who is actually earning a smaller number of euros now than they were 20+ years ago, even if they might be earning less than somebody 20 years younger than them today. The average salary has gone up by over 30% in that time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    For reference to the above post skip to 8 minutes. The graph at the end maps current stock price movements with 2008 and the correlation is fascinating. We'll worth 11 mins of your time to view the whole clip




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I thought the 2008 crash created a 2 tier employment contract scenario. Those employed after 08 were on significantly poorer terms and lower wages, maybe that's correcting a little now, but once you create a precedent and get away with it....



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,627 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Even inflation adjusted. In real terms IMO 2008-10 was the main cause of me having two peaks. From 2008-12 my earning dropped and tax increased. My Income in real terms started to climb again up until I retired.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭quokula


    The yellow and white lines in the graph are on different scales to exaggerate the correlation. I clicked on his twitter link to see if there was any more detail and it was just a wall of alt-right talking points against climate science and Jewish globalists peppered with simplistic one-liner self help nonsense that sound profound if you don't engage your brain for more than 2 seconds.

    These videos would be a better match for the conspiracy theories forum than Accommodation & Property.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,627 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The problem is a house now costs a lot more to build due to regulations and due to the fit out standard compared to 20 years ago and that houses was at a completely different standard to houses build in the 70's.

    While technology has dropped in price in real terms those commodities used in the building sector have got more expensive. While some efficiencies have come into the building sector it's still exceptionally labour intensive and that labour has got away more expensive. A trades person would have earned substantially less than teachers and Gardai back in the 70 and 80's. Now there earning are on par if not higher than those workers. General labour on a building site 40 years ago would have been very low wage now it's at or above the mean wage.

    Add to that these workers would traditionally be directly employed on site. Now they work for a subcontractor who needs a margin on top of there wage.

    Add in materials and government regulations and costs( planning was a gimmie 50 years ago not it's probably 2-5% of house costs

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The yellow and white lines in the graph are on different scales to exaggerate the correlation

    Of course they are, its from the S&p index 14 years apart.

    It's to display trends and price actions only

    Look at the max on below graph 08/09 looks like a blip. Comparing now to then is like comparing everest to macgillacuddy reeks

    What major change occurred to justify such valuations only QE and zero interest rate policy both are reversing sharply




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    A lot of people where I work move to contract roles as they hit their 50s. Paying themselves less to manage tax as you say. Also paying their spouses and children and filling up their pensions. Thier take home is less but they get paid a hell of a lot more than when they were fulltime. Theres a name for it but i cant remember. Accountants arrange it for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Would agree with what you have just stated, my problem is that the central bank that have just lifted the LTI rules, are now coming out saying that people will be in financial distress as they will be now paying nearly 40% of their income on a mortgage if they stretch to these new limits and the ECB follows suite with more rates hikes. There comes a price where things become too dear even with government (central bank) intervention.

    I still see builders shutting up shop and stopping anymore house building phases going into early next year (this is the word from the builders themselves , I think this will be a world wide problem too but in the days of cheap electricity and energy the raw materials costs would drop, but sadly I cannot see them dropping (as the days of cheap electricity due to cheap gas is over) that much to make things anymore affordable.

    Its extremely hard to know how this will play out, but one thing for sure supply can get a lot worse before it gets any better.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The 4x LTI limit does NOT mean people are paying 40% of their income on the mortgage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,627 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I semi retired. I have not accessed my pension yet. However my income would be better than in my twenties and as good as most of my thirties

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    "But research done by the bank itself, and first reported in the Business Post, says a two or three point rise in mortgage interest rates could see buyers with “average” incomes spending up to 38pc of their take-home-pay on a home loan".

    That's according to the independent, if rates go up a lot higher (which I don't think they will if anything I think they will be pivoting soon), and people are borrowing a larger principle sum due to the 4x limit, then I don't see how this article couldn't be correct if their wages remain the same.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Someone buying a house today, if they buy at the full 4x, would pay roughly 30% of their income on the mortgage if it was for a 30 year term.

    Mortgage rates would need to hit 5% before they are paying 40% of their income.

    Obviously, if all else is equal, the shorter the term the higher the percentage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Are you serious of course interest rates are going higher , look at the rest of Europe we are pigeon holed with the rest of Europe and even do Ireland have not hit the recession yet Germany and the majority of Europe are in serious difficulty and they will be in a recession a lot sooner than we will, so lowering interest rates is not an option for them with their levels of inflation and unfortunately they don't give a flying phuck about our property market. The next rate increase is coming this week and it will be at least another .75%. This upping of lending limits should be seen for what it is a last throw of the dice by the dept of finance who put pressure on the central bank to up these limits for the construction companies to continue coining it as it makes zero sense at a time of high inflation and such low supply to implement this measure and it is going to force prices up at least with these interest rates going up banks will have to very prudent as there will never be another scenario where anyone in this country will put up with money going into banks to prop them up like before so they will have to stick to their repayments capacity measures for new customers coming in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    And is that not what I stated in my first comment "40% of their income on a mortgage if they stretch to these new limits and the ECB follows suite with more rates hikes". Anyway rates may go that high who knows they are that high in a lot of other Western Countries at the minute, personally I cant see the ECB having rates that high or it would fundamentally change the whole Euro area.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,627 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    A couple on 100k between them have a monthly joint income of 6700 euro. Payments on 400k at present is approximately

    1830/month over 25 years or 27% of income

    1630 over 30 years or 24% of income.

    Well within the thresholds

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    I honestly believe they will hike rates globally till mid 2023, by that time we will see something fundamentally break in the financial system that will require them to do their only get out of jail card which is QE more QE and lower rates to 0.

    Sadly when they do this inflation will still be at +8%, so just imagine where inflation may go to then. By right interest rates must be hiked to kill inflation no matter what the cost, they wont do this don't let them fool they'll pussy out, BOE already done it, ECB are doing it with their new Anti Fragmentation tool, only a matter of time before the Fed starts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    I never disrupted any of that I merely echoed what the central bank of Ireland said regarding paying a higher principle due to 4x if the ECB lifts rates further.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    They have no other way of trying to tame inflation and it will come down there are way too many necessities competing for a limited amount of peoples cash. Wages over the last 24 months have come nowhere near being enough to cover inflation and it will take another decade to get wages there. Germany and its basket case that its economy finds itself in will not want QE it does not suit them and if the Germans don't want it then it simply will not happen. Inflation will come down as people simply cant pay the prices so once the war is over and the supply chain issues corrected we may well see either a lot of companies offering these services/goods at cut prices or hit the wall and with a recession going in parallel I can see a lot of deflation in about 18/24 months time. As for BOE the UK have no other country to answer too. As for Europe interest rates rising is actually helping with inflation. The FED will continue their interest rates rising as well, the US are in a recession (they are calling it a technical one) and will be out of recession a lot quicker then the EU because they acted quickly. As a matter of curiosity what is it you see breaking in the financial system I cannot see QE returning for the remainder of the decade it has not worked and has only kicked issues down the road Globally and Locally at some point the bill has to be paid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    This has been done to death in this thread already - a 100k household income is not average in this country. It is far beyond an average income by any metric.

    CSO incomes 2020 (https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-silc/surveyonincomeandlivingconditionssilc2020/income/)

    Mean: Total gross household income 73,698

    Median: Total gross household income 55,259



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,627 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We are not the talking about median or average incomes. We are talking about LTI and the repayments on an LTI of 4 is below the affordability threshold no matter the income.

    For instance the affordability on an LTI of 4@76k income is about 26% on a 25 year loan. That is borrowing 305k.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Thats a fair point - I thought I read talk about % of discretionary income, the article actually references "take-home pay". My bad.



Advertisement