Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New Boston virus (lab developed super-COVID)

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Seriously, are you capable of thinking for yourself? Your words, Covid was the cause of 30 deaths per week during the summer months.....absolute nuttery...if you tested everyone who dies for STDs you could probably claim they were taking lives....all your graph is showing us that there was very little excess death over the two years....Do you still believe covid took over 7,000 lives in this country? Can you confirm that for us please? How can someone so smug be so easily lead by bureaucrats at the same time...it's really amazing to see!!! Still wearing a mask ya?

    We won't have official death stats in this country for the last 6 months for some time, we may get preliminary data toward the end of the year. How could I produce evidence beyond what I am told by people who work in the industry?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Here is what I actually said:

    which is why the are no more calls for restrictions from anyone reasonable

    But by all means continue lying and misrepresenting someones position because someone has the temerity to disagree with the boards brains trust..

    And as I said, talk to me when you have actual data. Because the data we have doesn't align with your viewpoint



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Can you confirm if you believe Covid took over 7,000 lives in this country please?



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Getting back to the original topic, there is now more evidence that the original SARS-COV2 escaped from a lab, so more reason to be concerned about synthesising s new super strength variant!




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Going to have to try a bit harder to get your gothcha moment!

    Excess mortality is at about 50% of reported covid deaths in Ireland since the start of the pandemic. From March 2022 to August 2022 excess morality is about 4,000, reported covid deaths is about 8,000. For the UK Excess mortality is 160k, covid deaths about 200k, Spain: Excess 124k, covid 112k, Sweden excess 11k covid 19k, Germany excess 118k, covid 147k, Belgium, excess 23k, Covid 32k, US exess 1.14million, Covid 1.02million, Romania Excess 116k, covid 65k. In lots of places there was less excess deaths than covid deaths, and in lots more there was more.

    No doubt you will tell us why they weren't really covid deaths



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Expect the study in the op did not describe a super strength variant, it described the output of a trial with two different versions in mice specifically bred and raised to be very susceptible to enable clearer conclusion to be drawn. Why do this, well you cant ask a mouse about its symptoms and with a mortality rate of 0.6% you would need a massive sample to detect a difference, so you make the lab mice more susceptible to be able to draw relative, not absolute, conclusions on a smaller sample.

    Edit to add reference - study completed using lab mice of the same type found 100% mortality with a similar dose of original SARS-CoV-2

    We found that intranasal inoculation with higher viral doses (2 × 103 and 2 × 104 PFU) of SARS-CoV-2 caused lethality of all mice and severe damage of various organs, including lung, liver, and kidney



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    "Excess mortality is at about 50% of reported deaths in Ireland since the start of the pandemic"!!!! That is what you just said.


    That is complete gibberish. It doesn't make any sense. You get very slippery when you are asked a direct question.


    Now, stop trying to deflect, because you have accused me of believing in "bizarre theories" (you haven't been able to name one), and please tell us, do you think Covid took over 7,000 lives in this country?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Never even try to answer a question yourself do you? And you have the cheek to talk about "slippery". F*ckin hell!

    Official death toll is 8,000. How many were going to die any, we dont know, how many had incidental covid we dont know, how many were missed, we dont know. But on an average day in Ireland 80-90 people die, so on any given day about 0.002% of the population die. For half of deaths to have be caused by incidental infection, you are looking at about 2 incidental deaths per day. To have that rate on any given day throughout the pandemic approx 2.5% of the population would need to be infected on the average day. There were days when there was more than 50 recorded deaths. I will let you do the maths and come back with any conclusions you may have.


    Now, unless you are actually going to back with something other than sniping without anything to back it up, kindly **** ***

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    So you do believe that 8,000 lives were taken by Covid, the official narrative that we are all familiar with, thank you for eventually answering the question.

    But we didn't see 8,000 extra deaths did we...we didn't see anywhere near that.

    Being rational doesn't mean you can quote facts, being rational means you can understand what facts are relevant.

    Why would you believe that 8,000 figure when the facts suggest it is completely inflated.

    We didn't see 8,000 extra deaths on top of what is normal, so you are in no position to be accusing anyone of lying, or believing "bizarre theories" or telling anyone to "kindly **** off"...and remember, it was you who posted a sniping post on this thread.

    It is important, because if you believe that 8,000 people lost their lives during the pandemic due to Covid, you are much likelier to believe that the two years of severe restrictions didn't have any negative impact on the health of the population, you are likely to believe that the actions of our Government were justified, and you did, you were a constant presence on here, using your particular "tone" belittling anyone who disagreed with you, you are still doing that today!

    When, it is clear to many, the seriousness of the pandemic was completely overblown and the negative impact of those severe restrictions are being completely ignored.


    *we all know that this virus was a very nasty infection for some, very mild for others, so I don't want to be accused of denying the seriousness of the virus.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Kindly follow my previous request if you are not going to engage honestly. You are the person who went after me on this thread and I answered every question asked, in contrast to you. In the real world without the data there is no hard answer to every question. To believe 50% of deaths were incidental would require a suspension of all critical faculties however. You would either have to believe that at any moment a large portion of the population was continuously infected throughout the pandemic, or to believe by random chance a large proportion of deaths just happened to be over represented in the coivd figures.

    Data from other countries is also relevant, in general the higher the population, the closer the excess deaths tended to be to actual deaths. This is due to natural variation being higher as a function of all deaths in smaller populations. Its just stats.

    Why is there an effort to always boil complex questions down a one word answer? It rarely possible in complex situations.


    Back to the thread? Any opinion on the misrepresentation in this thread of mice designed to have high susceptibility to covid having an 80% fatality rate being deliberately conflated with the mortality of the disease without any attempt to understand that detail?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Engage honestly, says the man who accused me of believing in "bizarre theories" and still hasn't named one!!

    You really need to work on your ability to interpret data, rubbish in, rubbish out!! The published data from our institutions and health bureaucrats are frequently inaccurate rendering them completely useless to analyse. We included healthy people in our Covid infection figures for instance, completely bonkers stuff!!!

    I don't have any opinion on the data in this study, as I have said to you before, gain of function research and Covid are very hot topics and it is very difficult to find trustworthy information. I don't trust health bureaucrats given the last three years, could they take a virus and work on it a lab to improve it's ability to infect and do damage in individuals? At least we know that somebody in a lab is manipulating a Covid virus, we can all agree on that!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You have not once provided any data to back up any of your points. Just used polemic when confronted with data. Feel free to refute anything I have said with anything, anything at all. I am certain there is an evidence based argument that could be made. Please try!

    I think that answer says it all. "I don't trust the data because it doesn't say what I want and people shouldn't study the virus because reasons"

    Bonkers stuff is right



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Can a mod update the thread title to "New Boston Virus (lab developed coivd that kills less un-vaccinated, susceptible mice than ancestral SARS-CoV-2 but more than Omicron when injected with a massive dose)"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,152 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    It isn't the Chinese, Its the Yanks he's after


    But in a more serious light


    Down with this sort of thing

    Maybe humanity shouldn't be pushing our luck by telling any old lab how to engineer Covid to make it deadlier than the Plague times Ebola



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Do you even hear yourself????

    You said this..."I think that answer says it all. "I don't trust the data because it doesn't say what I want and people shouldn't study the virus because reasons""....., I explained why I don't trust the data, do you trust data you know to be leaky/inaccurate? What kind of an idiot does?

    This is your understanding of data (you posted this a short time ago) "Excess mortality is at about 50% of reported deaths in Ireland since the start of the pandemic"!!!! That is what you said...now this is not a person who has any kind of grasp on numbers or data, you are great at getting your hands on numbers, you don't seem to understand how meaningless most of them are!!

    We know the death figures were grossly inflated.

    We know the case numbers were inaccurate. We were testing 10,000s people per week, including people who weren't sick.

    We know the hospitalization numbers were also inflated. They included people who were infected while they were in hospital, and people who went to hospital for a health issue and tested positive on the way in.

    That is what we know, we also know the projections and modelling were off the charts inaccurate more often than not..

    So, forgive me if I don't gobble up all the nonsense health bureaucrats/politicians/media provide us without questioning any of it!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Still no data. Just polemic and invective.

    As I said, Va fa enculo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    You are asking me for data we won't get until next year. When it arrives, I'll break it down into digestible chunks for you, you seem to get overwhelmed easily.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,364 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Just so I understand what's happening here, on a "super virus" thread.

    Silentcorner is arguing about death tolls being inaccurate, has no data and is saying wait till next year.

    raind is posting data that we already have around death toll and Silentcorner is trying to scoff at it.

    Am I missing something?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes, no one has acknowledged the clarification on the study that confirmed it’s not a super virus because that would involve admitting they were incorrect



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    That's right Astrofool....that's what's happening!!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Yes you’re missing denial of gain of function research and it’s very public, and worldwide scientific concern about it’s risks.

    Also missing heads in sand re excess deaths. But nothing to see here now… it’s ALL conspiracy theories and anti-vaxx misinformation spread.

    Your work is done.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As I said, people continuing to ignore the facts on the study in discussion on this thread, and the data on excess deaths




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,364 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Gain of function research has been going on for years and relatively identifiable, none to very few in the field believe SARS-COV2 was from GoF because the changes made are currently beyond our technology. (note, this doesn't mean it wasn't a lab leak as it could have been an animal in captivity that caused it to spread across species).

    These articles pop up in various tabloids over the years, "super anthrax" etc, the daily mail is taking advantage of the gullible with this one (the clue should be the paper published detailing their findings in detail).

    But does every thread have to devolve to conspiracy theories these days? (when there is a whole forum for them).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This whole forum has descended into an echo chamber of the usual suspects fighting last years battles while the rest of the country have moved on. Time to close the forum and re-integrate to current affairs for ongoing discussions.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Time to close" as you've lost the argument and are unable to change people's minds as pro-covidians used to be able to do over the past couple of years.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Time to close as the topic is now only inhabited by cranks and continue discussion in the main CA forum.

    But quoting full post would of course not have been appropriate as that would not have been deliberate misrepresentation which than led to mis characterisation and a labelling of an “other”.

    Christ it’s tedious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,630 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    Whilst its open to debate how many covid killed so far,I dont think its time to say "it's all over", tell that to those experiencing "long covid" or is that all a myth too? I really don't think it is (personal experience I won't go into here), i think that's the real point of concern longer term as re-infections mount.

    If this thing was brewed in a lab, presumably in Wuhan, China, what is their zero-covid policy telling us?

    I strongly suspect we will start to see life expectancies dropping across many countries in the coming years which is going to be hard to explain away, time will tell.

    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is limited evidence that long covid is anything more that standard post viral complications that are experienced by many, just concentrated together due to the pandemic. Standard flu leaves many lasting effects that are on a par or worse than "long covid", including lung damage, chronic fatigue, Asthma or asthma type symptoms, auto immune conditions etc. What has been seen post covid is not something that has not been seen before with other viruses.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I used to be a fan of Dr John, but things have changed.

    This video, on the Boston virus, is the latest example of what has gone wrong.

    With Dr John, what appears to have happened is this: he started out with good intentions, providing detailed information on the novel coronavirus.

    That has since gone into remission. Now, in very subtle ways, he appeals to conspiracy theories, sensationalists, and fear. The other week, he cast questions about the New Economic Forum and billionaires secretly meeting together. The kind of questions David Icke would ask, only John couches the same ideas in more subtle language. People know what John is getting at, even if he doesn't phrase it directly. He constantly hints at "something going on"; a them versus us.

    There's a very, very large market for all of this. Just look at Alex Jones and so on. Dr John advertises free books, but has a donation section along with it. Donations and grifters are well-established bedfellows.

    Dr John gets away with it because his videos have a veneer of respectability - often, the videos are genuinely informative. However, now that he has 2.5 million followers, what started out with good intentions has become corrupted by his business model of the above I mentioned. Everything he says and does is now about raking in the cash. He could easily have chosen other videos to do, but he has consciously decided to move down this conspiracy/something going on path. Russell Brand does the same kind of thing, incidentally. They pretend to be the bishops of truth, against everyone who is trying to delude the masses.

    This Boston virus is the latest example. It's not really about delivering "the Truth", but rather an attempt to instil fear, to hoover up shares, and to create a narrative of them versus us. Watch the YouTube ad revenue flood in.

    He's very good at it, to be honest. Very subtle techniques. He's a businessman, not a "doctor".

    That said, you must take what he says with a pinch of salt, and in the wider context of what I've explained above.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see that this thread has been moved to the conspiracy theories forum, clearly that shows just how serious the corona virus mods are about the real risks involved.

    No point in discussing it further!

    Swept under the carpet!



Advertisement