Attempting to destroy famous paintings because fossil fuels

I know - What if this? . What if that?

Should probably be ignored - Realy.

Safe to say that no, you wouldn't be cheering them on if they damaged YOUR property for attention seeking purposes. Just let the public foot the clean-up bill when public property is damaged. It's only tax payers money anyhow.

They could decide to make an example of a random house because the persons living there are enablers of the evil Government by choosing to heat their home with dirty fossil fuels 😲

Art isn't exactly a target one would naturally associate with the extraction and burning of fossil fuels. It's hardly a leap to suggest these nut-jobs might start to attack private residences. It would not surprise me at all if they took such action and would likely target the residences of public figures. Would you support them if they did this?

So,the rich kids got bored playing climate activist, the penny must have dropped that they were alienating the public and doing harm to the climate change movement,did Greta have a word in their ears I wonder.Time for them to grow up.

Yes, normal people call them hypothetical scenarios. They are to help you question your own exclamations through a different lens by placing you into a similar situation experienced by others, or likely to be experienced by others.

Rather than engage constructively, yet again you deflect with absolute nonsense which for satirical purpose, I will answer on the remote chance you might answer my serious questions rather than try (and fail to) score some points.

If the pope broke my window, I would treat him like anyone else and either punch him in the face, or call the Gardai, depending on how I felt at the time and what other circumstances may be at play.

I own no paintings and if I did, I wouldn't even hang them up, as I value family pictures over someone elses idea of a priceless painting. You referenced me as a pearl clutcher, which is obviously a reference to my class, culture and wealth. I have some of the former, none of the middle and less of the latter. I couldn't care less about art and find it a waste of time, but just because I have no time for it, doesn't mean I care any less about some gombeens attacking it to make a scene.

I leave the floor open to you should you decide to address in good faith my previous post, unless you think I am being sneaky or something.

That comment is priceless 🤣, right conflict but wrong side, they have more in common with the unquestioning,brainwashed cultists that invaded Poland in September 1939.

Why is my hypothetical less relevent than yours - The pope has not pissed in your garden the protesters have not attacked houses.????

Can you see the ridiculenesses of it now? or would you like to continue imaginary games?

I support what they have done, and what they are doing, is that not clear? I believe that their tactics are appropriate and proportional to the absolute enormotype of the catastrophic disaster and devestation and death and destruction and hunger and extinction that is DEFINATELY coming according to people who are much cleverer than me or you and who have studied this climate situation extensively.

They have predicted food shortages Major flooding of peoples homes, loss of plant and animal species forever and parts of the world where people can no longer live.

What part of this is soo difficult for you to understand - Is it any wounder that I make fun of you any your ilk telling us about the type of art you prefer😂

I will be ridiculing you and your type as best I can from now on - Just in case there is someone reading this and tempted to take you seriously.

also google pearl clutcher please - youve got that wrong too

If the shoe fits wear it - you are the one who drew up their socio economic group not me.

You will be shocked no doubt to learn that their group has grown 4 fold since they started their protesting campaigns.

go look at what they called Rosa parks and MLK when they started their campaigns - troublemakers, upstarts, attention seekers - sound familiar?

They have been remarkably sucessfull with this campaign - the first step to making a change is highlighting the cause - Done

after that for every 20 establishment pearl clutchers such as yourself im sure they would be happy with 1 serious supporter.

Glad to hear that you are watching them closely - keep up the good work👍️

remember in drawing attention to a cause all publicity is good publicity👍️

So the comparrison with Rosa park et all is not with their personal suffering but with the justifiable criminality in the face of an unjust establishment

understand?

I would love to see your data on the campaign being set back "at least 5 years" and I am sure that it is not just something that you made up .

Just send the link and we can all view it.

"Highlighting the campaign in a negative way is not a job" well done"

again I suggest that you are imagining reality from your own bubble - From my perspective many people are saying how right they are, young people are asking and learning why they are protesting and I can show you that their group has gained massive support.

I cant wait to see your data so that you can show everyone that you have not just built up an impression of the situation from your own group of bigots on facebook or worse just making stuff up.👍️

What is it that you think they are protesting about?

Do you not think that you should find out what they are protesting about before posting?

But you have admitted that you dont know why they are doing it

Wouldnt it be clever to find out why they are doing it first ???????

I realy dont think that you know why they are doing it .

Why do you think that they are doing it?

I can sumarise my understanding of it if you want - Seriously not trying to patronise