Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1243244246248249469

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,091 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout




    Did he also mention "vaccine rollouts" and "getting Brexit done" for the full Trifecta of Boris Johnson PMQ talking points by any chance?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He unashamedly and blatantly did the ‘got Brexit done’ answer to an unrelated question. It’s pretty unbelievable tbh



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,690 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Away with your "charts" and your "facts" - everyone knows that aslyum seekers only go to Britain, because Britain is best! The Daily Heil has being telling us that for the past couple of decades - they couldn't be wrong, surely?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    Yesterday BBC News actually did a piece on how relatively few asylum seekers there are in UK. You don't see that kind of reporting very often, so it must have come as a surprise to your typical Daily Mail reader. No doubt many of them muttered something like..."fake news"...woke BBC"...as they switched over to GBNews.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its just the MSM promoting the "great replacement" and brainwashing women into fancying black lads 😛



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The typical Daily Mail reader thinks that the BBC and the Canary are ideologically identical which is patent nonsense. All anything but racism and xenophobia do for these people is to confirm in their minds their own confirmation bias.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    And right on cue... "Why are the left, the BBC and the blob so desperate to depose Suella Braverman for telling the truth about the illegal migrant crisis? Because if she stops the boats, the Tories have a chance of winning the next election"




  • Registered Users Posts: 25,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    If auld Dan wasn't a complete gobshte he might realize it was the Tories who "got Brexit done" who deposed the last few PMs not the "remoaners"

    Actually he does know that he is just a complete bllshter who appeals to the dumbest in society.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,609 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Plus if Brexit is all they have it is pretty damning...it has been a disaster...and it clearly isn't "done" just look at NI



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Well they promised Brexit and Britain has left. Maybe the DUP should have copped that the clue is in the phrase 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Dan is someone who repeatedly filmed himself laying wreaths and Buckingham Palace after the Queen died, pretending that he was mourning. He's just another right wing charlatan with no principles.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,429 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It's a worse than pathetic response; it's a shoot-yourself-in-the-foot response. The only possible relevance of Brexit here is that, as a result of Brexit, the UK is no longer within the Dublin Regulation, which narrows the options open to it for handling asylum applications. So Starmer is saying "who broke the asylum system?" and Sunak is, in effect, saying "we did, by Brexiting".

    Others have pointed out that Sunak has been a consistent Brexiter ever since being elected to Parliament; of the five PMs in the Brexit era he is the only one never to have adopted or expressed a Remainer position at any point in his political career. You'd think, then, that he be sufficiently interested in and aware of what Brexit entails to know better than to mention it in this context. But apparently not.

    I've seen it suggested, though, that Sunak's brexitry, though consistent, is shallow. He has only engaged with the issues and practicalities of Brexit to the extent required to satisfy the Richmond Conservative Association selection committee, which is not a very great extent; they are very happy with kneejerk but ignorant brexitry.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,488 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Fintan O'Toole wrote a very interesting article at the weekend about how Sunak is a 'globalist Brexiteer', one who wanted to leave the EU in order to pursue overseas trade and finance deals and so on. But this marks him out as being very different to the UKIP types - English nationalist, far right, anti-immigration, close the borders etc (which is one of the reasons Farage is already denouncing Sunak as a 'elite globalist').



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Except for the fact Farage himself was banging on about the same trade deals the UK would make out on the "high seas" and the far right clowns believed all that too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,580 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,007 ✭✭✭Shelga


    But I thought there is only One True Brexit and they all knew exactly what they were voting for?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Nobody voted for trade. They just couldn't articulate any positive reasons to vote leave so they just went and fabricated some. The idea that people on welfare and ex-miners were voting for increased trade with Thailand that is now being used to justify eroding standards is pathetically absurd.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I heard the line repeated over and over in London that "England could go around the world making amazing deals if only we were not held back by the EU"



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Sounds better than "We should impoverish ourselves so 20 people can make a killing", no?

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,850 ✭✭✭growleaves


    The EU is a protectionist bloc so, in theory, leaving it does open up the possibility of new trade deals.

    Of course if you don't already have new deals lined up then its castles in the air.

    Liz Truss said a UK-US trade deal could be "years away". I don't know all the details but politically Trump should have fast-tracked a deal since Brexit is associated internationally with his brand of populism.

    Trump, and now Biden, don't want it for whatever reason.




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    No, he couldn't. The Ways and Means Committee which controls trade deals was in the hands of the Democrats and they made it clear they would not tolerate the undermining of the GFA.

    What evidence do you have for the EU being a protectionist bloc?

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,850 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Okay well the Ways and Means Committee won't allow it so. I said I didn't know the details. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    Re "protectionist bloc" its how I would describe it. What would you call it? The EU can erect trade barriers, as a bloc, against goods from non-member states. That is why Leavers were furiously promising the UK would get a good trade deal with the EU itself.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So no evidence then.

    You could derisively say the same stuff about literally any nation on this planet. The EU is the world's largest trading bloc and has myried FTAs with nations all over the world.

    Leavers promised people anything they thought would win votes. Indians and Pakistanis in Birmingham were told EU migrants were the reason their relatives couldn't come over.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,850 ✭✭✭growleaves




  • Registered Users Posts: 25,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    What baffled me is people fell for it. Or maybe let themselves believe it is a better way of putting it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Plenty didn't. Problem is that a lot of older voters decided to vote based on their own prejudice instead of what was best for the nation and here we are. Would have helped if the young actually voted as well.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,335 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    When you subject people to austerity for a long time and living standards are constantly dropping, people will lash out. That's when they are offered false promises on one side and bogeymen on the other. Whichever works with a particular audience.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The EU is absolutely a protectionist bloc. There is nothing inherently wrong with that.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,471 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I'll believe this Brexiter canard when I see either proof or at least a cogent argument for it.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its not a "Brexiteer canard", and if they use it as such its just because they don't know what it means.

    The cost to entry to the EU market is exceptionally high in terms of regulations and agreements. Those agreements often come with quite strong preconditions on things such as labour laws that are far outside the scope of "normal" trade deals because the EU is concerned with undercutting their own market. All trade market unions are protectionist to one degree or another, the EU just happens to be very, very good at it.

    I would have thought it is an eminently uncontroversial statement. The EU is absolutely protectionist, but its also very large and very successful at forcing others to comply with its standards.



Advertisement