Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1464465467469470809

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Sounds like the CBI are certainly looking at introducing a 50% leverage limit to be in line with other European countries. Found another article that suggest most borrow up to 70% in the residential sector, so with rising interest rates and a potential recession. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.

    Funds that invest in Irish retail and commercial property typically have gearing of around 40pc and will not be affected by the changes.


    But those involved in the residential sector borrow 70pc of their funds on average, which reflects the high-risk/high-reward type of investor attracted to the Irish market.


    Sources said high leverage is common in the Irish market because building costs are high and the use of debt finance makes certain schemes more financially viable for investment funds.

    Without the availability of high borrowing levels, they said, funds are likely to “diversify capital geographically” – in other words, invest it elsewhere.




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,873 ✭✭✭amacca


    Any chance of a new entrant entering or re-entering the market and competing for deposits do you think?

    Or are the days of the likes of Halifax and Anglo tripping over each other to offer up to 8% on regular savers long gone never to be seen again?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    My understanding is nowadays banks pay well for short term bonds of 1-3 months that provide liquidity for equity which allow them to obtain lending from central banks. The draw for them will not be as strong as interest rates rise.

    If KBC or Ulster had remained ( KBC especially as it's within the euro) they would have been well positioned to take advantage and to access deposits which they could have collateralised elsewhere in the EU maybe.

    We are unlikely to see deposit above the ECB lending rate, but even rates of 1% seem unlikely unless the ECB rate pushed above 2.5-3% which is unlikely.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    If I was cynical, I would hazard a guess that the 70% leverage typically used to fund residential developments is a big part of the reason why FG have sought to have the property market continue to rise in value as the lobbyists have been telling them that it needs to keep rising if investment is to keep happening or else, due to the high leverage (ie high risk), investors will hit pause and of course only the kind, gentle institutional investors can get us out of the housing crisis so we need to give them what they want.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I think you will find the majority is 80% borrowed with the remaining 20% from investors. The majority of the property won’t be Irish property.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    KBC and Ulster would still be in trouble if they stayed in Ireland. The amount of capital that was trapped in Irish subsidiaries meant that it wasn’t profitable as the Irish market is to small. The majority of the capital will be held in government bonds and as rates rise the value of the bonds drop which results in more liquidity being needed to top the capital up. At the end of the day both KBC and Ulster parents can get a better return outside Ireland.

    can you explain your understanding of demand for short term bonds so that the banks can get lending from the ECB. The reason I ask is that a bank would be crazy to buy short term bonds and repo it to the ECB because they would get a better return by just place the funds with the ECB.

    To me it sounds like you are talking about the American banking system that still uses interest rate corridors which were gotten rid of in Europe and the UK after ‘08



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    No chance….what you have across Europe is banks merging because unless your of a certain size it’s an uphill battle to make a return.

    Add on top of that the reputation of the CBI being very difficult to deal with compared to other regulators and you would be mad to try and enter the Irish market….

    at the end of the day the existing banks can’t find enough customers to lend to so a new entrant would need to massively cut margins to steal business.

    Halifax and Anglo along with most banks were paying for deposits because they needed them to be able to continue lending to ever Tom dick and harry….



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    My understanding is that Irish banks have to carry a minimum of 10% liquidity. That is deposits or bonds they cannot lend out.

    KBC and Ulster would be laughing if they were still in Ireland. The 10% is only materials and an issue with negative interest rates. When interest rates became positive and with excess deposits the whole picture changed

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    thats not correct the banks have to hold capital for RWA’s under CRDIV and need to hold enough liquidity to meet the liquidity coverage ratio.

    Two examples would be:

    A loan to a property developer (defined as an individual or company with more than 6 properties) would require to hold capital of 100% of the value of the loan. So if they lend 10 million the would need to set aside 10 million in capital.

    A non operational deposit from a fund for example requires that 100% of the deposit must be available at any time. In other words you can’t fund any lending from it and is practically useless to a bank with the exception of charging transactional fees.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You can look at it another way. Six months ago the Irish banks ha 131 million in deposits. It was split among 5 banks and it was costing them about 650 million a year to have that money on whether on deposit with the CB or even if they had it lend out( they could borrow money cheaper from the ECB).

    Now three banks have 131 billion on deposits earning 1.95 billion in interest with the CB.

    Its immaterial whether they have the money lend out or where they have it lend out basically the banks are 2.5 billion better off per year at present. At some stage they will have to increase deposit rate but at the moment it worth 200 million a month.

    PS what you said about lending rules to developers or large property owners is why apartments have to be build by investment/pension funds

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Let’s also not forget that interest rises generate higher levels of default which means more capital needs to be put aside…. Just look at the levels of provisions the UK banks have put aside at Q3.

    A step yield curve is good for a bank but if it’s not run well it will also expose weaknesses.

    The only reason there is excess deposits at the moment is due to QE where long term money was transformed to short term money. This is already changing and once liquidity dries up due to QT transforming short term money to long term money you will see this excess liquidity removed from the market and banks paying for deposits again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Ireland has one of the highest total savings per capita in the EU. Its not going to drastically change. Most savings are held by people 60+ years of age. The Bass Reeves age groups.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Retail deposits or total banking deposits that are over inflated and is as useful a sat as GDP per capita.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is a not of a difference in a stat and 2.5 billion.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Registered Users Posts: 148 ✭✭Eclectic Econometrics


    Is the majority of that €131B not with the other lenders like BoI? I read that KBC had 4.4 billion in deposits in Ireland. If that is correct then the interest rate change would bring in, over a year, less than a tenth of their quarterly profits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    And if they use the capital trapped in the Irish sub for lending elsewhere you get a better return on equity and happy shareholders…The return from the Central bank is the lowest return available. Yes it’s better than negative rates but when you take into account the cost of inflation to the bank you probably end up in a slightly better off or in a similar position to before. That is unless you don’t invest in technology and refuse to move with the times and end up loosing younger customers and future profits.

    It’s a no brainier because you have fixed costs regardless of size due to regulation and IT costs so unless you have a big enough balance sheet you are better off deploying the capital elsewhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    KBC did not have a branch network. As well they did not seek out deposits( well no bank did over the last five years) however it would be fairly easy to pick them.up if you needed to.

    Ulster Bank would have had substantial deposits as it was mainly an old money bank( most deposits ate held by 60+ year olds).

    Yes but deposits at present are money for nothing. There is 25 billion in excess deposits over borrowing in Ireland. By just having it sitting in the central bank you are making money. Six months this ago it was costing banks to have deposits. They were actually starting to charge business accounts for having deposits over certain amounts.

    Yes banks would prefer to have it lend out there is a better return. But having it sitting there making money is the next nest thing

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,673 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    KBC had, and even still have, a branch network. They took on a number of former Halifax and NIB branches so they even have a few that look like proper old banks.

    They stopped the rollout and then made a cut to what was there a few years ago, the rest are closing in March.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    While technically they had a branch network it was not set up to handle cash deposits or withdrawal's, actually AFAIR they did not accept cheques for the last 7-8 years.

    The branches were more for arranging loans or setting up accounts. If Nanna Mary went in with her pension or she wanted to log a cheque it was not possible ( in the Limerick branch AFAIK)

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,673 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They still take cheques if you are still using the current account. Only time I ever used the branch was for that, not particularly long ago.

    Don't know about cash, that might have been pulled already.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Not for deposit accounts. Business yes think. But I think about 8-10 years ago they were offering very good deposit rates for regular savers but money had to deposited electronically by DD.

    10 years ago branch in Limerick had no counter, they had a few booths where a bank official would deal with you. Even if there lump sum saving accounts you could not deposit by personnel ( non business account) cheque it draw money out by cheque or draft.

    I am working from memory with all this. It's 3-4 years since the better half had an account there.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭kaymin


    KBC continue to accept cheques lodged by personal customers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Well with the saving accounts 8-10 years ago it had to be all online

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Branches aren’t the only fixed cost…regardless of size of bank they need a banking platform which will cost more or less the same for 100k customers or 1m customers.

    The need payment systems and access to payment networks.. most of this will be a fixed cost.

    They need AML and Risk. Systems to comply with banking regulations…yet again all fixed cost.

    They need access to treasury systems to monitor liquidity and be able to trade bonds etc and make placements with central banks..more fixed cost.

    on the people front they need people in central functions such as finance legal risk IT…yet again fixed cost on not really dependent on Size.

    On top of that the Irish banks have seen little investment in the past 10-15 years besides regulatory compliance and have a poor customer offering as a result which allows fintech compete and take over profitable parts of the business such as FX etc. If they don’t invest or acquire fintech companies and get up to speed it is questionable will they still exist in 10 years.

    Unless a bank is a certain size it will struggle to remain profitable even if they get a return from the central bank. If they struggle to write enough new loans which all Irish banks have difficulty doing as more loans are paid off than draw down for the past few years the return on equity is going to be low and it makes perfect sense to shut up shop and release the capital and use it else where they can get a better return.

    Saying they get a return from a central bank as opposed to earning a return else where is the equivalent of someone parking 10m Euro in a current account and getting a minimal return instead of investing the money elsewhere and getting a good return. It didn’t Matter much when rates were negative/low as it was difficult to get a return anywhere but with rising rates it’s more important than ever.



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    Of relevance to Irish property, as with other stories of big tech companies, due to the commercial property demand from these entities and also the demand for rentals from the employees of these companies.

    At the same time we are told this year's corporate taxes are a once off. The perfect storm but surely unsurprising to any of us when we saw there were no rentals available the past year or so anyway for these big companies to keep expanding in Dublin. Putin and inflation will be blamed blah blah but don't be fooled into thinking the fallout could not have been at least mitigated by ensuring a more sustainable housing market.





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    However, speaking at the Cop27 climate summit in Egypt on Monday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin urged: “Don’t panic.”

    What an arrogant plank. I would be advising anyone in that situation to brush up their CV and look for a job asap. Tis well for moneybags Martin....



  • Registered Users Posts: 104 ✭✭zisdead


    And the snowball now starts rolling. How big does it grow and how far does it roll. Twitter staff now in the mix of course.




  • Registered Users Posts: 752 ✭✭✭dontmindme




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 242 ✭✭gaming_needs90




Advertisement