Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

1285286288290291297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,770 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Pretty astonishing they are now predicting a 2 year recession in the UK and unemployment to rise up near 6%. The damage Truss did in her short time is office was like economic suicide. Bank of England are saying they were just hours away from a run of the markets that they wouldnt have been able to prevent, thats how close it was. Truss' mini budget has put the taxpayer in the hock for billions but of course the Tory mouthpieces are blaming it all on global events, do they ever stop lying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,970 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Any politician with real ambitions of being a successful PM headed for the backbenches and are waiting for a spell in opposition to start their leadership bid.

    Like who?

    This is not how politicians operate, or the great majority anyway. If the party leadership, and more particularly PMship comes up and they think have a decent shot at it they go for it, irrespective of circumstances. Look at the Tories during their New Labour wilderness years; whenever the leadership came up the 'big beasts' were queuing up even though they must have known their chances of making to no. 10 were slim. This guy knows the score




  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dont pretend that your side haven’t done the same. And that’s what it is now unfortunately…..it’s two sides, full of hate for the other and unbending in their respective views, in a war for the nation. Have you seen the daily telegraph recently? Getting closer to the USA as the weeks go by

    it’s going to be interesting to see how much traction the Reform party gets in 2024.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It wasn't a lie.

    Margaret Thatcher's majority to Boris Johnson's majority is approximately 40-years.

    I was clearly referring to the Conservative Party; this, a statistic that was repeated ad nauseum at the time Johnson secured the majority.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    So Boris had 100 votes and stood down to avoid splitting the party ?

    Also


    Who cares if either version is true. Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The only thing clear about your original post was that it was incorrect and your inability to admit you got something wrong.

    The statistic you're mixing up is...43.6% of the popular vote was the highest percentage for any party since 1979. That was the stat that would of been repeated ad nauseum, not the nonsense you came up with.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,698 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Worth comparing Johnson's 42% in 2019 with Jeremy Corbyn's 40% in 2017.

    So, Johnson the uniquely beloved miracle vote-getter? Nah, that's balls. Always was.

    Johnson did well - not amazingly well, but well - in an election in his new PM honeymoon period with a simple appealing slogan facing an unpopular opponent and an electorate that had no experience of what he would actually be like as PM. That combination of circumstances can never recur for him.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Seems that the Conservative Party is now hemorrhaging support to the modern doppelganger of UKIP, the Reform Party - led by Richard Tice.

    All those UKIP voters who lent their support to the conservatives in 2019 may now see the Reform Party as their new home, making the electoral prospects of the conservative party even more doomed. In much the same way UKIP was a semi-permanent thorn in the side of the CP.

    Sunak ought to be worried about this development. Though if Sunak can address the concerns of this voter block, and I doubt that he will, it may mitigate this risk.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,101 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So we are right back to where Cameron was. The last 6 or so years, which was essentially an attempt to protect the conservative party from loss of support to UKIP, have been a complete waste of time, money and effort.

    Now the whole country is worse off because the Tory party wanted the country to pay for their own internal argument.

    UKIP, Farage really, bottled it at the last election. He had likely support but dropped out to allow the Tories a free hand and since then they have done nothing but complain about it.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    yeh, it’s disappointing that brexit was done and yet the conservatives are right back to where they were pre referendum. What an utter wasted opportunity, from a party perspective. Let alone the damage to the country

    That said, I don’t see that the Reform party will be any more successful that Change UK. Easy to say you prefer them in a poll….harder to walk into a voting station and tick that box and either waste your vote or hand a bigger majority to labour



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,410 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Not quite comparing like with like there. Change UK were a new entry in an already saturated political market. Labour, the Lib Dems and the Greens all had pronounced Remain movements. There was no need for another.

    Reform's main threat isn't that it will win, it's the risk of them splitting the Tory vote. The problem with culture war politics is that you have to go all in all the time. Offering to put people on boats in camps is all well and good but when someone else comes along offering to shoot them, you're the weak option.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,846 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Reform Party is a few dozen puce-faced racists who can't get an erection now a brown man is prime minister.


    And Lawrence "1.9%" Fox.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Laurence Fox will never pose a threat to the Conservative Party. His "Reclaim Party" is just a manifestation of his own narcissism, probably created for self-promotional reasons and the financial opportunities that come with pretending to care about Woke politics.

    Reform UK under Richard Tice is a far more serious political formation, and definitely poses a threat to the Conservative Party's electoral prospects in 2024. It's unofficial spokesperson is Nigel Farage, who can redirect his traditional supporters down onto Tice. 8% support, and presumably that's with very little marketing of the party to date. In 2-3 years Reform UK may become a very serious force, acting as a stifling anchor around the political neck of the Conservatives.

    Your blithe dismissal of the party, with that cheap kind of language, only exposes your dearth of understanding on this matter.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,905 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Their threat is in splitting the Right wing Tory vote - They won't win a single seat.

    The way to nullify that threat is not to lean into the nutters like Cameron did by allowing the Brexit vote and bowing to the ERG but by trying to move in the other direction and winning the much larger middle ground.

    Sadly we know the likely options the Tories will choose.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,410 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The Reform party is likely to be a platform around which various deplorable demographics can coalesce. Obviously, we have the racists and xenophobes. There's also likely to be the UK's niche libertarian population as well as the usual loonies and fruitcakes like UKIP backer Demetri Marchessini who said that women shouldn't be allowed to wear trousers.

    Now that Farage has jumped ship, I can't see it doing well. At best, it'd split the Tory vote but very few people have heard of Richard Tice. He has no appeal. It's the downside of using a stoolie like Farage to do your dirty work for you.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,846 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    If you'd like to make a bet on how many seats the Reform Party will win at the next general election, I'm here. My bet is 0.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Ironically all down to FPtP which many on the UK rightwing refuse to believe is undemocratic



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's not about winning seats; it's about putting pressure on the Conservatives.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,905 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Indeed , but will they learn from the mistakes of the last time this happened with UKIP or will they just repeat them again?

    The mistake being pandering to the far right within their ranks to try to stop them jumping ship to UKIP.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,410 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's not ironic at all. It's being undemocratic is literally the point along with the new boundary changes. They know they can't win and argument despite incessant media blitzkrieg so they rely on the broken electoral system.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,698 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Yes, it's the same tactics used by UKIP, which also won basically no seats but succeeded in doing a management buy-out of the Tory party.

    But of course this means that the Tories have been here before. They know where accepting the hard right management buyout offer gets them; it gets them to here — five PMs in six years, and 21% in the polls. Madness to imagine that yielding to Reform pressure will work out any better for them than yielding to UKIP pressure did. To rebuild, they need to appear credible to middle-ground voters. There was a time when that was compatible with being an enthusiast for hard Brexit. That time is gone.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That would perhaps be true if that cohort of the conservative vote were extreme. But they aren't extreme, and Sunak must listen to them if he has any chance of winning the next election - or to score as high a result as possible for the conservatives.

    The precedent shows that moving to the centre, a la Cameron, doesn't work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,764 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Tories have been held hostage by the hard right / far right wing of the party for well over a decade. Cameron was insane to think he could ever unify the party by placating them. They got greedy, kept demanding more and more until they ended up running the UK - with predictably calamitous results (the events of 2022).



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What's "far-right" about the ERG? What's "far-right" about Brexit voters? (Was Tony Benn "far-right"?)

    It's a significant chunk of the conservative vote that Sunak must appeal to (and to some extent, is).

    Throwing around silly labels like "far-right" is the height of absolute absurdity.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Brexit voters are a very mixed bag. I agree that “far right” should be reserved for BNP types. But ERG for sure are further right than the tastes of anyone other than frothing at the mouth telegraph and mail readers. Conservatives are better off letting them drift off into whatever new party they think they can make a success of



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Personally speaking, I think some high-profile Conservative MPs should consider joining Reform UK.

    That would give Tice's party some veneer of legitimacy. Let's not forget that many Brexit voters are furious about how Johnson was stabbed in the back. If I were a Tory MP - particularly a Brexit-supporting MP - I'd seriously consider moving over to Reform UK before the next election. Tice's party is perfectly positioned to hoover up disaffected red wall voters (as well as voters concerned about migration in general). Sunak and Jeremy Hunt are stock globalists. They've dragged the Conservative Party back to Cameronian times - not completely, but more so than before. That's why Tice's party is surging in the polls.

    Quiescent Tory MPs need to make up their minds before the next election. Better to keep your seat under Reform UK than to sacrifice that seat at the political altar of Sunak and Hunt's globalist Conservative Party. I have every confidence that Reform UK can mushroom its support into double digits and, should that happen, I've no doubt that some Tory MPs will seriously consider making that very transition.

    Reform UK now up to 9%.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,698 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Huh? Cameron's centrism is what history will remember him for most kindly - same-sec marriage, being able to construct a functional coalition with the Liberals. His legitimising of brexitry by calling the referendum, so jeopardising his country's interests in an attempt to solve an internal party problem, is one of the things history will damn him for. But he's still going to be regarded as a better prime minister than at least his three immediate successors.

    If Sunak panders to the Tory right, he will lose the next election very, very badly.* And he will deserve to.

    *[He's going to lose it anyway; the only question is how badly.]

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭quokula


    The percentage change suggests that Reform UK are taking ad many if not more voters from Labour as the Tories.

    If I were to oversimplify I’d imagine this cohort is largely traditional white working class Labour voters, who didn’t align with an increasingly socially liberal Labour Party, who favoured Brexit and who then gave the Tories their vote in 2019. They’ve since seen the damage the Tories have done, switched voting intention back to Labour, but now Reform UK are wooing them.

    Labour may have as much if not more to gain than the Tories from going after these voters, and Starmer has shown he’s not above that with some of his attempts to court nationalists with flag waving and the like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,698 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    You can over-analyse these things. This is the Omnisis poll, which is a small poll (c. 1200 respondents) conducted very frequently (at intervals of between a week and a fortnight). The rise in support for Reform from % to 9% looks astonishing — a 50% jump in Reform's vote — and it appears to have happened in just 8 days (between 3 Nov and 8 Nov). That should set your sceptical alarm bells ringing.

    And your scepticism would be justified. Because of the small sample size the margin of error for this poll is unusually high — 3.1%, and more for "crossbreaks with very small sub-samples" (which is jargon for the groups of respondents indicating support for minor parties).

    In fact, all of the shifts in support for all parties shown in this poll are within the margin of error, so if you wanted to summarise the findings of those poll in one sentence it would be "not much change since the last poll 8 days ago", which is not really a very surprising conclusion.

    The shift most likely to be meaningful is not the 3% rise for Reform, but the 2% fall for Labour. Although it's a smaller shift, it's in a much larger sub-group (Labour supporters) so is more likely to mean something. But it's still within the margin of error. And, in another sense, even if it means something, it doesn't mean anything important. The Labour margin over the Tories has fallen from 24% to 23%; that's still a bloodbath for the Tories, if repeated at an election. It would be the largest margin of victory for any party since the Tories won the 1931 general election with a margin of 25.6% over Labour, winning 470 seats to Labour's 46.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,511 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Call the ERG what you like they are an extreme. There was a similar issue before Cameron became leader. There was three Tory part leaders in 5-6 years. Hague, Duncan Smith and Howard, the last two like Johnson and Truss taking the Consertives further right and losing the center vote.

    Its similar with Corbyn in Labour he took labour further left and made them.unelectable. you just have to look at the Republican party in the UK where MAGA extremism is also hampering that party. It is quite possible a Congress controlled by these extremists will benefit the Democrats in 2024 as they concentrate on revenge against Biden instead of policy

    Johnson was not stabbed in the back. His position was untenable and it got to the stage where someone had to weild the knife. The Consertives suffer as many political parties do now by handing control of electing a leader to there party members who often have little understanding of the reality of power. There can often be an extreme within the party and they can decide the election. Truss only got 50 votes in the first round of the Tory contest was in second place throughout and only got to the run off because of getting votes from the extremes.

    The British people never voted for the extreme type of Brexit that the ERG tried to impose on the country. It important to remember that

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement