Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 - Read OP

I was replying to this:

Which, to me, implies that the poster's thinking was the same.

The workers party are also of the same view as Murphy on this.

There was a recent article in the times

" Self-ID activists ‘will abuse hate speech law "

Murphy and the workers party can see how it will be abused to stifle one viewpoint and women,s groups can see how it will be abused to stifle another viewpoint.

For anyone who thinks this won,t be abused.

That video clip on its own doesn't actually show an abuse of hate speech legislation. It shows the cops weakly following up an allegation. We don't know if there's any merit to the allegation. If we heard what she is accused of saying, then we might be able to form some sort of judgement but without that, that video clip shows nothing.

Don't get me wrong, I'm against this legislation as it does have the potential for widescale abuse but that's not a great example of abuse.

I only ever see weird people using the word "woke".

That Posie Parker bird is also a weapon.

So hate speech is now not agreeing with Government policy. I have never seen this man before. The fact that he's on the panel says they're desperate. The fact he was able the openly state that on tele unchallenged was f*cking infuriating. With Gardaí monitoring social media activity around immigration protests now. It's a police state for dissenting views or opinions.

There has been a concerted effort by the government and their 0%- VAT media to distract the public from their incompetence by demonizing people by applying derogatory labels. It's been relentless. Openly calling them far right. The community reps attended meetings with TDs, not the kind of people you can sit and speak with, surely? The media have been intentionally conflating Ukrainian refugees and busloads of young male asylum seekers, heavily insinuating that the people in east wall have not welcomed nor welcome Ukrainian refugees. It's so blatantly deliberate and disgusting. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe is the main culprit, stating he was “concerned” by the language used by protesters. Was it that their use of language wasn't government-approved?

False flags being placed for example by 'radio & print journalist', Alison O’Reilly who said the asylum seekers were given an 8 pm curfew because of threats by "far-right groups" asserting that the curfew is in place to protect the migrants from the locals. When she was called out ‘Given a curfew’ now became the AS decided on a curfew themselves. She went on to report further that 12 security men were hired to work at the center as far-right groups threatened to drive a car through the building, usually centers have 4. Commissioner Drew Harris stated that there was no particular concern that violence is being planned..must have been some threat to bring in an additional eight men. O’Reilly’s posts got likes and were spread far a wide. It was lapped up by simpletons who no doubt spread it further.

The very people who are intentionally calling the asylum seekers in east wall refugees, are socially engineering and misleading the public in order too malign them as racist xenophobes, are the exact very people pushing the hate speech/crime laws, making objective reality illegal.

On the 16th of this month TD's were asked to vote on whether Hate Speech/Crime Bill should be read a second time. noting that if TD's voted No, this would mean the Bill would be defeated. This vote is important because it indicates who & how many TDs will vote to criminalize speech.

While this is just Stage 2 it will have to be voted again at stage 5 but this vote gives us an indication of how the vote at stage 5 will likely go. Only 13 voted no. That's pathetic! Not counting myself, I know four of the lads have contacted their local TD's to object, same as myself, family, and one or two neighbors I mentioned it to and emailed a rough template I used. My brother was against it and emailed his. The constituents all voted yes! Not one. no! When this was announced, many of us were skeptical that this might be what they were planning, which it turns out now, to be correct. It's being inserted into the constitution thanks to the removal of blasphemy by referendum 2018. If this went to a referendum it would be rejected. They intend to pass this law regardless of the views of the people they are meant to be representing.

Nonsense. Its not being inserted into the constitution.

Whats that got to do with constitution?

I asked it

Who is one?

🤣 Threatening. Talk about hysterics.