The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 3) Mod Notes and Threadbanned List in OP

How do you propose paying for looking after ordinary workers if you're creating an economy that is hostile to those international companies paying the salaries of those of us who's tax you're hoping will pay for it?

I'm no proponent of trickle down economics, and I fully agree with providing support to those who need it most. I believe that people working should be paid a living wage, I support our strong social welfare funding; I'm not arguing against protecting the poorest people in the state, but I sure as sh*t don't think nuking our economy is going to solve it.

If somehow SF manage to be part of the next government their voters will have their hopes dashed fairly quickly when the difficult choices in power have to be made .SF will find out along with whoever is in with them that all the big talk is just talk .I can understand people looking at them while the present parties have failed on the big issues like housing health etc but SF will do little to improve things if even that .

lol that how you think the economy works eh ?

just give everyone loads of money and everything will be grand ?

Shouting at paintings ? does that mean something

The poster is because to do otherwise and admit there is fundamental differences the whole house of cards will fall down in their warped little minds.

Such as as Provos/Ferris et al not viewing the ROI as a state, despite the fact the vast majority of the citizens despising the Provos/SF. Basically the Provos/SF were enemies of the Irish people they attacked my country and it's institutions. They did not recognise the courts of the ROI. Even to this day 'New SF' cannot utter the words Republic of Ireland.

No I think you need to reread. What you have is cognitive dissonance, a condition many in SF still suffer from to this day. The Provos are/were enemies to my country and it's institutions as a proud citizen of the ROI. I don't care about NI they are not really like us in the ROI, and have more in common with the Unionists - because of an equally warped mindset.

Casement never attacked a country and institutions that were the representation of the Irish people, for the Irish people and by the Irish people. Which were give a mandate for that Representation. What Casement attacked was British rule. What Ferris attacked was Irish institutions, and the country I live in the ROI.

Of course there is another major difference between Casement and Ferris. Ferris was a much better footballer. The only obvious similarity to me between Ferris and Casement. Is that both had Beards. After that the whole context is completely different.

No point in engaging if you are not addressing my points -

You asked me the difference between Casement and Ferris and I told you.

The main ones being the institions that both men attacked -

1) Ferris attacked an Irish state founded by Irish people for Irish people - there was a majority mandate for that Irish State FreeState/ROI. Ferris was attacking an Irish State against the wishes of the majority of the Irish people, an organisation which had no qualms of killing his countrymen in the ROI and the representatives of the Irish institutions.

The Provos had no qualms in killing Gardai that was the group Ferris was part of - the Provos. No doubt he did the usual SF/Provo thing and not recognise the Irish courts either. Ferris also refused to condemn the murder of Garda Gerry McCabe. Ferris also robbed banks in the ROI.

2) Casement only attacked British forces in Ireland, and British institions in Ireland.

Major difference.

--

Now I can understand why you as a SF/Provo supporter cannot see this difference. Because it is what I would call the 'SF/Provo sickness'.

You focus on the gunrunning, but who were those guns aimed at?

I have a few times at this stage = the institutions attacked Ferris robbed a PO and Bank in the ROI that is an Irish institution. Irish citizens money. Ferris guns could be pointed at Gardai, or any in the ROI who got in the way of the provos campaign of terror which included the Irish State - ROI.

Also Ferris refused to condemn the murder of his fellow Kerryman Garda McCabe. Which shows he has a Provo mindset has no respect for the institute of the Garda Siochana. An Irish institution. You can put as many clap emojis as you like. But you are not reading my replies, and just playing the SF obtuse game. Sniggering behind the balaclava is what I call it.

The very fact you think there is no difference to Casement and Ferris is the very definition of not only SF dogma, but dogma itself.

Ladies and Gentlemen behold the SF/Provo mindset. No matter how you dress it up Ferris attacked Irish institutions and does not have the balls to condemn the murder of his fellow Kerryman murdered in the line of duty.

What does condemnation achieve? It shows maturity, humanity and the recognition of grievous wrong. Not doing shows how the SF/Provo mindset is warped. So instead we get the mental gymnastics and 'republican phrases' which you seem to have learned and parrot 'What does the politics of condemnation achieve?'

I just told you. If a SF member or sitting SF TD did condemn the murder of a Garda by the provos, would they be asked the leave the party or would they be shunned by the party faithful or something?