Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1229222932295229722983691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Note how many weasel words are deployed in this one post.

    You ran away from the post yesterday because you know you have no real comeback other than weasel words, smokescreens and deflections.

    "You have seen sources arguing both cases."

    Sure you have, how about showing some discernment and deciding for yourself who is lying instead of spreading more 'both sides' relativism and uncertainty here - unless that is your agenda.

    "There are countless articles." Countless articles of what veracity? Well? That is proof of nothing. Which version is more compelling and why?

    Similarly, why aren't you posting any of the articles that don't call it a coup then? Why are you only ever posting from the side of Russian propaganda cues?

    "You don't know how many times Russia broke the Budapest agreement"?

    Strange you don't seem bothered to educate yourself on this fundamental document to Ukraine-Russia relations when you are oh so faux concerned about Ukraine ceasefire violations...

    Read the NATO-Russia Founding Act. That is a signed international treaty between NATO and Russia which supersedes any oral discussions. NATO broke no commitments to Russia. There are no NATO forces permanently stationed East of Germany as per the commitments given. There are no NATO weapons systems stationed anywhere that would violate that treaty.

    The Founding Act states that all signatories, including Russia, will work with “the aim of creating in Europe a common space of security and stability, without dividing lines or spheres of influence limiting the sovereignty of any state” and respect “the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security.

    Russia has signed international treaties which allow Ukraine, as a sovereign state, to choose the means to ensure its security ie join NATO.

    Russia has violated the commitments it gave in this treaty, not NATO.

    Just as it violated Budapest.

    So can you give us good reasons why a Ukraine not in NATO should trust Russia to abide by any future peace treaty?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,412 ✭✭✭Homelander


    They didn't go in with Shock & Awe because they're not remotely capable of an operation of that scale and effectiveness. That is the only reason.

    Russia spends about 6% of what the USA does on its military on a generally obsolete and bloated army. The only way they can wage war is by blunt force. They have no high-tech equipment, no effective combined arms, no strong logistics network, nothing remotely comparable to the USA.

    The US army is unmatched in the world, no other military comes close, though plenty of countries have strong, well trained and equipped, and well-led armies. Russian army is none of those things, it's just your average ex-Soviet state military with more of all the out-dated equipment.

    The war going terrible for them in Ukraine isn't surprising because it's happened before. It happened in Georgia in 2008, obviously Russia won because the Georgian military is minuscule, but the world noticed how badly the RU military performed given the absolutely massive disparity on paper, tenfold bigger between that of Ukraine and Russia.

    Interesting point about the tank games. And by interesting, I of course really mean embarrassing barrel-scraping. Things have really hit rock bottom if that's supposed to be a showcase of Russia military prowess given the reality of their fortunes thus far in Ukraine.

    Just have a good long hard look at the list of international participants and then try and repeat that flex. Seriously. Comical is probably the best word I would use but I can think of a few others.

    I don't suppose you've anything to say on those horrific tank losses in Ukraine and the fact they're resorting to pulling increasingly obsolete models out of storage as a result.

    Tanks in modern war are useless with proper leadership and effective combined operations between branches, and especially against a superior enemy. Simply throwing them into the grinder gets you nowhere. Thousands of tanks were lost in the Gulf Wars for that reason.

    Ukraine might not be a superior military based on paper strength but it is unquestionably a better trained and led one thanks to major investment in those aspects since 2014.

    Russia is still operating on the battlefield like it's 1945, with weaponry from the 1980s.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭zv2


    At least they got one of them-

    "Russian colonel Yuri Budanov, convicted of murdering Elza Kungayeva in 2000, was gunned down in Moscow, Russian authorities say. Photograph: Sergey Venyavsky/AP

    A former army officer who tortured and killed a young woman in one of the most notorious crimes of the Kremlin's "dirty war" in Chechnya, was murdered in Moscow.

    Yuri Budanov, 47, a former tank commander – lauded by Russian nationalists, but reviled in Chechnya – was shot four times in the head by bullets fired from a silenced pistol. His body could be seen slumped on a pathway next to a playground.

    The attacker had apparently waited in a white Mitsubishi Lancer, which was driven by an accomplice and later found abandoned on a nearby street."

    Russian colonel who killed Chechen woman shot dead in Moscow | Russia | The Guardian

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,432 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain



    You should be depressed then. If you're only joining the thread now, you've a bit of catching up to do.

    Did you not see the Z rally's outside of Russia? It's not just those within the borders. The Russian's that fled fled more out of fear for being conscripted themselves as opposed to any opposition to the regime. Otherwise, they would have fled sooner. The ones that left before perhaps were of a different attitude. There's no silent majority. There's major indifference for the most part.

    It was only when the mobilisation happened that the borders with Russia really had to be firmed up. Divisions are only happening now because they are not winning. Putin is a despot alright, but he could be replaced by worse. I don't hold much optimism for them guiding themselves away from the path they've gone down. But that's their choice. As I said, lets worry about Russia's future once Ukraine's has been secured.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    What would be the reaction in your regiment if any of the crews performed like that during exercises?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I lived through and remembered the Cold War of the early 1980s where talk of nuclear armaggeddon was commonplace. It's where my concern about the USSR then and Russia now comes from, plus a carryover fear of nuclear war from that age.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,555 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Oh trust me, they are. Did you even read your own link? Look at the "teams" Russia was up against and then ask yourself again why they won 🤣



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,432 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    That threat has allowed things to get to this point. Should they be allowed march all the way to France because of that threat?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ideally, of course not. Leaving aside for now the crap performance of Putins army in Ukraine so far, how do you control all of the escalatory scenarios that would probably result if they tried? Would it be a conventional (ie, a non-nuclear) conflict?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,432 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    That's just it. They've threatened escalation umpteen times. China has finally told them to tone it down. They've bluffed big time with Ukraine. Have Ukraine not attacked annexed Russian territories? Where were the nukes?


    Did Turkey not shoot down a Russian fighter previously? We're no closer to nuclear Armageddon unless some ridiculous chain of events happens. Russia won't go nuclear over Ukraine.


    They need to be turfed out and the lesson they should learn is that having "the bomb" doesn't give you free reign over your neighbours fledgling democracies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And the country they attacked gave up the bomb, in return for commitment from Russia not to destabilise or invade and to respect its territorial integrity.

    So there's another message from Russia guaranteed to ensure no other country follows Ukraine down that path.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That was comedy gold, but I suspect a clever plan by the Russians to get NATO to reduce their military budget by 90%.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Two things to note. Nothing to be worried about re the Chinese & will the Russians be able to field a team in the next competition 🤣



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Never said Russia was a normal country. You’d do well as a misinformation specialist yourself if your recent responses are anything to go by.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,392 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    The crews in question would be buying a lot of beers.

    That, and there'd be some additional training put onto the schedule.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nice deflecting bit of a rant you went on there. Again, point out where i said Russia is a normal country? “Join foreign websites like boards.ie”. Is that aimed at me or what? If you must know, no, I’m not Russian.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Explosions were reported near Balaklava -apt name, near Sevastopol


    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭MoodeRator


    Google maps is quite interesting to look at in this are to my untrained eye. Looks like lots of storage going there, but I cant seem to link the the google maps location

    @44.5987975,33.6698329,4200m/data=!3m1!1e3



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    how do you search for @44.5987975,33.6698329,4200m/data=!3m1!1e3

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    https://youtu.be/H22JOiXdm94

    Van Dyk (pro war) commits to debating Scott Ritter (anti war). Should be interesting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭I Blame Sheeple


    Some of the objects look like artillery pieces and some of the buildings also have more than 4 structures on the roof. Total conjecture but could be antennae alongside AC units etc.

    For future use, just search the longitude/latitude in Google Maps without the rest of the details.

    (Search for: 44.5987975,33.6698329 and leave out the rest)



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,568 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    I've a possibly stupid question, but before this ridiculous invasion, it was nigh on impossible to adopt a kid from Ukraine. Does anyone know if this has changed since February because I'd gladly try and make a difference for one or two if it meant that they don't have to be exposed to any more of these despicable acts. I find these pictures truly harrowing but I can just close the webpage when it gets too much, these kids don't have that choice and no one deserves to have their carefree youth ruined like this and have little hope in the near future for better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭zv2


    They say American pilots have great admiration for Ukrainian pilots-


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭rogber


    One bit about resilience the rest basically "ah it's not that bad, everyone used to live like that". Struck me as pretty dismissive of the harsh reality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,225 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I certainly didn't label them snowflakes, far from it. You chose that particular term which is wholly inappropriate in the given situation.

    But yes, people will have a tough winter, the population will manage. If anything it'll likely strengthen their resolve and deepen their hatred of the Russian military and political leadership.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,520 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I would use Google Earth, just input the coordinates, and off she goes.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Deleted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    Support for Bandera is apparently not something the Russian's view favourably.

    >A survey by the Democratic Initiative Foundation in April 2021 found that one out of three Ukrainians, 32%, considered Bandera's acts as positive, and just as many took the opposite view.

    I suspect that Russian state media broadcast this and also the plight of ethnic Russian people in donbas. That might be enough to keep the war going. We've blocked Russian media, maybe they have done similar for Western media so it's possible they are similarly polarized like the armchair warriors here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,415 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Russia are planning to mobilise 700,000 men before January.


    This war isn’t ending anytime soon.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement