Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

Options
1128129131133134163

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Having seen the general social media disposition of some of the clowns organising the protests, I can imagine the previous they have.

    Surely the DF MPs should just put up a cordon 500 metres away and let that be that. I don't imagine the intention is for open ship visits during the stay?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    We have enough problems with the other protestors kicking off when the Port of Cork close the Deep Water s ships are berthing and unberthing, because the hour or so is a great impact on their lives (maybe someone should explain what might happen if a mooring line snaps and how that could ruin their lives…), close off the area totally and they will join these muppets for more protesting.

    On happy news of the visit, the AC managed to play with one of the 139s landing and lifting off from the Doorman, and the Dutch had their helicopter up as well during the day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The rebirth of the air corps naval unit? As for the protest you would be ashamed showing up with so few protestors



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I was planning to drive down to Cork to get a view of the ships up close tomorrow, but other plans have intervened.

    Any pics anyone has would be appreciated.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The size of the Dutch ship the 139 landed on. Id say they had twice the room compared to where the land when on a standard 112 mission



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Tis a big old mother to be sure!



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Credit to Niall O'Connor, The Journal on Twitter.

    The 139 on the aft flight deck really gives a sense of scale

    HNLMS Karel Doorman

    205m 28,000 tons




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Mate of mine was aboard earlier.

    Everything light grey is crew accom, a hospital, dining facilities, driving the ship etc.

    Where you see the 2 lifeboats, inside that is hangar space for 6 NH90s (Dutch not at all happy with theirs at present)

    Beneath that, from the stern under the helideck to a point just under the CWIS up front, is a vehicle/cargo deck, which can be accessed either from the 45 degree stern ramp, the stern steel beach (With landing craft unloading but not entering) or via a large hatch on the main deck inside the 70 tonne crane between the refuelling posts.

    All with a crew of about 150. Mostly involved in the C&C role.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    So are we seeing a version of the Future MRV only smaller?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    That seems to be the persistent rumour on social media.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    IAC never had a Naval Unit, just 2 Dauphins fitted for Naval Ops, Helicopter Wing/3 Ops only.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Holland-Class PV 'Groningen'

    109m 3,750 tons

    Lead ship of the Seven Provinces-Class frigates, the 'Zeven Provincien'

    144m, 6,050 tons



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Seems the Dutch can just be added to the list of those unhappy with the 90 at this point, though the two that flew up along the beach looked good I have to say.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Desperate crates altogether.

    Yet again, never be an early adopter. Let some other poor bugger figure out how crap a piece of kit is. Whether that be an LTAV, a helicopter, a fleet support vessel or a helmet.

    I shall call it the L85 Maxim.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Does the EU Fishery ships carry Boarding crews and are they allowed to detain a vessell?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    I don't believe that is their remit, however they can monitor fishing activities, and ensure everyone is pinging when they are supposed to. SFPA are supposed to do the inspections when the FVs land their catch. Whether they do or not is a matter for SFPA.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    They do look nice.

    Useful I suppose when they become hangar queens.

    Last time Karel Doorman was about she also carried RNLAF Cougars. Similar size, but more reliable.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Arent the SFPA still on a work to rule? If the fisheries element was removed from the naval service how much time would that free up?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Moot point really because all our equipment purchases for the last 20 years has been towards fishery protection as a primary role, unfortunately.

    Lose fisheries now and you are left with vessels and aircraft incapable of doing much else except frontier patrol.

    This is why the Push towards the MRV. Get back into the naval business again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I was thinking along those lines myself Doh. What the hell else do they do....or can they do, apart from token frontier patrol and occassional rescue and drug interception? A couple of frigates and a sub or two is what's needed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,239 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    They carry sfpa officers, Irish and other European sfpa, they arrested a kinsale based trawler a week ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I see the Brexit Media are having a sh1t attack over the new british fleet support vessels being partially built in spain.

    Thank god we wont have that BS with the MRV



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I do wonder how H&W will handle the ramp up to build some fairly impressive ships though, will they stay on budget/spec? On the other hand having some domestic arms industry employment does focus politicians minds on sustaining that sector more. So yeah the MRV won't have any of those political issues, simply because we have no industrial buy in at all, is that the 100% better solution though?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Indeed, because wherever its built, it won't be in Ireland.

    Though you'd feel that even after our excellent partnership with Babcock, its more likely to be an EU builder that will get the gig, especially if its a variant of an OTS product from the likes of Damen or B+V



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    When we had Corvettes and Minesweepers, yes. Ships that in addition to being able to Patrol, could carry out other military task by design.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    But sure were they not outdated junk by the time we took them on from the RN?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The Flowers certainly were by the time we stopped using them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭thomil


    Yes and no, at least for the Flower class corvettes. These ships had been designed as "cheap & cheerful" convoy escorts during WW2, based on a commercial design and completed to merchant marine standards, to the extent that they were equipped with old triple expansion steam engines. This was by design, in order to allow even smaller commercial yards to build them in bulk. The combination of their old engine technology and their hull form made them rather slow for warships and whilst they were remarkably seaworthy, they would roll heavily even on wet grass.

    Having said that, their weapons & sensor suite were actually pretty extensive and they were remarkably effective at keeping German U-Boats down and protecting convoys. However, despite their large numbers and effectiveness, they started being decommissioned in the allied navies even while fighting was still going on. US-built Destroyer Escorts and British built River class frigates were simply more capable designs than the flowers were.

    They were designed and built to "hold the line" and keep Britain in the fight until more powerful units could be brought to bear. This, they did exceptionally well. As the mainstay of a fleet on their own, without heavier units to back them up, they were utterly unsuitable.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    The Flowers were a modern equivalent of a Perry class, still in service in Australia and Spain. No longer state of the art, but still ideal for the job it does. Problem was we were mean with maintenance, and as time moved on, the ASW gear was all removed, until all that was left was a slow whaler, armed with a 4 inch open cannon on the bow, and a single Pom-Pom aft. You still needed a huge crew to keep the engines running, and handle the seaboats for boarding.

    The Tons were nearly new when we got them, and still in use with the RN for years after we dispensed with ours. The Hunt class or tripartites are comparable today. Problem is they were way too small for the west coast, and were probably designed with the Humber or the Wash, Persian Gulf or Hong Kong in mind, maybe even the Med. Not Dingle though.

    Thing is, at the time both of these type were purchased, there were better ships available, for similar cost. There were as many Castle class in reserve in 1947 as Flowers, and they were better suited to our waters, even if we only had to patrol a few miles off the coast back then. When we got the Minesweepers, the RN were literally giving away surplus frigates to former Colonies. Oz, Canada, India and Pakistan did well from it. We took the smallest ship going that wasn't an RAF rescue boat.



Advertisement