You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the right.

Hardly mentioned?

The GOP devote a huge amount of their time in every political campaign talking about the radical socialists plan to increase taxes and how the deficit will rise. They then stop talking about it when they are in charge and the deficit skyrockets, such as with Trump, or Bush before him.

And just what negative impact has Galloway and his motivations/actions/intent brought about?

You once again justify the thread title explicitly with your content, describing a left wing politician who never sat in government, or significantly influenced policy as being an example of the menacing danger of the left, while you use the image of a right wing character as your avatar, that has contributed hugely to the massively negative impact on at least an entire generation of people in the UK.

LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!

Do you need me to go get the links of Trump wanting to get the justice Dept to prosecute Hillary and also James Comey for not shutting down an investigation in to him.

The UK government has introduced severe laws restricting protests.

Putin's main opponent is sitting in a jail in Siberia.

The current Brazilian PM was literally jailed by a judge friends with his opponent, who was then given a high profile job by that opponent.

Are you for real?

Except that hasn't happened, has it? Of course, there are some cases, and some individuals who call for it, but what we are talking about with respect to issue from right wing positions is them being implemented at a government level and impacting hundreds of millions of people, or billions in the case of the climate.

And that again illustrates the justification for the thread title, lots of concern expressed about such 'ideals' on here and elsewhere, with little justification for the need to be concerned, and meantime, at best, a sense of ambivalence towards the massively impactful topics or in all too many cases, actually being strongly in favour of the ideologies that brought them about.

Neither is Putin apparently, nor Brexit, or climate denial......

Don't think even the most blinkered commentators would still try and insist that Nick Fuentes isn't a dangerous and hateful character.

What he says has a lot of familiarity to it, doesn't it.

Interesting that you say I am focused on labels, and then identify these people as above.

Anyway, that aside, you do realize

• That these people were there at the behest of and encouraged by the sitting US President.
• That many of the people connecting with, and tying in with the protesters were in close communication with friends of and former advisors of the president.
• That a right wing activist said that him, and thee sitting representatives were "planning something big": a "mob" to pressure Congress into rejecting the election results"
• That sitting Representatives were cheerleaders to what was going to happen in the days before it.
• That a sitting Representative tweeted during the attack to guide those doing it.
• That a Senator raised his arm in solidarity with them before running to safety.
• That the President called them special people and told them that he loved them.
• That the wife of a sitting supreme court judge is a supporter of these who attacked the Capitol
• That up to 6 sitting politicians asked Trump for pardons around their actions and the events of that day.

It's not unusual to see posters twist their position, but there's so much wrong with your post her, I can almost smell it through the screen. It's preposterous to suggest that these people could never influence a political party or institution.

Also, You didn't answer my question, so please, when you're ready; Were the people who stormed the capitol, right wing, or far right, in your view?

P.S. 'I would never characterize 'the left'' You were the chief cheerleader for GB News, No one is buying this sanctimony.