Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dangerous Dogs Owners

145791050

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,297 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "Vastly decrease" how, in what artful way are we excusing ourselves to repeat the same mistakes? Forced sterilization? Forced interbreeding? Culling? This isn't a rosemary bush we are talking about.

    There is no such thing as "normal" when it comes to human pets - most breeds were created to target some desirable characteristics, and plenty of breeds have died out in the past too as a result. The fact that humans have moved on from archaic practices like pit fighting dogs is plenty of reason to see pitbulls start to disappear from the gene pool.

    That can occur naturally, though, not as a matter of humans engineering it to be. Stop breeding them, especially for fighting purposes, and these traits wont prevail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,151 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    A ban on owning them and breeding them, strict penalties for those found in breach of that.

    Demand will quickly fall away, and so will birthrates of pits. Those currently as household pets will have to be put down. What is inhumane about any of that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,297 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    There are 18 million pit bulls adopted in the United States today. What do we do with them when this ban comes into force? Are they euthanized en masse?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,104 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    Simply not allowing the dogs to reproduce, say by neutering, is not "human experimentation on other sentient animals". You seem to have gone off on some weird tangent in your head that isn't grounded in reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,104 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    Are you against the general practice of neutering and spaying pets?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 251 ✭✭Meirleach


    What the actual hell overheal?

    I'm aware you're just trying to 'win' an argument here, but that kind of language is not really necessary .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,297 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Spaying and neutering of pets is already commonplace and shelters already perform this as a matter of policy, in that regard there's no special enhancement available to 'neuter pit bulls twice' or something. As a result, if you eliminate all dog-fighting breeding, I think you'd still find pit bull in the dog gene pool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,151 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    🙄 Ding ding ding, we have a winner folks.

    I did wonder how this thread would jump the shark into total lunacy - here we have it. Vets putting down animals, or even animal culls (routinely done all over the world, incl. here in Ireland) is somehow comparable to the Holocaust. Wew



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,297 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    You literally asked what's inhumane about exterminating 18 million dogs, though? And you don't see the connection? Oh, you don't want to see it. You see it as "jumping the shark" got it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭almostover


    I agree to a point - dangerous breeds should be muzzled. But I think that some breeds are so dangerous that their ownership should be severely restricted. I can't understand why anyone would keep a pitbull as a pet. Other than perhaps for intimidation purposes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    'Farmers are fully entitled to shoot dogs when they are out of control, in either a public or private land, under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.'

    Fully within my rights



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,104 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa



    That reply to my question doesn't make any sense, nor does it make any sense as a stand-alone post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭notAMember


    I kinda agree humans shouldn't reproduce as much. ;)


    Dog breeds are a human invention, remember? Quite recently, in the last few 100 years only. We created all these breeds, bred those traits into them. This isn't an endangered natural creature, all dogs are created by us selectively breeding for traits. This isn't a panda whose bamboo habitat was removed. This is a genetically engineered creature.

    How you think those hyperallergenic cockerpoo puppies come about? A poodle and a cocker spaniel aren't falling deeply in love and starting a family together...


    As we have artificially created an animal which by it's nature rips the face and belly off a 9 year old child, I think we should take some responsibility, as humans. Take a step back and say, hey, you know what, maybe this one wasn't a super good idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,648 ✭✭✭✭Witcher




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,297 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭almostover


    We could neuter all pitbulls in common ownership and only allow breeding for small number of select approved kennels. Keeps the breed alive but takes them out of the hands of the masses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,297 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    most dogs period in common ownership are already neutered...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,104 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa



    But why do we have to keep the breed "alive"?

    Edit: and to be very clear, I'm not talking about exterminating any extant dogs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 251 ✭✭Meirleach


    Also just baning the sale and breeding of them in Ireland is highly unlikely to massively effect numbers world wide.



  • Registered Users Posts: 216 ✭✭Max H


    My personal view is the UK got it right regarding certain breeds, however there are still these breeds around in the UK.

    https://www.lancs.live/news/lancashire-news/dog-breeds-banned-uk-what-24241056



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 77,708 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Overheal threadbanned



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,246 ✭✭✭Esse85


    All stems back to not having enough law enforcement in this country.

    From cnuts with 80+ convictions getting suspended sentences by a corrupt judge, scum attacking gardai like in Ballyfermot, irresponsible dog owners put people's lives at risk and no deterrent, for how long more do decent people need to suffer while scum in the minority can repeatedly do as they please unpunished?



  • Registered Users Posts: 216 ✭✭Max H




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,648 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    The Examiner quote is wrong, there is no 'Dangerous Dogs Act, 1991' here...read the correct legislation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 310 ✭✭Hillmanhunter1


    No, what's really "funny" is that if you google pit bulls you'll find that they top the table for attacks on humans, and kills of humans. Pit bulls top that chart despite not being in the top fifty breeds in terms of popularity/population.

    That's hilarious (if that is what you think is funny).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭bmc58


    I agree completely with you.I have a little cross bred terrier and we (my wife and I) walk him regluarly in our local park as do many others.But there are an elderly couple who do the same with two alsations who are not muzzled .Whenever we come close(we go another way to avoid them) the Alsations are pulling at the leads to come over to us and my dog.It is really scarey as if one of the dogs broke free I know there would be trouble.I waited one day for the couple to get back to their car and told them their dogs as a prescribed dangerous dog in Ireland should be muzzled.The elderly man told me to f$ck off and mind my own buisness.They still continue to walk their unmuzzled dogs in the park.I have never seen a dog warden in forty years of owning dogs checking on dog owners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    If you'd seen the photos of the young lad in Wexford with potentially life changing injuries you'd probably understand the anger on display in this thread.

    The young lad could have been killed himself.


    Ultimately some idiot thought it was a good idea to get a breed of dog well known for attacking and indeed killing people. Then decides they are different and that the law around restricted breeds doesn't apply to them. Then decides it's okay to let these animals out unleashed and un- muzzled.

    Unfortunately there are a lot of idiots in the world who will do stupid things. You've either got to stop them doing stupid things(bans or restrictions on what they can own), punish them for being stupid (criminal proceedings) or a combination of both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,543 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    There's no good reason to keep this breed "alive".

    Breeds have gone extinct before and it's not like they are any great cultural loss, usually because they had fallen out of fashion or outlived their usefulness.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,886 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Will you stop with the macho "tough man, especially on the internet" shite saabsaab, never say anything on a forum that you wouldn't say without your mates falling around laughing at you in the pub!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users Posts: 46 autoboi


    All dogs are dangerous and have the potential to do harm. There was a baby killed in the UK by a Jack Russell (2012).

    I'd rather we advocate for responsible dog ownership - breed independent. One set of rules for a minority of dog owners is never going to work and frankly isn't fair. Teaching a child that a dog that looks a certain way is dangerous but all others are grand is irresponsible.

    Dogs allowed to run wild, no recall, dog sh*t everywhere is not on, a cultural shift towards responsible dog ownership is required.

    I honestly believe this begins with how we acquire dogs, its to easy. The removal of puppy farms and the selling of dogs through a central source where the income would need to be declared would be a start - but this is another topic altogether!



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,842 ✭✭✭buried


    This thread is prime example of apex materialism gone out of control. People literally getting traumatised that they may not be able to purchase some breed of animal because of its aesthetic.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,474 ✭✭✭✭lawred2




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,543 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Well that cultural shift won't happen on it's own. The only thing people here understand and gets them to behave is being hit in the pocket.

    People here lack civic responsibility and have a problem with following unenforced rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,399 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    Why was this dog roaming about outside on its own? The owner has a lot to answer for.



  • Registered Users Posts: 46 autoboi



    100% that's why I think it needs to begin with how dogs are acquired. I pay tax when I buy a Snickers. How can someone sell a litter over dogs for over 10K and walk away with the cash? Get caught smuggling them out of the country and you get fined for a couple of hundred quid? If there were no moral/legal implications I'd take that gamble myself!!!

    It's worth noting we also export rescue dogs to Scandinavian countries - I'm embarrassed, we probably all should be.

    I really only see changing the system of how we acquire dogs as the catalyst for cultural change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,983 ✭✭✭spookwoman


    Enforcement is non existent or just passing the buck in this country. There is an ole one on the next street who has this view she is above the law and entitled to do and she pleases. She also lies when confronted and puts on I'm a harmless little ole lady routine, and the dogs are rescues from those terrible people.

    She's had a run in with the warden a number of years back for letting her dog roam and it stopped for a bit when it died. It's started again this year with another one of her dogs and she has been reported 9 times with photographic evidence. First problem, the warden after 6 reportings is prepared to fine her but if she doesn't pay it will have to go to court and that could take a year. It's up to me to go to court if she doesn't pay and provide the evidence. The dog has been caught in the garden 3 time since and I'm still reporting to the warden. I'll go to court if I have to but it should not get to a stage where there are 9 reports with evidence that she is letting a dog loose with no supervision. Most of the time she just opens her door and lets it loose. She has a Jack russell that roams her street which is full of young kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,132 ✭✭✭Ms2011


    I often wonder what people think will happen if you eliminate Pitbulls from existence? Do they think the people who irresponsibly own them will just sit on their hands & never own another dog or more realistically will they move onto the next trendy breed and destroy their reputation too, I know which I'd bet on.

    If there are no repercussions, real repercussions for people whose dogs damage people or property banning dogs breed by breed is like peeing against the wind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,842 ✭✭✭buried


    People want the likes of this lad to learn a lesson? Then demand the eradication of free legal aid.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭dunnerc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,886 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I'd hazard a guess that it escaped from a bad or careless enclosure maybe in a chaotic house with a lot of comings and goings, thus self dispensing of the muzzle law as people don't muzzle their dogs at home. These dogs aren't your average staffie, they're expensive & desirable to idiots and commonly stolen by idiots from idiots (they actually don't make great guard dogs) and are as likely to walk away with a stranger as they are to bite them.

    All being said, you're 100% correct. The owner has a lot to answer for for not safeguarding & corralling the dog from the public. Accidental or escape, the consequences are devastating for a beautiful little boy who's life has irreversibly changed physically & mentally. The owners punishment will never ever match the suffering to that of the little boys.

    I've dealt with one of the XL Bullies and they're incredibly muscled with necks that are impossible to choke out so if it all goes wrong it's difficult to control, unlike a lot of big heavy dogs they've a low centre of gravity and can defend from below effectivly with all that muscle and that short powerful wide mouth muzzle that allows the devastating molars to work. I found (the one I dealt with) difficult to read with cropped ears. Very very boisterous at playtime & even the bitch was quite dominant. Much harder to read than a lot of big breeds that would signal with ears, tail, tongue flicks, body posture etc.. like your more well established big guard breed - German Shepard, Rottweiler, Dobermann, Giant Poodle, Mastiff, Giant Schnauzer, Ridgeback etc.. whom are relatively easy to read and will tell you if they're pissed off.

    They also have an incredible tolerance to pain which is a further problem when things go wrong and victim recovery is acted on.

    They're not at all suitable dogs for ownership in Ireland, a country with very little crime, in fact there's only a few very inhospitable places in the world where they could be considered suitable and those areas are covered by typical guard dogs like the Boerboel in South Africa where home invasions are common and the breed is a lot more developed and concentrated for specific tasks.

    The breed is new, has an unspecified & ambiguous role in society, they're basically a useless companion dog, damaging and have no cultural affinity with humans other than a showpiece for people with fragile egos, similar to your average teapot dog but with desperate consequences.

    Watch this space, Argentine Dogo, Presa Canario & the Bully Kutta are another few seriously unsuitable breeds the man child mouth breathers will get their hands on and start to **** around with in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Of course pitbulls should be banned. The clue is in the name 'Pit', bred to dogfight other dogs to the death in a pit. Other breeds that are dangerous should be restricted but at least you would have a major killer out of the picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Time to ban these dogs. Owners completely ignore the law, I see these kind of dogs with no muzzles all the time.

    Also, law needs to hold owners personally and financially responsible for dog attacks.

    In South Africa after a spate of attacks by Pitbull's on children, people have gotten sick of it, and have taken the law into their own hands, and are killing these dogs. Owners are surrendering the dogs due to this en masse.

    The current situation is bad for everyone, these dogs will keep on attacking and killing people, dogs and other animals, and will lead to an inevitable back lash against them. Better to humanely stop breeding these animals and have strict conditions on existing dogs, so they can live out their lives peacefully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,983 ✭✭✭spookwoman


    Also there is often inbreeding when gotten from puppy farms. Just reading the RTE report on the owner and he is a prime example why proper regulation and enforcement need to sorted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,132 ✭✭✭Ms2011


    They were originally bred to fight bulls in pits, as you say the clue is in the name, they were subsequently used in dog fighting. They were also bred to be non aggressive to people so that their handlers could safely separate them mid fight if needed.

    But my point still stands, by eradicating Pitbulls you are not eradicating the problem, you'll just pass it on to another breed. What you need to do is make the consequences of your dog doing damage to people or property so off putting it won't be worth the risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Those that have them don't have any fear of the law and the point is that at least one and probably the most dangerous breed would be removed from the scene.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,886 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    100% correct. Inbreeding is inherent in puppy farms and also, if you buy a dog with all the certificates and papers from a reputable IKC show breeder you're most likely buying an inbred dog.

    We need to step away from designer dogs and the show dogs are the worst. The perceived "imperfections" disallowed by the ring means a shallower breeding selection.

    Get an unwanted lurcher or gaze hound. Unwanted, healthier, calmer, cleaner and less hassle.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement