Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

solve the housing problem easily...some solutions?

Options
11011131516

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There are legal avenues in place for the removal of tenants that don't take 10 years 🙄

    Given the small amount of cases that appear to use them, it doesn't look like a major issue to be honest but by all means show me otherwise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭notAMember


    Any "small amount" is non-zero, so point proved tbh. ;) Anecdotal of course, but I know where people paid the tenant to leave. Or another was threatened basically.

    I don't want to get into any of those situations, or the additional risk of damage, so I won't let it out. There's nothing in it for me. By the time you pay the tax , fees, maintenance and agent, there's shag all left over, so it's not worth the risk. Makes far more sense to leave it vacant.

    That's the way the system is set up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    DT, stop being rude. After all you are the waffler supreme. Neither you not @[Deleted User] really have any understanding of the issue.

    You are both caught in a up in a conscientious objection against LL and renting property.

    Earlier this year before the assembly in NI was close SF voted to bring in a 10% reduction on rents for tenant's. The DUP abstained on the vote. Then SF found a way to prevent the 10% reduction bring applied because they knew it would lead to tenant's being evicted and LL leaving the sector.

    The CEO of the RTB has already stated that regulation is causing a problem within the rental sector. We have had six year of more and more regulation and 41k units have left the sector in that time. A large portion have being left vacant

    DaCor while it is generally not taking two years to terminate a tenancy 6-9 months is generally the minimum where a tenant decides to obstruct that process.

    People using aerBnB as a rental type will not return to longterm renting

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,440 ✭✭✭macraignil


    The experience with letting property I have seen with my mother having a share in the farm buildings where she grew up would put anybody off renting out their property. The farm house is now derelict for a number of years with the last tenants being very confrontational with my uncle and trying to pick a fight rather than just paying their rent before eventually leaving. The house has since been poorly maintained and it would likely be cheaper to knock it and build again rather than renovate to bring it up to modern living standards.

    One of the farm sheds which was just a small building with as far as I know low rent was used by someone who claimed a verbal agreement had been made with my deceased granda and they simply refused to leave and just used it as somewhere to dump broken windscreens. It led to a payment of about 20,000euro to the guy doing the dumping for him to agree to leave plus legal fees for my mother's family that ran into the thousands. Maybe it's a hangover to the foundation of the state being supported by so many tenant farmers but property law seems very complex here and I know of a number of properties that simply can't reach the housing market because of issues related to ownership taking so long to resolve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Bass, you accuse others of waffling and then start goign on about SF policy in Northern Ireland.


    A poster responded to a scenario of not being able to rent out on short term let by saying that their best option under that scenario would be to board up the property and let it rot. Such hysterical dramatics! If they board it up and leave it lying there (with all the deterioration and insurance implications) they will be fine, but if they rent it out to a tenant then they risk losing their own personal property. That's a statement from a self-proclaimed landlord.


    If I buy a pub only to immediately board it up because I don't know how to run a pub, can I really call myself a publican? Would you suggest that as a good investment on my part to do that - pour capital into a pub with the intention of boarding it up?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The CEO of the RTB has already stated that regulation is causing a problem within the rental sector. We have had six year of more and more regulation and 41k units have left the sector in that time. A large portion have being left vacant

    That coincides with the rise in property prices so all those involuntary landlords sold up.

    It also coincides with the rise of airbnb and other short term letting platforms

    DaCor while it is generally not taking two years to terminate a tenancy 6-9 months is generally the minimum where a tenant decides to obstruct that process.

    That sounds about right. Any idea on % of tenancies that this would occur in?

    People using aerBnB as a rental type will not return to longterm renting

    I'm sorry but that makes no sense. Are you saying landlords will let a property sit idle just because?



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,919 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Professional landlords are simply bribing people to leave. It's cheaper overall than taking 1-2 years to go through thd legal process.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Seems a lot of landlords could save themselves a world of pain by following some rules themselves

    I mean, whats good for the goose and all that



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Following on from their restrictions on airbnb and other short-term lets in certain parts of the city, Barcelona have introduced a "use it or lose" policy. If a property sits idle for more than 6 month they take it over and rent it out

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-16/to-fill-vacant-units-barcelona-seizes-apartments

    This week, the city’s housing department wrote to 14 companies that collectively own 194 empty apartments, warning that if they haven’t found a tenant within the next month, the city could take possession of these properties, with compensation at half their market value. These units would then be rented out by the city as public housing to lower-income tenants, while the companies in question could also face possible fines of between €90,000 and €900,000 ($103,000 and $1,003,000), according to Spanish news outlets. 


    The plan builds on previous measures in the city to fill empty apartments. Since 2016, it has been legal for municipalities in the Catalonia region, which includes Barcelona, to take control of properties that have been left without tenants for more than two years. The cities can then rent them as affordable housing for a period of between four and ten years before returning them to their owner’s control. This measure, however, has only ever been used in a few cases, and still requires the city to return the properties. Now, using a legal tool approved by the Catalonia region in December 2019, Barcelona will have expanded power to actually buy the apartments outright by compulsory purchase, at 50% of market rate.

    Put those 2 measures together and you wouldn't be long sorting out the accommodation shortage in the country



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The housing shortage accounts for a large part of inflationary pressures




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,018 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Answer me this.

    If you had a property that would make you a maximum of 12,000 per year (pre-tax) with full time tenants or one that would make you 24,000 (pre-tax on Airbnb, what option would you pick?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,018 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    As expected. I think everyone would take you and your chum more seriously if you just answered the question.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It was answered, just not what you were hoping for



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,919 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    If I had a property that might make me 12k (if the tenants feel like paying), or might make me zero (if they don't), and I knew that I would need it again in 12/18 months - then I would take the option that is least likely to see me in court or a board arguing to get it back.

    Especially when inflation is high.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If you had a property that would make you 12k pre tax ( maybe 2k çosts) with risk of a tenant defaulting or causing 10-20k in damage or you could put it on aerBnB for 8-10k ( with 3-5k in costs) but virtually no risk of damage or defaulting tenant's which would you take.

    Also factor in ability to get property back.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,018 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Absolutely AirBnb.

    No protection for landlords in this country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,018 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    No it wasn't.

    We know what you would both pick though, if you had the option.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well yeah, you have your preference which results in the current dysfunctional market we now have

    Mine results in a functioning property market (rental and sales)

    We'll have to agree to disagree but the winds are only blowing in one direction currently and the noose is tightening around the short term letting game



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,018 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Plenty of ways around it, not that you'll have to worry about that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Look up the SF one was in the Sunday Info last Sunday week. Very interesting considering the way they carry on down here.

    Very few people buy a property to board it up straight away neither a publican or a LL. What has happened is that you have individuals who were LL's for years that have walked away. The real problem is you have people where a property may be vacant for 1-3 maybe even for 5-10 years ( owner in a nursing home) who will not rent or lease there houses because they are scared sh!tless by the rules and regulations or by the inability to resolve issues with a problem tenant.

    By the way Donald it was you who said that @notAMember was on planet waffle when you were and still are the waffler in chief better know as Dwic

    I have explained this to you before. Generally people who hold onto property and do not rent it have a valid reason to. Maybe they want it for a son or daughter who is away or is a few years from needing it.

    However even though it has coincided with the rise in property prices it is rising exponentially, the thinking first it was accidental LL's but it's also owner of multiple properties.

    DT is of the opinion that all these houses will end up with owner occupiers, however occupancies rates decline when going from rented to owner occupied.

    But people do not need to leave them empty. They can rent short-term fir 90 days and receive less ROI. Some sell up. Some intend to hold onto for a child who may be travelling or still in there teens. Selling may trigger a serious CAT event.

    Just on trying to terminate there is a case gone to.the Supreme Court where throughout the system the courts have upheld the LL's right to evict but he cannot get possession as the tenant has kept appealing. There has been no rent received for about 3-4 years. Yes an outlier but it's a possibility

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    But it not bringing property onto the market. Not only that government has brought in a temporary eviction ban which it will maybe have to extend in March which will blow the complete system open

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And the poor auld landlords cry when tenants don't follow the law. Is it any wonder LL's have such a bad name and so little sympathy



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You'll have to explain to me how removing approx 27,000 properties off airbnb (probably 35k if you factor in all selling apps) won't lead to properties going on to the open market, either rent or sales markets

    Honestly, I'm curious how thats actually possible. Its the second time you've made the claim and its a bizarre one so by all means clarify it as it would seem to go against all logic but maybe I'm missing something so go ahead and explain it



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,018 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Your disdain is more based on personal begrudgery, rather than any true empathy towards those affected by the lack of rental properties.

    I'm not a landlord by the way, I just don't have an issue with people being smart with their personal property and using it intelligently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    DT is of the opinion that all these houses will end up with owner occupiers, however occupancies rates decline when going from rented to owner occupied.

    You're making things up now. If you are not able to manage your rental property, then rather than boarding it up, I would advise sell it to someone who can (general "you" as you personally appear to be able to manage). I mean the same poster is portraying themselves as the saviour landlord of Ireland .... despite apparently not renting their property to actual renters.


    The other poster is a self-proclaimed landlord of 20 years with multiple properties whose choices appear to be, were they to be not allowed to continue to rent short term in possible contravention of planning laws

    1) Rent it to a tenant (ya know, like a "landlord" actually does) but possibly lose their personal residence somehow

    2) Board up the house and allow it to sit there and rot. Thereby not risking their personal residence.

    How on earth could any competent person find themselves in that position after 20 years in a business? At a time when income and capital values of the assets are at an all-time high? Surely your advice to such a person would be to get out of the game and get into something that they can do?

    You are free to agree with notamember that the best financial advice would be for them to board up an expensive capital asset and suck up the depreciation over time as it rots and decays (plus the additional insurance cost ... if they can get it). I don't think I'd be recommending you to anyone as a financial advisor though..........

    Anyway, I'll leave you be. You'll likely meander off about Northern Ireland or Pakistan or the Outer Hebrides



  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Very true. The problem however is vested interests arguing against an increase in supply. For example, the Irish Property Owners Association representing amateur landlords was arguing as late as January of this year that there was a severe danger of supply in the rental market if there was too much investment in housing in Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Because maybe a large section of there properties are the owners PPR. I suspect that many may be only temporary vacant. There is somewhere around 70-100k vacant properties in the country that we cannot get people to rent because of present rules.

    As well there may be many of these houses that are classed as holiday home and exempt from any legislation anyway. As I pushed earlier the legislation only applies to RPZ properties anyway

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    DT you are getting very techy about the SF example in NI.

    Most of the rest of your post is well dare I say it just...... waffling....as I say Dwic.

    I am quite well able to manage any assets I have properties or other investments.

    However the problem in this country is LL's running for the hills......or they were until the government decided to bring in the winter rental termination ban. How the government get themselves out of this mess I am not sure because as Gerry Adams said they have not gone away or in this case the problem will not have go e away.

    Imagine all those houses for sale for owner occupiers.

    So how do you try to solve it. More stick that has not worked for the last six years,( as the shinnors know and are afraid it might happen in NI after helping to create the mess here by there populism policies) or try to incentive ( by not frightening them.sh!tless) those that have properties that are vacant for a couple years to rent them.

    You and @[Deleted User] are the BDSM specialists of the rental sector and we see where that has lead

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ok so nothing solid, just nonsense

    As I pushed earlier the legislation only applies to RPZ properties anyway

    Yeah you didn't provide anything to back that up either despite there being no mention of it, anywhere



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Landlords often present themselves as being the solution to the problem but I think they often forget that when a landlord buys a property, often to provide very insecure accommodation to a tenant, they are blocking that house from being bought by a first time buyer or someone trading up. When they sell that house becomes once again, a purchasable home for a family. I'm a supporter of landlords in general but the situation is not as clear-cut as they themselves make out.



Advertisement