Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Reflection on the pandemic: questions about the authorities' response.

Options
1192022242550

Comments

  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As you obviously already know the Associated Press is simply a news aggregator, they only have a small team of reporters and seldom produce news stories, they mainly receive and redistribute stories from any of their contributory members.

    Therefore their reliability as an impartial and always correct source of information is no better than that of any newspaper that you can think of.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "There are none so blind as those who will not see"




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭Spudman_20000


    Sure lads, we can't even trust what comes out of everyone's favourite veterinarian's mouth:




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No, that's why I am asking you, you are the one claiming, I have "puppet masters", you are really entering into conspiracy theory territory.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Great. But the bones of that article is from the EU and the Digital Services Act. Its not an opinion piece.

    The misreporting was by the poster who referred to the article.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    No you said everything was disinformation being fed by someone else. So that therefore includes anything you say also.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wrong, or if it is correct, then it must also include the stuff you're fed as well by the media outlets whose information you also digest and take at face value and obviously totally believe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'm just agreeing with you. You've said its ALL misinformation, which includes you. So no one should believe you. Well ok.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As you can see, and have proven, by changing a comment, you have now stated that it is all information is misinformation, just one of the tactics that I mentioned earlier in this thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'm agreeing that no one should believe you. Because thats what you've told us to do.

    That its all misinformation is your own creation.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The same way that we shouldn't believe you and the claims that it's "safe and effective" as it has been proven otherwise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Simply saying something is proven. Doesn't make it proof of anything. That's not how that works.

    Of course you've told us not to believe you regardless.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well, the millions of people who caught the virus after the vax may think otherwise. Anyway, why are you still replying when you have already stated that you didn't understand my earlier post.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Well you've said it's all misinformation. Including what you post . So therefore none of that's true either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Anyone who thinks the Covid vaccines don't work is a Conspiracy theorist. After 2 years of repeated demonstrations of effectiveness there is no argument that they are effective.

    The one area where the Irish authorities excelled was the vaccine rollout.

    I think the reason the poster questioned if you had "puppet master" was probably because they find you constant posts denying a life saving treatment to be baffling. A treatment that is only available due to the advances in modern medicine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,998 ✭✭✭Xander10


    When you say the Covid vaccines work, what are you defining as *work" ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    The vaccines are effective at protecting against death and serious illness. That's the basis they were approved on. So that's my definition.

    When the Pfizer vaccine was approved it was on the promise that it was 95% effective against death and serious illness for the strains at the time. In the last 2 years or so this has basically been shown.

    The idea that vaccines have to stop Covid completely is a strawman. Can you find people in the media who were hyperbolic about Covid yes but you need to look at what was actually promised by the scientists.

    Anti vaxxers have turned the hyperbole into a strawman to pretend vaccines don't work. This can be seen in countless threads in this forum.

    If you want to know how effective vaccines are particularly RNA vaccines, look at China. One of the reasons it's afraid to abandon its 0 Covid strategy(a strategy I think everyone would agree is not sustainable long term) is that's it's failed to sufficiently vaccinate its population and especially people who are at high risk of serious complications from Covid 19.

    Anyone denying that Covid 19 vaccines are effective is a science deniers/conspiracy theorist. At this stage denying that Covid 19 vaccines work is getting into the territory of thinking that the earth is flat.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Anyone denying that Covid 19 vaccines are effective is a science deniers/conspiracy theorist. At this stage denying that Covid 19 vaccines work is getting into the territory of thinking that the earth is flat."

    If this is the case, would you please explain why the case numbers went through the roof in the autumn of 2021 when the vast majority of the population was "protected".

    Your comment also proves the point I made earlier that the propaganda around covid has successfully influenced people into classifying those of us who have concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines as "nutjobs" without justification. Such claims will come back to haunt you in the years to come as the evidence comes more open to the risks involved in rushing a medicinal product into the general population without sufficient testing to verify their long term effects. I will say again, the approvals were rushed and the verification checks were rushed, therefore the products were not tested to the levels that would be considered satisfactory.

    The root cause in the increase in "unexplained" deaths over the past few months needs to be thoroughly investigated without any pre-assumptions, which medical conditions have caused such an increase and what caused those increases.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Your post is a classic strawman. Case numbers have nothing to do with the predicted vaccine effectiveness.

    As restrictions eased you would expect case numbers to increase however the number of people in hospital and particularly ICU did not increase in line with in the increase in cases. This was due to mass vaccination. Hong Kong is a classic case study of how much damage Covid can do to even partially vaccinated populations

    It has been repeatedly shown is that vaccinated individuals are many many times less likely to suffer complications from Covid that requires medical assistance or result in death. That's a statement of Scientific fact.

    The rest of your post is just scare mongering. If you really had evidence of how dangerous vaccines are you wouldn't be posting in on Boards.ie you'd be posting it in a reputable scientific journal. But let me guess you won't/other people with evidence won't because they think the entire field of medicine is part of some global conspiracy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,714 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Post the other trial data on severity that I made you post in excruciating detail previously 😉



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,041 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Most people are rational and understand that treatment has limitations depending on a whole bunch of things. For example, we have flu jabs every year because that virus mutates a lot. We don't have smallpox jabs every year, because that virus is different, one shot works.

    As we've discovered, Covid is more like the former. The vaccines we currently have for Covid are safe and effective. That doesn't mean perfectly, absolutely 1000% safe in every single situation, it means relatively very safe. Huge attention is paid to safety for vaccines, and with these ones, which were administered to billions, every effort was naturally made (constraints considered) to keep them as safe as humanly possible.

    You're a vaccine regulator, you know your family, relatives, friends, colleagues will be taking this treatment - I shouldn't need to finish that sentence.

    Effective means effective. If the best our technology could achieve were Covid vaccines that did nothing but reduce deaths by 30% from the virus, then they could still be called effective and probably would have been rolled out everywhere (if that was the best achievable vs the virus). The current crop performed very well in trials against earlier variants (which they were designed for), however as the virus has evolved and mutated, that has led to varying results. Still very good overall, they reduce transmission, reduce infection and reduce serious hospitalization and deaths from the virus (by up to 90% from the virus)

    A new mutation could come out tomorrow that the vaccines could be much less ineffectual against. A much more deadly strain could develop.

    All we can do is respond as best we can. At the moment, despite initial high hopes, it looks like we just have to live with Covid like we have to deal with seasonal flu, thankfully we have created safe and effective vaccines that do reduce transmission somewhat and significantly reduced severity of the disease, no doubt saving millions and millions of lives. Perhaps down the road we'll develop better treatments.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How about some autopsy data.

    So I again ask about the excess deaths that have occurred in every country that has adopted the universal vaccination programme with a drug that has not been tested to the same degree that almost all other medication is expected to prior to approval. Are you happy to just accept the word of the companies who produce the drugs and finance the regality bodies.

    As you and your cohort have pointed out, the virus changes constantly, so why use (and sometimes compelled to use) what are now effectively obsolete products to attempt to protect against a virus that has changed such that the original vaccine is almost useless against it. Millions of cases in vaccinated people prove this to be the case.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,637 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Multiple times now posters have provided you with evidence of the effectiveness of vaccines versus severe covid. And for earlier variants v infection.

    I linked qatar study in direct reply to your earlier post which demonstrates their effectiveness v severe covid even v Omicron. You ran away from the evidence.

    You have entirely failed to engage with the evidence provided to you.

    You continue to post medical disinformation about the vaccines being obsolete which is entirely without foundation or merit.

    Do you think posters dont notice such blatant attempts at evasion?

    There is no data showing a link between vaccines and excess deaths. I dont know what that link is meant to prove but it does not show that. Provide the exact quote in the study which supports your position.

    Or have you misrepresented its contents in an attempt to deceive?

    Your posts are exercises in scurrilous anti vax propaganda.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,798 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    This link only shows that in 5 out of 6 particular autopsies performed on people who died at home post vaccination " may have died " as a result of the vaccination causing myocarditis .

    The study concludes in this case by saying more research is needed before any conclusions can be

    No secret that vaccination can cause myocarditis. . This is a known risk of not just this vaccination but others and has been examined before . There are many many more cases of people who have sustained damage and died as a result of contracting severe SARS-Cov2 infection , and this is why , as you know , the balance of risk benefit comes into the equation when any vaccination authorising body is recommending vaccination.

    How about some autopsy data for you ?

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00428-022-03319-2

    Your comment on the vaccination being " obsolete " is also untrue .

    It is and has reduced serious disease and deaths in all groups vaccinated , some more than others, granted . This has been discussed already and hard to believe that anybody would even try to say that they are not still working, despite such large numbers being infected and yet our hospitalisations remain low .

    The level of effectiveness against infection due to variant immune evasion has decreased and that is why more development of more targeted vaccines is necessary . As with flu vaccines , every year .

    At least we are not dealing with a novel virus anymore , and people have more and hybrid immunity , thanks to the vaccines .

    Anyone who had the original strain and on up to Delta can testify to how severe that illness was without vaccine induced immunity in most older age groups .

    Do you really not believe that we are in a better place now because of vaccination ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,637 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    This is an utterly false misrepresentation of the contents of the article.

    Find us the exact quote in the article which states that is it nearly 80% of the cases studied.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Other people have critiqued you on the misinformation you have posted. Your posts appear to be classic conspiracy theory/conman tactics. Throw as much dirt at a wall and spread doubt in people who have no knowledge of the area and approval process.

    However on broader point you are accusing the medical and scientific community of being stupid and or lying. Why would these people lie? What's the motivation?

    This is why I compare vaccine denial to flat earth. Both ideas accuse thousands if not hundreds thousands of people of lying to the public.

    This is my question to you why do you think that hundreds of thousands of people in practically every country is the world are lying about vaccines?

    If you really knew more than them you wouldn't be posting on Boards.ie you would be posting in a reputable scientific publication.



Advertisement