Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why inheritance is the dirty secret of the middle classes – harder to talk about than sex

Options
13468916

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,619 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The 12.4% effective rate means we collect a lot more corporate tax than if it was a higher value (most of the inflation give aways were funded by this), so that's not a fair thing to say.

    You can of course argue that our rate should be higher so that other countries can collect more corporate tax but that will mean more taxes needed in Ireland or lower public spending.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    So you've lived a productive life and managed to save up enough that you can leave some wealth to your kids and the government should be allowed come in when you die and take a big cut to hand it over to some NGO, asylum chancer or yet another assistant executive to the senior executive manager in the HSE because what?


    Fuck that



  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    I partially agree with you but our corporate tax returns are so variable that they cannot be relied upon to fund the nation (and will reduce disproportionally if there's a likely global slowdown.) Also, it's only been in the past few years that corporate tax receipts have been exceptional and not even the government thinks this will continue. Either way, my point is that blaming wasters for your taxes being high is an overly simplistic argument.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,619 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Corporate tax has been good for Ireland for the past 2 decades (not to mention the jobs it provides). Point stands re: whether an individual in Ireland is funding the effective corporate tax rate, they're not, it reduces the individuals tax burden. Whether that's fair on other countries and their individuals paying more tax because they avoid it in Ireland is the real question there.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,536 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I'm very confused at to how an article in a british newspaper, about the inheritance system in a different justification (British) is being used as a reason to denigrate fianna fail and fine Gael.

    Surely there are much easier, and way more applicable, issues to get at the government over???



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,958 ✭✭✭gipi


    That relief only applies to businesses - not to individual personal inheritance. I've done my planning, thanks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I never said otherwise. (Although it also applies to Agricultural Relief too)

    You may not have understood it, but it is open to you to invest in any business should you so wish and to make it so that the beneficiary satisfies the conditions in order to satisfy the relief. The conditions are easier to satisfy if it is only yourself (and the beneficiary) who work in the "business"


    It is your choice as to whether it is worth the hassle to leave it so they can avail of the relief. If you don't have that much to leave, then it might not be worth it for you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Count Dracula


    As opposed to it being raised to 33per cent after the FF government had nowhere else to go when they handed over the entire state pension fund and its resources to capitalise our still defunct banking system?

    I respect the earnestness that most lefties have to wolf anything in exchange for a chance to steer the digger, particularly those new wave republican type longbeards who dress like school teachers and refuse to wear a tie?

    It is hilarious that the entire commi agenda, that is lurking rather unhealthily, within the murky shadows of Opposition politics have zero concept that it is a hypocritical power grab by around 15 fanatics... who haven't a bulls notion how to do anything else accept throw mud at a government working paper.

    These new wave revolutionaries are only talking about nailing South Co Dublin so that can reinforce kudos with their local council estate which their party have being courting since the GFA was finally signed.

    This concept that Ireland even has a class hierarchy is such crap.

    To clarify with any idealists, gooning away on wealth redistribution, there is no such thing as "working class" in Ireland. Anyone who has a job is phucking working for a living? People who bother working for a living will be aware of just how hard that is. There is less poor in Ireland than ever before. The only reason the government raised CAT by 65per cent is because they woke up broke and with no other option, they had to scrape that barrel to give the money away to investors who weren't even Irish, read that again if you don't get it. The same Fianna Fail gov who raised CAT by 65per cent have also scraped €195,000 in allowances from every citizen in the country, circa potential windfall to the state of 975 Billion, to spend on what exactly? The last thing any Irish government actually needs is more tax, the government simply don't know where or what to do with it. All politicians know about tax is that you cut it 2 budgets before the end of term and raise it 2 terms after winning one, after that they haven't got a clue what to do with it.

    Itish citizens who live as unemployed English soccer fans who own cars, Iphones , a house in a council estate, a large widescreen TV, 2 weeks a year in Magaluf , their precious Saturday night pints at the disco and their love of the X Factor and Eastenders.... Don't complicate these types with people who have a working life and should be trying not to insult people trying to eek out a living and working for it. Anyone who works for a living would know that. Longbeard millenials who think that cranks who have never had any government experience, at all, are actually suitable candidates to run this kip astonish me with their naivety. Thinking that supporting a communist Utopia driven by fanaticism is somehow going to enable change is abhorrent.

    People who don't like working, living off everyone else's efforts, have never ever in the history of this country been better off? They get paid handsomely to do nothing. 100 years ago this week there were 200,000 Dubs living 10 to an unplumbed room from Parnell street to the Bridewell. I find republican's cranking away on 10,000 junckies living in heated hotels extremely patronising, they don't even actually care about those homeless people. They only care about using that fact as a whipping stick to government, I have never ever seen Proud Mary Lou, Lord Boyd or cranky Smurph on a food run ever... btw Mary is from Rathgar, Lord Boyd went to Michaels and Cranky Smurfs is Goatstown Co Dublin. They are all turncoats. For the record I actually like Mary Lou McDonald, she is tireless, smart and would be a brilliant leader of this country. How she has ended up having to window dress criminals and terrorist's is beyond me? I worry sometimes that her relentless petty cranking of every government action has lost its' bite.

    Rant over, but smugly taxing fellow "citizens" under the Denison of a creative wealth distribution to the "poor working class" of Ireland is not only patronising in the extreme, but the epitome of Irish begrudgery? The fact that it is being used to influence future mandates is actually setting a precarious scenario for everyone who values their democracy. Since the crash the only austerity measure which remains is the 65per cent increase in CAT and the relinquishing of every Irish citizens rights and other access to almost 1 trillion Euro.

    Anyone thinking that the state is entitled to demand rights or ownership of family property has forgotten why they love this country at all?

    " Low Wealth Inequaity " FFS, the notions. I am only saying this one more time, taxing private property and the estates of citizens will only degenerate growth and destabilise community, think about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,026 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    100%.

    My Grandparents built our family home. My Grandfather slaved as an engineer on the road and on overseas assignments to pay the mortgage on his work and he died relatively young, such that my parents took over the mortgage at the worst time of the early 80s when they already gave up 60% of every pound they earned before paying the monthly amount. They were asset rich and cash VERY poor and never received a penny in State benefit, other than children's allowance, which was meagre enough.

    On top of that, the house is now in the €900 LPT rate, which my surviving mother pays out of a pension and my late father's widow's benefit is also bloody taxed!

    And the final insult, when my sibling and I come to inherit the house, we'll be facing a tax bill of about €150,000 on a property that was already taxed about 10 times over! We already pay our own mortgages, so that bill will mean its basically impossible for either of us to take on the family house to live in while having to pay the inheritance tax and so it will be sold and lost to us, with the Government getting six figures for nothing.

    Family home inheritance is nothing more than a scam and it should be be reformed to have an inverse indexation with LPT, to reflect the historic tax take and costs on the home.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Government getting €150k for ‘doing nothing’.

    You getting c.€650k (after tax) for doing nothing. Can’t imagine too many will be shedding tears for you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    So you are talking about a property of around 1.1-1.2 million Euro?

    You think that you should be able to inherit that tax free because your grandfather did some work? You portion of the tax would be 75k. Your cost to buy out your sibling would be about 600k. Is that 75k really preventing you from buying out your sibling, or are you using that as a cover to moan about having to pay a little tax on a substantial windfall?


    I shouldn't have to pay PAYE. Sure my great grandfather's cousin's uncle's next door neighbour worked in a coal mine in his bare feet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    The biggest scandal of all is a fifty percent marginal tax rate. The place is a joke... probably several years away from them seizing 90% of your income over 40,000 to waste on more welfare bonus and luxury property...



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,703 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Based on these figures, you and your sibling are getting an asset worth 1.1m and need to pay tax of 150k on that. I don't want to be unkind but it's hard to have sympathy for you on that one



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,443 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    there's an interesting dichotomy between the 'i worked hard so i deserve to pass the money on to whomever i like' - equating toil and 'deservingness' - with the fact that the money is being passed on to someone who (pretty much by definition) hasn't worked to earn that money. it's a weird inbuilt contradiction in the argument.

    e.g. 'living off other people's efforts' (in the 'dole scrounger' sense) - but me inheriting the family home would be precisely me benefitting from other people's efforts!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    You have heard of stamp duty right?

    The State involves itself in all sorts of transactions with taxes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,884 ✭✭✭amacca


    "particularly those new wave republican type longbeards who dress like school teachers and refuse to wear a tie?"


    I just snorted some tea out of my nostrils while laughing reading that

    🤣🤣🤣



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,718 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    To clarify with any idealists, gooning away on wealth redistribution, there is no such thing as "working class" in Ireland. Anyone who has a job is phucking working for a living? People who bother working for a living will be aware of just how hard that is.


    Of course the concept of working class exists in Ireland, the idea of a class of people who need to work in order to generate wealth, as opposed to the class of people who inherit the families wealth and don’t need to work to generate wealth. I work for a living, I don’t need to pretend there’s anything hard about it in order for it to be perceived as being of any moral value, it’s financial value is a far more objective measure of wealth.


    The rest of that rant? Well, someone’s bitter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    I don't see any of that in the actual figures for tax returns from corporations. Our returns were pretty stable from 2002 to 2008 then dropped massively for 5 years. Returned to growth in 2014 and have then skyrocketed since 2015. Probably because they closed the Dutch Sandwich loophole that year. The returns we were getting from corporations were certainly no higher than other similarly sized economies with higher tax rates up until then, and their returns were far less volatile especially during the recession. They cannot be relied upon, the government knows this which is why they won't reduce income taxes despite bumper receipts. Either way, as you mentioned, corporate tax rates the world over have dropped in recent decades leaving private taxpayers to pick up the slack.


    Now, that being said, I have no problem with our corporate tax rate, it just galls me to see the same lazy stereotypes thrown out whenever this topic comes up. No one has any stats for the cost of the welfare class but they get blamed in these threads all the time. The total spending on working age supports + housing in this country is ~€7.7 billion a year. That's about 8% of total spending. Now how much of that spending can be accounted for by the welfare class? Even if it was 50% (and that's highly doubtful) it would be only 4% of our yearly budget. The vast bulk of people's taxes go elsewhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    You may have no tax to pay. It's known as, Dwelling House Exemption. Property can be any value, no inheritance tax due.

    You have to be living in the house for 3 years before, have no other property, hold it for 6 years after inheriting.

    I know of someone, sold their house and trousered 500K. Then moved back home with elderly parent, availed of this exemption on a gaff worth 1M.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,364 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    I have been - wasn't enough to warrant paying taxes though. We (sibling and I) deicded to sell and paid tax on that (which I have no problem with). But what do you do when one sibling wants to sell and the other doesn't and can't afford the tax? You want to saddle them with a massive loan?

    You seem to be making the same mistake as Donald - assuming that everyone who inherits already has hundreds of thousands stashed away. Not always the case

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    How is it that the tax is an issue but buying the other siblings out of the house isn't?

    Doesn't make sense now at all. You're just putting on the poor mouth.


    As per the example above with two siblings, a house worth over 1.1m would have resulted in a tax bill of only 75k. That is between two siblings. How is it that the 75k is an issue where the 550k+ wouldn't be????



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    And if they happen to not have €75K each lying around? Then what?

    Forced into selling the family home to avoid getting a mortgage?


    What does the value of the property have to do with your sympathy levels, other than begrudgery?

    What amount would you be ok with them getting? Lemme guess, €350K?



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,329 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Yes, the income has been taxed, so it isn’t someone else’s turn, or shouldn’t be.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,026 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No not free, just proportionate.

    Your nice little socialist take on it is sweet and all, but to follow it through to its logical conclusion, are you going to bring the proportionate tax on it down to be in line with the Country outside of Dublin, Cork and Galway, or are you going to bring the rest of the Country up to meet it?

    There is absolutely nothing progressive about the current inheritance tax structure.

    If there was, my sibling and I would be levied an inheritance tax of 5 to 10% of net value, which would apply across the Country, and instead of having to sell up to fund a stupid level tax bill, we would have the freedom to take on the house and upgrade it for energy efficiency, decor etc, putting lovely money through the hands of contractors and retailers and VAT, before eventually ending up in the exchequer anyway. And then we could sell our own smaller current house and put it back into the market for the generation coming behind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    More like "I havent worked hard to earn that money"

    And, as pointed out many times already, its not money. It might be an asset, or more likely part of an asset.

    But lets follow your analogy to its logical conclusion....why exactly should dole scroungers get a better deal that those with an inheritance?



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Do you think both siblings were going to move into the house and live in it?

    Leave it empty?

    Rent it out to a third party?

    Sell it altogether?

    Or one buy the other out to live in it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    "only €75K" Sure whats anyone worrying about? Everyone knows that if you are left something by your parents everyone involved was already loaded to begin with roight?



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    "Socialist"

    Coming from the posters who think that others should pay their contributions for them

    So were you goign to both move into the house and live in it together?

    You appear to be suggesting that you couldn't afford 75k but that you'd be able to fund a refurbishment with a view to selling it anyway? No sentimentality there. Only pure hard cash



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,443 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    if they have to pay tax on it, they were not living in it. if they want to move in - they either can sell the house they're moving out of, if they own it; or if they don't already own their own house, yes, they get a €150k mortgage secured on a €1.1m house.

    or else they keep the house and rent it out.



Advertisement