Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
16176186206226231067

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,124 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    There goes the "renewables are getting cheaper" angle.

    I don`t think anybody claimed that turbine maker were raking it in.

    The "Big Wind" lads raking it in are those piggy-backing on fossil fuel prices.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,124 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Which for some reason the E.U. are very lax to change.

    Who do you believe that suits ?

    Your "Big Wind" companies selling electricity perhaps!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The SEAI Energy In Ireland 2022 report has just been released



    Some of the key points in it from that article

    • carbon dioxide emissions are moving in the wrong direction and rose by 5.4 per cent in 2021, when the plan was for them to fall by 4.8 per cent
    • a rebound in traffic on the roads and an increase in the use of coal and oil in electricity generation had affected CO2 levels with emissions returning to pre-Covid levels.
    • "The current level of progress in moving to renewables” is “not at the rate required to achieve our climate ambitions"
    • The increase in 2021 emissions was driven by electricity generation, up 17.3 per cent; transport, up 7.3 per cent; and industry up 3.3 per cent.
    • The increases were partly mitigated by decreases in residential emissions of 6.1 per cent, and commercial and public services by 2.7 per cent.

    SEAI are calling for immediate action, including

    • More energy storage and electricity interconnection
    • Smarter travel including walking, cycling and take public transport coupled with a decrease in petrol and diesel using vehicles
    • Deployment of district heating networks at scale to replace gas and oil use for heating
    • More electric vehicles, upgrades of 500,000 homes to at least B2 energy rating and more heat pumps in place of oil and gas boilers.
    • Develop further onshore and offshore wind and solar

    I'm still going through the report, its 160 pages and goes into a massive amount of detail



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Isn't that what you'd expect though from a body such as the SEAI? Are these two points incompatible?

    • The increase in 2021 emissions was driven by electricity generation, up 17.3 per cent; transport, up 7.3 per cent; and industry up 3.3 per cent.

    and

    • More electric vehicles, upgrades of 500,000 homes to at least B2 energy rating and more heat pumps in place of oil and gas boilers.

    I'd hate at the moment to be reliant on electricity, no matter how it's generated, for most of our transport, cooking and heating needs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    It's like asking a 6 year-old what they want for Christmas in list form no thought needed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,594 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Unreliable electricity generation in Europe will fall with the decline of Germany. Angela Merkel made a political decision to build wind turbines and shutdown nuclear to placate the Greens and import Russian gas to cover up its deficiencies. Russian president Putin was delighted. It gave him economic and political control over Germany and Russian funds to the environmental groups made Greens popular as well. Germany’s economy has already begun to implode, given the production suspensions and terminations by BASF and Thyssen-Krupp. As it collapses, it takes the EU down with it.

    Further damaging interventions are the emissions trading schemes that must be paid by European consumers and are a massive wealth transfer from people with lower incomes to those in receipt of the subsidies. Adding more wind turbines is not bringing down the cost of electricity to end consumers.

    The EU’s emissions trading scheme adds about €17 billion a year to energy costs within the bloc, and the UK’s newly independent version is expected to cost a staggering €6.7 billion in the current financial year. In addition to this, the EU has spent an incredible €800 billion providing income support to renewables since 2008, a total that is still increasing at €69 billion a year. The UK alone is paying over €12 billion every year topping up incomes for wind and solar. So far, the US is a relatively minor player, having spent a mere €120 billion from 2008 to 2018, which is probably part of the reason that things are not as bad on that side of the Atlantic. source


    Due to a lack of cheap and available energy, EU protectionism using a carbon border tax is going to aggravate the economic misery for many of us across the zone (if it gets anywhere). The multinationals will rearrange their affairs (regulatory arbitrage) and all this will do is shift production to other countries where emissions are higher and energy is available.

    The EU's first-of-its-kind carbon border levy designed to shield its industries from rivals in countries with lower CO2 pricing is almost a done deal, following talks that ended at 5 a.m. on Tuesday.

    It's a key part of the EU's Fit for 55 program that aims to cut CO2 emissions by 55 percent by the end of the decade and the Green Deal that plans for the bloc to be climate neutral by 2050.

    But there's still a few key aspects of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to iron out in another round of talks this weekend.


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 64 ✭✭Commoner


    A wise Irish female journalist recently described the Green Party as Watermelons: green on the outside, red on the inside. The same Green Party is planning to back Fianna Fail's removal of democratic consultation on planning appeals to make it more easier to railroad big eco monster apartment blocks on middle class areas and other areas. Anyone who looks at the Aarhaus Convention and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights will see this proposed law is not only illegal but also a breach of the EU Treaties that the Irish Government previously signed up to and ratified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,743 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    That description has been around for quite some time. It does the Green movement no favours that it does not really have any champions on the political right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    A lot of that is just down to your standard Eu chaos and indecision in the face of a problem.


    Gas remains the only Energy source for margin electricity across Europe and that's not going to change in the next decade.


    That shouldn't preclude some rebalancing of how electricity is priced.


    It's incredible given the lasting damage done to Europe's economy that nothing yet has been done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    If we are going to go there, the sun has been around longer than the propeller.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl




  • Registered Users Posts: 140 ✭✭The Real President Trump


    What are you taking about, our power prices have trippled



  • Registered Users Posts: 140 ✭✭The Real President Trump




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭ps200306



    I don't know why you would think that. A wind turbine is just an electrical generator with a gearbox and some complicated control electronics.

    The Betz limit for maximum theoretical wind turbine efficiency was formulated over a hundred years ago. More recent work has shown the Betz limit to be too high, and current wind turbines approach the modern theoretical limit. So there's nothing in the way of efficiency to be squeezed out of new turbines.

    The only way to improve them is to catch more wind. That means building a) bigger, b) higher and c) offshore. The latest machines are monsters. For instance the GE Haliade-X has a rotor area of 38,000 square metres and a height of 260m (850 ft). An up close view of the nacelle gives you an idea of scale:

    The main problem with these things is the separate (and relatively measly) 12-14 MW generator for every unit. That uses an awful lot of copper, not to mention a tonne of neodymium and other rare earths. Though for these offshore turbines the biggest copper use is actually in the cabling.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,732 ✭✭✭ginger22


    And the only answer the morons in charge of the EU can come up with is to increase interest rates to "cool inflation" when we all know it is energy prices thats driving inflation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭KildareP


    Wind is very much a proven tech. It's been used for centuries to power any number of energy sources, long before fossil fuels or even electricity itself.

    When it comes to electricity generation for a modern grid, it has proven itself to be completely incapable of being able to follow demand profiles.

    When we need power most, i.e. periods of deep cold, or extreme heat, this tends to coincide with extremely calm conditions and so direct electricity generation from wind effectively fails outright. The Eirgrid dashboard has proven this.


    OK, so you say we bridge the gap by massively overbuilding wind generation to capture significantly more wind energy than we need and storing that "somehow" to subsequently power your generator, e.g. hydrogen.

    That aspect is, as of yet, completely unproven at the scale and runtime needed to maintain grid output.

    Since this intermediary storage is fundamental to maintain a functioning modern electrical grid using only (true!) renewable sourced energy, such a grid is therefore completely unproven.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭KildareP


    A nail in the coffin of the fossil fuel industry?

    Sorry but that is quite simply nonsense because as becomes all too clear on days like today, wind can not and will not directly replace fossil fuel generation.

    At the very minimum it requires an intermediary storage which to date no-one has come close to building a production plant on the scale required.

    Hydrogen is often dangled as a solution but no-one has solved the logistics of how to produce suitable feed water at the input side at the quantity required, storing and transporting it from source to use, or how to feed it into a large capacity electrical generator like a gas turbine without being back to dealing with emissions.

    As the saying "actions speak louder than words" goes, wind's real world verified performance proves all by itself that is incapable of being able to directly replace fossil fuels, far more than any negative PR campaign could.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What a monstrosity - imagine that near you and the shocking amount of mined materials going into making it and the necessary cabling. Never mind the construction impact on environment. First wind farm came to our region over 20 years ago, we went up and marvelled at the soaring towers. This particular installation is tiny now though compared to the 150m+ height machines they've installed on other nearby hills.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,420 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    @[Deleted User]

    • "Deployment of district heating networks at scale to replace gas and oil use for heating"

    There will be a lot of push back against that there are constant threads on Reddit and here about how apartment owners are getting massive increases in bills from district heating companies. They blame high gas prices but still there is no completion and its not regulated.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo




  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Don't forget the nuclear decommissioning costs, Fukushima is at $100Bn and counting...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    The Aunt and Uncle got the whole house retrofitted with the new one stop shop from the SEAI that the greens are bragging about. Their house was already well insulated but got some solar PV cells on roof, and changed the oil/turf solid fuel heating to air to water.

    Their electricity bill was 575 euro for 2 months including the 200 credit off so realistically 775 euro for 2 months and that's including what ever the PV generated. They are absolutely shocked.

    Their heating used consist of mainly turf range that heated the whole house and hot water. The turf was cut and saved by themselves on their own plot and roughly 500 euro worth of turf heated the house for the year, the oil was only used for to flick on for 15mins to get the radiators warm prior to the range taking over so a fill of oil could last them over 2 or 3 years.

    They are disgusted with the electricity bills and the crazy cost compared to what they are used too. This one stop shop is not all its cracked up to be. Uncles said heed take a day on the bog all day long over paying nearly 400 euro a month for electricity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I think that because its a fact, wind energy is cheaper to build and run now than it has been in the past, and it keeps getting cheaper.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Only if your focus is terribly regional. There is enough renewable energy on the planet for everyone, many times over.

    You insist on saying that wind is incapable because you are deciding that only turbines in Ireland can be used to generate energy for Ireland.

    Why do we have interconnectors if that the case?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,124 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    How can you state that as a fact when you consistently attempt to ignore how much just the offshore section of a plan you back will cost ?

    Turbines are not getting cheaper, they are going to get much more expensive. The end of year reports from Siemens, Vestra and General Electric all posted here recently a number of time all show that. Vestra is selling turbines at 8% below cost, Siemens Gamesa lost close to €1 Bn and has effectively gone broke, and General Electric has lost $2 Bn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,124 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Interconnectors do not generate anything.

    They only import energy if you are short or export if you have a surplus, and in Europe year on year the top exporters have been countries with nuclear plants.

    When there is little or no wind, as we have now seen on multiple occasions in just the past two years nobody has excess wind energy to export.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,387 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    have we anyway of actually knowing if anyone has had excess wind energy to export? id imagine most energy networks are interlinked, as is the case in ireland, i.e. all our energy production systems are connected, so its not possible to know exactly what energy source is being exported, at any one time



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    had reconditioned stanley mourne range fitted mainly burning my own cut wood, perfect when the lights go out



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,387 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ffs, one of them could run the country, some yokes



Advertisement