Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Ah but that was "Institutional Harry". Even fecking that up was not his fault.

You are zeroing in on a minority of users to try and backup your argument. The vast majority of users on here for/against HM would not wish any harm to befall them. That would be crazy. Because someone hates HM does not mean that person is racist. You have zero basis to say that. Especially when you refuse to see any wrongdoing by HM. People can not like or even hate other people without race being a factor.

You mention lack of proof, we are swimming in proof. Take the Oprah interview for starters. Markle was at best misrepresenting a lot of facts on there and at worst downright lying and spinning stories to generate controversy, which would earn her money. Claiming racism as the reason her kids didnt get certain titles, claiming she was married days before the public ceremony, claiming she wanted out of the media spotlight.....on an Oprah interview broadcast the world over. Want further proof of her hypocrisy? How about the Netflix series and Harry's book? IM not even getting into any of the smaller stuff thats out there, the likes of the Nelson Mandela comment etc.

You might think all that is small bananas, fine. But just because you don't see what we see doesn't give you the right to casually accuse us of racism. Same as the other goons insisting that we are all secretly RF lovers and will defend them tooth and nail.

 Because someone hates HM does not mean that person is racist.

Maybe not, but to hate someone you have never met or spoken to who has committed no crimes is pretty fúcking weird. Don't you think?

Jill Dando'esque.

You know what I found odd? That the reasons for them wanting to escape on a freedom flight (lol!) was because William shouted at Harry and Charles told lies but the elephant in the room is that they never mention Andrew as a factor in any of it. I suppose he doesn't control the purse strings and so there is no point in flogging a dead horse dependent on handouts. I find it odd that, given the platform provided to them, and as self-declared compassionate humanitarians they never spoke about Andrew, his victims, his associations with criminals, his behaviour or Harrys family protecting him and covering for him. It would be plausible (and laudable) if they said they were disgusted at his behaviour, appalled by his associates, appalled at his family protecting him. But no, William shouted at me and my Dad told lies and we had to get away because that's clearly worse than Andrew.

That would mean they are part of the general protection of Andrew though? Maybe the book will go into the details.

You seem to think me calling him a sex offender is a compliment, that's rather worrying.

17,500 complaints.

He has probably done for himself now, given the number of prior offences.

But I bet his farm shop will be swamped with punters forever more...

Or just a dumb statement? Why does it have to be racist?

I don't think this will ruin Clarkeson, I mean he punched his work colleague and pretty much got away with it. In fact, two other colleagues left with them and they got a massive deal with Amazon. He sort of failed upwards. This however, I think has given him a big dent. He got too big for his breeches and thought he could get away with it. It was absolutely vile. I got the GOT reference but my goodness, there are people I despise, but I do not lie awake thinking of horrendous things to befall them. Absolutely unhinged stuff. I think he must have gotten a big shock, maybe because his daughter spoke up so quickly against him. I've a feeling it's not the first time they've probably clashed like this. I was shocked that he too also acknowledged the hurt his words caused, although he didn't actually apologise. The cynic in me thinks he only did this because of the backlash it caused his friend, Camilla.

I think it is evident, that journalists can have free pot-shorts at Harry & Meghan without an reprisal. But if there's anything about the rest of the family, there's obviously some calls in the background. Just look at the lack of articles on Andrew. Sure some things are coming to light now, but many of those photos would have been known at the time and not reported on. I too thought maybe there's a superinjuction but usually when there is, it's public know that there's one in place, but the person/people's names are kept secret, however the rest of the world can report on it. That's what happened that time with Ryan Giggs, people in the UK found out through social media.