Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Nobody cares about Covid anymore"

Options
1111214161743

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I'm fairly sure the mask prevents you from spreading it but makes very little difference in getting it.

    The only way this could be true is if people were wearing masks that somehow prevented aerosolized virus from escaping their nose and mouth, but did nothing to prevent it entering their nose and mouth.

    That's not how masks work, they reduce transmission in both directions.

    Unfortunately, if you tell people the mask will protect them, then they say "f*ck it, I'm healthy, I'll be grand". If you tell them the mask will protect other people, then more people might take notice of that, so maybe that's where the confusion arises. Not everyone cares about other people, as evidenced by this thread, however.

    (NB - reduce transmission, not prevent. No one has ever said that masks would be 100% effective.)



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,504 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Surgeons wear masks for altogether different reasons



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,036 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm guessing surgeons thoroughly wash their hands, wear PPE and put on a fresh mask for the duration of the surgery and then dispose of it afterwards and repeat the process for each new surgery they perform.


    Bit different for the average Joe on a daily basis though. You have a mask stuffed in your pocket, you pop it on in the shop, take it back off. Put it back on. Take it off to eat. Back on etc etc etc.

    In the global data, there is nothing available that actually shows cases dropping with a mask mandate or increasing when a mandate was removed.



  • Posts: 0 Jade Scary Tea


    not being a surgeon no I never. And yes I wore a mask when it meant without doing so I wasn’t able to do normal things, such as; go to the shop, use a bus, go to work. You know, just like everyone else had to.

    But that’s an irrelevance to the fact that they aid in reducing the spread of infection, what part of that changes because I didn’t wear a mask before it was not a choice?

    I really do struggle to understand what point you’re making here. It’s like me saying that flu vaccines don’t prevent the flu, you arguing the obvious fact & me telling you I bet you never got one before heard they helped!!!

    I still don’t wear one regularly, either, but again, to tell someone they don’t reduce the spread of infection is bollox. So I don’t.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Jade Scary Tea


    No, they definitely don’t.


    The facemask has been used in surgical settings for over a hundred years;2 first described in 1897, at its inception, it consisted merely of a single layer of gauze to cover the mouth,3 and its primary function was to protect the patient from contamination and surgical site infection. This practice was substantiated, at the time, by a recent discovery which demonstrated that bacteria could be disseminated from the nose and mouth during normal conversation as observed by bacterial colony growth on strategically placed agar plates in theatres. In the 1940s and 1950s, antibiotics and aseptic technique came to the forefront of infection control strategies within the surgical setting

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,504 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Surgeons in operating theatre wear masks to stop droplets falling into open chests etc



  • Posts: 0 Jade Scary Tea


    Again, that’s akin to arguing that hand washing doesn’t help because some people are dirty pigs.

    Using the mask correctly provides a reduction in the spread of infection. This is being said to be false, I am simply countering that notion. Caveats are of course present but irrelevant to the underlying point.



  • Posts: 0 Jade Scary Tea


    Which may cause infection. That’s what masks do. Stop the spread of droplets and aerosols from our mouths and nose.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Especially considering the definition of a covid death was made so wide its impossible to quantify how many really died from covid.

    I'm not going to go on about the positive covid test guy who died falling off a ladder counting as a covid death. I don't know how true that is or even if there is any truth in it. But when you count everyone who died within 28 days of a positive test you're going to come up with an inflated number. Especially so considering how widespread covid was at some point in particular in healthcare settings.

    I remember that freedom of information act request in England that showed the number of covid deaths where acute covid was the single confirmed cause of death and it was a fraction of the official number. As in a few (single digit) thousand vs. a couple of hundred of thousand 'officials'.

    All the while the covid revisionists are trying to tell us the number is bigger even cos we weren't counting everyone. Couldnt make this sht1 up...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!


    I never said they don't help. I'm saying you cannot be absolutely sure you got covid because you didn't wear a mask. You have no idea how/why you got it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!




  • Posts: 0 Jade Scary Tea


    I never claimed that. You’re confusing me with another.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    This is an urban myth. Or rather, a social media myth.

    In England and Wales, there are total deaths "involving" Covid and deaths "due to" Covid.

    In 2020 the proportion of the total that were due to Covid was about 90%.

    Edit; I guess 90% is a fraction so maybe you're technically right. Pretty big fraction though.




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,215 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    And to stop blood and other bodily fluids from splashing their mouth and nose. This is widely accepted. If it was purely for infection control then they would wear an n95 or full ppe and not just a surgical mask. Further in the same article posted above it says

    "In the modern era, there has also been a scarcity of experimental evidence to support the effectiveness of facemasks in the prevention of surgical site infections. The earliest retrospective studies7 failed to demonstrate any statistically significant improvement in surgical site infection rates following the use of masks. Indeed, the latest National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on the matter do not require operating staff to wear a mask in theatre.8 "




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I think its more most people have more to be doing especially this time of year than " discussing " the same issues over and over again with posters who don't either listen or care about learning anything, to be honest .

    Most people I know are happy now to move on with their lives once they know what they are dealing with and how to .



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I understand things are 'grey' which they are so often.

    That FOI request speaks of covid as sole reason on death cert and that is indeed a fraction like I described. But just because someone had co-morbidities (not sole reason) doesn't mean that covid wasn't a major or even deciding factor.

    The stat you linked actually divides between 'due to covid' and 'involving covid'. It doesn't explain what that means precisely, but it does show that under half of all covid deaths are 'due to covid' and a little over 50% are 'involving covid'.

    So I wouldn't ever claim only 10% truly died of covid. That just doesn't appear logical and while I've been a covid restriction critic throughout I'm not in the business of spreading false data to booster my views.

    I'd say the true number is somewhere in between that 10% and the full official figure. Where exactly god only knows and I don't think there is a deliberate effort to foggy up that number. Health authorities probably don't know themselves. I'd say that 50:50 is their best approximation.

    But I would say it's safe to say that per the covid death definition the 'true number' is lower than the official number. Certainly not upwards.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't have time to read that because I'm in work but if it actually says that 90% of COVID deaths were due to COVID only then it's absolute rubbish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    This is just more soundbites from you .

    You have been supplied with research and data all along on the Covid

    forum which you have resolutely ignored on every single thread.

    This is nonsense. People from all age groups have died pre vaccination , and many of those deaths in people who would have lived 20+ years with a treatable health condition.

    Not that at matters ,as nobody wants anybody to die needlessly.

    True the latest variants are milder , but Delta was cutting a swathe through many in their middle age.

    This commentary is pure ageism and is just representative of a minority who value themselves above everyone else .



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I'm sorry but you're not reading it right.

    "Due to Covid" is a subset of "Involving Covid". There were 73,766 deaths due to Covid out of a total of 81,795 involving Covid, which is 90.1%.

    It's explained exactly what these terms mean;

    We use the term "due to COVID-19" when referring only to deaths with an underlying cause of death of COVID-19 and we use the term "involving COVID-19" when referring to deaths that had COVID-19 mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, whether as the underlying cause or not.

    Therefore, contrary to urban myth, a guy getting hit by a bus three weeks after testing positive for Covid does not show up in those numbers.

    In terms of the total deaths in England and Wales in 2020, 13.5% "involved" Covid and 12.1% were "due to" Covid. Those are significant numbers.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I previously reviewed and discussed the Irish death figures on the COVID forums. Don't have the figures to hand but I remember the vast majority of deaths were 70+ and had 3 or more Comorbidities.

    But it's absolutely not like 90% of deaths were people struck down in their prime



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    This entire thread summed up in one sentence. Sure who needs bollocks like facts and statistics?



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That doesn't specify whether COVID was the only illness listed as an underlying cause.

    I highly doubt with all the elderly and nursing home people dying that 90% died only due to COVID.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I never said that. However it's not like those people were at deaths door either as we have discussed at length before.

    Many 50 + year old have 2 or 3 underlying conditions ...they usually go on to live productive happy lives for a few more decades once they take due care .



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    In today's paper it says emergency departments are being overwhelmed due to a surge in patients with the flu, people with COVID , and other respiratory disease,s don't go to emergency dept unless it's really necessary

    Eg COVID will be with us for years it will take up beds that may be needed for other patients that need treatment

    Right now there's 740 people on trolleys in Ireland

    Due to the housing crisis nurses are leaving Ireland to go to country's where they can get housing at a reasonable price

    Even before COVID there would be overcrowded emergency wards in the winter

    Of course if you are young fit you might say I'm grand I don't care about COVID

    Most young people feel invulnerable eg they have no sense of mortality

    I'm not a doctor I read your chances of surviving COVID depends on how fit you are are you overweight

    your general metabolism eg every person is different it's common sense get vaxxed and take basic precautions to avoid getting it



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Sorry my bad and thanks!

    So up to November 2021 they 82k covid deaths, 70k due to covid another 12k involving covid.

    But when you google 'uk covid deaths total' now you get 213k. Which is what I meant with the 'official figure' cos thats what media are using. It comes from 'our world in data' and its also what it says on 'coronavirus.data.gov.uk'.

    Did they have 82k covid deaths in 2020 & 2021, but 130k in the last year? That doesn't seem to add up especially when you look at the graph provided there. Do you know what the story is with that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's 83k in 2020, and 75k up to October 2021, so that's 158k anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yeah . If numbers could have been kept lower/ brought down faster , so health services could get on with cancer care and get back to screening , it would have made a big difference to those people alright .

    But that would have meant some people having to wear a mask, restrict their socialising , at times of high community transmission , and maybe even get vaccinated ...but what about their freedoms ?!

    I see from your posting that you are not a fan of any of those mitigation measures ...

    So now you are worried about cancer care ?

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Personally, I just think we've moved to a stage where pragmatically getting on with life is the only thing any of us can do. There are certain precautions that should be taken to limit spread, but nothing on the scale of what was going on in 2020/21. A lot of background things could be done, particularly improved ventilation and filtration. Some of that simply hasn't been done and I think that's fairly inexcusable, particularly in densely packed venues and schools.

    They're simple, pragmatic solutions that don't disrupt anyone at all - in most cases you wouldn't even be aware of them being in place, and they actually improve the air quality in buildings and busy venues, but they cost a few quid or they create a draught, so you can't be doing any of that. Some of the universities and some employers have done an excellent job on this, but they seem to largely be acting entirely on their own on some of the measures.

    Just to give an example: my very elderly, very immune compromised relative was called for a 6th vaccine dose at her GP's surgery and when she showed up the waiting room was packed, there was no specific appointment, all the windows were closed, condensation dripping down the window panes, people coughing and spluttering, a few people wearing masks (the staff weren't). She walked out saying you could 'practically smell the viruses'. She ended up getting her vaccine in City West instead which was just vastly better organised, much safer and genuinely efficient and pleasant.

    Stuff like that GP surgery scenario simply shouldn't be happening. It's genuinely very high risk and pointless. If we took some practical steps to eliminate situations like that it would make a lot of sense and it doesn't mean going to extremes with everyone needing to be running around with masks on in the supermarket or walking doing the street.

    Same with public transport - if there's cold weather, closed windows and all of that - wearing a mask is probably pragmatic and sensible. If the ventilation can be dramatically improved then it also should be too. There's a lot could be done in that space.

    I still think we are not being pragmatic at governance and policy making level and there are some people who are just pretending it's entirely gone away and there are others who are way too extreme on their level of caution (although most of those are online online). Neither of those positions is particularly helpful. The reality is in some pragmatic middle ground, which is where the vast majority of the public are. They're neither panicking nor are they freaking out about conspiracy theories, they're just trying to be sensible and get on with life.

    I just find sometimes there's been a lack of sensible and pragmatic guidance and information available. The Department of Health / HSE advice has been either draconian or very patronising and it's often poorly communicated and even sometimes out of date and wrong (e.g. the lack of advice on ventilation). People can only do their best with whatever informations available and most of them are doing that and just getting on with life.

    I just think there's a lot we can learn from what was done well and what was clearly an overreaction or policy failure in some other areas, both here in Ireland and what happened in peer countries in Europe and elsewhere. There's a lot to be learned and discussed and I would hope that fear of conspiracy theorists getting all freaked out about everything is not going to take away from being able to analyse, discuss and learn from all of that, because we need to be a lot more prepared for any future weird outbreak like this. It's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility and I think we (and I mean more than just in Ireland) have shown that we are not very good at either calculating risk or responding to a crisis in a sensible way.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    I think 90 plus per cent people are vaccinated and boosted it would make no sense for the government to close down or put restrictions on pubs cafes restaurants you are still free to wear a mask if you want

    We are following international policy's re containing COVID and encouraging people

    to get vaxxed while allowing the economy to return to normal

    We are a democracy we can't follow China in imposing extreme restrictions on city's or factory's



Advertisement