Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

€1,350/cow payment to cut suckler numbers

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    No it's for existing suckler farmers only I would imagine. Usually they use an average of the last three year or something similar. As Well I imagine it will only be on cows calved down.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The proposed scheme is a stupid idea. The uptake of schemes is poor as it.

    The lads calving cows in the spring would be culling their cows at the end of the year when it’s most expensive to finish cattle.

    It would make way more sense to base a scheme around:

    1) Scanning of suckler cows to reduce empty cows in the system

    2) Improvements in finishing of stock to get away from bullocks over 30 months etc

    3) A silage quality improvement scheme which would probably assist in pulling in timelines for finishing cattle

    Paying lads 1350 to cull cows is nuts. There are lot of fellows finishing beef cattle off grass.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The goal of the scheme is to reduce methane emissions. Every lad in dairy cows I know is expanding planning on milking more cows etc.

    Even if the scheme achieved a reduction of say 200 k suckler cows then an additional 100k dairy cows would wipe that out.

    Numbers are continuing to grow in dairy https://www.statista.com/statistics/1192315/dairy-cow-numbers-ireland/

    There is already a natural decline in suckler cows. https://thatsfarming.com/beef/cow-numbers-in-ireland/

    The money should be used to reduce emissions from cows in active herds in both beef and dairy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Why do you assume a dairy cow is twice the emissions of a suckler out of interest?

    The nitrates has a suckler plus a calf up to 1 Yr old at 85 + 24=109. Highest band of dairy cow at 106.

    Post edited by Grueller on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That’s what’s reported in the media.

    If you look at the figures there we can see the decline in suckler cows is pretty much being off set in numbers by the increase in dairy cows.

    Its taking lads over 30 months to finish freisian bullocks at a lousy kill out.

    What are the emissions for the dairy cow and her calf?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Last question is fair enough. My cows are middle band so 92 kg/N. Add calf to yearling at 24 more so 116kg/N in total. That's 7 kg/N more than a suckler and calf. I don't see where the doubling is coming from.

    That friesian bullock is still no less efficient given that Mammy has to be carried around for a year to facilitate the suckler progeny. 24kg+57kg+42kg for the 30 months for friesian. That's 123kg/N. Mammy has paddled her own canoe and has sold €4000 of milk in the calfs 1st year of life. Two industries are supported, both a huge beef and a huge dairy processing industry, that's why I am not adding in the 92 for the cow.

    The suckler progeny figures are 85 + 24 + 57= 176kg/N. That's at 24 month slaughter. They are N figures I know and it's all I really have as a barometer as the methane figures vary wildly.

    I am not saying get rid of sucklers, they have their place. I don't think that place is up at numbers of 900,000 of them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The suckler cow numbers are falling naturally anyway. They are being more than replaced by increasing cow numbers in dairy.

    The government encouraged and incentivised the dairy expansion. The best solution is one that includes an approach like New Zealand that also focuses on methane reducing supplements and improving genetics etc.

    The export market for calves will shrink over time as we can see the best farmers in Europe in the Netherlands are being made cut numbers etc. The Netherlands is a big market for Irish calves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You forgot to factor that 0.8 calves weaned per suckler cow carried. So multiply the 116 by 1.25 and tou get 144kgs/unit for 12 months.

    As well factor in the tendancy now for some in the suckler game to have heifers nearly 36 months at calving much less prevalent in Dairy. Suckler farmers are more inclined to give a cow a second chance. Even if this happens in dairy the cow can be milked through to the following summer. Finally the myth of U24 months, There is a tendancy by some suckler farmers to register calves a few day late after finding them in the rushes. This is not a factor in dairy where if anything some lads are registering a few days early to get them off the farm sooner

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Calving beef heifers for the first time at 36 months is nuts. It’s 24 months here.

    The 20% empty rate just shows the importance of scanning.

    The emissions reduction will need to focus more on the active herd than culling



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Its immaterial where these practices are nuts or not, the simple fact is there prevalence in the suckler herd. Its virtually impossible to wipe out trends like these. Especially as the specialist breeders who sell heifers for substantial sums seem to carry on this practice

    Scanning has its place and from what I can see most suckler farmers carry it on. However if the give a cow that lost a calf a second chance they are as likely to give an empty cow a second chance

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If a cow loses a calf and you don’t have a foster calf then it doesn’t make sense to keep her. If she gives trouble one year then it’s more likely a pattern so she should be marked for the road even if you can get her to rear a foster calf.

    Emissions reduction within the active herd is the answer. Suckler cow numbers are reducing as it is without this daft proposed measure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Suckler bred calving down by 24,000 ytd, dairy calving up by almost 27,000.

    "While the number of suckler calves born this year has fallen and the number of dairy-bred calves born this year is growing, the overall number of calves born to date has remained relatively steady; the fall in suckler calvings is offsetting the rise in dairy calvings."




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    The problem with fostering calves on suckler cows is you cannot record it. If a farmer of 10 cows loses a calf at calving and fosters a replacement even though ICBF can see said farmer reared 10 calves they have a wean ratio of 0.9

    Also I think given the price of cull/dry cows the giving another chance has gone in majority of suckler farms.

    This should not be a suckler v dairy argument, each has it’s own place and merit



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Seems like this suckler reduction scheme (cull) is off the cards anyway, from listening to the radio.

    And they'll get the reduction required through encouraging other activities i.e. diversification.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    @JohnChadwick, I could never see it running anyway, as the lad with a few suckler cows who like to bred top quality weanlings would carry on at that for as long as he is able physically. The lad that is farming 50 plus suckler cows would most like take the payment but only if he could diversify into something more else, so he could end up rearing 100 dairy cross calves. In either of these options there would be no reduction in emissions.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    I don't know if individual farmers were getting worried, but factories were shouting a lot and the farmer representatives were singing off the exact same hymn sheet as them.

    It's as likely that this kite-flying exercise from the Dept will probably increase suckler numbers. Now that a reduction scheme has been mentioned and possibly remains on the table, then you'd be better off to hold what numbers you have, or maybe even increase numbers a small bit, in anticipation of cashing out in 2023 or 2024.

    The processors will be delighted with the extra supply coming dow the line and they might get their glory days again! Meanwhile, GHGs increase and the Dept wonder why???

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Any Reduction scheme before 2030 looks off the table to me.

    Sounds like they're confident they'll meet the required reduction figures just through the natural economic ebb and flow, so no scheme will be needed.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There must be massive money in freisian bullocks at 30 months based on your input. Probably costs 6 or 700 to buy a freisian yearling throw 400 euro worth of silage, half a ton of meal and the costs of keeping him till 30 months on grass and you will do well to break even



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think they believe it will be a problem for the next government or else they realised that suckler cow numbers are already decreasing year on year and/or that private money in pension funds etc will buy land for afforestation for the guaranteed income



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭smallbeef


    Your sums are well off there mate.

    Try 4.5 bales of good silage, even valued at 50 a bale that's €225. Out to good grass in March. Max of 60 days of meal @ 3kg/d to finish in July/Aug U30m. Will cost about €550 to carry those yearlings to finish. Purchase price €500-600 for decent 300kg+ yearlings bought in March. All will kill over 340kg DW. Its the only way to do friesian bullocks. Will take a crazy amount of meal to get them to a fat score of 3 to finish U24 months like you keep suggesting, and even then you have a ~270kg carcass.

    My only gripe with the friesian bullock is that the price has usually dropped by the time they are ready in July/Aug, whereas the AA and HE's will all be gone by mid June. But that is baked into the purchase price of a friesian bullock anyway.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You must have a short winter if you are getting away with 4.5.

    Keeping a handle on costs is the key when finishing cattle.



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Yea Sinn Fein won't be in until March 2025. Hard to know will they have been allowed enough scope and time to meet whatever emissions targets are in place. Be hard to imagine them giving soft handouts to suckler farmers in any case.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭smallbeef


    Not really, just high DM May silage. Stores went in Nov 5th and 4.5 bales will get them to about March 10th. Usually get them out around then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭joe35


    The father was saying a few weeks ago he seen in the Journal, that there would be a 5,000 subsidy for culling suckler cows.

    I don't know where or when he seen the article, but 1350 seems a long way off 5,000.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ah here. There will be lads getting sex changes for bullocks to cows at that rate



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    @smallbeef and @[Deleted User] I have pens with 14 store bullocks in each, a bale of silage will last my suckler bred stock 3 day, my AAx & Hex dairy stock about 2.5 days and from previous experience FR about 2 days. Again my cattle would be in from around Dec 1st until after St Patrick's Day. So my suckler bred cattle would eat about 4 bales of silage each for the winter, Hex & AAx 4.5 bales and when I had FRs you would allow 5 bales each. But as the FR cattle seem to hate slates I used to try and get them out first if at all possible. I was saying this to my brother last year, he said they is no way there could be that much of a difference in what they ate, so this year he pen his cattle by breed. He has 15, 18 month old FRs in a pen, he feeds pit silage and he can't believe how much harder they ware on feed than the the other cattle in the shed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Anything that reduces the number of calves produced is a help. When calf and export end as well as more dairy calves there will be 250,-300k calves more there to be finished. Dairy farmers will have to carry them to 8 week if demand is poor.

    I see all the experts are out explaining out how to finish a Friesian bullock. Now I buy stores and the earlier in the year you buy them the better the margin. As other have said high DM silage, totally against expert advice. But sure we all make mistakes after all these were the lads that advised us to finish pre second winter or polish them off fast in the house on Ad-lib meal.........then they said put them to grass and slaughter in May( I have seen the weights and grades and was not impressed.

    It hovering between 1.1-1.2euro a day to carry my stores over the winter this year. Mostly Friesian's. That is costing silage at 36-38/ bale. House 5-10th November on average, back to grass 17-25th March on average 135 days.

    Wintering cost 160 euro inc mins&vits . Grass costs Friesian that come in early go out early those that come in late go out late summer. Previously I costed it at 100/ head now it probably goes to 125/ head. Dosing vet transport mortality and misc is 100/ head. Ration 3/ head/ day for ten weeks is 80 euro. Total 465

    Average store cost 640inc mart fees in 202, this year it probably a tad lower than that. They can hang off grass any time from June on. I have not calculated the average slaughter value this year.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    Had noticed that too with some AAX and HEX heifers vs CH and LM suckler heifers of the same age. I’m now of the opinion of bigger cows been harder fed and 2% body weight is BS. Once our dry suckler bred stock come into the shed with a little condition it takes very little to keep them that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    @Bass Reeves

    I'm not having a go at you but where is the reduction of livestock coming from.

    At the end of the day the dairy herd is increasing whilst the suckler herd is diminishing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I cannot see a reduction, whether we like it or not. The problem with no suckler exit subsidity is that lads are hanging in for one.

    It's 60-80% self financing as it will see a reduction in financing present suckler cow support schemes. I cannot see the objection it gives a choice to some suckler farmers they can cease running suckler cows and either go into other beef or sheep production.

    Why should it worry people if other accept it as an option. You will carry a beef unit ( calf, yearling and a two year old ) where you carry a suckler unit.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Haven’t had a caesarean in around 20 years. Can’t remember the last case of mastitis. Rarely pull a calf, if I have to the cow is marked for the road.

    I can see the argument for a dairy cross bullock or heifer that can be hung at say over 300/270 sub 24 months.

    Your system may work for you but there are people making a margin in sucklers improving gear and facilities along the way.

    Sucklers are reducing naturally anyway and there is no need for a scheme. You will probably have to go to Dublin zoo to see a cow in 15 years the way things are going.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    And if you could buy an eight week old calf of there's for 100-400 euro depending on quality and breeding you could not go too far wrong

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You will not have to go to the Zoo to see a cow there's will be plenty black and white ones around

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have my doubts. Sure cattle are as big an enemy of the climate as fossil fuels if you listen to the mainstream media



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dairy expansion is outstripping suckler reduction so either way the New Zealand approach will have to be followed around improvements in genetics and supplementation.

    The government promoted dairy expansion. They can’t back track now inside the space of 7 or 8 years farmers have taken on too many commitments in terms of leases and loans etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭smallbeef


    I agree with you there. I have a narrow centre feed passage with pens both sides, put a few bales in the passage and they eat from both sides. Have all the FRs on one side and mix of AA/HE the other. Similar numbers in both sides but I do find myself piking silage more to the FR's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,449 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I wouldn't like to bet a bag of ration that this Govt will give a hoot about what lads have invested etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,449 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    What a Fr eats is incredible and the uglier they are, the more they eat.


    That said for a lot of lads, self included, they do the job often better than most.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,258 ✭✭✭✭wrangler




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think the government will push afforestation as a solution which is the eu suggestion. As we know this government will do tax free deals for big funds. Perhaps big funds get in to forestry for guaranteed returns for so called carbon sinks for 30 years



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I’d say the key is cost control as in keep them at grass as long as possible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    TBH I wouldn't take that bet. I don't think the traditional farming sector realise how large the dairy expansion has been over the past few years. OH and I have witnessed it first hand as it grew - we are not dairy farmers but we do work with dairy farmers. Teagasc/DAFM/and various Government bodies have driven and supported production - they won't pull the plug nor will the banks/financial institutions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I agree. However there will be some changes. The nitrates allowances to the cows will change. Even if they cannot access fertilizer and milk data they will change the rules accross the total herd. Access to land will limit numbers and calf age retention rules will also impact.

    For the last 2-3 years no of cows has increased by 40-50k on average and stands at 1.6 million and will probably hit 1.65 million next year.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    OH and I have been flat out with ex parlour cull cows and our own feeder cull dairy cows to the factory for most of the year. I've previously posted earlier this year when same were getting €2+/kg live weight in marts.

    Anyway, whether we like it or not, dairy bred and their beef cross bred calves will dominate our landscape into the future. However I hope the majority of suckler farmers will sit tight, hold hard and continue to produce quality continental and traditional bred cattle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    new climate action plan (ironically CAP) is proposing 10 percent number reduction. Embrace it. it will happen slowly and be paid for. E.g organic conversion where number reduce naturally, increased forestry payments taking land out etc.

    how they extend it to dairy is not clear.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Could it be improved genetics and supplements to reduce methane. If the lads in New Zealand can maintain numbers and cut emissions by 50% in dairy then the lads here can surely do 10%.

    The lads doing beef cattle could also use supplements and benefit from improving genetics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The problem is how you square the circle when exports disappear. I saw an article recently questioning the climate change credentials of U24 month slaughter as it will require excessive ration in the diets and pumping cattle from virtual birth to a hie e decent slaughter wrights

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Fair enough sit tight and poodle along with sucklers if your an ould lad and its too late to change tack.

    If you're young I think maybe best to change to another area. No point holding out for a cull scheme at this stage, as it ain't coming. If sucklers become more financially viable again in future it doesn't take long to re-scale up anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Isn't that kinda what the Thrive demo farm in the IFJ is doing? Horsing meal into them from mid-summer to try get them gone before a second winter?

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



Advertisement