Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Options
1427428430432433732

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I imagine the reason the RF have not come out and condemned it is because they are terrified Clarkson will spill the beans on who asked him to do it.

    I mean private drinkies with Camilla and 2 days later this incel fantasy torture porn is published. They are not even trying to be subtle anymore.

    But but but Meghan is evil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Ms2011


    Oh I'd say they've commented alot, they just haven't assigned their name to it.

    They use 'sources' & 'leaks' like a Ventriloquism uses a dummy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    Wokism is authoritarian. The centre right believe in personal freedoms they are anything but authoritarians. The left over the last few years have proven themselves to be militant authoritarians. Even your belittling of people with different viewpoints is authoritarian.



  • Administrators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,947 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Neyite


    Queen Elizabeth would not stand for this - the Queen consort meeting publicly with ‘journalists’ who then produce one of the most hate filled, violence inducing articles I’ve read in the British press in modern times.

    @CruelSummer The queen had to meet all sorts whether she liked it or not. She met Trump and you could probably infer from her demeanour that it was a tedious engagement for her, at best. She had to meet Putin, Xi Jinping, King Abdullah and Mugabe and likely many others who've done far worse to humans around the globe than write a hateful column. She herself as head of the armed forces didn't exactly have a squeaky clean image either.

    And now the King and Queen Consort will have to meet everyone and anyone in a diplomatic capacity should it be required. They have to meet with journalists from the press rota, even the rags. It's literally their job and what they signed up for.

    Why do people always find a way to blame a woman for the actions of a man though? Clarkson said what he said. It's on him. Just because he happened to be at a lunch, hosted by a posh shop with Camilla as the celebrity attraction that she probably had no say in attending or not and people are falling over themselves to assume that the Evil Stepmother enticed him to write what he did. Bollocks. He's a grown man well able to spew his own vitriol without any help from Camilla.

    Out of all of those royals, she's one of the few you can point to and say she's never gone whining to the media even from way back in the 70s when she wasn't good enough for the Heir, right through to when she was getting pelted with food and subjected to abuse in the supermarket by the public through the 80s and 90s.

    So I highly doubt she sat there bitching about Meghan to a journalist, she's not that stupid and it would be very out of character for her. If anything, she, as a spokesperson for VAWG and her work in that field probably found his article distateful as well. This is fully on Clarkson and he deserves everything he gets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    Why do some on here seem to think that Camilla had any part in the writing of Jeremy's article.

    That seems a bit crazy to me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,826 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    🤣🤣🤣

    Come on now brutestock.

    Are really going to say you are against authoritarianism , authoritarian is wokism and at the say time say belittling your opponent is authoritarian.

    All while your post history is available for anyone to search?


    Because looking at your post history and your equation of woke I would have to surmise that your posts BruteStock are Woke!

    🤣🤣🤣



  • Administrators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,947 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Neyite


    Some people are compelled to search around when a man behaves badly to find a woman, any woman, to take the blame.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some of you would fight with your toenails.

    Not one person here has a background free from pain and if you think you don't then think a little more and you will find it. We don't handle ourselves maturely all of the time and without that pain getting in the way now and then. Harry and Meghan are making a hames of things due to their own issues and the world gets to look on.

    My views are mixed because I don't think any of this is clearcut. How could it be when we are talking about people? I think it's all really sad and it could have been different because there are no bad guys in this.

    It's family hurt and generational trauma being played out for the world to see. It's not about security or titles or money. It's about family. Longing, jealousy, resentment, hope, expectation, anger.

    Meghan is someone who I would be wary of if she was in my life. I'd connect with her warmth which I think is genuine but there would be a hesitancy in me as well due to what I think is her ability to manipulate and a sense that she can be quick to cut you down or something a bit mean. There's a lot of her.

    The press did treat her very badly and I don't think any of us truly know what it must be like to have that level of interest in your life and how you would handle it. Her father as well, I believe he acted as she described and I also found her points about the baby shower eye opening for me.

    Her friends wanted to do something lovely for her. It is nobody's business how they (the friends) spend their money and yet the press were up in arms about Meghan. That kind of thing was highlighted for me the twisty ways of the tabloids.

    Harry Gods love him but he would drive one to drink. There is so much anger and bitterness in him. I feel for him at the same time though, even if he is an eejit. I believe he was the one who wanted to move and in Meghan he found the perfect enabler.

    I can imagine how infuriating he must have been at the Sandringham meeting. William probably fit to shake him. Of course Harry would have felt a rejection in that, a "how could you Wills". All emotion and no rationality.

    William and him are very different. William is second in line to the throne and is very much part of its machinations. I've a feeling as well that his memories of Diana are somewhat different to his brother's. Harry needs therapy. His hatred of the press I get but they didn't cause the death of his mother and they didn't cause his wife to miscarry.

    A person who is happy enough in their own skin and position in life will be unlikely to experience so many perceived slights against them. An outward appearance of confidence and worldliness can hide fragility. This is Harry and Meghan all over I think.

    "Why won't you hug me back now I feel embarrassed" "Why won't you hug me back I want to be your friend" "Why are you dressed like that it makes me feel bad" "Why are you dressed like that I wish I had the confidence to be like you, easy in myself".....and on and on.

    There is so much letting go that needs to be done and that doesn't mean minimising what you went through. I think things could be salvaged between them and the royals, their families.

    Only if their was a willingness to do so of course, an attempt at rebuilding the relationships. In fact I think there is a a part of Harry who still wants this but the small boy lashes out and stamps his foot as he grapples with both frustration and longing.

    One thing that I did find really strange was when the Queen so easily went along with her advisors when they said she was too busy so therefore couldn't see. Why is it so difficult to meet your Grandmother even if she is the monarch? Again with 'the institution'.... do these people have no autonomy of their own?

    It's a bonkers way to live that's for sure but I do think it's sad how it came to this for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    I also think that by blaming Camilla, they try to justify Meghan's actions... And are against RF as well, so use everything they can against them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭Be right back


    As if Camilla asked Jeremy to do that. A- I'm not sure many people can tell Jeremy what to do and b - they will be cautious now due to the backlash from Lady Hussey.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,346 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Just shows how deluded the hardcore supporters are on both sides.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 7,029 Mod ✭✭✭✭HildaOgdenx




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The hatred Meghan invokes in people is a strange one. The likes of Jeremy Clarkson or some posters here...what is it that causes such powerful responses? Maybe it's as simple as she happens to be very much in the public eye and very vocal about her experiences, so anyone doing the same would receive similar.

    Certainly the public bashing of Harry's family is horrible. Maybe there is something else happening. Maybe we are uncomfortable when someone raises their heads above the status quo and dares to challenge so publicly 🤔

    Or not. I don't know but it is fascinating.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    St Camilla the great would never ever do a bad thing in her life. She just vilified Diana from behind the scenes and ruined any chance of that marriage even being bearable, all while she was married herself with her own children. The dishonesty of it all. Now Meghan on the other hand, existing and breathing and having the cheek to fall in love with and marry Harry is beyond contempt for such despicable actions.

    Also if Camilla is so against violence against women, the palace should have issued a statement. A royal ‘expert/correspondent’ should have condemned the article as their indirect spokespeople - and we’ve absolutely nothing from them, pathetic.

    I’m actually indifferent to Harry and Meghan and didn’t really care about them either way as the truth is usually in the middle of both sides claims. In this instance, there is clearly one side that is failing as an institution and as a family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    very out of character for her

    LOL. We talking about the same woman?

    The one who has lied, schemed and cheated for years to get to where she is today?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I hear this all the time : "woke extremists", "EU fanatics" etc, when the whole point of liberalism and centre ground politics is not to go out to the extremes and to try and reach compromise and consensus.

    Extremists are usually only every drawn to the right and left (and invariably the far right and far left). But said extremists then try and turn everything on its head by claiming that liberals are bigots and intolerant and authoritarian and they (the far right, far left) are the real defenders of freedom of speech.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We’re kinda forgetting how utterly ridiculous it is to make such a documentary at all



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭seenitall


    I remember watching the Bashir interview when it came out - in an English class, of all places, as I’m from the continent and took English in my studies. The lecturer was all aglow with the poor Diana spiel, and I just felt - God this was rehearsed to an inch of its life. You could see from a mile away how she was ready for every question, not missing a beat in answering promptly and very eloquently, with that famous self protective head tilt of hers, with those expressive eyes looking up in earnestness. I felt - this is so fake; but then I’m like that when someone is as gullible as that lecturer was, very annoying.

    Poor Diana, indeed, but my take is different to what was discussed in class that day. She tried to play the PR game herself but what good did it all do her in the end. She was messed up by a bad childhood and so made the mistake of her life while still barely more than a naive kid. Ironically for being a Princess, I don’t think she was the type of person who would ever have got her happily ever after.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    Jeepers I'd say Camilla is delighted she's living rent free in some posters heads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    You mean like Meghan has been for years? The Camilla defenders are hilarious. Defending the indefensible, rather than condemn, they condone. I was indifferent towards Camilla and Charles until this week. Their silence tells me all I need to know about them as people, William and Kate too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I don’t think she was the type of person who would ever have got her happily ever after.

    Sure what chance had she when her husband was off having wánk chats with his lover?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭Be right back




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Gross misuse of that phrase, she is topical at the moment, because she had private drinkies with some of the most Edgelord attack dogs in the British Media and 2 days later incel fantasy torture porn is produced by one them.

    Now I imagine if the same hate was directed at her daughter or the other daughter in law we would have wall to wall condemnation from the palace by now.

    But no, radio silence. Weird that isn't it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I don't think it is technically an affair when your husband is constantly off balls deep in his mistress, is it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭Be right back


    ^^ Such a way with words.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Timid TBF, compared to what those two got up to.

    Charles: "Oh, God. I'll just live inside your trousers, or something. It would be much easier!"

    Camilla: (laughing) "What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?"

    Both laugh

    Camilla: "Oh, You're you're going to come back as a pair of knickers!"

    Charles: "Or, God forbid, a Tampax! Just my luck!" (Laughs)

    Camilla: "You are a complete idiot! (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea!"

    Charles: "My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on, forever swirling round on the top, never going down."

    Camilla: (Laughing) "Oh, Darling!"

    Charles: "Until the next one comes through."

    Camilla: "Oh, perhaps you could come back as a box."

    Charles: "What sort of box?"

    Camilla: "A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going."

    Charles: "That's true."

    Camilla: "Repeating yourself...(Laughing) Oh, darling I just want you now."

    Charles: "Do You?"

    Camilla: "Mmmmm."

    Charles: "So do I!


    🤢



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,978 ✭✭✭wyrn


    I don't think Camilla incited Jeremy to write that article, he has form. That said he is a friend of hers and obviously knows how she feels about Meghan, otherwise I think he might have reined it in a bit. A bit like how Laura Kuenssberg was quite soft when it came to Boris.

    Anyway this thread is so depressing and angry, how about some Tracey Ullman as Camilla! She's hilarious in these roles.





  • Registered Users Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    Ya some posters getting fierce uptight, a bit of light-hearted posting is a welcome change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    How many people are enraged by Meghan and Harry (outside of few wind up merchants in the media), almost none I would say. I think most people just find them tedious and boring and find their self pitying to be embarassing .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 55,694 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Exactly. Vast majority people/commentators just see them as many of us here do: petulant childish attention seeking drama queens telling childish silly boring tales!!



Advertisement