Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Oh right, so they weren't concerned.

I don't see how that anecdote is relevant TBH.

I mean yes it should because racism is not something that should be tolerated

Sure using public money to silence a rape victim shouldn't be tolerated.

But the Royal Family eh? Never Explain!!! 🤷‍♀️

the queen personal Wealth

She earned that fixing cars at the weekend did she? 🤣

Although TBF more palatable than the reality that they profiteered from the slave trade and colonialism. 😕

They are two different situations

No they aren't in the context of your claim of what is tolerable.

It would appear to me there is no ceiling.

Well I would never compare the issues I have with Harry and Meghan and their claims with the extremely serious accusations against prince Andrew.

the queen had money from land she owned.

And btw I never said that the allegations against prince Andrew should be tolerated. Please don’t imply things I said that I didn’t.

For me what made them discussing how dark Archie would be just a bit more sinister was the comment of "what that might look (for the family) and what that might mean", don't tell me other families have those concerns or discussions when expecting a biracial child.

Most of the H&M saga is 'he said, she said', I think the claim would hold less weight if Harry didn't back her up though.

You're so stuck in the past. It's 2022......slave trading and colonialism....big deal. This is what HUMANS did back then. Today and recently is a whole different world.

And btw I never said that the allegations against prince Andrew should be tolerated. Please don’t imply things I said that I didn’t.

I never claimed you did.

You said racism should not be tolerated, The RF are unaccountable and have shown just this year they will tolerate child rape. I doubt racism is going to knock a stir out of them.

I shudder to think what crime this insidious family would hold their hands up to.

It’s not at all pertinent to the RF today, as they cannot change the past. They, like us live in the present. You’re just so anti RF/Britain that you bring up past human activity to try attach it to how humans live and behave and react today. It’s beyond stupid.

It’s not at all pertinent to the RF today

Of course it is, you clearly didn't read the article I posted.

as they cannot change the past

They can certainly apologise for it and maybe liquidise that wealth that was earned off misery and start paying some of it back.

I wouldn't hold my breath though.

Coming from the guy that’s so pro British and pro royal family that he wanted Ireland to have a day of national mourning for the queen lol.

It’s beyond stupid not to recognise that the current grandeur that the royals live in today is because of atrocities committed. Pillaging, raping, enslaving, murdering, torturing, stealing you name it. That built their wealth and properties that they live in today. Not once have they ever apologised for what was carried out in their name that they profited from and what the current generation continue to profit from to this very day. Hard pill for the peasants for swallow but I’m afraid facts don’t care for emotions.

Yes you did advocate for a day of mourning for the queen. Going on about how great she was and how we should do it as a mark of respect for our closest neighbour. That’s just the parts of the vomit inducing plea I can remember.

This happened under your beloved queens reign as well, no doubt you’ll make more excuses and whataboutery for your beloved queen. Below all happened under her reign, the least she could have done was apologise. If an army that represented you committed war crimes and were compared to nazis by the empire heads in that country I assume you wouldn’t apologise either. You would be happy for that to happen under your reign, says a lot about your character something something virtue signalling no this was war crimes rape torture murder carried out in her name to keep the empire intact.

She was the figure head of the British army who in that time committed war crimes in Ireland and have been found guilty of committing such acts. She never once apologised. 

For 8 years of her reign (1952-60) the British in Kenya imprisoned and killed thousands, raped, tortured, stuck glass bottles up female genitalia, shot people dead on the spot amongst many many unspeakable things. It wasn’t until 2012 that UK government accepted that prisoners had suffered torture and ill-treatment at the hands of the British. They expressed sincere regret at what happened but wouldn’t apologise.

During the massacres and war crimes the colony's attorney general, Eric Griffith-Jones, said the mistreatment of detainees was "distressingly reminiscent of conditions in Nazi Germany or communist Russia", but agreed to draft new legislation sanctioning beatings as long as it was kept secret. "If we are going to sin, we must sin quietly," he wrote.

She never once apologised and she was the head of those who committed it. She sat on her hole and said nothing. But but but….

Please elaborate which “child” was raped according to you, and what age they were exactly.

If you had an iota of what you are on about you'd know the Queen and now the King cannot apologise for anything. They can only do so if the government ask them to. Furthermore history is history and all nations have a history of slavery, pillage and invasion somewhere in their history. History has nothing to do with the grifting of the Markles

Palace throwing shade in the honours list lol

”This year’s list is the first published since the death of Queen Elizabeth II, and the first to be signed off by her son Charles as king.

Jason Knauf, the former royal aide who made a complaint of bullying against the Duchess of Sussex, which she denied, has been recognised for his service to the monarchy.

He is made a Lieutenant of the Royal Victorian Order (RVO) after working for seven years for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, and later the then Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Honours within the RVO are in the king’s gift and are bestowed independently of Downing Street to people who have served the monarch or the royal family in a personal way”