Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

60% TAMS grant for women farmers.

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭I says


    Interesting must look it up. I’m the skivvy around here 😂😂😂 .



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    One way to get the oul gender balancing in farming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There one for you my farm will qualify as well. Nothing like forward planning. Everything comes to he who waits

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Have you a female with the green cert? Or alternatively years farmed qualified?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Alternative years farm qualified. Originally herd number was in spouse's name, partnership since I retired

    She was job sharing when I bought the place twenty years ago. At the time there was off farm limits for grants. She qualified as a trained farmer as well as her father had a farm.

    Never needed to use it as they removed the off farm income limits. If I was to get any value out of it now I would need more land

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭Grueller


    My wife has the green cert nearly finished. Had started a year before this was announced. Be forming a partnership as soon as and going at a badly needed shed with tank, feed passage and loose bedded area on the other side for cows on point of calving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,834 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    I know of someone in the country. A male who has now changed gender to female.

    Can't be changed in my eyes. But their name has changed to female and dress has changed. Don't know about what else changed. It's their own business.

    But I'd imagine if they were to apply they'd qualify for the grant.

    A possible repercussion from this could be other minorities in the farming community should also be encouraged and rewarded similarly by the dept. All things being equal. Or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere


    Tempted myself to apply for gender recognition certificates as a female to get a grant.


    2 minute job. Where all nonsense see in Britain nearly 70% of medical students, legal students etc are female; imagine similar here. So where does it stop? I bought land and anyone can do the same and all the land here bought by someone at one time or the other. Women might just be too intelligent to be at farming.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Seriously high figures there for medicine and law. I know some women enjoy farming but I’d say the dangerous element / unsociable hours might turn women off?

    What percentage of oil rig workers are women? Got to be sub 1%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,149 ✭✭✭amacca


    Will they actually do anything for the old young forgotten farmers I wonder?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭Grueller


    There is something coming alright but you have to have completed the green cert in specific years to qualify according to a neighbour here. It affects him but not me so I wasn't really that tuned in when the conversation was going on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Under 40 but not a young farmer cos at it more than 5 years.... fair enough encouraging women and all that but could just make existing rules someway fairer. Most of the grants only shoot up the price of everything by that amount anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 275 ✭✭scottigael


    Pure discrimination against men. Disgraceful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,938 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    I don't think it should matter if you're a woman or not, how many years have women fought for equality and here they are giving women extra which means they are not equal. A farmer is a farmer in my eyes male or female. Don't get me started on the women in farming articles, should they all get a medal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,674 ✭✭✭✭fits


    What’s the years farmed eligibility?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    While I agree with you there is an opportunity of a 60% grant for farmers that never had it before.

    I put up the post to inform farmers male and female of this opportunity. As I said in my OP I have heard of a couple of younger male farmers (younger than me) that are going to enter partnerships with their spouses in order to avail of the grant. It's a work around solution but imo includes their wives in a more positive way in the business. Now having said that, imo most spouses wouldn't know the difference between a heifer and cow but maybe this initiative may help to redress that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭kollegeknight


    It’s not discrimination if it’s a minority that’s being targeted positively.

    same with the grants that can be got for hiring females over males in engineering roles.

    not the same for jobs where men are minorities though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It's the same as any other system, such as young farmer, you put a saddle on it and ride on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,493 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    It's a good thing for those that benefit and I'm all for getting as much from the state as possible as I pay enough tax, but I doubt it will result in many spouses becoming more engaged.

    Those in good relationships with an interest will already be engaged.

    Those with no interest or a poorer spouse who doesn't discuss the business with their wife are unlikely to become engaged.

    It may help get fathers to engage interested daughters more but again if it didn't happen before an extra bit on a TAMS grant is unlikely to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    can see a few Kerry lads suddenly identifying as females in order to qualify for this ( all you need is a card )



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭alps


    But they wouldn't have the "years elegigibility"..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Can you imagine the media headlines


    “ department of agriculture bigoted against LGBTQ” , some fella will apply for the laugh ( and should)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭kollegeknight


    I think it’s a good thing tbh. what’s the harm in promoting women in farming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Jesus the negative comments here are ridiculous, of course more women should be involved in farming. There is a shockingly low amount of farmers under 35 in Ireland and we obviously need more involved regardless of gender.

    There was a young farmers too up which many of us availed of who were under 35 at the time, is that scheme agist against older people who can't join it? Of course not, it's high time for this boys club sh1te to end or there will be none of us left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    60 percent is a great grant. I don’t think it will “attract” any additional female farmers other than “brass plate” ones. Everyone qualifies for 40 percent. The jump to 60 ain’t gonna get them to quit their jobs and start milking cows.


    Off topic but if you were applying for a Tams grant on a piece of machinery how do you go about it.

    Example being a mower or dingy spreader (allowable under organics).

    Do you need to price it first and have a quotation or what?

    Does the seller have to be on an official list?

    When I click onto Tams on agfood online it wont allow me start an application for any of the tams. Have you to ring them for activation first?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭timple23


    Tranche not open, new scheme not launched yet. Not open for applications. No need for quotation, just look up reference costs and know size in meters, can't just buy something off Johnny down the road, any established business would be fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    Ah. Kinda thought to was always open as such.

    So for the application i need to have decided the size of the mower. Makes sense I suppose so they can budget.


    For equipment is there any documents that need to be uploaded as part of application do you know that need to be organised?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭timple23


    You just need to make sure you apply under the organic scheme. Know what size mower. Make sure you use the correct reference cost. Upload the safety training course, maybe upload your organice cert/licence too, not cetain on that though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭Lime Tree Farm


    The machinery merchant will have a form to fill out for you. You will also have to provide a tax clearance cert for tams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    So for a mower the reference cost per meter is circa 2.5k. Does that mean that “they” expect a 3m mower to cost 7.5k ? and then will pay 60 percent of that cost?


    What if the mower is more than 7.5k? When you apply you don’t say that is it and just claim for the reference cost allowed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭timple23


    When you submit an application you submit a proposed cost. That can be higher or lower than reference cost. Grant will be 60% of whichever of the two figures is lower.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    I am guessing if your actual proposed is lower than reference they look on it more favourable?


    if final cost ends up being higher is there any issue with a claim?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭timple23


    Yes but it might be changed with new scheme.

    No issue. Normally reference costs are lower than actual costs. 3m mower is probably closer to 10k to buy. There is no need to tell dealer you're going for a grant as they'll only jack up price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    Great thanks. That’s 60 percent grant prob more like 45 percent unless some “cheap” make is selected I would be guessing. But still a good grant.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    Remember the reference cost is ex vat. So the 60% is just a touch shy of 49% Inc vat.

    No issue if price comes in above the reference cost at they will only fund grant on the reference cost

    Make sure to apply to get bigger than you plan. No point being approved for an 8ft mower and then going shopping and changing the mind to a 9ft, you will only get grant on the amount of the 8ft. If it's the other way around they will round down the reference cost.

    On the tax clearance side of things, you won't need to get a tax clearance cert as you will input the company's vat number and DAFM will check that the dealership has an eTC. All Tax clearance now is digital. And dealerships are filing Vat returns every 2 months, stick with dealers that have a good rep.

    All the above is if the T+Cs are similar to the existing TAMS. You will have no issues submitting an application and the following claim on agfood. If you have any further questions or queries when it comes to the time drop a DM.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    So it’s 60 percent of the ex vat price on the mower also? Even though I can’t claim back the vat?


    Thats not great.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    Yep its ex vat. That's the way it was with LESS for the tankers and dribble bars. If you were vat registered you could claim it back. It's not a fixture or fitting, I can't be bolted down when I'm use

    Personal experience of it from LESS and was aware before applying, Don't forget you will have Cap ex on the amount Inc vat minus the grant for tax purposes so if in the higher rate, it will only cost approx 25% of the total cost when written down over the 8 years.

    Always read the fine print before signing up. Just think of some of the ads you see daily with the size 4 font

    Most folks have got used of claiming the vat back with tams, but the majority of the work was items that would stay on the farm should you seel up on the morning, it's fixtures and fittings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭Lime Tree Farm


    @mr.stonewall "Always read the fine print before signing up. Just think of some of the ads you see daily with the size 4 font"

    The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    Is that the correct way to write it off?


    Two options I see both with advantages /disadvantages depending on the farm.

    1) Like you say capitalise the cost of the mower minis the grant. This becomes difficult though if the grant is paid in a different tax year to the mower.


    2) The grant is treated as an income, same as BpS on the year it’s received. Capitalise the full cost of the mower.


    Which is correct. The second feels more correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,674 ✭✭✭✭fits


    Can anyone explain the years farmed eligibility to me? I only have a herd number for last year but doing the practical work for at least ten.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    My accountant always capex the amount minus the grant. Theory behind it is that the tams grant is a payment towards this capital expenditure thus reducing the value of it. He's with a national firm specialising in farm a/c.

    Unsure of what way it would work if it was building work spread from one year to the next. On simple straight forward investments like a piece of equipment,( auto scraper, calf feeder mower, scales calving gate etc) you should have your payment on average 4-6 weeks after claim is submitted. I just looked back and last year on a LESS investment it was 12 days from claim to payment issue

    Some else maybe better to explain the pros and cons of each



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    I guess if the farm is in loss. And can afford to take the grant as “income” without losing half of it to the tax man the farm then gains the advantage of capitalising the full cost of the mower.


    If the farm is in profit then better off taking the grant from the capital cost. Keeping the grant tax free as such and capitalising cost minus grant.


    but which is correct from a tax compliance POV.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    You’d be 1 Year farming. It’s since you received/were added to the herd number



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I think it depends on your age. To qualify as a younger farmer you have to have the green cert completed. For older farmer it's years farming. They used to allow time assisting a parent or relative before

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement